| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional social |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anjan Sahni
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Steve D'Allessandro
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
|
Prosecutor investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agents/Team Members (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant, Public Corruption (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant (Redacted)
|
Professional administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Clark Tarbert
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Chief, Money Laundering Unit (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Approver (Redacted)
|
Professional hierarchical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Respondent
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Witness interview for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Pensacola, Florida (Hilton ... | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Interview near Stockholm for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Stockholm, Sweden | View |
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Interview in Los Angeles for Epstein investigation | Los Angeles, CA | View |
| 2019-12-15 | N/A | Travel to Santa Monica/Los Angeles for witness interviews. | Los Angeles, CA; DoubleTree... | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding a brewery printing 'Epstein didn't kill himself' on beer cans. | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding an airport paging system being used to broadcast an Epstein ... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-04 | N/A | Interview in West Palm Beach for Epstein investigation | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-03-20 | N/A | Meetings and interviews for United States v. Epstein | West Palm Beach / Fort Laud... | View |
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the incompatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' review platform, the massive volume of data (terabytes), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 remote work. The US Attorney's office expresses frustration with the organization of the data, specifically requesting better linkage between emails and attachments and clearer identification of seized devices by serial number.
Reply attaching the requested document: '2019-03-14, _JE,_unsealing_proposed_order_(as_submitted_2019-02-05).docx'.
Initial request for travel to West Palm Beach/Fort Lauderdale for United States v. Epstein.
AUSA from SDNY reaching out to OPR contact for deconfliction or discussion regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
Providing contact info following a conversation and offering assistance regarding records information.
Request to set up a Relativity database for 'U.S. v. Epstein'. Mentions uploading FBI materials and expecting a large amount of case files in coming weeks. Discusses potential privilege review.
Discussing inquiries from Sarnoff regarding a documentary/book on Epstein and trafficking allegations.
Discusses office strategy: Alex wanted it to stay a state case to provide minimum protections (jail/compensation) and to let Barry Krischer save face.
Apologizing for delay and stating he is not planning on coming down for the meeting.
Asking if Jay is going to be at the meeting on Thursday with Roy.
Inquiry about a letter addressed to the Records Custodian requesting the 'entire file' and asking if it should be treated as FOIA. Also asks about Mr. Edwards.
We will deal with the state. To answer your? The addendum has been filed
Discusses confidentiality provisions in the Non-Prosecution Agreement, a letter sent to Epstein's defense counsel regarding a request/suit by the Shiny Sheet, and the failure of defense counsel to file the complete agreement with the Court.
Thank you, [Redacted].
Gentlemen: Please review the attached letter. Thank you.
Discussing lack of response from Epstein's team regarding a victim list and stating intent to draft a letter.
Confirmation of requests. Mention of seeing an Order: 'I saw the Order (OMG). Sorry!'
Reaction to the order: 'Aaah, yes. I knew that it was coming, so I wasn't that surprised.'
Clarification: 'The one about the turning over the agreement...'
Clarification question: 'Which order?'
Request to watch for faxes from 'Epstein friends' and scan them. Request to reserve the big conference room for Monday morning.
Sending a response letter to Jay's letter of Aug 18, 2008, and a Protective Order regarding Jane Doe v. United States.
Expression of thanks.
Clarification that Leap Year is still open in case of breach but should be considered "on hold."
Inquiry about caseload certification and the status of "Operation Leap Year".
AUSA asks Roy Black to call them to discuss something.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity