MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Examination of witness KATE, including direct, cross, redirect, and recross. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal hearing | A Daubert hearing, which the Court references when asking Ms. Pomerantz if the disputed question ... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Espinosa regarding Ghislaine's residences. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her memory of what she was wearing during a mass... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding/hearing | Discussion at sidebar regarding a prior consistent statement, potential impeachment of a witness,... | Southern District (implied) | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness, Mulligan, testifies about what Annie told her regarding an incident with Jeffrey Epstein. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal examination | Redirect examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal examination | Direct examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. | Southern District | View |
| 2025-11-11 | Meeting | Proposed final pretrial conference. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Direct examination | Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about his employment at Brown University, his title, responsi... | Court proceeding (location ... | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio by Mr. Pagliuca in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Testimony | A witness provides testimony regarding a study on grooming behaviors, discussing the stages and a... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Direct examination | A witness named Rocchio is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about the scientific basis for determining... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding where logistical matters are discussed, including a party's absence from a fut... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding his opinion on a published article. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Daubert hearing | The court proceeds to a Daubert hearing regarding the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocc... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding grooming, risky sexual behav... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding professional qualifications in p... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Dr. Rocchio provides direct testimony about the strategies and tactics of grooming for the purpos... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | The beginning of the direct examination of witness Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court hearing | A court hearing where Government Exhibit 3 was admitted into evidence and a witness, Dr. Rocchio,... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, where he is questioned about Governm... | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court hearing | A cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Admission of evidence | Defendant's Exhibit A was admitted to the hearing record. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | N/A | Court hearing involving cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio. | Southern District Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013734.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, regarding a conversation with agents in 2006 and the presence of holiday decorations. The transcript also shows a procedural exchange between two attorneys, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Pomerantz, who objects to an exhibit being shown to the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013731.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding a pair of boots, which are admitted as Defendant's Exhibit AF9. The questioning establishes that the boots were purchased in 1996 and show significant signs of wear.
DOJ-OGR-00013724.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Ms. A. Farmer regarding her memory of a chef preparing a meal for 'all three of you' (implied to be herself, Epstein, and Maxwell). The questioning highlights a discrepancy between her current lack of memory regarding the chef and FBI notes from 2006 which indicate she recalled the chef at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00013721.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a weekend trip the witness took to New Mexico, specifically probing whether Ghislaine Maxwell transported them. The witness denies having personal knowledge of Ghislaine's involvement and confirms that the trip was over a weekend, a fact they discussed with their mother and disclosed to the government.
DOJ-OGR-00013720.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, specifically a cross-examination. The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of Ghislaine's involvement in their travel plans to New Mexico, with objections raised by MS. POMERANTZ.
DOJ-OGR-00013717.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorney Ms. Pomerantz raises two points with the judge: a scheduling inquiry about the next witness and a legal objection regarding the current witness. She argues that the witness, a psychologist, is being improperly questioned on topics like 'hindsight bias' which require expert testimony, whereas the witness was designated to testify only as a lay witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013716.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange between the judge (THE COURT), Ms. Pomerantz, and Ms. Menninger, where they agree to take a 45-minute luncheon recess as there are no further matters to discuss at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00013714.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning centers on a statement Farmer allegedly made to the FBI during an interview on November 15, 2006, concerning a planned trip where a person named Maria was to accompany another named Annie to New Mexico. The witness states they do not recall making the specific statement but acknowledges that it is written in the report being referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00013713.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. Ms. Menninger uses a document to help the witness recall and confirm that their first interview with the FBI took place on November 15, 2006. The transcript also includes an objection from another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, and rulings from the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00013709.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on how the witness determined a trip occurred in April 1996, revealing they used memory fragments of the movie 'Primal Fear' and prom, and cross-referenced them with online information and friends' recollections. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the line of questioning, citing 'mischaracterization'.
DOJ-OGR-00013707.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Ms. Farmer's prior communications with Mike Baker, a journalist for The New York Times. Ms. Farmer confirms she had email exchanges and an interview with Mr. Baker about her experiences, including a trip she took to New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00013706.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's memory of a trip to New Mexico, which they admit is a "reconstructed memory." The witness explains they established the timeline by researching the release date of the movie 'Primal Fear', which they saw during the trip.
DOJ-OGR-00013705.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on Farmer's lack of memory and absence of journal entries regarding the planning of a trip to New Mexico in the spring (specifically April) of 1996. The defense attorney questions Farmer about prior statements made to the government regarding the difficulty of distinguishing between different trips.
DOJ-OGR-00013704.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness A. Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The witness confirms speaking to Jeffrey Epstein on the phone regarding a trip to Thailand and admits speaking to him between her trips to New York and New Mexico. The defense attorney also questions the witness about discussions with her sister and asks if she ever spoke to Ghislaine Maxwell on the phone.
DOJ-OGR-00013701.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is cross-examining witness A. Farmer regarding a specific piece of evidence, Exhibit 604 (a journal), confirming that the witness provided a picture of the back of the journal to the government. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) confirms possession of the copy.
DOJ-OGR-00013699.jpg
This document is page 108 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding a journal entry she wrote in January 1996. The questioning focuses on how hindsight affects her perception of events that occurred in New Mexico and New York, specifically referencing a 'movie theater incident' involving an unnamed male ('him').
DOJ-OGR-00013691.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and counsel (Ms. Menninger, Ms. Pomerantz) during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The parties address a terminological issue regarding the admission of exhibits labeled "AF1" and "Government Exhibit 603," with the court deciding to temporarily admit a seven-page version of AF1 under seal. Ms. Menninger also notes a disagreement over redactions, which is deferred to a later time to avoid delaying the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013690.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on a journal entry the witness wrote after a trip to New York, confirming she visited Jeffrey Epstein's home, attended 'Phantom of the Opera' (which she described as the best night of the trip), went cross-country skiing, and met a woman named Maria's boyfriend.
DOJ-OGR-00013689.jpg
This document is page 98 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her past hopes that Epstein (referenced as 'Maria's boss') would pay for her college or help her gain admission. The testimony confirms she wrote these hopes down before traveling to New York but did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell in those specific notes.
DOJ-OGR-00013688.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The court admits a single page document, Bates labeled AFarmer10472, as exhibit AF1 without objection from the government. Attorney Ms. Menninger then begins questioning the witness about a handwritten journal entry made before a trip to New York.
DOJ-OGR-00013687.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer (Maria), by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding an undated entry about an upcoming trip to New York. The witness confirms her excitement about seeing her sister and meeting a person named Epstein, who had purchased a ticket for her.
DOJ-OGR-00013686.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. Ms. Menninger introduces a new exhibit, labeled AF1, which is a page from a journal not previously included in the government's exhibits. After receiving no objection from Ms. Pomerantz, the Court admits exhibit AF1 temporarily under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013682.jpg
This document is page 91 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a statement Farmer made to the government in September 2019. The questioning focuses on whether Farmer used a journal to refresh her memory about her age (specifically being 16) during a specific trip to New York in her junior year.
DOJ-OGR-00013679.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to Mr. Epstein's New York home for a New Year's Eve party after Christmas 1995. The witness confirms no sexual activity occurred during the stay and discusses the possibility that the home was under renovation in early 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00013677.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a brief recess during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The judge coordinates with attorneys Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger before recalling the witness and jury.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Scheduling and Scope of Cross-Examination
Ms. Pomerantz asks about the timing for the next witness and flags an issue regarding 'hindsight bias' questions being asked of a lay witness who happens to be a psychologist.
CBP Record Keeping
Questioning regarding whether CBP records in the 1990s were paper and if they were logged in systems prior to 9/11.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding memory of abuse and reliance on documentation.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding metadata dates and titles of Government Exhibits 420, 418R, and 418B.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding the emotional significance of compensation funds and potential financial interest in the trial outcome.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding Epstein's actions in bed and previous cross-examination questions about his penis.
Topics for cross-examination
Conferred with defense counsel regarding topics for cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.
Direct Examination regarding 1995 trip
Q&A regarding a trip to NY in 1995, meeting Epstein, and identifying a photo.
Objection Ruling
Judge sustains an objection regarding the line of questioning, prohibiting the attorney from drawing associations with other defendants the witness has testified for to avoid prejudice under Rule 403.
Redaction Dispute
Discussion regarding a dispute over redactions on page 2370, lines 14 to 18, concerning an objection to a question lacking predicate foundation.
Exhibit Identification
Exchange regarding identifying exhibit K-8 / 3513-019.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding travel logistics to New York and payment of flight.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding Government Exhibits 16 and 18.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity