The Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Williams
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
196 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
228 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Members of the jury
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
116 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
MR. ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MR. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
136 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court ruling | The Court previously considered and rejected the defendant's argument regarding the 'categorical ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing to discuss scheduling for an upcoming trial, including setting deadlines and hear... | Southern District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal hearing | An initial bail hearing was held where the Court found the defendant had no underlying health con... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | Defendant filed a motion for a new trial and requested it be kept completely under seal. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | Redirect examination of witness Edelstein. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Conference | The Court conferred with Ms. Comey about her position on the sealing of exhibits. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Scheduling announcement | The judge informs the jury that the court will not sit on the upcoming Monday, Tuesday, and Wedne... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Proposed juror questioning | The Government proposes that the Court question Juror 50 about their answers to a written questio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Voir dire | The jury selection process during which other jurors disclosed experiences with sexual abuse, sex... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Voir dire | The jury selection process, prior to which the defense counsel allegedly knew about the suspensio... | Court | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where she was convicted of Mann Act offenses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hearing | An initial bail hearing was held where the Government expressed doubt about the defendant's repor... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal hearing regarding evidentiary disputes over a book/list. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The document describes the legal standards and procedures for a court making a bail determination... | court | View |
| N/A | Jury selection | The voir dire process where prospective jurors were questioned. The document analyzes this proces... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A hearing in the case of United States of America v. Paul Daugerdas where the defense and prosecu... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A hearing was held where the court granted a motion to exclude time from the date of the hearing ... | Southern District Court (in... | View |
| N/A | Trial | A criminal trial where the Court gave instructions to the jury regarding charges against the Defe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Daubert hearing | A prior hearing mentioned in the transcript where literature and the scope of examination were di... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court is in session to discuss a note from the jury regarding their deliberation schedule aro... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A Detention Hearing where the Government informed the Court about the seized diamonds and cash. | Court | View |
| N/A | Court testimony / cross-examination | Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines Mr. Alessi about his prior sworn testimony regarding his supervisors,... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A final pretrial conference held on November 23rd where a request was made to share Dr. Rocchio's... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document discusses the scope of a trial, arguing that introducing certain evidence about gove... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The judge discusses jury deliberation scheduling with counsel, sends a note to the jury, takes a ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
EFTA00038903.pdf
This document is a calendar entry and email notification containing the text of a court order filed on January 14, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, schedules Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and outlines deadlines for joint letters regarding the Speedy Trial Act and severed perjury counts.
EFTA00038902.pdf
This document is an email notification of a court filing (Document 577) in the case USA v. Maxwell, dated January 14, 2022. It contains the text of a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and deferring proceedings on severed perjury counts. It also sets a deadline of January 18, 2022, for a joint letter regarding Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.
EFTA00037100.pdf
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated Nov 2, 2023) responding to objections regarding a class action settlement related to Jeffrey Epstein. It addresses allegations made by Ms. Ransome (and a redacted individual) that Class Counsel had undisclosed conflicts of interest and relationships with Epstein's associates. The filing argues these claims are meritless and asserts the settlement was reached through good faith negotiations.
EFTA00032725.pdf
This document involves an internal email chain between U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in June 2021. The prosecutors discuss legal strategy concerning a suppression hearing, noting that Maxwell's defense team filed 12 separate Memos of Law (MOLs) to bypass page limits. The correspondence also references past proceedings involving Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon, and requests access to original applications and transcripts.
EFTA00032696.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from April 2021 between employees of the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of NY). An Assistant US Attorney is inquiring about the location of specific Epstein-related Bureau of Prisons (BOP) documents that do not contain a 'translucent green watermark,' anticipating that the Court will require clean versions for production. A colleague responds the following day with a potential network location for the files.
EFTA00032083.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim is formally notifying government officials (likely USANYS) of a breach in attorney-client privilege, stating that during a VTC session the previous day, Maxwell observed suspicious activity on the monitor which was also witnessed by an MDC Case Manager. Sternheim demands an explanation and remediation for this interference with the 'secure' Webex line.
EFTA00032011.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 30 to December 1, 2020, between Assistant United States Attorneys (USANYS) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence details coordination with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MDC legal regarding a proposal, which was subsequently rejected by defense counsel members 'Bobbi' and 'Chris.' The chain concludes with the preparation of a draft letter and affidavit to be submitted to the court.
EFTA00031821.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between attorney Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and redacted recipients (likely prosecutors). The correspondence concerns the filing of a victim impact statement to oppose Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail. The email includes the full text of the statement, in which the victim describes Maxwell as a 'psychopath' who sexually abused them as a child, groomed victims for Epstein, and poses a significant flight risk.
EFTA00031683.pdf
An email dated May 3, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Mark Manley. The email forwards a court order related to a 'Third Party Letter' in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00031432.pdf
An email chain from April 2021 discussing the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement. Her attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, requests that Maxwell be allowed to access legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she spent over three hours idle there that morning. The forwarding party indicates they have no objection to this request subject to Marshal approval.
EFTA00031356.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 14, 2020, referenced by case number 20 Cr 330 (associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The correspondence is between an individual who read a victim statement in court and a person (likely a court reporter) preparing the transcript. They discuss sharing the unfiled statement to ensure accuracy of spellings in the official record.
EFTA00030756.pdf
This document is an email dated December 8, 2020, from attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of a 'Renewed Bail Motion' and associated exhibits (A-E) in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed under seal pursuant to a court order.
EFTA00030707.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2019, between attorneys regarding the case 'US v. Tartaglione' (16-cr-832). Al-Amyn Sumar of The New York Times Company informed Bruce Barket and others that a letter had been faxed to the Court on behalf of the NYT and reporter Ben Weiser concerning the unsealing of records. Bruce Barket acknowledged receipt of the email.
EFTA00030417.pdf
This document is an email chain from late November to December 1, 2020, between officials at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). They are coordinating a legal response regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically involving a 'joint letter' to the Court and interactions with the BOP and MDC legal team. The correspondence notes that 'Bobbi and Chris' (likely defense counsel) rejected a proposal, necessitating the drafting of a new letter and affidavit regarding a defense request concerning the MDC warden.
EFTA00030000.pdf
This document is an internal email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated January 28, 2021. The correspondence concerns a deadline to submit a letter to Judge Nathan regarding 'GM's' (Ghislaine Maxwell) proposed redactions to pre-trial motions. The email includes an attachment of the draft letter for review.
EFTA00027665.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 12, 2021, regarding the preparation and review of juror questionnaires for the 'US v. Maxwell' trial. It discusses uploading files to USAfx, sharing them with defense counsel, and setting deadlines for the legal team to review and object to juror batches. The attachment filename explicitly links the correspondence to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00027382.pdf
This document is an email thread between Assistant United States Attorneys (USANYS) dated April 11-13, 2021. The discussion concerns locating a comprehensive set of Jeffrey Epstein documents from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) without a 'translucent green watermark' for potential production to the Court. The attorneys confirm that BOP previously emailed them PDFs of these documents, which were then produced to defense counsel.
EFTA00027381.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys (USANYS) regarding the collection of Epstein-related documents from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The discussion centers on locating a version of FOIA documents without a 'translucent green watermark' for anticipated production to the Court, noting that a set was previously shared with defense counsel. The emails discuss the logistics of how the documents were transferred (JEFS vs. email) and the comprehensiveness of the files.
EFTA00027303.pdf
An email chain from August 2021 among legal team members (likely prosecution) discussing the organization of witness files for an upcoming trial. The emails specifically mention filing notes for Larry Visoski (Epstein's pilot) into a 'testifying witness 3500 folder' and an 'Epstein share'. They also discuss deadlines for producing '3500' (Jencks Act material) and 'GX' (Government Exhibits) to the defense and court.
EFTA00026926.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and redacted government officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement. Sternheim requests that Maxwell be allowed legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she was held idle for over three hours. The government responds that they do not object but that the US Marshals require a court order.
EFTA00026524.pdf
This document is an email dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Parker. The email submits an amended application and affidavit for a second warrant, correcting errors made in a submission the previous day. The attachments indicate the warrants and indictments are related to Ghislaine Maxwell (specifically referencing GPS and arrest warrants).
EFTA00026478.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a telephone conference for the Maxwell case presided over by Judge Nathan. The email follows up on previous communication from Bobbi Sternheim and provides dial-in information for the defendant, referencing an attached court order.
EFTA00024985.pdf
An email chain from November 2021 between attorney Joe Nascimento and a redacted client. Nascimento alerts the client that a redacted individual (likely close to the client) was subpoenaed in a lawsuit against their ex-husband involving allegations of sex discrimination and battery. The email notes that the plaintiff is attempting to connect the individual to actions taken while working for Jeffrey Epstein and has included the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in their legal filings.
EFTA00024706.pdf
This document contains an email thread and the text of a Court Order dated May 14, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Maxwell's request to stop flashlight checks performed by guards every 15 minutes, accepting the Government's explanation that these are necessary security protocols for a high-profile inmate housed alone. However, the Judge urged the MDC to consider whether sleep disruptions could be reduced and to ensure protocols remain neutral and necessary.
EFTA00024356.pdf
This document is a highly significant email thread from August 10, 2019, chronicling the immediate aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence involves the US Marshals Service (USMS), the US Attorney's Office (USAO), and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP)/MCC New York. The thread reveals significant confusion and frustration within the USAO, as officials complain that the BOP issued press releases about Epstein's death before providing basic facts to the prosecutors, leaving them unable to inform Epstein's defense counsel or family. The timeline moves from an initial report of an 'apparent suicide attempt' at 7:52 AM to confirmation that he 'passed away' by 8:46 AM.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity