Assistant U.S. Attorney (Redacted)

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
24
Events
8
Documents
2

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
24 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Special Agent (Redacted)
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Roy Black
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Jay Lefkowitz
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Marc A. Weinstein
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Ted
Professional social
1
1
View
person Anjan Sahni
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Steve D'Allessandro
Professional
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
Prosecutor investigator
1
1
View
person REID WEINGARTEN
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
person Agents/Team Members (Redacted)
Business associate
1
1
View
person Legal Assistant, Public Corruption (Redacted)
Professional
1
1
View
person Legal Assistant (Redacted)
Professional administrative
1
1
View
person Michael Bachner
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Stan Pottinger
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Elizabeth Clark Tarbert
Professional
1
1
View
person Recipient
Business associate
1
1
View
person Recipient
Professional collaborative
1
1
View
person Andrew Tomback
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Co-Chief, Money Laundering Unit (Redacted)
Business associate
1
1
View
person Approver (Redacted)
Professional hierarchical
1
1
View
person Alex Acosta
Business associate
1
1
View
person Jack Scarola
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
Professional
1
1
View
person Redacted Respondent
Business associate
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2020-02-19 N/A Witness interview for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) Pensacola, Florida (Hilton ... View
2020-01-29 N/A Interview near Stockholm for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) Stockholm, Sweden View
2019-12-16 N/A Interview in Los Angeles for Epstein investigation Los Angeles, CA View
2019-12-15 N/A Travel to Santa Monica/Los Angeles for witness interviews. Los Angeles, CA; DoubleTree... View
2019-11-08 N/A Discussion of news article regarding a brewery printing 'Epstein didn't kill himself' on beer cans. Email Correspondence View
2019-11-07 N/A Discussion of news article regarding an airport paging system being used to broadcast an Epstein ... Email Correspondence View
2019-11-04 N/A Interview in West Palm Beach for Epstein investigation West Palm Beach, FL View
2019-03-20 N/A Meetings and interviews for United States v. Epstein West Palm Beach / Fort Laud... View

EFTA00032085.pdf

Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00023728.pdf

This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the incompatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' review platform, the massive volume of data (terabytes), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 remote work. The US Attorney's office expresses frustration with the organization of the data, specifically requesting better linkage between emails and attachments and clearer identification of seized devices by serial number.

Email chain / correspondence
2025-12-25
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
180
As Recipient
58
Total
238

RE: call from Maxwell attorneys

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: jeevacation@gmail.com;...

Discussion regarding a phone call from Maxwell's attorneys (Chris and Mark) and internal strategy regarding potential subpoenas for documents (photos, journals, financial records).

Email
2020-01-21

RE: travel approval request

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Redacted Approver

Requesting travel to Stockholm, Sweden for Jan 29/30 interview regarding case 2018R01618.

Email
2020-01-21

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Gary Bloxsome

SDNY asks for understanding of the issues causing delay. Notes investigation is moving expeditiously. Offers phone call.

Email
2020-01-20

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Bloxsome states Duke has strong desire to cooperate but they must deal with procedural issues first. Estimates two weeks for minor preliminary issues.

Email
2020-01-20

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Gary Bloxsome

Follow up on phone conversation from a week ago. Asks if client is willing to speak.

Email
2020-01-18

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Confirms call for Friday Jan 10th at 1400 LDN time.

Email
2020-01-08

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Bloxsome asks to schedule a preliminary telephone call for Friday, January 10th.

Email
2020-01-07

RE: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Gary Bloxsome

Discussion of timing for the Friday call. Suggests 9 a.m. due to a 'proffer' starting at 10.

Email
2020-01-07

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Gary Bloxsome

SDNY requests a consensual, voluntary law enforcement interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship and communications with Jeffrey Epstein.

Email
2020-01-04

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Gary Bloxsome

DOJ requests a 'consensual, voluntary law enforcement interview' with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship/communications with Epstein and public allegations. Mentions ability to use diplomatic channels but prefers direct counsel contact.

Email
2020-01-04

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Confirms representation of HRH the Duke of York. Asks what specifically SDNY invites them to contact about.

Email
2020-01-03

Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Bloxsome confirms they represent HRH the Duke of York and asks for clarification on what the DOJ specifically wants to discuss.

Email
2020-01-03

U.S. Department of Justice investigation

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Gary Bloxsome

Initial contact from Federal Prosecutors investigating Jeffrey Epstein. Asking to confirm representation of HRH The Duke of York.

Email
2020-01-02

Unknown (Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation)

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Gary Bloxsome

SDNY prosecutors identify themselves as investigating Jeffrey Epstein. They ask if Bloxsome represents HRH The Duke of York and request contact.

Email
2020-01-02

RE: plaintiff counsel request for documents, Epstein case

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Redacted (USANYS)

Discussion regarding handling document requests from plaintiffs suing Epstein's estate via Touhy Requests; specifically mentions request from Robbie Kaplan.

Email
2019-12-30

RE: Epstein trustees' counsel

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: USANYS Officials (Reda...

Requesting a meeting between Epstein Estate Trustees and a senior official to discuss civil forfeiture resolution and the victims' fund.

Email
2019-12-19

RE: travel approval request

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Redacted Approver

Requesting travel to Los Angeles for Dec 16/17 interview regarding case 2018R01618.

Email
2019-12-11

RE: Epstein forfeiture theory

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Co-Chief, Money Launde...

Requesting a meeting early next week to discuss forfeiture theories for Epstein properties and statute of limitations issues to present to the Trustees' counsel.

Email
2019-12-04

RE: RE: Epstein forfeiture theory

From: Co-Chief, Money Launde...
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Suggesting Monday at 2pm for the meeting.

Email
2019-12-04

Epstein production question

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: REDACTED

Sender requests a rundown of materials produced/given to a third party because that party claimed they were missing items.

Email
2019-11-09

RE: I mean . . .

From: REDACTED
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Really? [Link to NY Post article about beer cans]

Email
2019-11-08

I mean . . .

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: REDACTED

jesus. [Link to NY Post article about airport paging message]

Email
2019-11-07

Re: travel approval request

From: Approver (Redacted)
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Approval for travel to Los Angeles for Epstein investigation interview.

Email
2019-11-05

RE: Epstein estate subpoenas

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Marc A. Weinstein; And...

Providing contact information for the team and confirming a meeting for the following Wednesday at 9:30.

Email
2019-11-01

RE: travel approval request

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Legal Assistant (Redac...

Requesting specific JetBlue bookings for Nov 4-5 trip to West Palm Beach.

Email
2019-10-28

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity