BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
David Boies, II
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's Counsel
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 1-2 in Case 22-1426, which identifies the parties and their legal representation. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Attorney David Boies filed a Notice of Appearance in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered that redactions on a March 26 letter from Boies Schiller Flexner L... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order stating there is no reason to maintain redactions on a let... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-25 | Meeting | BSF met and conferred with the Defendant's counsel regarding redactions. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court order | The Court ordered BSF to file its March 22, 2021, letter on the public docket with proposed redac... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Legal filing | BSF was to file a letter containing objections to the Defendant's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-12 | Legal filing | The Court issued a Sealed and Ex Parte Order requiring BSF to file a letter regarding a subpoena ... | United States District Cour... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002198(1).jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan, which includes a statement from Annie Farmer. Farmer, identifying herself as a victim, vehemently opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail, characterizing Maxwell as a manipulative psychopath and a significant flight risk who has lived a parasitic lifestyle. The statement argues that releasing Maxwell would prevent justice for her and other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00019317.jpg
This is a legal letter from attorney David Boies representing plaintiff Annie Farmer, addressed to Judge Debra C. Freeman on May 18, 2020. The letter argues against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery in the civil case pending a criminal investigation, citing case law that characterizes such stays as extraordinary remedies when no indictment has yet been issued. Boies asserts that Maxwell's motion is an unjustified attempt to delay litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00010753.jpg
This document is a letter dated June 27, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley explains that her client, victim Virginia Giuffre, cannot physically attend a court hearing due to a medical issue and requests permission to read Giuffre's statement on her behalf. A handwritten note on the document, signed by Judge Nathan, grants this request, ordering that counsel will be permitted to read a shortened version of the statement.
DOJ-OGR-00010674.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 24, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves to submit a written victim impact statement from Teresa Helm, who identifies herself as a victim trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 at the age of 22. Helm's statement directly addresses Maxwell, describing the grooming process, the psychological trauma endured, and the devastating long-term effects on her self-worth and life trajectory.
DOJ-OGR-00010672.jpg
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, counsel for Maria Farmer, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, providing a victim impact statement for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. Maria Farmer details how Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein trafficked, assaulted, and threatened her in 1996 on the Wexner estate, leading to the destruction of her career, health issues, and profound personal suffering. Due to a medical issue, Maria Farmer requests her statement be read into the record by her attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00010670.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 22, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter submits the victim impact statement of Virginia Giuffre, who details being trafficked and abused by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein from the age of 16. Giuffre's statement directly blames Maxwell for spotting her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 and introducing her to Epstein, thereby 'opening the door to hell'.
DOJ-OGR-00010649.jpg
A letter dated June 22, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, representing Teresa Helm, asserts that Helm was trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 and requests permission for Helm to make an oral victim impact statement at the upcoming sentencing. The majority of the detailed statement is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00004785.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order filed on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge denies Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, the law firm that represented Virginia Giuffre in a 2015 civil defamation suit against Maxwell. The document outlines the background of the civil suit, noting that Giuffre alleged defamation regarding accusations of sexual abuse by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00004737.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on June 4, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to subpoena Boies Schiller Flexner LLP for specific items, including a victim's teenage diary, a pair of boots allegedly gifted by Epstein and Maxwell, and original photographs. The judge notes that while the victim's diary describes visiting Epstein in New York, there is no indication Maxwell is mentioned in the journal.
DOJ-OGR-00002842.jpg
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 26, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that redactions on a letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP be removed unless the Government objects by March 29, 2021. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release.
DOJ-OGR-00020097.jpg
This document is a letter dated December 15, 2020, from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. In the statement, submitted via her attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, Farmer strongly opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail, detailing her personal experience of being sexually abused by Maxwell as a child. Farmer characterizes Maxwell as a manipulative psychopath and a significant flight risk who lacks remorse for her role in procuring girls for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002877.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 22, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. BSF objects to a subpoena issued by Maxwell's defense, arguing it is overly broad and lacks clarity on which victims require notice, while clarifying that the firm represents victims Annie Farmer (Minor Victim-2) and Virginia Giuffre. The firm states its intention to notify all Epstein victims it represents about the subpoena out of an abundance of caution.
DOJ-OGR-00002819.jpg
This is a legal letter dated March 26, 2021, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The letter informs the court that BSF, representing victims, has conferred with the defendant's counsel and agreed to redact a small piece of information from a recent filing out of caution. BSF states it will remove these redactions if the court orders it to do so.
DOJ-OGR-00002807.jpg
This document is a legal declaration filed by Sigrid S. McCawley on March 26, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, an attorney for an intervenor, declares under penalty of perjury that she meets the requirements for admission pro hac vice, including having no felony convictions or disciplinary actions. She is associated with Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and is a member of the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C.
DOJ-OGR-00002806.jpg
This legal document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, is requesting permission to appear as counsel for her firm and the victims they represent in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion affirms McCawley's good standing in the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C., and attests that she has no history of felonies or disciplinary actions.
DOJ-OGR-00002805.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 26, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters her appearance as counsel for the Intervenor (the law firm itself) and the victims represented by the firm.
DOJ-OGR-00002804.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney David Boies of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP is formally notifying the court that he is appearing as counsel for his firm (as an Intervenor) and for the unnamed victims the firm represents in this matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002890.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated April 5, 2021, concerning the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution requests that the court compel Maxwell's defense to share a copy of a proposed subpoena for records from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and to also share any documents produced as a result. The letter notes that the government has already provided over 2.7 million pages of discovery to the defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017962.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 28) of a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in Case 1:19-cv-03377. It includes a prayer for relief in excess of $75,000 and a formal Jury Demand. The document is signed by attorneys Joshua Schiller and Sigrid McCawley of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to Congress.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017935.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It establishes the case of Virginia L. Giuffre (Plaintiff) versus Alan Dershowitz (Defendant). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018038.jpg
This document contains an email thread from December 9, 2015, between Alan Dershowitz and attorney David Boies. Dershowitz drafts proposed language for a public statement to be issued by Boies' client, 'VR' (Virginia Roberts), suggesting she admit that her allegations of having sex with 'AD' (Alan Dershowitz) 15 years prior might be a case of mistaken identification. The document was filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018031.jpg
Affidavit of David S. Stone in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Alan Dershowitz, filed April 16, 2019. Stone details his professional relationships with both Dershowitz and David Boies and describes facilitating meetings between them in May 2015 regarding sexual abuse allegations against Dershowitz. Stone explicitly refutes Dershowitz's claim that Boies stated during a May 19th meeting that Giuffre (referred to as Roberts) was 'mistaken' about the abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016199.jpg
This document is an affidavit (page 3 of 6) filed in July 2019, detailing how attorneys (the affiant and Mr. Edwards) connected with witness Virginia Roberts Giuffre in 2014 for the CVRA case. It describes a May 2014 interview in Fort Lauderdale where the attorneys determined Giuffre's allegations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz were credible. Due to limited resources, the attorneys sought the assistance of David Boies and his firm to handle potential civil lawsuits against Epstein's 'rich and powerful friends'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity