Juror No. 50
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
second juror
|
Co jurors |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Communication |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Juror court |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant juror |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional potential bias |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional juror defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lucia Osborne-Crowley
|
Professional interviewer interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Social media interaction |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Juror witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Elizabeth Loftus
|
Adversarial juror vs expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Juror witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Luc Cohen
|
Interview subject interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Osborne-Crawley
|
Interviewee interviewer implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lucia Osborne-Crowley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-24 | Court proceeding (voir dire) | The court questions a prospective juror, Juror No. 50, about their personal background, including... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-02-16 | N/A | Jury Selection | Court context | View |
| 2022-01-18 | N/A | Juror No. 50 appeared in an ITV documentary | ITV / YouTube | View |
| 2022-01-18 | Media appearance | Juror No. 50 appeared in a documentary produced by ITV. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-07 | Media publication | The Daily Mail published a video of a portion of the interview with Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Media publication | The Daily Mail published an article based on its interview with Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-04 | Verdict returned | A jury returned its verdict in a case, less than one week before January 4, 2022. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-04 | Jury deliberation | Juror No. 50 revealed his history of sexual abuse to the jury during deliberations, which he stat... | jury room | View |
| 2022-01-04 | Interview | Lucia Osborne-Crowley of The Independent published an article based on an interview with Juror No... | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-04 | N/A | Ms. Osborne-Crawley published her interview with Juror No. 50. | Published Media | View |
| 2022-01-04 | Publication | The Independent published an article based on the interview with Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-04 | Interview | Lucia Osborne-Crowley interviewed Juror No. 50 for an article. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-01 | Publicity tour | Juror No. 50 engaged in a publicity tour, giving multiple interviews to news outlets. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-01 | Media interviews | Juror No. 50 gave multiple interviews, congratulating himself for persuading other jurors to conv... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Voir Dire (Jury Selection) | District Court | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Voir dire | Juror No. 50 appeared for his voir dire (jury selection questioning). | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Juror No. 50 joined Twitter. | Online | View |
| 0023-12-01 | N/A | Jury Deliberations | Jury Room | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009711.jpg
This legal document details a post-verdict interview given by Juror No. 50 (using the name Scotty David) to The Independent on January 4, 2022. The juror revealed that he was a victim of sexual abuse, shared this personal story with the jury during deliberations, and used his own experience to validate the accusers' testimonies. He explicitly stated that he disregarded the testimony of defense expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on memory, influencing the jury based on his personal beliefs.
DOJ-OGR-00009710.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, alleges juror misconduct. It claims that Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury questionnaires by denying they had been victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. The document contrasts this with the other alternate and deliberating jurors, none of whom disclosed such a history.
DOJ-OGR-00009708.jpg
This is page 16 of a legal document filed on March 11, 2022, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document discusses the final composition of the jury, noting that 694 potential jurors answered a questionnaire. A footnote explains that defense counsel was unable to find the Twitter account of 'Juror No. 50' during the voir dire process.
DOJ-OGR-00009707.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It argues that Juror No. 50 was dishonest about deleting his Instagram account and his ability to be impartial, noting he posted about the trial post-verdict. The defense explains they did not ask follow-up questions during voir dire because the juror denied bias, contrasting this with other jurors who disclosed abuse histories.
DOJ-OGR-00009704.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022, detailing the jury selection process for the trial of Ms. Maxwell. It specifically focuses on 'Juror No. 50', listing their responses to questionnaire items 13, 25, 42, 43, and 44, wherein the juror denied being a victim of a crime or having biases that would affect impartiality under penalty of perjury. The document notes that 694 individuals originally answered the questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009701.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, argues for a new trial for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The basis for the request is the allegation that Juror No. 50 provided a false answer on a jury selection questionnaire regarding personal experience with sexual assault, which was a core issue in the case. This alleged dishonesty is claimed to have resulted in an unfair and impartial jury, thereby depriving Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009695.jpg
This document is page 3 (Table of Contents) of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated March 11, 2022. It outlines arguments claiming Ghislaine Maxwell is entitled to a new trial because 'Juror No. 50' allegedly answered voir dire questions (specifically 25 and 48) falsely. The document also argues against Juror No. 50's right to intervene or receive discovery, noting the juror is currently under investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00009694.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. The filing argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct. The primary focus is on "Juror No. 50," who allegedly was untruthful during voir dire and subsequently gave media interviews; it also mentions a second juror who disclosed during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00014743.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, where the defendant is found 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three through Six. Following the reading, the court polls individual jurors (identified by number) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00008822.jpg
This is a legal letter dated January 19, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves to inform the court that Maxwell's counsel has filed a Motion for a New Trial and requests that all materials concerning Juror No. 50 be kept under seal until the court rules on the motion.
Personal history of sexual assault and abuse
Juror No. 50 told several media outlets that he was a victim of sexual assault and sexual abuse as a child, which contradicts his answers during the voir dire process.
Personal history of sexual assault and abuse
Juror No. 50 told several media outlets that he was a victim of sexual assault and sexual abuse as a child, which contradicts his answers during the voir dire process.
Closing of Twitter account
Juror No. 50 made communications on Twitter and Instagram shortly after the trial and allegedly misstated the date he closed his Twitter account.
Juror No. 50’s service as a juror in this case
A request for non-privileged communications between Juror No. 50 and any other person or media organization about his jury service.
Juror No. 50's service as a juror
A request for all communications to and from Juror No. 50 on social media platforms regarding his jury service.
Juror No. 50's service as a juror
A request for all posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 on social media regarding his jury service.
Statements to the media
The table of contents indicates Juror No. 50 gave an interview to The Independent.
Statements to the media
The table of contents indicates Juror No. 50 gave an interview to the Daily Mail, which was partially recorded on video.
Statements to the media
The table of contents indicates Juror No. 50 gave an interview to Reuters.
Unknown
Juror No. 50 has sat for several interviews with journalists.
Unknown
Juror No. 50 has Tweeted and publicized himself on social media.
No Subject
The document states that Juror No. 50 'liked' the tweet posted by annie farmer.
Response to annie farmer
The document states that Juror No. 50 tweeted directly to Ms. Farmer in response, but the content is not provided.
Liking a tweet
Juror No. 50 'liked' Ms. Farmer's tweet.
Response to Ms. Farmer
The document states that Juror No. 50 tweeted directly to Ms. Farmer in response, though the content of the tweet is not shown.
Jury service
The document states that in early January, Juror No. 50 posted about his jury service on his Instagram account.
Juror No. 50’s service as a juror in this case
The document requests production of non-privileged communications from Juror No. 50 regarding his jury service.
his service as a juror in this case
The document requests all communications to and from Juror No. 50 on social media platforms regarding his jury service.
his service as a juror in this case
The document requests all posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 on social media regarding his jury service.
Identity of the second juror and other matters
The document states that what Juror No. 50 said to the other jurors is relevant to the investigation.
Twitter handle @ScottyDavidNYC
Defense counsel was unable to locate the Twitter account of Juror No. 50, with the handle @ScottyDavidNYC, during voir dire.
History as a victim of crime or sexual abuse
Juror No. 50 denied being a victim of a crime, sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment on his questionnaire, which the document alleges was untruthful.
Personal history of sexual abuse
During deliberations, Juror No. 50 told his fellow jurors about his experience as a victim of sexual abuse to persuade them to believe Ms. Maxwell's accusers.
Jury deliberation process
Juror No. 50 told several media outlets that he drew on his personal experience as a victim to persuade fellow jurors.
Experience as a juror in the Ms. Maxwell case
Juror No. 50 gave an interview to the Daily Mail, which was the basis for a January 5 article. In the interview, he described Ms. Maxwell as a 'predator' and explained how he helped the jury understand traumatic memories from a victim's perspective.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity