Unnamed Questioner
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Maguire
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Aznaran
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kane
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of Brune regarding his professional relationship and actions as the lawyer for... | Court | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | Witness Berke is questioned about their knowledge regarding a juror's background and potential co... | Courtroom (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony (direct examination) | Ms. Brune is questioned about her ethical standards and actions as a former Assistant U.S. Attorn... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of witness Parkinson regarding the evidentiary limitations of videos and photog... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness named Edelstein is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding t... | Southern District (implied) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her ethical obligations as an officer of the court. | court | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding his firm's jury selection process. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their understanding of the voir dire (jury ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness named Kate testifies about her experience at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony/deposition | Ms. Edelstein is being questioned about the potential connection between Juror No. 1 and a suspen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Direct examination | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge of potential juror misconduct. | Court | View |
| N/A | Testimony / deposition | A colloquy where an unnamed defendant was questioned about Jeffrey Epstein's activities. The defe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Berke is cross-examined in a legal proceeding about his professional obligations ... | courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her handling of a 'significant piece of information' an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | Mr. Berke is questioned under oath about an attorney's ethical obligations regarding juror miscon... | Court | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Berke is being cross-examined about their knowledge of a juror's background. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Visoski is being questioned about their observations during flights. | court proceeding | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony/deposition | Edelstein is being questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune regarding the content of a l... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness named Alessi gives testimony under direct examination, describing the layout of Mr. Eps... | Courtroom (inferred) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Brune regarding the decision not to research potential juror Cather... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | Direct examination of witness Brune regarding the submission of a letter and brief to the court. | The Court | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Berke is being cross-examined about their duties as an attorney and officer of th... | Courtroom or deposition set... | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her ethical obligations and knowledge of potential juro... | Court | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017960.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning attorney establishes the witness's expertise in neuropsychology, confirms they are not a toxicologist, and begins to probe the relationship between memory and delayed disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00017910.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, filed on August 10, 2022, as part of a legal case. Dr. Rocchio, an expert, testifies that childhood sexual abuse is typically committed through grooming and coercion by individuals known to the child, rather than physical force by strangers. The testimony defines 'grooming' as deceptive tactics used by perpetrators to engage a child in sexual abuse and discusses its recognition within the psychological community.
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the methodology of a study or article, specifically the demographic characteristics of the "experts" and professionals involved, and challenges the response rate of the data collection, which the questioner labels a "dropout rate."
DOJ-OGR-00014899.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on establishing Rocchio's expertise, specifically their extensive experience as a peer reviewer for academic publications. Rocchio states they are on the editorial board for the journal of the Division of Trauma Psychology and also serve as a guest reviewer for other journals related to psychological injury and law.
DOJ-OGR-00020896.jpg
This document is a transcript of a voir dire or deposition from February 28, 2023, where an attorney questions a potential juror about an inaccurate answer on their questionnaire. The juror admits to mistakenly checking 'no' when asked if a family member had ever been accused of a crime, explaining that their stepbrother had been. The juror attributes the error to being distracted, unfocused due to a recent breakup, and skimming the form too quickly, calling it an 'inadvertent mistake' and 'one of the biggest mistakes' of their life.
DOJ-OGR-00019016.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts were passengers together on two flights on April 9, 2001, traveling from Palm Beach to Atlantic City, and then to Teterboro. It also documents a subsequent flight on April 11, 2001, from Teterboro to St. Thomas.
DOJ-OGR-00018567.jpg
This document is a segment of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing testimony under cross-examination regarding the execution of warrants. The testimony confirms that first and second warrants were executed on July 6th and July 7th, 2019, respectively, with specific times provided for the initial search on July 6th and the conclusion of the search on July 7th, also mentioning a later visit on July 11th to collect CDs.
DOJ-OGR-00018445.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on establishing a timeline, suggesting that Kate's contact with an unnamed male ended around 2012 or earlier. This cessation of contact coincided with her becoming a mother and her employment at a facility she ran for women recovering from substance use and trauma.
DOJ-OGR-00018413.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, focusing on her ambition and statements she made in a 2004 interview about her intense focus on her modeling career.
DOJ-OGR-00030569.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing an interview about an individual's travels with an unnamed male. The interviewee states she visited his private Caribbean island and London home as a vacationing guest, not as an employee. She also recounts attending a peculiar symposium in Santa Fe, New Mexico, about cleaning homes, which she describes as "stupid."
DOJ-OGR-00019099.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding the residences of an unnamed male individual in New York City. The testimony establishes that the individual lived on 69th Street around 1991, when he hired the witness, and later moved to a townhouse at 9 East 71st Street in 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00016664.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Loftus. The questioning centers on a 1995 research paper by Loftus, which involved an experiment to implant a false memory into participants. The experiment presented subjects with three true childhood stories, obtained from their parents or siblings, and one fabricated story about being lost in a shopping mall.
DOJ-OGR-00016611.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus, who holds a doctorate in psychology, explains how memory retrieval can be influenced by suggestive pressures, citing examples from law enforcement interviews and psychotherapy. She also clarifies for the jury that she is not a practicing therapist and does not conduct therapy, although she does study patients.
DOJ-OGR-00016579.jpg
This court transcript details a direct examination of a witness from the travel agency Shoppers Travel. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein's office was a customer for whom they booked flights and other travel. The testimony also reveals that in 2016, the witness was asked to generate a report from their QuickBooks system related to Epstein's office records.
DOJ-OGR-00013723.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a witness, A. Farmer, is being cross-examined. The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of a potential trip by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to a ranch in New Mexico in April 1996. The witness denies knowledge of a flight log and has limited memory of staff present at the ranch, such as a chef, and is being shown a 2006 document to refresh their memory.
DOJ-OGR-00013441.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about various aircraft owned by an unnamed male individual, confirming the purchase of a Boeing 727 in January 2001. The testimony also details the use of a smaller Cessna for flights between a ranch, Palm Beach, Florida, and St. Thomas.
DOJ-OGR-00010232.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It captures the questioning of a witness about their answers on a jury selection questionnaire. The examiner probes whether the witness, who has a history of sexual abuse, intentionally provided inaccurate answers to get selected for the jury, which the witness denies. The witness also recounts the timeline of being summoned for jury duty and filling out the questionnaire on November 4th.
DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a potential juror regarding their answers on a juror questionnaire. The individual clarifies that their experience with sexual abuse was not what they considered when answering about being a victim of a crime, stating they no longer identify as a victim and can serve as a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg
This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.
DOJ-OGR-00009362.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. Brune explains the reasoning behind filing a legal brief, noting that other lawyers on the case were surprised by their findings. The questioning focuses on a July 22nd phone call and Brune's anticipation that the government would raise a "waiver issue," for which Brune planned to answer truthfully.
DOJ-OGR-00033101.jpg
This document is a page from a 2017 deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. The witness denies being involuntarily sent to a juvenile facility but admits to lying to her father about visiting 'Epstein's house,' claiming she was going shopping instead. She confirms that she had previously admitted this lie to the police.
DOJ-OGR-00033067.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness is questioned about their contact with Steven Lavelle, stating they no longer speak. The witness denies knowing two redacted female individuals by name but suggests they could identify them from photos, and also denies any knowledge of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury.
DOJ-OGR-00033060.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.
DOJ-OGR-00032993.jpg
This document is page 5 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. In this section, the deponent affirms they are fit to testify, states they are living with their aunt and uncle but cannot recall the address, and is questioned about a contempt motion filed by their mother. The transcript was prepared by Censor & Associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029075.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a Q&A session featuring Steve Bannon. Bannon discusses the 2008 financial crisis, the lack of accountability for bank executives, and how this fueled the Tea Party movement. A questioner named Mario Fantini asks Bannon about how to counteract the rise of the 'Identitarians' (a neo-nativist movement) in Europe. The page concludes with a pull quote noting that despite Congressional recommendations, no bank executives were indicted following the crisis.
Procedure for creating FBI Form 302 interview summaries
An unnamed questioner asks the witness, Young, about the process of taking notes during interviews and creating a 302 document. Young confirms that the 302 is an accurate summary of a witness statement, not a verbatim transcript, and that the process is collaborative with their partner, Detective Byrnes.
Witness's research funding and government consultations
An unnamed questioner asks the witness, Loftus, about fellowships or grants received for research and about any consultations with government agencies. Loftus confirms receiving support from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health, and having consulted with agencies like the DOJ, CIA, and FBI.
Witness's stay at a New York mansion
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Jane about her stays at an eight-story mansion on the Upper East Side belonging to Epstein. The questioning confirms she started staying there at age 14 and asks about the presence of a massage room and whether Ghislaine lived there.
Jane's 1994 application to Interlochen
An unnamed questioner is examining a witness named Jane about an application she submitted to Interlochen in 1994 at the age of 13. The focus is on her answer to a question about difficult musical works she had performed.
Student permanent file maintenance practices at the Profe...
A witness named Kane is questioned about the creation and maintenance of student permanent files at the Professional Children's School. Kane describes the contents of the files and explains that they are now maintained electronically in an archive, whereas they were kept as hard files until about ten years prior to the testimony.
Photographs of a house and its appearance over time
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Maguire about photographs taken of a house in July 2019. The questioning establishes that the photos do not show what the house looked like in 1994, and that the witness has no knowledge of the house's appearance prior to 2019.
Cross-examination regarding trips, feelings about New Yor...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness A. Farmer about her trips to Mexico and New York, her feelings about New York, and a journal entry she wrote about Epstein after a 'movie theater incident'.
Definitions of abuse and witness's clinical experience
A transcript of a direct examination where an unnamed questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to define 'childhood sexual abuse' and 'child', and to describe their clinical experience with patients during their graduate studies.
Accounts controlled by Jeffrey Epstein
An attorney questions witness Mr. McHugh about his testimony regarding accounts controlled by Jeffrey Epstein. The questioning covers a $5 million transfer into an account under Epstein's name in 2002 and another account under the name of Financial Trust Company, also controlled by Epstein.
Shoppers Travel's business relationship with Jeffrey Epst...
An unnamed questioner interviews a witness about Shoppers Travel's client profile for Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms Epstein's office was a customer, that they booked travel for the office, and that they were asked to generate a report from their QuickBooks system in 2016 related to the account.
Experience with high net worth clients and banking practi...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines Mr. McHugh, confirming his 30 years of experience at JP Morgan and his familiarity with the banking practices of the firm's high net worth and ultra-wealthy clients, including account opening processes and structures.
Witness's professional background and employment
An unnamed questioner interviews the witness, Rocchio, about their current employment. Rocchio states they are a Clinical Assistant Professor at Brown University School of Medicine's department of psychiatry, a position they have held since June 2020.
Origin of 'author' metadata in Microsoft Word documents
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Flatley to clarify that the 'author' field in a Microsoft Word document's properties is populated by the user who set up the software, not necessarily the person physically creating a specific document. Flatley confirms this and provides an example where the account name was 'Ghislaine' and the author name was 'gmax'.
Information contained in Government Exhibits 419 and 54
An unnamed questioner conducts a direct examination of Mr. Flatley, asking him to identify details from Government Exhibit 54. Mr. Flatley confirms the software install date was February 22, 2001, the product was Microsoft Windows 2000, and the registered organization and owner was 'Gmax'.
Logbook and manifest recording practices
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about how passengers were recorded in flight logbooks. Rodgers confirms that for frequent, recognized passengers on Epstein's planes, initials were sometimes used instead of full names to save space.
Chain of custody for evidence (CDs)
An attorney cross-examines a witness named Maguire about the location and handling of CDs found as evidence. The witness clarifies that one CD (1B26) was found in a safe during a search on the 6th and 7th, while others (1B75, 1B78) were in suitcases brought to them on July 11th.
Dr. Rocchio's graduate studies and expertise in psychology
An unnamed individual questions Dr. Rocchio about his doctoral training in clinical psychology, his specific areas of focus such as traumatic stress and forensic psychology, and his knowledge of interpersonal violence.
Signatory authority over Ghislaine Maxwell's bank account
A questioner cross-examines the witness, McHugh, about checks drawn on Ghislaine Maxwell's bank account that appear to be signed by Harry Beller, suggesting Beller had signatory authority.
Witness's interactions with Mr. Epstein
A questioner cross-examines a witness named Farmer about her visit to Mr. Epstein's house with her sister. The discussion covers conversations about college applications (UCLA, Ivy League), summer travel, and Mr. Epstein gifting her tickets to 'Phantom of the Opera'.
Layout of a house
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Parkinson about the names and locations of various rooms in a house, referencing a floor plan (Exhibit 298) and a video walk-through. The witness confirms the layout but states they cannot determine who stayed in the rooms from the evidence.
Neuropsychology, toxicology, memory, and disclosure
An attorney cross-examines a witness named Rocchio, establishing the definition of neuropsychology, confirming the witness is not a toxicologist, and questioning them about the relationship between memory and delays in disclosure.
Journal entries related to a trip to New Mexico
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Farmer, establishing that the government only has photocopies of a journal, not the physical copy, and that there are no entries in the journal regarding a trip to New Mexico.
Professional affiliations
A questioner asks the witness, Loftus, to describe the professional organizations they are affiliated with. Loftus details their involvement and leadership roles in several psychological associations.
Ghislaine's knowledge of flight passengers and the Interl...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Visoski about Ghislaine's knowledge of flight passengers and then focuses on the nature of the Interlochen Summer Arts Camp in Michigan, its attendees, and whether Epstein attended it as a youth.
Ownership and registration of vehicles
A witness, Visoski, is questioned about cars (a 2008 Land Rover, a 2005 Mercedes Benz CLK, and a 2005 Jaguar X-Type) that were bought by Epstein but registered in Visoski's name. The witness confirms this, states the cars were kept at Epstein's Palm Beach residence, and acknowledges they were Epstein's cars, which Visoski and others could use.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity