Ms. Maxwell
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
Virginia
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Unspecified |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
opponent in the Civil Litigation
|
Adversarial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the O'Neills
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judicial judge defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Grumbridge
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Judicial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
anonymous accusers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Julié
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
her counsel
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Perpetrator victim alleged |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell's Sentencing Proceeding | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding circumstantial evidence and inferences. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detention Hearing Decision | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator arrives at Jeffrey's, goes to massage room where Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell are waiting... | Jeffrey's residence, massag... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Request by Daily News to unseal documents related to Ms. Maxwell's new trial effort. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Took Minor Victim-2 to a movie | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period when alleged events took place (described as 'over 25 years ago') | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged massages of Epstein by Accuser-3 | England | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness duties regarding household preparation | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight to New Mexico | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Last bail hearing where the Court expressed concern about lack of ties. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Mr. Alessi regarding Ms. Maxwell's use of the telephone directory. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell's forthcoming motion before Judge Nathan. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding Count Four | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell visited Mar-a-Lago for potential treatment. | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acts alleged in Count Four of the Indictment (Transportation of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexu... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Trial | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transportation of Jane in interstate or foreign commerce. | Interstate/International | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sighting of Virginia Roberts | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Spa Check | Mar-a-Lago (Spa) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Three bail renewal hearings | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018016.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. An unidentified questioner asks Alessi to confirm his recollection of various pages from a booklet that was given to him by a 'Ms. Maxwell'. Alessi confirms seeing some pages but explicitly states he does not remember seeing page 45 in the booklet.
DOJ-OGR-00018011.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The questioning focuses on the witness's ability to recall the contents of specific pages (13-19) of a booklet they reportedly received from a 'Ms. Maxwell'. Alessi states they recognize some parts of the booklet but do not remember certain items on pages 16 and 19.
DOJ-OGR-00018007.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about a booklet or checklist from approximately 20-23 years prior and recounts a conversation with a 'Ms. Maxwell' in which he refused to perform the associated work. The questioning is then directed to Government Exhibit 606, a paper copy of which is provided to the witness in court.
DOJ-OGR-00018004.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi recounts a brief, five-minute visit to Ms. Maxwell's small townhome in London, which occurred while Alessi was employed by Mr. Epstein. The witness also states that Ms. Maxwell imposed numerous rules on Mr. Epstein's staff regarding presentation, dress, and forms of address.
DOJ-OGR-00018000.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Alessi recounts a trip to Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch in New Mexico around 1994-1995. Alessi states they were invited by both Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell for a supposed "symposium" to train household staff on cleaning. The witness describes traveling commercially from Florida to New Mexico for this purpose.
DOJ-OGR-00017997.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely Juan Alessi) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness describes the layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property, specifically a structure and a wall he nicknamed the 'Berlin Wall' which obstructed the view from the staff quarters to the main house. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding a question about where Ms. Maxwell slept, citing a lack of specific dates.
DOJ-OGR-00017988.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The witness describes the layout and contents of several rooms in a house, including a living room, garden room, dining room, and kitchen. Notably, the witness mentions the presence of "Ms. Maxwell's desk" in both the garden room and the dining room.
DOJ-OGR-00017983.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies that Ms. Maxwell was present with Mr. Epstein at his Palm Beach residence "95 percent of the times." The witness then identifies Government Exhibit 298 as an accurate depiction of the first floor of the residence, which is subsequently admitted into evidence by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017980.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Juan who worked for Mr. Epstein. The witness states that he primarily received instructions from Ms. Maxwell on a wide range of household duties. He also testifies that he understood Ms. Maxwell to be Mr. Epstein's girlfriend and the "lady of the house."
DOJ-OGR-00017978.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi regarding their employment at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach property. The witness describes the property's structures, including a staff house built around 1999-2000, and states that both Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell gave them instructions about their job responsibilities.
DOJ-OGR-00017860.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness, Mr. Besselsen, reads a letter from 1994 into evidence. The letter, from Interlochen's Vice President Tim Ambrose to Ghislaine Maxwell, discusses finding a lost envelope in the 'Epstein Lodge' and confirms a reservation of the lodge for 'Jeffrey's use'. The transcript establishes a connection between Ghislaine Maxwell, a 'Jeffrey' (presumably Epstein), and the Interlochen institution in 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00017834.jpg
A sidebar transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court discuss the admissibility of testimony from a witness named Matt, specifically regarding whether a female accuser had revealed abuse allegations to him prior to meeting with the government. The Judge challenges the defense's objection, noting they had previously attacked the accuser's credibility regarding her financial background (living in a pool house, losing her home), making this testimony relevant as a 'prior consistent statement.'
DOJ-OGR-00017824.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge and several attorneys (Ms. Moe, Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Rohrbach) regarding trial procedures. Key topics include clarifying testimony about Ms. Maxwell, the status of contacts with a witness named 'Jane', and confirming an agreement that victim-witnesses will not observe the trial until after both the prosecution and defense have rested their cases.
DOJ-OGR-00017776.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Jane by a lawyer, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on whether Jane's cooperation with the government was motivated by potential financial gain from civil litigation against the Estate of Epstein and Ms. Maxwell, as well as a victims' compensation fund. The transcript also captures procedural discussions between the lawyers and the Court regarding the timing of witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00017756.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on a claim Jane made against Ms. Maxwell via a 'claims program,' which resulted in an initial offer of $5 million. The witness confirms receiving the offer and a subsequent wire transfer, but suggests the amount wired was not the full $5 million.
DOJ-OGR-00017686.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys and a judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The core issue is whether questions about a $25 million settlement demand, made by the witness in a civil case, are admissible under Rule 408 to show bias, particularly as the demand was made while a related criminal case against Ms. Maxwell was pending. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues the questions are proper to show bias, while attorney Ms. Moe seeks to limit the scope of the examination.
DOJ-OGR-00015125.jpg
This legal document, dated August 6, 2025, is a declaration from the law firm HMF (represented by attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger) regarding their withdrawal as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The document confirms that Maxwell has retained new counsel, David Markus and Melissa Madrigal of Markus Moss PLLC, to handle a government motion to unseal grand jury transcripts. It also states that Maxwell consents to HMF's withdrawal and that HMF will share its case files with the new firm.
DOJ-OGR-00015112.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of victims in the Epstein/Maxwell case, respectfully requesting the Court to implement specific protective measures before unsealing grand jury materials. The requests include requiring the government to confer with victims' counsel, judicial in-camera review of the materials, and pre-release review by victims' counsel to propose redactions. The filing argues these safeguards are essential to protect the survivors' safety, privacy, and dignity from further trauma, especially given recent events concerning Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014846.jpg
This court transcript page, filed on August 22, 2022, documents a hearing for Ms. Maxwell. Her counsel, Ms. Sternheim, requests she be designated to the women's prison facility in Danbury and enrolled in the Female Integrated Treatment (FIT) program; the court agrees to recommend this to the Bureau of Prisons. Subsequently, the government's counsel, Ms. Moe, moves to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight and any underlying indictments, a motion which the court grants.
DOJ-OGR-00014845.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge (THE COURT) and an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, regarding her client Ms. Maxwell's sentence. Ms. Sternheim argues that Ms. Maxwell cannot pay a fine because a bequest she was to receive is 'unactualized,' but the Court counters that other assets exist and proceeds to formally impose the sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00014844.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a sentencing hearing filed on August 22, 2022. A judge sentences Ms. Maxwell to five years of supervised release and orders her to pay a $750,000 fine. The judge rejects the defendant's claim of inability to pay, citing her receipt of a $10 million bequest from Epstein as evidence of her financial capacity.
DOJ-OGR-00014843.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, detailing the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell. The judge, citing Ms. Maxwell's lack of remorse, imposes a sentence of 240 months (20 years) imprisonment, followed by five years of supervised release. The total sentence is composed of concurrent terms for Counts Three, Four, and Six.
DOJ-OGR-00014842.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The presiding judge rejects Maxwell's complaints about her treatment at the MDC, noting she had ample resources for legal preparation. The judge criticizes Maxwell for a pattern of dishonesty regarding finances and deflection of blame, noting that while she acknowledged the victims' suffering, she failed to accept personal responsibility.
DOJ-OGR-00014839.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on August 22, 2022, in which a judge explains the reasoning behind the sentence for Ms. Maxwell. The judge states the sentence must reflect the gravity of her offense, her pivotal role, and the harm caused, while also serving as a deterrent to others. The judge explicitly notes that Ms. Maxwell's wealth and high profile are not factors in the punishment, but rather the principle that no one is above the law.
DOJ-OGR-00014838.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 22, 2022, details testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who describes being subjected to a long cycle of sexual abuse by the defendant (identified as Ms. Maxwell) starting at age 14. The defendant exploited knowledge of Carolyn's prior abuse by her grandfather. The document also notes that this was part of a broader pattern of criminal conduct where Ms. Maxwell and Epstein victimized multiple underage girls over many years, and it commends the bravery of the witnesses who testified at trial.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Government/Victims | $0.00 | Restitution (Government is not seeking restitut... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Unspecified | $0.00 | Sale of 69 Stanhope Mews and purchase of Kinner... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $23,000,000.00 | Transfer of funds confirmed by bank statements. | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court/Government | $0.00 | Discussion regarding a court-imposed fine and M... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | the government | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine; amount not spec... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Attorney Escrow A... | $0.00 | Funds for legal services presently held in atto... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Proposed bond (amount not specified on this pag... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Escrow | $0.00 | Money currently held in escrow for legal fees. | View |
| 2020-12-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Reported assets in support of bail application. | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A (Reporting) | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Ms. Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Assets reported in support of bail application. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Deal closed for leasehold property. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Closing of the deal for property sale. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Contracts exchanged for leasehold property. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Exchange of contracts for property sale. | View |
Request for permission to share information
Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Nathan for permission to share information under seal with Judge Preska.
Request to stay unseal proceedings
Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to stay the unseal proceedings to allow her to get permission to share confidential information from a criminal case.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Something that happened between her move from a large apa...
The document references prior conversations between the witness (Rodgers) and Ms. Maxwell, which are the basis for a question from the attorney.
Detention conditions
Ms. Maxwell filed written complaints through internal prison procedures to her unit counselor, the warden, and the regional office to seek remediation for her conditions, but to no avail.
Something that happened between her move from a large apa...
The document references prior conversations between the witness (Rodgers) and Ms. Maxwell, which are the basis for a question from the attorney.
Needs/requests
Communication via beeper if she needed something
Phone Message
Telephoned. (No specific message text written)
Location tracking
Government located Maxwell by tracking her primary phone.
Legal consultation
Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.
General communication
Communication via cell phones
Household duties
Ms. Maxwell gave the witness, Juan, many instructions on how to perform his duties, including cleaning the house, serving, managing the kitchen, preparing shopping lists, and maintaining cleanliness.
Performance of duties at the residence
Ms. Maxwell provided instructions to Alessi regarding his duties at the residence, which involved tasks in various rooms and areas of the property.
Discovery Disc
Federal Express envelope containing an unreadable discovery disc, delayed by two weeks.
Legal Emails
Legal emails prematurely deleted by MDC in violation of policy.
Discovery relevant to motions
Ms. Maxwell asked the government for documents relevant to these motions, but was denied.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
In-person legal conference
Four-hour legal conference marked by restrictions on water, earbuds, and privacy.
Video conference
Monitor repositioned further away, impacting document review.
Upcoming flight information
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Upcoming flight information
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Video conference
Session reduced by 90 minutes; severe audio/video technical issues impacting confidentiality and visibility.
CorrLinks emails
Ms. Maxwell's CorrLinks emails were allegedly erased by guards.
Non-legal personal matters
Her non-legal phone calls are monitored in real time, and information from them was used by staff to confront her about a personal matter (the death of someone close to her).
Denial of request
Judge Nathan denied Ms. Maxwell's request to share information with Judge Preska.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity