| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional social |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anjan Sahni
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Steve D'Allessandro
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
|
Prosecutor investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agents/Team Members (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant, Public Corruption (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant (Redacted)
|
Professional administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Clark Tarbert
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Chief, Money Laundering Unit (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Approver (Redacted)
|
Professional hierarchical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Respondent
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Witness interview for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Pensacola, Florida (Hilton ... | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Interview near Stockholm for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Stockholm, Sweden | View |
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Interview in Los Angeles for Epstein investigation | Los Angeles, CA | View |
| 2019-12-15 | N/A | Travel to Santa Monica/Los Angeles for witness interviews. | Los Angeles, CA; DoubleTree... | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding a brewery printing 'Epstein didn't kill himself' on beer cans. | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding an airport paging system being used to broadcast an Epstein ... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-04 | N/A | Interview in West Palm Beach for Epstein investigation | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-03-20 | N/A | Meetings and interviews for United States v. Epstein | West Palm Beach / Fort Laud... | View |
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the incompatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' review platform, the massive volume of data (terabytes), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 remote work. The US Attorney's office expresses frustration with the organization of the data, specifically requesting better linkage between emails and attachments and clearer identification of seized devices by serial number.
Draft response to defense preservation requests based on conversations and discovery motion schedule. Attachment included.
Discussion regarding a draft response to defense preservation requests, citing a tight discovery motion schedule and referencing attached drafts and defense letters.
Confirmation of request for records relating to flights on Epstein jets and employment history of a specific individual.
Wednesday ?
Confirming Wednesday works, suggesting between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m.
11:30?
Follow up on previous discussions and a meeting 'the week before last'. Requesting a time to discuss status early next week.
I have the discs, where should I bring them?
Request to burn specific network folders containing subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank to a disc for FBI/Law Enforcement pickup.
Request to burn folders regarding American Express and Deutsche Bank subpoena returns to a disc for a Special Agent and Detective.
Mentioning list of attorneys to send to 'taint prosecutor'.
Submission of a courtesy copy of the Government's request for exclusion of speedy trial time between July 15 and July 18, 2019, noting defense counsel consent.
Confirming chat later in the week at the hearing; mentions starting work on general discovery and a draft protective order.
Expresses eagerness to find common ground in 'this nightmare'; mentions demanding judges in other cases and an unexpected potential conflict; notes he is on the west coast.
Inquiry about a passport discussed earlier and copies provided; specifically asks if Epstein is or has been a citizen or legal permanent resident of a country other than the US.
Informing that cash/personal effects will be brought to Thursday hearing, but electronic devices are retained under search warrant.
Agrees; plans to see him at 10:00 prior to the hearing.
I'm here, give a call
States he is 'just leaving the jail'; notes schedule is jammed; asks to talk after the hearing instead.
Confirming expectation to produce records as part of Rule 16 discovery. Noting they may reference financial information in filings but will provide full materials as discovery.
Asking if the recipient is around or if tomorrow morning is better.
Weingarten states he will be with the client tomorrow evening and suggests meeting Monday morning around 8.
Acknowledges; confirms readiness to chat Monday at 8:00.
Agrees to talk Monday morning; asks for general sense of agenda; asks Weingarten to CC other team members on communications.
Apologizes for missing CCs due to being 'hopeless on a computer' and using a Blackberry; will send informal agenda after meeting client.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity