| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
U.S. Supreme Court
|
Authority affirmed |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
Opposed rule aspect |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Tom Harkin
|
Supportive in context of rulemaking |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
George Miller
|
Supportive in context of rulemaking |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Lester A. Heltzer
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Employers
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
American Trucking Association
|
Adversarial in context of rulemaking |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Heritage Foundation
|
Adversarial in context of rulemaking |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
employer
|
Regulatory |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Adversarial in context of rulemaking |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Various employers, unions, and interest groups
|
Regulatory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Public/Stakeholders
|
Rulemaking process |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Center on National Labor Policy, Inc.
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) promulgated a rule requiring employers to post a notice... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the legal principle of 'equitable tolling' for the statute of limitations under NLR... | N/A | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of a final rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in the Federal Register.... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of the 'Final Rule' for 29 CFR Part 104 in the Federal Register. | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of 'Rules and Regulations' in the Federal Register, containing a legal analysis/disse... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of a final rule in the Federal Register requiring employers subject to the NLRA to po... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board published its final rule on employer requirements for posting ... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final 'Rules and Regulations' in the Fede... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule and accompanying explanation i... | Washington, D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of 'Rules and Regulations' by the National Labor Relations Board in the Federal Regis... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of the Final Rule for 29 CFR Part 104, 'Notification of Employee Rights; Obligations ... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The NLRB published its final rule in the Federal Register, requiring employers to post notices of... | United States | View |
| 2011-03-23 | N/A | The NLRB's final cutoff date for accepting public comments on the proposed rule. | United States | View |
| 2011-02-22 | N/A | Original deadline for the public to submit comments on the NLRB's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in American Hospital Association v. NLRB, which unanimously upheld an NLRB... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld t... | United States | View |
| 1974-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Bell Aerospace, which emphasized the existence of the Board's l... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., which emphasized the existence of the Board's... | United States | View |
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | National Labor Re... | Employers | $0.00 | The required notices for employees would be mad... | View |
Proposed a 5 percent standard for the 'significant' threshold for translated notices.
Suggested the rule on electronic posting would 'chill' employers' use of new technologies.
Objected that the rule could require them to use all of their various communication technologies to convey the notice.
Asserted that 'A regulation cannot stand if it is contrary to the statute.'
Proposed that the 'significant' threshold for translated notices be 40 percent of the production and maintenance workforce.
Proposed a 5 percent standard for the 'significant' threshold for translated notices.
Suggested the rule on electronic posting would 'chill' employers' use of new technologies.
Objected that the rule could require them to use all of their various communication technologies to convey the notice.
Proposed that the 'significant' threshold for translated notices be 40 percent of the production and maintenance workforce.
Proposed a 5 percent standard for the 'significant' threshold for translated notices.
Suggested the rule on electronic posting would 'chill' employers' use of new technologies.
Objected that the rule could require them to use all of their various communication technologies to convey the notice.
Argued that the Board's reliance on general Section 6 authority is insufficient to meet the Administrative Procedure Act's requirements.
Expressed concern that the statute of limitations could be tolled 'perhaps indefinitely'.
Expressed concern that the statute of limitations could be tolled 'perhaps indefinitely'.
Argued against tolling based on the maxim 'ignorance of the law is no excuse'.
Argued that unions filing charges should be deemed to have constructive knowledge of the unlawful conduct.
Argued that employees represented by a union should be treated similarly to those represented by an attorney regarding knowledge of filing time limits.
Opposed deeming union-represented employees to have constructive knowledge, as it would create a disincentive for employers to post required notices.
Asserted that the Board cannot properly consider an employer's knowing failure to post as evidence of unlawful motive.
Submitted a comment, presumably in support of the Board's practice of considering unlawful conduct as evidence of motive.
Argued that Section 6 of the NLRA 'does not authorize the Board to promulgate rules and regulations which have the effect of enlarging its authority beyond the scope intended by Congress.'
Argued that the lack of express language in Section 6 requiring a notice posting indicates the Board lacks the authority to impose such a requirement.
Emphasized that the Supreme Court in the AHA case examined the NLRA's structure and policy to support the Board's rulemaking authority.
Argued that Section 6 of the NLRA 'does not authorize the Board to promulgate rules and regulations which have the effect of enlarging its authority beyond the scope intended by Congress.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity