| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional social |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anjan Sahni
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Steve D'Allessandro
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
|
Prosecutor investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agents/Team Members (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant, Public Corruption (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant (Redacted)
|
Professional administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Clark Tarbert
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Chief, Money Laundering Unit (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Approver (Redacted)
|
Professional hierarchical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Respondent
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Witness interview for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Pensacola, Florida (Hilton ... | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Interview near Stockholm for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Stockholm, Sweden | View |
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Interview in Los Angeles for Epstein investigation | Los Angeles, CA | View |
| 2019-12-15 | N/A | Travel to Santa Monica/Los Angeles for witness interviews. | Los Angeles, CA; DoubleTree... | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding a brewery printing 'Epstein didn't kill himself' on beer cans. | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding an airport paging system being used to broadcast an Epstein ... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-04 | N/A | Interview in West Palm Beach for Epstein investigation | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-03-20 | N/A | Meetings and interviews for United States v. Epstein | West Palm Beach / Fort Laud... | View |
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the incompatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' review platform, the massive volume of data (terabytes), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 remote work. The US Attorney's office expresses frustration with the organization of the data, specifically requesting better linkage between emails and attachments and clearer identification of seized devices by serial number.
Discussion regarding a phone call from Maxwell's attorneys (Chris and Mark) and internal strategy regarding potential subpoenas for documents (photos, journals, financial records).
Requesting travel to Stockholm, Sweden for Jan 29/30 interview regarding case 2018R01618.
SDNY asks for understanding of the issues causing delay. Notes investigation is moving expeditiously. Offers phone call.
Bloxsome states Duke has strong desire to cooperate but they must deal with procedural issues first. Estimates two weeks for minor preliminary issues.
Follow up on phone conversation from a week ago. Asks if client is willing to speak.
Confirms call for Friday Jan 10th at 1400 LDN time.
Bloxsome asks to schedule a preliminary telephone call for Friday, January 10th.
Discussion of timing for the Friday call. Suggests 9 a.m. due to a 'proffer' starting at 10.
SDNY requests a consensual, voluntary law enforcement interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship and communications with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ requests a 'consensual, voluntary law enforcement interview' with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship/communications with Epstein and public allegations. Mentions ability to use diplomatic channels but prefers direct counsel contact.
Confirms representation of HRH the Duke of York. Asks what specifically SDNY invites them to contact about.
Bloxsome confirms they represent HRH the Duke of York and asks for clarification on what the DOJ specifically wants to discuss.
Initial contact from Federal Prosecutors investigating Jeffrey Epstein. Asking to confirm representation of HRH The Duke of York.
SDNY prosecutors identify themselves as investigating Jeffrey Epstein. They ask if Bloxsome represents HRH The Duke of York and request contact.
Discussion regarding handling document requests from plaintiffs suing Epstein's estate via Touhy Requests; specifically mentions request from Robbie Kaplan.
Requesting a meeting between Epstein Estate Trustees and a senior official to discuss civil forfeiture resolution and the victims' fund.
Requesting travel to Los Angeles for Dec 16/17 interview regarding case 2018R01618.
Requesting a meeting early next week to discuss forfeiture theories for Epstein properties and statute of limitations issues to present to the Trustees' counsel.
Suggesting Monday at 2pm for the meeting.
Sender requests a rundown of materials produced/given to a third party because that party claimed they were missing items.
Really? [Link to NY Post article about beer cans]
jesus. [Link to NY Post article about airport paging message]
Approval for travel to Los Angeles for Epstein investigation interview.
Providing contact information for the team and confirming a meeting for the following Wednesday at 9:30.
Requesting specific JetBlue bookings for Nov 4-5 trip to West Palm Beach.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity