MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Aznaran
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Janice Swain
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
STEPHEN FLATLEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the Judge
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
STEPHEN FLATLEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lisa Rocchio
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Swain
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lisa Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Aznaran
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Professor Loftus
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness 'Kate' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Calling of witness David Mulligan. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lisa Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013917.jpg
This court transcript details the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. She testifies about her first trip to Europe three years prior, during which she stayed at a residence after contacting Ghislaine for permission. The questioning then pivots to her knowledge, from her "work in the office," of whether Epstein made charitable donations, which she confirms he did.
DOJ-OGR-00013916.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about their knowledge of Ghislaine's residences, confirming she had a townhouse on 65th Street in New York and another residence at 44 Kinnerton Street in London. The witness also states that, to their knowledge, Ghislaine never lived with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013906.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein, stating that when she began working for him, he owned Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, 9 East 71st Street in New York, and El Brillo in Florida. She also states that during her employment, Epstein acquired a Paris apartment and an island in St. Thomas, which was originally named Little Saint James but was later renamed Little Saint Jeffs.
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between Ms. Pomerantz (prosecution) and Mr. Everdell (defense) before the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs intended to prove a 'continuing relationship' between a witness (pseudonym 'Jane') and the defendant. The Court rules to allow the evidence, citing that it is not prejudicial under Rule 403, while emphasizing the need to maintain the witness's anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00013884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by context and LCGVMAX1 code). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that photographs sent by a witness ('Jane') to Ms. Espinosa, an employee who worked in Epstein's office daily, should be admitted as evidence to show 'Jane' maintained relationships with Epstein's circle after claiming to flee. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz counters that the evidence is irrelevant because the witness already acknowledged maintaining such relationships during direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013883.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about evidence. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, requests to admit photographs into evidence that were provided by Ms. Espinosa, a fan of a soap opera star named Jane who sent them to her. The government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects, stating that the government does not understand the relevance of these photographs to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00013857.jpg
This document is an index of examinations from a legal proceeding, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the direct, cross, and redirect examinations of witnesses WILLIAM BROWN, ANNIE FARMER, DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN, and JANICE SWAIN by various attorneys, including Mr. Rohrbach, Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Sternheim, referencing the corresponding page numbers in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00013826.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the conclusion of a witness's testimony, where counsel (Ms. Menninger) confirms the witness was in Germany at the same time a person named Annie was in Thailand. After the witness is excused, another counsel (Ms. Moe) informs the court that the government rests its case.
DOJ-OGR-00013824.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Swain by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Swain's phone conversations with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically whether they discussed Ghislaine Maxwell or Epstein's dating life, and details regarding a trip to New Mexico involving individuals named Annie and Maria. Swain explicitly testifies that they never spoke with Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013821.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain describes attempting to question a person named Annie about a trip she took to New Mexico, which occurred sometime before her return from Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996. Annie was consistently evasive, refused to discuss the trip, and repeatedly stated, "I'm not going to let it ruin my life."
DOJ-OGR-00013820.jpg
This is page 229 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Swain by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on a woman named Annie, specifically inquiring about who paid for her trips to Thailand and Vietnam, and noting her 'tired and withdrawn' demeanor following a trip to New Mexico. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger successfully objects to questions about the payment source on hearsay grounds.
DOJ-OGR-00013818.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the direct examination of a witness named Swain. The testimony concerns a trip taken by an individual named Annie to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, which the witness confirms was paid for by Epstein. The witness denies any contact or meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell but confirms speaking with Epstein shortly before the trip and driving Annie to the airport.
DOJ-OGR-00013817.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness recounts a phone call with Jeffrey Epstein. During the call, Epstein offered to fund a trip to New Mexico for 20-25 students, including a girl named Annie. The witness states they felt comfortable with the offer after Epstein claimed his "wife," Ghislaine, would chaperone the girls and that he was funding the entire trip, which the witness perceived as a "generous offer."
DOJ-OGR-00013814.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain states that she first spoke with Jeffrey Epstein by phone in 1995, when he called to invite a person named Maria on a work trip to Florida via his plane. Swain confirms they spoke more than once, and that during these initial calls, Epstein discussed Maria's art career and talent.
DOJ-OGR-00013811.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony establishes that Annie Farmer is the middle child of Maria Farmer (born in 1969) and introduces Annie Farmer's birth certificate into evidence as Government Exhibit 13.
DOJ-OGR-00013810.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the swearing-in and initial direct examination of witness Janice Swain by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. Ms. Swain identifies herself as a 71-year-old sales representative with a high school education and three children.
DOJ-OGR-00013809.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a witness's, Mr. Mulligan's, testimony where he describes conversations with someone named Annie about New Mexico as 'memorable' and 'emotional.' After Mr. Mulligan is excused, the government calls its next witness, Janice Swain.
DOJ-OGR-00013808.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Ms. Sternheim concludes her questioning of witness Mr. Mulligan, establishing that he spoke to the New York Times to corroborate a story and that Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. Ms. Pomerantz then begins a redirect examination regarding Mulligan's memory of conversations with Annie.
DOJ-OGR-00013806.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mulligan. The questioning attorney probes Mulligan about conversations with a woman named Annie, focusing on Annie's media involvement, her alleged contact with other victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and whether she expressed a desire to make money from the case. The witness denies recalling Annie mentioning contact with other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00013794.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of the direct examination of David James Mulligan. After being sworn in as a witness for the Government, Mulligan states his name for the record. Attorney Ms. Pomerantz then begins her questioning, establishing basic background information about Mulligan, including his age (42), his state of origin (Arizona), and his level of education (master's degree).
DOJ-OGR-00013788.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It records the conclusion of testimony by witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer), with both Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger stating they have no further questions. The government then attempts to call David Mulligan as the next witness, but Ms. Sternheim interrupts to request a sidebar/conference with the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00013786.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on clarifying details regarding Jeffrey Epstein's anatomy and specific actions he took while in bed with the witness, amidst procedural objections from defense attorney Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013785.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she does not need a journal or paper to remember Ghislaine Maxwell touching her breasts during a massage because it was a 'very distressing event.'
DOJ-OGR-00013784.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms she first spoke with the FBI in 2006 without a lawyer present and acknowledges receiving a significant financial award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Farmer states the money provides security for her family and explicitly denies having any financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013781.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named A. Farmer (Annie) by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness recounts what she told the FBI in 2006 about a massage given to her by someone named Maxwell, describing being asked to undress and being touched. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to the testimony on the grounds that it is narrative.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Direct examination of Dr. Lisa Rocchio's professional qua...
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about her profession as a clinical and forensic psychologist, the definitions of those fields, and her educational background from Emory University and the University of Rhode Island.
Basis of witness testimony and knowledge of the case
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, who confirms he has not interviewed witnesses, has no personal knowledge of the case facts, and that his testimony will not be based on information from this specific case. He also states he is being paid hourly for his time.
First meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about her age during a trip to New York and asks her to identify Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then asks Annie to describe her first meeting with Epstein.
Clarification of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio
Ms. Pomerantz clarifies their understanding of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio regarding third parties and support in literature, before deferring to the judge's point.
Allegations of recruiting underage girls for sexual abuse
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's case, alleging the defendant recruited multiple underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages, citing specific examples involving victims named Jane, a 16-year-old, and a 17-year-old in various locations.
Identification of Journal Entry
Questioning regarding Government Exhibit 603.
Clarification of Dr. Rocchio's testimony regarding a thir...
Ms. Pomerantz addresses the court to state the government's understanding that the Court's opinion excluded Dr. Rocchio's opinion on the presence of a third party. She references a specific part of the transcript to distinguish this from the defense's concept of 'grooming by proxy'.
Direct examination regarding a written entry
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about an entry she wrote, asking her to state its date and read it to the jury.
Scheduling and scope of witness testimony
Ms. Pomerantz asked for an estimate on when the next witness would be ready and raised an objection that the current witness, a psychologist, was being cross-examined on matters requiring expert testimony despite being a lay witness.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Clarification on questioning a witness
Ms. Pomerantz asked for clarification about a planned line of questioning for a witness, initially believing it concerned an unsigned declaration involving the witness's ex-husband.
Direct examination and introduction of evidence
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Flatley, about his review of evidence using forensic software. She successfully enters Government Exhibit 418B into evidence and requests that exhibits 420, 421, and 422 be displayed for the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity