Unnamed Questioner
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Maguire
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Aznaran
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kane
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of Brune regarding his professional relationship and actions as the lawyer for... | Court | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | Witness Berke is questioned about their knowledge regarding a juror's background and potential co... | Courtroom (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony (direct examination) | Ms. Brune is questioned about her ethical standards and actions as a former Assistant U.S. Attorn... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of witness Parkinson regarding the evidentiary limitations of videos and photog... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness named Edelstein is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding t... | Southern District (implied) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her ethical obligations as an officer of the court. | court | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding his firm's jury selection process. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their understanding of the voir dire (jury ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness named Kate testifies about her experience at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony/deposition | Ms. Edelstein is being questioned about the potential connection between Juror No. 1 and a suspen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Direct examination | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge of potential juror misconduct. | Court | View |
| N/A | Testimony / deposition | A colloquy where an unnamed defendant was questioned about Jeffrey Epstein's activities. The defe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Berke is cross-examined in a legal proceeding about his professional obligations ... | courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her handling of a 'significant piece of information' an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | Mr. Berke is questioned under oath about an attorney's ethical obligations regarding juror miscon... | Court | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Berke is being cross-examined about their knowledge of a juror's background. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Visoski is being questioned about their observations during flights. | court proceeding | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony/deposition | Edelstein is being questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune regarding the content of a l... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness named Alessi gives testimony under direct examination, describing the layout of Mr. Eps... | Courtroom (inferred) | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Brune regarding the decision not to research potential juror Cather... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | Direct examination of witness Brune regarding the submission of a letter and brief to the court. | The Court | View |
| N/A | Cross-examination | A witness named Berke is being cross-examined about their duties as an attorney and officer of th... | Courtroom or deposition set... | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her ethical obligations and knowledge of potential juro... | Court | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017960.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning attorney establishes the witness's expertise in neuropsychology, confirms they are not a toxicologist, and begins to probe the relationship between memory and delayed disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00017910.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, filed on August 10, 2022, as part of a legal case. Dr. Rocchio, an expert, testifies that childhood sexual abuse is typically committed through grooming and coercion by individuals known to the child, rather than physical force by strangers. The testimony defines 'grooming' as deceptive tactics used by perpetrators to engage a child in sexual abuse and discusses its recognition within the psychological community.
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the methodology of a study or article, specifically the demographic characteristics of the "experts" and professionals involved, and challenges the response rate of the data collection, which the questioner labels a "dropout rate."
DOJ-OGR-00014899.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on establishing Rocchio's expertise, specifically their extensive experience as a peer reviewer for academic publications. Rocchio states they are on the editorial board for the journal of the Division of Trauma Psychology and also serve as a guest reviewer for other journals related to psychological injury and law.
DOJ-OGR-00020896.jpg
This document is a transcript of a voir dire or deposition from February 28, 2023, where an attorney questions a potential juror about an inaccurate answer on their questionnaire. The juror admits to mistakenly checking 'no' when asked if a family member had ever been accused of a crime, explaining that their stepbrother had been. The juror attributes the error to being distracted, unfocused due to a recent breakup, and skimming the form too quickly, calling it an 'inadvertent mistake' and 'one of the biggest mistakes' of their life.
DOJ-OGR-00019016.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts were passengers together on two flights on April 9, 2001, traveling from Palm Beach to Atlantic City, and then to Teterboro. It also documents a subsequent flight on April 11, 2001, from Teterboro to St. Thomas.
DOJ-OGR-00018567.jpg
This document is a segment of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing testimony under cross-examination regarding the execution of warrants. The testimony confirms that first and second warrants were executed on July 6th and July 7th, 2019, respectively, with specific times provided for the initial search on July 6th and the conclusion of the search on July 7th, also mentioning a later visit on July 11th to collect CDs.
DOJ-OGR-00018445.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on establishing a timeline, suggesting that Kate's contact with an unnamed male ended around 2012 or earlier. This cessation of contact coincided with her becoming a mother and her employment at a facility she ran for women recovering from substance use and trauma.
DOJ-OGR-00018413.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, focusing on her ambition and statements she made in a 2004 interview about her intense focus on her modeling career.
DOJ-OGR-00030569.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing an interview about an individual's travels with an unnamed male. The interviewee states she visited his private Caribbean island and London home as a vacationing guest, not as an employee. She also recounts attending a peculiar symposium in Santa Fe, New Mexico, about cleaning homes, which she describes as "stupid."
DOJ-OGR-00019099.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding the residences of an unnamed male individual in New York City. The testimony establishes that the individual lived on 69th Street around 1991, when he hired the witness, and later moved to a townhouse at 9 East 71st Street in 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00016664.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Loftus. The questioning centers on a 1995 research paper by Loftus, which involved an experiment to implant a false memory into participants. The experiment presented subjects with three true childhood stories, obtained from their parents or siblings, and one fabricated story about being lost in a shopping mall.
DOJ-OGR-00016611.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus, who holds a doctorate in psychology, explains how memory retrieval can be influenced by suggestive pressures, citing examples from law enforcement interviews and psychotherapy. She also clarifies for the jury that she is not a practicing therapist and does not conduct therapy, although she does study patients.
DOJ-OGR-00016579.jpg
This court transcript details a direct examination of a witness from the travel agency Shoppers Travel. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein's office was a customer for whom they booked flights and other travel. The testimony also reveals that in 2016, the witness was asked to generate a report from their QuickBooks system related to Epstein's office records.
DOJ-OGR-00013723.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a witness, A. Farmer, is being cross-examined. The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of a potential trip by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to a ranch in New Mexico in April 1996. The witness denies knowledge of a flight log and has limited memory of staff present at the ranch, such as a chef, and is being shown a 2006 document to refresh their memory.
DOJ-OGR-00013441.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about various aircraft owned by an unnamed male individual, confirming the purchase of a Boeing 727 in January 2001. The testimony also details the use of a smaller Cessna for flights between a ranch, Palm Beach, Florida, and St. Thomas.
DOJ-OGR-00010232.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It captures the questioning of a witness about their answers on a jury selection questionnaire. The examiner probes whether the witness, who has a history of sexual abuse, intentionally provided inaccurate answers to get selected for the jury, which the witness denies. The witness also recounts the timeline of being summoned for jury duty and filling out the questionnaire on November 4th.
DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a potential juror regarding their answers on a juror questionnaire. The individual clarifies that their experience with sexual abuse was not what they considered when answering about being a victim of a crime, stating they no longer identify as a victim and can serve as a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg
This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.
DOJ-OGR-00009362.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. Brune explains the reasoning behind filing a legal brief, noting that other lawyers on the case were surprised by their findings. The questioning focuses on a July 22nd phone call and Brune's anticipation that the government would raise a "waiver issue," for which Brune planned to answer truthfully.
DOJ-OGR-00033101.jpg
This document is a page from a 2017 deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. The witness denies being involuntarily sent to a juvenile facility but admits to lying to her father about visiting 'Epstein's house,' claiming she was going shopping instead. She confirms that she had previously admitted this lie to the police.
DOJ-OGR-00033067.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness is questioned about their contact with Steven Lavelle, stating they no longer speak. The witness denies knowing two redacted female individuals by name but suggests they could identify them from photos, and also denies any knowledge of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury.
DOJ-OGR-00033060.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.
DOJ-OGR-00032993.jpg
This document is page 5 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. In this section, the deponent affirms they are fit to testify, states they are living with their aunt and uncle but cannot recall the address, and is questioned about a contempt motion filed by their mother. The transcript was prepared by Censor & Associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029075.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a Q&A session featuring Steve Bannon. Bannon discusses the 2008 financial crisis, the lack of accountability for bank executives, and how this fueled the Tea Party movement. A questioner named Mario Fantini asks Bannon about how to counteract the rise of the 'Identitarians' (a neo-nativist movement) in Europe. The page concludes with a pull quote noting that despite Congressional recommendations, no bank executives were indicted following the crisis.
Massages, consent, and photography by Ms. Maxwell
This is a transcript of a cross-examination where the witness (Alessi) is asked about massages, whether anyone was hurt or forced to participate, and about Ms. Maxwell taking photographs. The witness states no one complained of being forced and that Ms. Maxwell was a good, artistic photographer.
Carolyn's interactions with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein durin...
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell touched her breasts, hips, and buttocks in a massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house, telling her she had a 'great body for Mr. Epstein and his friends.' After Maxwell left, Mr. Epstein entered the room.
Personnel working on the Parma matter
An unnamed questioner asks the witness, Brune, to identify attorneys and non-attorney personnel (paralegals) who were assigned to work on the 'Parma matter'.
Peer-reviewed journals and professional presentations
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to define what a peer-reviewed journal is and what a professional presentation is. Rocchio provides a detailed explanation of the blind peer-review process for academic articles.
Cross-examination regarding studies on offender-generated...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Rocchio about the reliability of offender-generated data and the findings of studies, including one by McElvaney and Culhane, concerning who child victims disclose to first.
Experience as a peer reviewer for publications
An unnamed questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, about their experience serving as a peer reviewer for publications. Rocchio confirms they have served as a peer reviewer for several journals, including being on the editorial board for the journal of the Division of Trauma Psychology, and as a guest reviewer for others related to psychological injury and law.
Expert testimony on memory, trauma, and delayed disclosure
An unnamed questioner conducts a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, an expert witness. Dr. Rocchio explains how memory functions in victims of child sexual abuse, contrasting clear memories of the event with memories of peripheral details in cases of dissociation. The testimony establishes Dr. Rocchio's expertise in trauma psychology and touches on the concept of delayed disclosure.
Risk factors for child sexual abuse
An unnamed questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to identify factors that place children at a higher risk of sexual abuse. Rocchio responds by describing individual factors (prior victimization, marginalization, disability) and family-related factors (single-parent homes, other abuse in the home).
Supervisory roles and clinical work in Rocchio's practice
An unnamed questioner asks Rocchio about their professional practice. Rocchio describes supervising seven clinicians, providing guidance on complex cases, leading weekly meetings, and treating adult patients who have experienced traumatic stress.
Scientific analysis of offender behavior
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to describe a scientific analysis where professionals rated offender behaviors to create a model. Rocchio explains the methodology and the resulting five-stage model.
Professional expertise in clinical psychology, traumatic ...
An unnamed questioner elicits testimony from Rocchio, a clinical psychologist, about their career specializations. Rocchio discusses their focus on traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, defines childhood sexual abuse, and quantifies their experience treating victims.
Clinical experience with disclosure of sexual abuse and a...
Rocchio explains that in clinical practice and training, it is more effective to use behavioral descriptors rather than labels like 'rape' or 'abuse' when asking about traumatic experiences. This is because individuals often do not apply these labels to themselves, even if the described events occurred.
Vulnerability factors, sexual abuse, and the definition o...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines the witness, Rocchio, about the relationship between vulnerability and sexual abuse. The witness is then asked for and provides a definition of 'grooming'.
Vulnerability factors, sexual abuse, and the definition o...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines the witness, Rocchio, about the relationship between vulnerability and sexual abuse. The witness is then asked for and provides a definition of 'grooming'.
The use and definition of the term 'grooming'
An unnamed questioner asks Dr. Rocchio to respond to a passage from an article about the term 'grooming'. Dr. Rocchio critiques the passage, finding it confusing and disagreeing with the author's conclusion that grooming cannot involve prosocial or normal behaviors.
A study on the term 'predatory alienation'
An unnamed questioner is cross-examining Rocchio about a phenomenological study. The focus is on the term 'predatory alienation', which was allegedly created by an advocacy group, and the nature of the study itself (subjective vs. qualitative).
Basis for opinions on disclosure-related issues in forens...
The witness, Rocchio, is questioned about the basis for their opinions on disclosure. Rocchio states their opinions are based on scientific and clinical literature, specifically studies and surveys that establish prevalence rates for experiences like rape, sexual assault, and childhood sexual abuse.
Identification of Government Exhibit 5
An unnamed questioner asks Dr. Rocchio to identify Government Exhibit 5. Dr. Rocchio confirms he recognizes it and describes it as an article about the evolution of the word 'grooming' in the context of child sexual abuse.
Factors contributing to personal vulnerability
An unidentified questioner cross-examines witness Rocchio about whether conditions like emotional disability, personality disorder, low self-esteem, drug/alcohol abuse, and prior sexual assault would place a person in a vulnerable population. Rocchio provides cautious responses, often citing the need for further research.
Jury Questionnaire Answers
An attorney questions a potential juror about their answers on a jury questionnaire, specifically regarding questions 48A and 49B about whether a family member has been accused of a crime. The juror explains that their initial 'no' answer was an inaccurate mistake made due to distraction and skimming the question too fast.
Jury Questionnaire Answers
An attorney questions a potential juror about their answers on a jury questionnaire, specifically regarding questions 48A and 49B about whether a family member has been accused of a crime. The juror explains that their initial 'no' answer was an inaccurate mistake made due to distraction and skimming the question too fast.
Jane's 1994 application to Interlochen
An unnamed questioner is examining a witness named Jane about an application she submitted to Interlochen in 1994 at the age of 13. The focus is on her answer to a question about difficult musical works she had performed.
Student permanent file maintenance practices at the Profe...
A witness named Kane is questioned about the creation and maintenance of student permanent files at the Professional Children's School. Kane describes the contents of the files and explains that they are now maintained electronically in an archive, whereas they were kept as hard files until about ten years prior to the testimony.
Photographs of a house and its appearance over time
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Maguire about photographs taken of a house in July 2019. The questioning establishes that the photos do not show what the house looked like in 1994, and that the witness has no knowledge of the house's appearance prior to 2019.
Cross-examination regarding trips, feelings about New Yor...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness A. Farmer about her trips to Mexico and New York, her feelings about New York, and a journal entry she wrote about Epstein after a 'movie theater incident'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity