Assistant U.S. Attorney
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Civil Attorney (Unnamed)
|
Conflict of interest |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Berman
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator subject |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor subject |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
four FBI agents
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
victims
|
Investigator witness |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
FBI special agent
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge Pitman
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Victor Norris Hamilton
|
Contractor supervisor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH NETBURN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lt. Craig
|
Professional interagency cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-11-28 | N/A | Victim notification letter sent to Jay Lefkowitz. | West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... | View |
| 2007-11-21 | N/A | Meeting regarding Judge Davis's selection of Podhurst and Josephsberg. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney signs the Addendum on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-18 | N/A | Hearing regarding Epstein's Computer Equipment (date inferred as 'a week from today' relative to ... | West Palm Beach (implied by... | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Legal action | An Assistant U.S. Attorney submitted a draft 60-count indictment against Jeffrey Epstein to her s... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2006-10-06 | N/A | Subpoena issued | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2006-10-06 | N/A | Issuance of Grand Jury Subpoena | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 0019-06-01 | N/A | Victim interview in Los Angeles | Los Angeles, California | View |
| -0019-07-15 | N/A | Meeting between Michael Bachner and SDNY Attorneys | Unknown | View |
EFTA00032972.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 8, 2019, concerning the government's bail memorandum in the case U.S. v. Epstein (19 Cr. 490). An Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York submits the detention memo to Judge Pitman's chambers and defense counsel (including Marc Fernich, Martin Weinberg, and Reid Weingarten) ahead of the arraignment and bail argument. Marc Fernich acknowledges receipt of the document.
EFTA00030698.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2020 between Gary Bloxsome (Blackfords LLP) and prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice, Southern District of New York (SDNY). The SDNY formally requests a 'consensual, voluntary law enforcement interview' with Bloxsome's client, HRH The Duke of York (Prince Andrew), regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. Bloxsome confirms he represents the Duke and arranges a preliminary telephone call for January 10, 2020.
EFTA00029275.pdf
This document is an email thread from February 10, 2020, between Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The discussion focuses on managing concerns from witnesses' counsel regarding confidentiality following public comments made about Prince Andrew on January 27. The emails mention that two potential witnesses who worked for Maxwell/Epstein have expressed willingness to be interviewed, while another witness has already met with prosecutors multiple times. There is also a reference to reviewing depositions related to Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00028528.pdf
This document is an email exchange from July 30, 2019, primarily discussing an individual's potential late arrival to an event due to an 'issue came up with Epstein.' The email chain shows three messages, with the latest sent at 17:48 +0000 and the earliest at 1:46 PM, all related to the subject 'Head over?'. The document also includes contact information for an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York.
EFTA00027856.pdf
An email chain between US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff from August 6 to August 9, 2019, discussing a draft legal response to preservation requests filed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team. The prosecutors debate whether to send the response on Friday, August 9th, or wait until Monday, August 12th, noting that the delay wouldn't significantly impact the case. This correspondence occurred immediately prior to Epstein's death on August 10, 2019.
EFTA00027239.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 6-7, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's historical state plea transcript. An Assistant U.S. Attorney highlights specific quotes from the plea hearing where the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida was detailed, explicitly noting that federal prosecutors agreed not to prosecute Epstein federally in SDFL if he completed probation. The email also notes that SDFL representatives were present in court during the plea.
EFTA00026683.pdf
An email chain from July 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Roberta Kaplan's legal team regarding the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. The Assistant U.S. Attorney reaches out to inform victims' counsel of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Roberta Kaplan responds requesting a discussion.
EFTA00026681.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan (along with her team). The AUSA contacts Kaplan regarding 'U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490' to inform her of her client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Kaplan responds briefly asking to talk.
EFTA00024566.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence, spanning February to July 2020, details technical challenges including incompatible file formats, encryption (specifically APFS on Mac devices), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 staffing reductions. The prosecutors express frustration with the pace and format of data production, eventually proposing to hire an outside vendor (BRG) to complete the work.
EFTA00024440.pdf
This document is an internal email from July 8, 2020, within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It requests the creation of a new Victim & Witness Services webpage for the Ghislaine Maxwell case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)), modeling it after the previous Epstein case page. The email provides specific text to be posted regarding the unsealing of charges on July 2, 2020, and contact information for victims.
EFTA00021008.pdf
This document is an automated 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, dated September 23, 2020. It confirms the filing of a letter on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case Number 20-3061). The original filename indicates the letter was a response to a government opposition regarding a motion to consolidate.
EFTA00020670.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 27, 2020, between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team in the case United States v. Maxwell. The correspondence concerns scheduling a 'meet and confer' regarding a protective order, specifically addressing the Government's concerns about the defendant potentially naming victims of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in public filings. The Government also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive from the defense to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
EFTA00019473.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York, dated December 19, 2018, detailing a phone call regarding the opening of an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The call discussed identifying potential witnesses, the role of victim attorneys, and the need for confidentiality due to the sensitive and early stage of the investigation. The parties agreed to maintain confidentiality and to continue discussions.
EFTA00019173.pdf
An email chain from June 2010 involving the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). The core of the document is a forwarded list of 17 pointed questions from an inquirer asking why Jeffrey Epstein received such lenient treatment, why federal trafficking charges were dropped, why Ghislaine Maxwell was not charged, and questioning the involvement of the US Attorney General (USAG) in stopping the investigation. Internal commentary from the USAFLS notes they likely cannot answer the questions.
EFTA00018647.pdf
This document is an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the FBI's Litigation Support Unit regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence, spanning from January 2019 to October 2020, focuses on discovery materials, specifically the processing of CDs and media files found in boxes from Florida. The document includes a specific report on technical difficulties accessing 48 audio files from 2006 Grand Jury testimony and lists other media including a 2007 FBI interview and a 2010 deposition of Jeffrey Epstein provided by attorney Brad Edwards.
EFTA00014172.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Barry Krischer discussing the confidentiality clauses of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The sender informs Krischer that Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Black, Goldberger) must be notified before any disclosure, specifically regarding a request or potential lawsuit from the 'Shiny Sheet' (Palm Beach Daily News). The email also notes that the defense has failed to file the complete agreement with the Court as previously ordered.
EFTA00013965.pdf
An email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys discussing the filing of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The correspondence highlights significant 'misstatements' made by Epstein during his change of plea, specifically regarding the 'Florida Science Foundation' (FSF). The emails reveal that the FSF was incorporated much later than Epstein claimed, operated out of Jack Goldberger's law office without signage or staff knowledge, and that Epstein could not have worked there daily as he claimed.
EFTA00013867.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Jack Goldberger, an Assistant U.S. Attorney, and other legal counsel (Roy and Jay Lefkowitz). The key content is a notification that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. Epstein was given a deadline of June 30, 2008, to comply with a plea agreement that required him to plead guilty, be sentenced, and surrender for imprisonment.
EFTA00013448.pdf
This document is an email chain from February to May 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a forensic/technical team regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical difficulties, including the inability to link emails to attachments (using 'flight records' as an example), mismatched load files, and a 'disaster' in tracking over 1 million documents. The technical team notes delays due to COVID-19 work reductions and a major network replacement that required the deletion of 400 TB of old data.
EFTA00011386.pdf
This document is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent Addendum between the United States (represented by US Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In the agreement, Epstein agrees to plead guilty to state solicitation charges and serve a recommended 30-month sentence (18 months in jail plus probation) in exchange for federal non-prosecution. Crucially, the agreement also grants immunity from federal prosecution to any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, with specific names redacted in the text.
DOJ-OGR-00002366.jpg
This legal document argues that the government violated due process by misrepresenting facts and failing to disclose information, which likely impacted a Protective Order. It cites several legal precedents to assert that prosecutors have a duty to seek justice, are presumed to have knowledge of their office's investigations, and must ensure the truthfulness of representations made to a federal judge. The document concludes that the Assistant U.S. Attorney failed in this fundamental duty.
DOJ-OGR-00002366(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government violated due process by materially misrepresenting facts to a court. It cites several legal precedents to assert that a prosecutor's primary duty is to seek justice, not just convictions, and that the prosecutor is presumed to have full knowledge of their case file, with their actions being attributable to the government as a whole. The document concludes that the Assistant U.S. Attorney failed in their basic duty to ensure their representations to a federal judge were true and complete.
DOJ-OGR-00002361.jpg
This document is page 9 (filed as page 14 of 23) of a legal filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It discusses David Boies' frustration that the government initially failed to pursue perjury charges against Maxwell despite his belief they had her 'dead to rights.' The filing argues that a redacted individual (likely a judge, referred to as 'she') modified a protective order based on misrepresentations made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney. A large portion of the page is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
This is page 14 of a legal filing (Document 134) from the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government previously failed to act on perjury charges despite attorney David Boies claiming they had Maxwell 'dead to rights.' The filing alleges that a judicial officer (name redacted) was misled by an Assistant U.S. Attorney's misrepresentations, leading to the modification of a Protective Order. A large portion of the page is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002359.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is page 12 of a court filing that accuses the government of misrepresentation. The text alleges that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It references court appearances in March and April 2019 and claims an Assistant U.S. Attorney omitted mentioning these prior contacts.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-28 | Paid | Assistant U.S. At... | Airline (implied) | $100.00 | Cancellation fee for personal flight caused by ... | View |
Re: [Redacted] - Epstein
Discussing availability for dates in late September or October 2021.
Epstein victim call
Detailed summary of a phone call received from a woman claiming to be an Epstein victim and context regarding her former attorney.
N/A
Victim identifying herself and providing contact info. Call lasted less than 3 minutes.
Re: Epstein investigation
Discussing slips in FOIA scans and CDs not being scanned.
RE: Epstein investigation
Reporting technical issues with 48 audio files (codec problem) and providing a table of media files downloaded.
RE: Epstein investigation
Following up on previous inquiry.
RE: Epstein investigation
Inquiry regarding how the FBI approached CDs found in boxes of materials from Florida.
RE: delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery productio...
Sent next round of discovery via FedEx. Password sent separately.
Re: delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery productio...
Asking which carrier was used (FedEx/USPS) to locate the package.
Re: delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery productio...
Confirmed sent via FedEx, delivered Friday 8/07/2020 at 7:16 am.
RE: delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery productio...
Inquiring about which carrier (FedEx/USPS) was used to send the hard drive as it hasn't been received/located yet.
delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery production to...
Inquiry about protocol for delivering discovery hard drive to Ghislaine Maxwell. Asking if encryption is allowed.
RE: delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery productio...
Instructions: mail to legal department, drive will be etched with number, authorization memo needed. Password protection allowed if password provided in cover letter.
RE: delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery productio...
Confirming they will mail the drive tomorrow and thanking for the help.
RE: delivery of hard drive to MDC for discovery productio...
Explaining protocol: Hard drives must be mailed to Legal Dept, etched with a number, provided with authorization memo. Can be password protected if password is provided in cover letter.
Unknown (Initial email)
Asking for protocol to deliver hard drive with discovery to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC. Asking about encryption rules.
Meeting arrangement
Caller spoke with Scarola and the female subject; confirmed she is willing to meet.
RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Confirming need for a list of locations in the house where each item was recovered.
RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Requesting serial numbers to differentiate duplicate devices (Dell PowerEdge, Sony Vaio, etc.) and asking for location data within the house.
RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Complaining about data format issues, specifically that emails cannot be linked to attachments (citing 'flight records' as an example) and load files don't match native files.
RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Complaint about disorganized data delivery. Notes a folder 'NYC024362' has 600,000 items alone. Requests a spreadsheet tracking every device and its dump status.
RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Expressing confusion over the contents of a delivered hard drive, noting duplicate files and lack of clear labeling.
RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Initial complaint about confusing data dumps, specifically folder NYC024362 with 600,000 items.
RE: travel approval request (Flight Options)
Sending flight options for Pensacola trip.
RE: travel approval request
Requesting sample itineraries as meeting is not fully confirmed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity