| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional social |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anjan Sahni
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Steve D'Allessandro
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
|
Prosecutor investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agents/Team Members (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant, Public Corruption (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant (Redacted)
|
Professional administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Clark Tarbert
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Chief, Money Laundering Unit (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Approver (Redacted)
|
Professional hierarchical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Respondent
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Witness interview for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Pensacola, Florida (Hilton ... | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Interview near Stockholm for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Stockholm, Sweden | View |
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Interview in Los Angeles for Epstein investigation | Los Angeles, CA | View |
| 2019-12-15 | N/A | Travel to Santa Monica/Los Angeles for witness interviews. | Los Angeles, CA; DoubleTree... | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding a brewery printing 'Epstein didn't kill himself' on beer cans. | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding an airport paging system being used to broadcast an Epstein ... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-04 | N/A | Interview in West Palm Beach for Epstein investigation | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-03-20 | N/A | Meetings and interviews for United States v. Epstein | West Palm Beach / Fort Laud... | View |
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the incompatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' review platform, the massive volume of data (terabytes), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 remote work. The US Attorney's office expresses frustration with the organization of the data, specifically requesting better linkage between emails and attachments and clearer identification of seized devices by serial number.
Noting that only the original September agreement was filed, not the addenda.
Black thanks the prosecution for agreeing to oppose disclosure of the 9/24/07 plea agreement in civil cases. He expresses concern that civil lawyers will publicize it to get more plaintiffs. He confirms the agreement was filed under seal in state court.
Requesting availability to discuss the Epstein matter.
Stating he is out of town and asking what the matter is about.
Clarifying that the discussion relates to the performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Requesting availability to discuss the Epstein matter.
Stating he is out of town and asking what the matter is about.
FYI -- I was going to respond that it relates to the performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. What do you think?
Notification that a victim notification letter was filed in court regarding a civil suit against Epstein. Mentions that 10 letters have been sent and the FBI coordinator is updating addresses for the rest.
Inquiry regarding extending the grand jury term in case the agreement regarding the Epstein case unravels.
Please review the attached letter.
Discussing Goldberger agreeing to changes, lack of press coverage, and upcoming Monday hearing.
Sender plans to work on a presentation outline at home and call the recipient later to review it. P.S. mentions Goldberger accepted changes to the plea agreement, which is expected to go forward tomorrow.
Sender attaches 'Epstein_Plea001.pdf', comments 'Wow, am I good. Here it is already. I think our faxes crossed in cyber-space.' and apologizes for poor quality.
Sending attached Notification Letter.
Sender informs recipient that Epstein's publicist, Howard Rubenstein, is also the publicist for The New York Post, suggesting a connection regarding an article quoting Lefcourt.
Sender is urging for a response from DOJ regarding Epstein's indictment, stating urgency due to upcoming vacation. Discusses preferences for assigning another AUSA from Fort Pierce or Miami.
Report on Epstein's investigators harassing victims and threatening to release videos on the internet; request for intervention from DC.
Sharing an article titled 'Jan_3_2008_Palm_Beach_Daily_News_Article.pdf' with the message 'FYI'.
Notification regarding the sending of a box of correspondence related to the negotiation of the agreement and a box of evidence.
Inquiry regarding permission to send victim notification letters and whether to copy Mr. Josefsberg.
Discussing an email chain and information requests. States 'The only sources of the information are our Office and the FBI.' Mentions feeling 'very demoralizing'.
I can put something together. I assume something short and sweet? And has a date been set?
Discussing due diligence on Judge Davis' selection of mediators, citing the Justice for All Act of 2004 regarding victim notification, and setting a deadline for objections.
Discussing victim notification and confirming December dates for plea and sentencing. Mentions lack of response from Barry and Lanna.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity