Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Sternheim

Person
Mentions
877
Relationships
86
Events
390
Documents
429
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
86 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Professor Elizabeth Loftus
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Besselsen
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Conrad
Business associate
5
1
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Business associate
5
1
View
person Laura Menninger
Business associate
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Pagliuca
Business associate
5
1
View
person Ms. Moe
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
person Unnamed witness
Cross examiner potential
5
1
View
person JANINE GILL VELEZ
Professional
5
1
View
person DANIEL ALAN BESSELSEN
Professional
5
1
View
person Conrad
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person Ghislaine
Client
5
1
View
person Ms. Moe
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
person Professor Loftus
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
Professional
5
1
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Professional
5
1
View
person Laura Menninger
Professional
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Pagliuca
Professional
5
1
View
person Judge Nathan
Professional
5
1
View
person the Judge
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Court proceeding regarding trial schedule, closing arguments, and jury deliberation timing relati... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceeding sidebar or argument regarding courtroom logistics and COVID protocols. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Opening statement by Ms. Sternheim defending Ghislaine Maxwell Open Court View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Examination of witness 'Kate' Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Janine Gill Velez Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule and closing arguments Courtroom View
N/A N/A Sentencing hearing where the judge discusses factors for punishment. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four. Courtroom View
N/A Trial Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th. Courtroom View
N/A Legal proceeding Closing arguments are anticipated for the 20th or 21st. Courtroom View
N/A Court testimony Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... Courtroom View
N/A Court proceeding A court hearing to discuss the schedule for jury deliberations. Courtroom View
N/A Court examination Cross-examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Sternheim, starting on page 2242. N/A View
N/A Future court hearing The court scheduled the next session for the 23rd of the month. Courtroom View
N/A Trial An upcoming trial that Ms. Sternheim is scheduled to start on the 16th of the month. Unspecified View
N/A Court proceeding Examination of witness KATE, including direct, cross, redirect, and recross. N/A View
N/A Court proceeding The judge discusses jury deliberation scheduling with counsel, sends a note to the jury, takes a ... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Court examination Cross-examination of witness DANIEL ALAN BESSELSEN by Ms. Sternheim. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
55
As Recipient
5
Total
60

Witness Testimony Objection

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussing objections to the relevance of testimony from upcoming witnesses called out of order.

Dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling concerns

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Confidentiality for Ms. Conrad's testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter submitted by Ms. Sternheim regarding Ms. Conrad's confidentiality, medical conditions, disciplinary proceedings, and intention to assert her Fifth Amendment right.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Format inquiry

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Inquiring if a specific format was satisfactory.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Checking on Mr. Hamilton's availability

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Mr. Hamilton

The Court instructs Ms. Sternheim to 'make that call' to check on Mr. Hamilton's availability, and she confirms she is doing so.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Witness's positive COVID test

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter was apparently sent to the Court, mentioned by the judge, which stated that Ms. Sternheim's side had the witness's positive COVID test result.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding sentencing guidelines, probation recommendations, and culpability comparison between Maxwell and Epstein.

Court proceeding
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Request to speak

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Request to stand at the podium and address the victims directly.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing and Fines

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the imposition of a fine, the status of a bequest in a will, and the formal imposition of the sentence.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing of Ms. Maxwell

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["THE COURT", "Judge N...

Ms. Sternheim addresses the court during Ms. Maxwell's sentencing. She acknowledges the victims, confirms the judge can hear her, and begins to argue against the government's sentencing recommendation.

Courtroom dialogue
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Defense argues for a lower sentence, citing the probation department's recommendation and comparing Maxwell's culpability to Epstein's.

Meeting
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Opening Statement

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Ms. Sternheim describes the circumstances of Annie's meetings with Epstein in New York and Ghislaine in Santa Fe when Annie was 16.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Defense opening statement in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Jury/Court

The defense lawyer argues that the case is about Epstein's conduct, not Maxwell's, and that the government's case relies on four accusers whose memories are corrupted and motivated by money.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Objection to closing argument statement

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim argues that a statement made by Ms. Moe during closing arguments is incorrect. The statement claimed that a massage table from California affects interstate commerce, which Ms. Sternheim disputes as an inaccurate application of the law.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a sidebar

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["Judge"]

Ms. Sternheim requests to raise an issue at sidebar with the Judge, and the Judge agrees.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim responds to the Court's questions and begins to address the Court on a matter before being instructed to use the microphone.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pending redaction issues

From: Ms. Moe
To: Ms. Sternheim

Ms. Moe informed the court that she had spoken with Ms. Sternheim that morning about the redaction issues being discussed.

Spoken conversation
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination of Gill Velez

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["Gill Velez"]

Ms. Sternheim questions Gill Velez about her employment history with a property management company and her lack of personal knowledge regarding a document dated 2000, as she only started working there in 2007.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding exhibit 'Defendant's K9'

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["Kate", "THE COURT"]

Ms. Sternheim questions the witness, Kate, about an exhibit marked 'Defendant's K9'. She directs Kate to a specific part of the document to identify her 'true name'.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Opening Statement (Defense)

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Members of the jury

Ms. Sternheim begins her opening statement for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, by arguing that women are often unfairly blamed for men's actions and that Maxwell is not Jeffrey Epstein, despite the charges relating to his conduct.

Courtroom statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Defense's argument against the credibility of accusers an...

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Court/Jury (implied)

Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's case lacks substantive evidence and relies on the thin, uncorroborated stories of four accusers. She suggests the accusers' testimonies are unreliable, having been influenced by lawyers, media, and the prospect of large financial rewards from the Epstein fund.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relevance objection

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim objects to evidence based on relevance and foundation as a business record.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Opening statement regarding 'Annie'

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Ms. Sternheim describes Annie's meetings with Epstein in New York and Ghislaine in Santa Fe when Annie was 16, asserting that nothing criminal occurred and she was above the age of consent in New Mexico.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary objection regarding witness credibility

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

A dialogue between Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the legal basis for an objection to testimony. The Court argues that since Ms. Sternheim's side attacked a witness's credibility regarding her upbringing, the opposing side can bring in evidence to support it. The Court presses Ms. Sternheim for the specific rule (e.g., Relevance, 403) underpinning her objection.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relevance of a question

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim argues that the question is relevant because it sheds light on the witness's knowledge of what other accusers are doing.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search