BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
David Boies, II
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's Counsel
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 1-2 in Case 22-1426, which identifies the parties and their legal representation. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Attorney David Boies filed a Notice of Appearance in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered that redactions on a March 26 letter from Boies Schiller Flexner L... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order stating there is no reason to maintain redactions on a let... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-25 | Meeting | BSF met and conferred with the Defendant's counsel regarding redactions. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court order | The Court ordered BSF to file its March 22, 2021, letter on the public docket with proposed redac... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Legal filing | BSF was to file a letter containing objections to the Defendant's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-12 | Legal filing | The Court issued a Sealed and Ex Parte Order requiring BSF to file a letter regarding a subpoena ... | United States District Cour... | View |
EFTA00021344.pdf
A letter dated October 15, 2019, from Matthew L. Schwartz of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to an Assistant US Attorney. Schwartz informs the government that his client intends to purchase a Sikorsky S-76C helicopter for $3.5 million from Hyperion Air, LLC, a USVI entity associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The letter notes that Darren K. Indyke represents the seller and seeks confirmation that the government does not intend to block the sale or seize the asset.
EFTA00021307.pdf
Email correspondence from October 2019 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney for the SDNY coordinating interviews with victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The emails discuss scheduling interviews for multiple victims around a 'victims' meeting' in New York on October 22-23. One victim requires visa clearance and was noted as having been brought to the US by Epstein multiple times; another victim is identified as the sister of a previously interviewed individual.
EFTA00021064.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 5, 2020, involving attorney Sigrid McCawley. McCawley highlights a filing by the Epstein Estate in the US Virgin Islands, specifically noting that Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers (Haddon Morgan) submitted a $621,000 bill to the estate. McCawley points out that this contradicts Maxwell's previous testimony claiming Epstein did not pay for her litigation.
EFTA00020699.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2019 involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP regarding a Grand Jury Subpoena. The correspondence discusses a sealed order from the Southern District of New York granting BSF permission to produce confidential discovery materials from the case '[Redacted] v. Maxwell' (likely Giuffre v. Maxwell) in response to the subpoena. It explicitly notes that the order does not apply to other litigation such as 'In re Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein'.
EFTA00019483.pdf
An email dated March 22, 2019, from attorney Sigrid McCawley to a redacted recipient. McCawley attaches a 2016 subpoena notice regarding 'Shopper's Travel' and informs the recipient that the travel agency previously resisted legal requests and provided no documentation.
EFTA00017068.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 30, 2020, in which Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP forwards a PacerPro notification to a redacted recipient and Peter Skinner. The notification concerns a 'Motion to Stay' filed that day on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 20-02413). McCawley indicates she intends to respond to the motion by the following day.
EFTA00015859.pdf
This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to subpoena Boies Schiller Flexner LLP for three items: the complete teenage diary of Minor Victim-2, a pair of boots allegedly gifted by Epstein and Maxwell, and original photographs. The court ruled that the request for the full diary was a fishing expedition primarily for impeachment (which is not allowed under Rule 17(c) at this stage), and that the requests for the boots and photos were moot because the government agreed to make them available for inspection.
EFTA00014526.pdf
This document contains a 2019 email chain from Boies Schiller Flexner discussing Jeffrey Epstein's use of pseudo email accounts to communicate. Attached are historical emails from September 2005 demonstrating Epstein's use of these accounts (likely ending in @gmail.com and @ellmax.com). The attachments show Ed Razek (L Brands) forwarding an investment opportunity from William Mook to Epstein, and Mike O'Neil inviting Epstein to a Trilateral Commission meeting in Montreal. The document also includes text from a Bloomberg article detailing Epstein's connections to Les Wexner, Victoria's Secret models, and his use of Wexner's Boeing 727.
EFTA00011363.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Sigrid McCawley dated March 18, 2020, discussing an indemnification action filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the USVI. McCawley notes that the filing contains statements contradicting Maxwell's previous sworn depositions regarding financial support from Jeffrey Epstein and lists companies she was employed by which were not previously disclosed. The email mentions that ABC is preparing a news story on the matter.
EFTA00009865.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney (likely Maureen Comey) regarding the filing of a victim impact statement. The chain includes the full text of the statement from an unnamed victim opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail, describing Maxwell as a 'psychopath' who groomed and abused the victim as a child and procured victims for Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence coordinates the formatting and timing of filing this statement as an exhibit to the government's opposition to bail.
DOJ-OGR-00015103.jpg
This is a legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from attorney Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to U.S. District Judges Berman and Engelmayer. The letter is written on behalf of victim Annie Farmer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter heavily criticizes the Department of Justice for failing to pursue further criminal investigations and notes that Maxwell is attempting to negotiate a pardon.
DOJ-OGR-00001179.jpg
This legal document, a letter dated December 15, 2020, from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, contains a statement from Annie Farmer opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer, a victim of Maxwell, details Maxwell's history of abuse, manipulative behavior, and flight risk, arguing that Maxwell is a psychopath who lacks remorse and would flee to avoid justice. The statement emphasizes the need for Maxwell to stand trial to ensure justice for her victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000766.jpg
This is a memo dated August 5, 2025, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to federal judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The firm, writing on behalf of victim Annie Farmer, responds to a notice about the potential unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The memo strongly criticizes the U.S. Government for not pursuing further criminal investigations, despite admitting there were over a thousand victims, calling this inaction a 'cowardly abdication' of its duties.
DOJ-OGR-00020658.jpg
This document is a court docket log (SDNY CM/ECF) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between April 22 and April 23, 2021. It details procedural exchanges regarding electronic devices in the courtroom (denied), suppression motions, adjournment requests, and proposed redactions to protect third-party privacy (granted). The document lists key legal teams for both the defense (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach), and includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on these procedural matters.
DOJ-OGR-00020650.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, detailing legal filings from March 24 to March 29, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP appearing for victims, the prosecution (USA) and defense counsel filing letters with Judge Alison J. Nathan, and the filing of a superseding indictment against Maxwell. The docket also records a motion to appear pro hac vice and a related $200 filing fee.
DOJ-OGR-00020626.jpg
This legal document, part of case 22-1426 from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated February 28, 2023, records the dismissal of several felony charges, including coercion of a minor and perjury. It also identifies the legal counsel for an "Interested Party," the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and an "Intervenor," the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00020521.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty to a superseding indictment, various motions regarding subpoenas and trial scheduling, and a specific incident where Maxwell's defense claimed MDC guards wrongfully seized her confidential legal documents. Judge Nathan issued scheduling orders for pretrial motions and ordered MDC counsel to explain the seizure of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020512.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's order regarding the handling of subpoenas involving alleged victims, specifically requiring a law firm (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) to coordinate with defense counsel on redactions and objections. The docket also records Maxwell's Notice of Appeal, the filing of several sealed documents, and the formal appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020492.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court docket (Case 22-1426) listing the legal counsel for various parties involved in the case, dated July 8, 2022. It details contact information and representation status for attorneys representing the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (representing victims), and the USA (Plaintiff).
DOJ-OGR-00020488.jpg
This document is a service list (Page 2 of 92) from a court filing dated July 8, 2022, associated with Case 22-1426 and the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the email addresses for various attorneys receiving electronic notice, including prosecutors from the US Department of Justice (Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, etc.) and private counsel (Sigrid McCawley). The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00020488.
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020417.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) detailing filings and orders between April 20 and April 21, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include Judge Nathan questioning the defense on whether they are seeking to adjourn the July 12th trial date, potentially until January 2022, and demanding a specific justification if so. The docket also covers disputes over redactions involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and motions to dismiss the indictment based on a Non-Prosecution Agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00020412.jpg
This document is a court docket log from Case 22-1426, detailing filings and orders from late March 2021 in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment by the U.S. government, multiple letters and orders concerning redactions in court documents, motions related to subpoenas, and the payment of appeal fees. The log shows active litigation between Maxwell's defense team, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and the prosecution, all under the supervision of Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020391.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022. It outlines the parties involved in the case, including the plaintiff (USA), an intervenor (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP representing victims), and an interested party (Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press). The document provides the names and contact information for the lead attorneys representing each entity.
DOJ-OGR-00002198.jpg
This document is a formal letter from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer describes her personal victimization by Maxwell and argues that Maxwell is a flight risk, lacks empathy or remorse, and exhibits psychopathic behavior.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity