BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
David Boies, II
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's Counsel
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 1-2 in Case 22-1426, which identifies the parties and their legal representation. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Attorney David Boies filed a Notice of Appearance in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered that redactions on a March 26 letter from Boies Schiller Flexner L... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order stating there is no reason to maintain redactions on a let... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-25 | Meeting | BSF met and conferred with the Defendant's counsel regarding redactions. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court order | The Court ordered BSF to file its March 22, 2021, letter on the public docket with proposed redac... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Legal filing | BSF was to file a letter containing objections to the Defendant's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-12 | Legal filing | The Court issued a Sealed and Ex Parte Order requiring BSF to file a letter regarding a subpoena ... | United States District Cour... | View |
EFTA00030155.pdf
Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.
EFTA00029816.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, seeking to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. The defense argues that the government made false representations to Judge McMahon to bypass a civil protective order and obtain confidential deposition transcripts, alleging collusion between the civil plaintiff's lawyers (Boies Schiller) and federal prosecutors. The document details the history of the civil defamation case, specific deposition questions regarding sexual acts and Epstein, and the procedural history of the protective order modification.
EFTA00029100.pdf
This legal filing is a Reply Memorandum by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, arguing for the suppression of evidence and dismissal of charges based on government misconduct. The defense asserts that prosecutors misled Chief Judge McMahon about the extent of their prior coordination with civil attorneys (Boies Schiller Flexner) to obtain a grand jury subpoena, thereby circumventing a civil protective order. The document details a specific meeting on February 29, 2016, where civil attorneys 'pitched' the prosecution of Maxwell and provided documents, including flight records (though the specific flight data is not listed in this text), which the prosecution later failed to disclose to the judge.
EFTA00027881.pdf
An email chain from December 2019 involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink, Troutman Sanders, and Boies Schiller Flexner regarding The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence involves the forwarding of attached letters between counsel, with Roberta Kaplan forwarding the thread to an undisclosed recipient noting, 'I assume you have this.' The thread indicates ongoing legal coordination or dispute resolution concerning the Epstein Estate.
EFTA00027824.pdf
This document is an email thread from March 2020 discussing a Daily Beast article titled 'Is One of Jeffrey Epstein's Co-Conspirators Suing His Estate?'. The correspondents discuss a quote by Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, who condemns a lawsuit filed by a 'Doe' plaintiff, alleging the plaintiff is actually a co-conspirator who profited from Epstein's abuse.
EFTA00027729.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 29, 2020, originating from an automated PacerPro notification regarding the case '[Redacted] v. Maxwell' (Case No. 1:15-cv-07433-LAP in S.D.N.Y.). A partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP forwards the notification to alert recipients that Maxwell's counsel, Ty Gee, has filed a letter addressed to Judge Loretta A. Preska requesting reconsideration of a July 23 ruling.
EFTA00027163.pdf
This is a court order dated April 21, 2021, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a joint letter from the Defendant and law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) regarding proposed redactions to filings concerning a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The court orders the parties to confer by April 22 and sets a deadline of April 23 for the Government to justify any redaction requests or for the letter to be filed publicly.
EFTA00027162.pdf
An email chain from April 21, 2021, between attorneys Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner), Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger regarding compliance with an order from Judge Nathan. McCawley requests confirmation to send specific documents and redactions related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case to the Government. Pagliuca forwards the relevant PDF attachments, noting they were missing from a previous email.
EFTA00026965.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns the submission of evidence from a witness represented by McCawley, specifically photographs and journal entries from 1995 and 1996. The witness's journal entries detail a trip to New York, visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house, and going to the movies with him.
EFTA00026800.pdf
This document contains an email chain from February 2020 between Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence coordinates a meeting scheduled for March 4, 2020, in New York between the prosecutors, McCawley, and a female client/witness (name redacted). One participant notes they will miss the meeting due to a conflict in White Plains.
EFTA00026703.pdf
This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.
EFTA00025501.pdf
This document is an email thread between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, spanning January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of 1995-1996 journal entries and photographs, and schedules a second interview with the witness. The prosecution explicitly states they have 'no doubts whatsoever' about the witness's candor and truthfulness.
EFTA00025468.pdf
An email thread from April 24, 2020, in which attorney Sigrid McCawley sends documents (attached as a ZIP file labeled RFP_RFA_ROG) to a redacted recipient. McCawley notes that her staff is reviewing the materials to ensure completeness and mentions that she is working to provide access to videos later that morning.
EFTA00025329.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Sigrid McCawley and the SDNY (specifically an Assistant US Attorney, possibly named Boxer) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, a visit to Epstein's house, and a movie outing with him. The SDNY expresses confidence in the witness's truthfulness and requests a follow-up interview to review her experiences again.
EFTA00025324.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visits to Epstein's house, and social outings with him. The prosecutors also request a follow-up interview with the witness, noting they found her previous testimony credible.
EFTA00025319.pdf
This document contains a series of emails between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of specific journal entries from 1995 and 1996, which detail the witness's trips to New York, visits to Epstein's house, and social outings with him. The prosecutors explicitly state they have no doubts about the witness's candor and request a follow-up interview.
EFTA00025305.pdf
This document is a series of email chains between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness cooperating in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of the witness's journal entries from 1995-1996 and schedules a follow-up interview. The journals confirm the witness visited Epstein's NY house in January 1996 and went to the movies with him.
EFTA00025295.pdf
This document is an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and a redacted Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of evidence, specifically journal entries from 1995-1996 and photographs involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails confirm the witness's historical contact with Epstein, including visits to his NY house and going to the movies, and arrange for a follow-up interview with prosecutors.
EFTA00025125.pdf
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling an in-person interview/meeting for McCawley's client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted]', to take place on March 4, 2020, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New York. The subject line references the 'Epstein investigation'.
EFTA00024287.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) coordinating interviews for several Epstein victims. The correspondence discusses scheduling around a 'victims' meeting' on October 23, 2019, and visa/passport issues for a specific victim who was 'brought to the US by Epstein a number of times.' The emails also mention a set of sisters, one of whom had already been interviewed by the SDNY.
EFTA00023343.pdf
An email chain from March 2020 involving attorney Sigrid McCawley discussing a new indemnification action filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the USVI. McCawley notes that the filing contradicts Maxwell's previous sworn depositions regarding financial assistance from Jeffrey Epstein and reveals previously unproduced correspondence and employment history. The information originated from James E. Hill, likely an ABC reporter, as ABC was preparing a story on the matter.
EFTA00023292.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on November 14, 2019, by Jane Doe 1000 against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff alleges she was recruited in late 1999 under the guise of modeling opportunities for Victoria's Secret, then subjected to years of sexual abuse, manipulation, and trafficking by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York and Palm Beach. The complaint details Epstein's wealth, his specific properties in NY and NM, his 2008 plea deal, his 2019 arrest and death, and specific instances of abuse involving Maxwell.
EFTA00023169.pdf
This document is an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The emails discuss scheduling a follow-up interview in May 2020 for a witness located in Texas who has a 'patient schedule'. The chain also includes correspondence from January 2020 where the SDNY requests, and McCawley provides, specific journal entries from the witness dating back to late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visiting Epstein's house, and going to the movies with him.
EFTA00022958.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2020, initiated by an automated PacerPro notification regarding a 'Motion to Stay' filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 20-02413). Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP forwarded this notification to colleagues (including Peter Skinner), stating that she would respond to the motion by the following day.
EFTA00022027.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 5, 2021. The Government requests that the Court order the defendant to provide notice of all Rule 17(c) subpoenas (specifically referencing one to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and to share any materials obtained with the Government. The letter argues against ex parte subpoenas for discovery purposes, citing the need to protect victim privacy (specifically mentioning a request for a victim's diary) and prevent 'fishing expeditions.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity