| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Civil Attorney (Unnamed)
|
Conflict of interest |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Berman
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator subject |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor subject |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
four FBI agents
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
victims
|
Investigator witness |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
FBI special agent
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge Pitman
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Victor Norris Hamilton
|
Contractor supervisor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH NETBURN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lt. Craig
|
Professional interagency cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-11-28 | N/A | Victim notification letter sent to Jay Lefkowitz. | West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... | View |
| 2007-11-21 | N/A | Meeting regarding Judge Davis's selection of Podhurst and Josephsberg. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney signs the Addendum on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-18 | N/A | Hearing regarding Epstein's Computer Equipment (date inferred as 'a week from today' relative to ... | West Palm Beach (implied by... | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Legal action | An Assistant U.S. Attorney submitted a draft 60-count indictment against Jeffrey Epstein to her s... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2006-10-06 | N/A | Subpoena issued | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2006-10-06 | N/A | Issuance of Grand Jury Subpoena | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 0019-06-01 | N/A | Victim interview in Los Angeles | Los Angeles, California | View |
| -0019-07-15 | N/A | Meeting between Michael Bachner and SDNY Attorneys | Unknown | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government failed to acknowledge that a redacted individual had voluntarily approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It references court appearances in March and April 2019 and alleges the Assistant U.S. Attorney omitted mention of prior contacts between the redacted individual and the government.
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge it had approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It cites legal appearances in March and April 2019 and references testimony from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (in Exhibits D and E) who allegedly omitted mentioning these prior contacts.
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times by another party prior to a grand jury subpoena being issued. The document alleges that the government and an Assistant U.S. Attorney continued to omit mention of these prior contacts during court appearances in March and April 2019.
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, detailing complaints about the conduct of federal prosecutors in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text alleges that prosecutors made unprecedented financial demands, including a requirement for Epstein to pay $150,000 to alleged victims (most of whom were later found to be adults, not minors) and to fund a specific civil attorney chosen by the prosecution. It further alleges a conflict of interest where an Assistant U.S. Attorney recommended a civil lawyer connected to their boyfriend, and notes that First Assistant Sloman's former law partner, Mr. Herman, began filing civil suits against Epstein.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-28 | Paid | Assistant U.S. At... | Airline (implied) | $100.00 | Cancellation fee for personal flight caused by ... | View |
Discussing availability for dates in late September or October 2021.
Detailed summary of a phone call received from a woman claiming to be an Epstein victim and context regarding her former attorney.
Victim identifying herself and providing contact info. Call lasted less than 3 minutes.
Discussing slips in FOIA scans and CDs not being scanned.
Reporting technical issues with 48 audio files (codec problem) and providing a table of media files downloaded.
Following up on previous inquiry.
Inquiry regarding how the FBI approached CDs found in boxes of materials from Florida.
Sent next round of discovery via FedEx. Password sent separately.
Asking which carrier was used (FedEx/USPS) to locate the package.
Confirmed sent via FedEx, delivered Friday 8/07/2020 at 7:16 am.
Inquiring about which carrier (FedEx/USPS) was used to send the hard drive as it hasn't been received/located yet.
Inquiry about protocol for delivering discovery hard drive to Ghislaine Maxwell. Asking if encryption is allowed.
Instructions: mail to legal department, drive will be etched with number, authorization memo needed. Password protection allowed if password provided in cover letter.
Confirming they will mail the drive tomorrow and thanking for the help.
Explaining protocol: Hard drives must be mailed to Legal Dept, etched with a number, provided with authorization memo. Can be password protected if password is provided in cover letter.
Asking for protocol to deliver hard drive with discovery to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC. Asking about encryption rules.
Caller spoke with Scarola and the female subject; confirmed she is willing to meet.
Confirming need for a list of locations in the house where each item was recovered.
Requesting serial numbers to differentiate duplicate devices (Dell PowerEdge, Sony Vaio, etc.) and asking for location data within the house.
Complaining about data format issues, specifically that emails cannot be linked to attachments (citing 'flight records' as an example) and load files don't match native files.
Complaint about disorganized data delivery. Notes a folder 'NYC024362' has 600,000 items alone. Requests a spreadsheet tracking every device and its dump status.
Expressing confusion over the contents of a delivered hard drive, noting duplicate files and lack of clear labeling.
Initial complaint about confusing data dumps, specifically folder NYC024362 with 600,000 items.
Sending flight options for Pensacola trip.
Requesting sample itineraries as meeting is not fully confirmed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity