CAROLYN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Danchuk
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
AMANDA
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accused accuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Tatum
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Scheduler victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sean
|
Confidant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Carolyn's mom
|
Family |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Communication |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional exploitative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Accused of sexual abuse |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Willits
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Unspecified |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Exploitative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Recruiter victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruitment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Strangers prior to meeting |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Scotty David
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Sean stole a car and ran away from Florida to Georgia. | Florida to Georgia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Ms. Roberts leaving Epstein's house after payment | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits by Carolyn to Epstein's home. | Mr. Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Receipt of package containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second visit to Epstein's property. Sean drove and waited in the car. Carolyn sat in the kitchen ... | Epstein's Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant (Maxwell) entered massage room while Carolyn was nude and touched her. | Massage room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial testimony regarding Count Five and Count Three. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn's second visit: Greeted by Sarah, Chef offered food, Sarah prepared table. | Epstein's residence (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn dropped out of school in the seventh grade. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn testified and wrote down her mother's phone number to avoid saying it aloud. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia and Carolyn enter Epstein's house for approximately one hour and five minutes. | Jeffrey Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage encounter where Epstein masturbated in Carolyn's presence. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn visited Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 14. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Larry Visoski, Cimberly Espinosa, and Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn turned 18, marking the legal end of the specific charged sex-trafficking conspiracy regar... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn received a package via FedEx containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Carolyn and Juan Alessi regarding the roles of Maxwell and Kellen. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn going to Epstein's house for massages. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn observing Maxwell in the office area off the kitchen. | Jeffrey Epstein's house (of... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence; Defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. | The residence | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013232.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The judge and attorneys briefly discuss the arrival of a witness before the judge addresses the jury to apologize for a delay and outline the court's schedule for the next several weeks, which includes days off due to a scheduling conflict and the Christmas holiday.
DOJ-OGR-00013231.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that a witness named Carolyn showed inconsistency by amending a prior answer to state she was 'transported via private car provided by Jeffrey Epstein,' which the judge allows into evidence. The page concludes with Ms. Sternheim requesting a recess and prosecutor Ms. Comey questioning the length of the cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013228.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues for the inclusion of specific interrogatory questions (16 and 17) regarding how the witness came to be at Jeffrey Epstein's home and whether she received any money or things of value. The Court sustains an objection regarding 'compound' questions but indicates an inclination to allow question 16.
DOJ-OGR-00013227.jpg
This court transcript page from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, attempts to introduce evidence (paragraphs 207 and 208) concerning Sarah Kellen, arguing it constitutes 'impeachment by omission' because Ms. Maxwell's name is absent. The Court sustains the objection, ruling the evidence inadmissible because, unlike previously discussed documents, it does not reference 'unnamed individual employees and assistants'.
DOJ-OGR-00013224.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The judge sustains a series of objections raised by Mr. Pagliuca, referencing specific paragraph numbers from another document.
DOJ-OGR-00013223.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) covering the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The text details a legal argument between prosecutor Ms. Comey and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the admissibility of questions about specific paragraphs (39, 51, 57) of a complaint. Ms. Comey explicitly describes an incident where Jeffrey Epstein brought another female into a room and penetrated the victim twice.
DOJ-OGR-00013221.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a legal debate between Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca regarding the testimony of a witness named Carolyn. Ms. Comey argues that the witness did not specify a time frame for an alleged act, while Mr. Pagliuca contends that her testimony about the frequency of the act (up to four times a week) contradicts a complaint that alleges it happened twice a month. The judge intervenes to manage the procedural aspects of their arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, in front of a judge. The discussion focuses on whether omissions in a legal complaint regarding specific sex acts are inconsistent with a witness's testimony. The judge concludes that the testified detail is significant and sustains an objection related to the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00013219.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination related to a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court that there are inconsistencies in the testimony regarding incidents in July 2002, specifically noting that the allegations involve 'fondling of breasts and buttocks' rather than 'sexual intrusion or penetration.' The Judge clarifies the record regarding paragraph references (33 vs 39) before turning to Ms. Comey (prosecution) for a response.
DOJ-OGR-00013218.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The transcript captures a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge regarding the admissibility of evidence related to an incident. The judge highlights a time frame inconsistency, noting the complaint states an incident occurred in 2002 while the witness testified it happened in 2001, and rules the point cumulative.
DOJ-OGR-00013217.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, discussing inconsistencies in dates provided in testimony versus an indictment. Mr. Pagliuca and The Court discuss a witness's (likely Carolyn) direct testimony and cross-examination regarding the dates of alleged incidents, specifically contrasting July 2002, 2001, and 2002-2003/2004. The discussion focuses on impeachment based on these chronological discrepancies in the alleged events.
DOJ-OGR-00013215.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The conversation centers on the consistency of paragraph 206 of an exhibit, which describes allegations against Epstein, with prior testimony. The Court ultimately rules that the paragraph is not inconsistent and sustains an objection.
DOJ-OGR-00013214.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, documenting a legal argument between counsel, Ms. Comey, and the judge. Ms. Comey objects to admitting a document (C4), arguing it was drafted by lawyers and would confuse the jury, but the judge overrules the objection. The transcript also references another document (C5) which alleges an agreement between defendant Epstein, his employee Kellen, and others to facilitate a crime.
DOJ-OGR-00013213.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features an argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Comey argues that the defense has already established that the witness sued Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in 2009 but did not name Ghislaine Maxwell, and that further questioning on this topic is cumulative and prejudicial.
DOJ-OGR-00013212.jpg
This document is page 199 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between the Judge ('The Court') and attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey regarding the legal theory of 'omission' and whether prior statements lacking certain facts constitute an inconsistency relevant to the jury. Ms. Comey argues that omission is only relevant if the omitted facts would reasonably have been expected in the original statement.
DOJ-OGR-00013211.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca argues that a legal complaint is inconsistent due to factual omissions, specifically citing that paragraph 8 fails to mention the witness's testimony of being subjected to penetration and intercourse by Epstein. The judge acknowledges this "omission theory" and states an intention to hear from a Ms. Comey on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00013210.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to admit a prior document for 'impeachment by omission,' stating that the witness (Carolyn) filed a complaint and was interviewed by the FBI in 2008 regarding sexual abuse by Epstein and his employee Sarah Kellen, but notably failed to mention Ghislaine Maxwell at that time. Pagliuca argues this contradicts the government's current narrative which emphasizes Maxwell's role while downplaying Kellen's.
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, involving Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Comey, and The Court. The discussion centers on an objection regarding a document's consistency with witness testimony and the potential admission of the document or its factual paragraphs. A key point of inquiry was whether Ms. Maxwell is mentioned in the complaint, to which the answer was confirmed as no, leading to a plan to identify inconsistencies with testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00013206.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding her sworn answers to interrogatories from 2009. The witness repeatedly states she is confused, and her attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00013204.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding an alleged 6.5-hour meeting with Dr. Richard Hall on October 21, 2009. The attorney presses the witness on whether she told Dr. Hall she began seeing Jeffrey Epstein in 2002, though the witness claims no recollection of the meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00013203.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on paragraphs 206 and 207 of a complaint, with specific mentions of Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. The witness denies that paragraph 207, which mentions Sarah Kellen, was about engaging her in prostitution.
DOJ-OGR-00013201.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, confirming a specific incident where Jeffrey Epstein masturbated in her presence and paid her $300. The testimony also references a legal complaint filed against Epstein in federal court in 2009.
DOJ-OGR-00013199.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness and plaintiff named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca reads from a legal complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf, which alleges she was first brought to defendant Jeffrey Epstein's mansion and introduced to him in May or June of 2002 at age 15. While Carolyn confirms the text is in the complaint, she states that the information is inaccurate.
DOJ-OGR-00013197.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The proceedings are interrupted when another attorney, Ms. Comey, makes an objection that is subsequently sustained by the judge.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Sarah Kellen / Je... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Massage book for dummies | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $400.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Victims' Compensa... | CAROLYN | $2,800,000.00 | Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant (Ma... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein sent her gifts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. | View |
| N/A | Received | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | CAROLYN | Shawn | $0.00 | Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money received for attending 'appointments'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Over 100 paid sexualized massages. | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money for engaging in sex acts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | General statement that 'we could make money' by... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unnamed Older Man... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Virginia... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus | View |
Civil complaint accuracy
Testimony regarding trafficking and abuse; defense claims Maxwell was not mentioned.
Escort Service
Deposition where Carolyn was not asked about working for an escort service.
Testimony
Carolyn mentioned Maxwell twice without prompting regarding scheduling massages.
Deposition/Prior Testimony
Reference to prior testimony given under oath in 2009.
Deposition
Witness confirms testimony said nothing about Ms. Maxwell other than two specific words.
Deposition testimony
Carolyn described Maxwell in her deposition.
Sexual Abuse
Witness was interviewed by the FBI about the same subject matter with counsel.
Interrogatories/Deposition/Complaint
Detailed answers to interrogatories, deposition testimony, and a 91-page complaint that allegedly did not include Ms. Maxwell.
Lawsuits
Meetings with lawyers regarding civil complaints.
Lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen
A 290-paragraph lawsuit that allegedly did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell.
FBI Statement/Interview
Interview conducted at Carolyn's house.
An incident involving a kitchen and a chef.
Mr. Pagliuca questions Carolyn about a statement she made to the FBI in 2007, where she said she sat in a kitchen and a chef asked if she was hungry.
Statement about being instructed to lie about age
Carolyn confirms that she told the FBI in August 2007 that she had been instructed to say she was 17.
How Carolyn obtained Epstein's phone number
Carolyn allegedly told the FBI in 2007 that she obtained Epstein's phone number from a telephone book. She clarifies in her testimony that it was her personal address book.
Statement regarding interactions with Epstein
Statement given to FBI regarding obtaining phone numbers
Investigation interview
Witness spoke to agents; Attorney claims she did not mention Maxwell at that time.
Investigation related to Epstein
A discussion in 2007 between the witness (Carolyn) and the FBI, where topics included Virginia Roberts, Sarah, Sean, Epstein, and a cook, but not Ghislaine Maxwell.
Statement regarding Epstein
Carolyn told FBI that Epstein returned her call.
Sex assault inquiry
Statement given to FBI regarding events with Epstein.
Witness Statement
Interview regarding interactions with Virginia; witness claims FBI recorded the location wrong.
Mr. Epstein
Witness confirms speaking to the FBI in 2007, which was her first time talking to law enforcement about Epstein.
Instruction from Virginia regarding age
The witness, Carolyn, confirms that she told the FBI in August 2007 that she was previously instructed by Virginia to tell Epstein she was 17.
Jeffrey Epstein
FBI asked witness questions specifically about Jeffrey Epstein.
Statement regarding interactions with Sarah and Epstein
Witness told FBI that Sarah called her to inform her about concert tickets.
Witness Statement
Witness told the FBI she saw an older lady with short black hair and an unknown accent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity