Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Comey

Person
Mentions
1419
Relationships
127
Events
630
Documents
693
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
127 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
18 Very Strong
28
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
17
View
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
16
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
10
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
10
View
organization The government
Representative
12 Very Strong
10
View
person CAROLYN
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Alessi
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person CAROLYN
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mr. Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
38
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Shawn
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Meder
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
37
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
155
View
person Mr. Visoski
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person your Honor
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Rodgers
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Shawn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of David Rodgers Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey Courtroom View
N/A N/A Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Michael Dawson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00013245.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, given the case number ending in PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Carolyn is being cross-examined by Mr. Pagliuca regarding her 2009 testimony about using cocaine in Jeffrey Epstein's bathroom and whether Epstein explicitly told her to use drugs. The questioning then pivots to her claim of having sexual intercourse with Epstein, at which point Ms. Comey interrupts to request a definition of 'sexual'.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013244.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by counsel Mr. Pagliuca. The witness admits to using powder cocaine at Mr. Epstein's house on some occasions. She specifies that she would use it alone in the bathroom and cannot recall the specific dates and times.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013243.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between two attorneys, Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey, and the judge regarding which portion of a prior testimony a witness should read. The central point of contention is a question and answer where the witness apparently admitted to using cocaine at Mr. Epstein's house.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013241.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness denies using cocaine at Mr. Epstein's house. The proceedings are interrupted by procedural matters, including an attorney's objection and the judge's instruction to the witness, who also questions the relevance of a statement about Mr. Epstein telling her not to use drugs.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013239.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of a cross-examination where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions a witness named Carolyn about a deposition document dated October 21, 2009. The witness denies ever having seen the document and also states that she has never taken a hallucinogenic.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013238.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness about inconsistencies with prior testimony from 2009 and asks if she ingested 'angel trumpets' while traveling to Jeffrey Epstein's house. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) objects to the impeachment attempt, and the Judge sustains it, ruling the testimony is 'not inconsistent.'

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013237.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding her past use of Xanax, alcohol, and alleged cocaine use between 2000 and 2005. The witness admits to Xanax use for anxiety at age 13 and alcohol use in 2005, but denies the document's claim regarding the frequency of alcohol use starting in 2000 and adamantly denies using cocaine or crack in 2002-2003.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013235.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Carolyn's past substance use, including her use of Xanax, drinking and smoking marijuana at age 13, and using benzodiazepines frequently between 2002 and 2003.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013233.jpg

This document is page 220 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It depicts the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, who attempts to introduce a prior deposition (Exhibit 3505-43) to refresh the witness's memory, while prosecutor Ms. Comey objects.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013232.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The judge and attorneys briefly discuss the arrival of a witness before the judge addresses the jury to apologize for a delay and outline the court's schedule for the next several weeks, which includes days off due to a scheduling conflict and the Christmas holiday.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013231.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that a witness named Carolyn showed inconsistency by amending a prior answer to state she was 'transported via private car provided by Jeffrey Epstein,' which the judge allows into evidence. The page concludes with Ms. Sternheim requesting a recess and prosecutor Ms. Comey questioning the length of the cross-examination.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013228.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues for the inclusion of specific interrogatory questions (16 and 17) regarding how the witness came to be at Jeffrey Epstein's home and whether she received any money or things of value. The Court sustains an objection regarding 'compound' questions but indicates an inclination to allow question 16.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013223.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) covering the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The text details a legal argument between prosecutor Ms. Comey and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the admissibility of questions about specific paragraphs (39, 51, 57) of a complaint. Ms. Comey explicitly describes an incident where Jeffrey Epstein brought another female into a room and penetrated the victim twice.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013222.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 209 of 264 1650 LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross 1 inconsistency. I'm not sure where the disconnec...

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013221.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a legal debate between Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca regarding the testimony of a witness named Carolyn. Ms. Comey argues that the witness did not specify a time frame for an alleged act, while Mr. Pagliuca contends that her testimony about the frequency of the act (up to four times a week) contradicts a complaint that alleges it happened twice a month. The judge intervenes to manage the procedural aspects of their arguments.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, in front of a judge. The discussion focuses on whether omissions in a legal complaint regarding specific sex acts are inconsistent with a witness's testimony. The judge concludes that the testified detail is significant and sustains an objection related to the matter.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013219.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination related to a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court that there are inconsistencies in the testimony regarding incidents in July 2002, specifically noting that the allegations involve 'fondling of breasts and buttocks' rather than 'sexual intrusion or penetration.' The Judge clarifies the record regarding paragraph references (33 vs 39) before turning to Ms. Comey (prosecution) for a response.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013214.jpg

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, documenting a legal argument between counsel, Ms. Comey, and the judge. Ms. Comey objects to admitting a document (C4), arguing it was drafted by lawyers and would confuse the jury, but the judge overrules the objection. The transcript also references another document (C5) which alleges an agreement between defendant Epstein, his employee Kellen, and others to facilitate a crime.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013213.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features an argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Comey argues that the defense has already established that the witness sued Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in 2009 but did not name Ghislaine Maxwell, and that further questioning on this topic is cumulative and prejudicial.

Court transcript (trial proceedings)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013212.jpg

This document is page 199 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between the Judge ('The Court') and attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey regarding the legal theory of 'omission' and whether prior statements lacking certain facts constitute an inconsistency relevant to the jury. Ms. Comey argues that omission is only relevant if the omitted facts would reasonably have been expected in the original statement.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013211.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca argues that a legal complaint is inconsistent due to factual omissions, specifically citing that paragraph 8 fails to mention the witness's testimony of being subjected to penetration and intercourse by Epstein. The judge acknowledges this "omission theory" and states an intention to hear from a Ms. Comey on the matter.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, involving Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Comey, and The Court. The discussion centers on an objection regarding a document's consistency with witness testimony and the potential admission of the document or its factual paragraphs. A key point of inquiry was whether Ms. Maxwell is mentioned in the complaint, to which the answer was confirmed as no, leading to a plan to identify inconsistencies with testimony.

Legal document (court transcript)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013206.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding her sworn answers to interrogatories from 2009. The witness repeatedly states she is confused, and her attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully objects to the line of questioning.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013204.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding an alleged 6.5-hour meeting with Dr. Richard Hall on October 21, 2009. The attorney presses the witness on whether she told Dr. Hall she began seeing Jeffrey Epstein in 2002, though the witness claims no recollection of the meeting.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013203.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on paragraphs 206 and 207 of a complaint, with specific mentions of Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. The witness denies that paragraph 207, which mentions Sarah Kellen, was about engaging her in prostitution.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
113
As Recipient
4
Total
117

Missing Jurors

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Asking if the Court has attempted to call the missing jurors.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussing the redaction of phone numbers for Carolyn and third parties.

Court dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Ending the day

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Stopping the examination because it is 4:59 PM.

Court instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding Exhibit 662

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding the columns in a logbook exhibit.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding Melissa and Amanda's visits to Epstein's house.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Clarification on how nonsealed exhibits will be shown (on screen).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Witness testimony issue

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Comey requests permission to submit a letter to the court to look into the issue being discussed regarding witnesses.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Search of 358 El Brillo Way

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["Mr. Parkinson"]

Ms. Comey questions Mr. Parkinson about a search conducted on October 20, 2005, at 358 El Brillo Way. The questioning clarifies the timeline of events, distinguishing between an incident in 2003 and the 2005 search, and details the rooms Mr. Parkinson observed.

Direct examination testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Property Layout

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Alessi

Direct examination regarding the physical layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding a specific female passenger on Epstein's planes who attended Interlochen.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Video Evidence Presentation

From: Ms. Comey
To: The Court / Ms. Drescher

Discussion regarding the playback of a video on Ms. Drescher's laptop and pausing at specific timestamps.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admission of Evidence

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Requesting admission of exhibits 11-16 and 1004, and requesting jurors view sealed binders.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a moment

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey asks for a moment, Judge grants it, counsel confers.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Photograph Identification

From: Ms. Comey
To: Parkinson

Questioning regarding a photograph of a work area containing the name Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding witness background, education, and past relationships.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Transcript availability

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Not necessarily, your Honor. We're not being recorded right now and we're getting a transcript.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary Ruling

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

The Court sustains a foundation objection regarding witness testimony about a book version, instructing the jury to disregard specific beliefs of the witness.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey requests a ruling on whether the government needs to 'draw the sting' on direct examination regarding a witness's juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photograph (Exhibit 250)

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Argument describing a photo of Epstein and a girl, arguing its probative value because it was displayed in the house the defendant ran.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect Examination

From: Rodgers
To: Ms. Comey

Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Timing of evidence release

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the timeline for releasing redacted photographs (by Sunday) and videos (by Tuesday) due to IT staff schedules.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: CAROLYN

Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 313

From: Ms. Comey
To: Ms. Meder

Questioning regarding a photo found on a CD (1B75) from the Epstein/Maxwell investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Meder

Questioning regarding the identification of a photo found on a CD during the investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search