Ms. Maxwell
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
68 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Client |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Client |
12
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
55 | |
|
person
Judge Preska
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Defendant victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Financial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell's Sentencing Proceeding | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding circumstantial evidence and inferences. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detention Hearing Decision | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator arrives at Jeffrey's, goes to massage room where Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell are waiting... | Jeffrey's residence, massag... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Request by Daily News to unseal documents related to Ms. Maxwell's new trial effort. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Took Minor Victim-2 to a movie | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period when alleged events took place (described as 'over 25 years ago') | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged massages of Epstein by Accuser-3 | England | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness duties regarding household preparation | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight to New Mexico | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Last bail hearing where the Court expressed concern about lack of ties. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Mr. Alessi regarding Ms. Maxwell's use of the telephone directory. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell's forthcoming motion before Judge Nathan. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding Count Four | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell visited Mar-a-Lago for potential treatment. | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acts alleged in Count Four of the Indictment (Transportation of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexu... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Trial | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transportation of Jane in interstate or foreign commerce. | Interstate/International | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sighting of Virginia Roberts | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Spa Check | Mar-a-Lago (Spa) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Three bail renewal hearings | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008581.jpg
This document is page 43 of a court filing (Instruction No. 31) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines the legal definition of 'Conspiracy' under Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, specifically regarding Counts One, Three, and Five of the indictment. The instruction explains to the jury that conspiracy is an independent offense and that Maxwell can be found guilty of conspiracy even if the substantive crimes were not actually committed.
DOJ-OGR-00008580.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, likely containing jury instructions. It outlines the criteria for finding the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, guilty as an "aider and abettor" in a criminal venture. The text specifies that if she knowingly associated with the venture and acted to make it succeed, she is guilty; otherwise, she must be found not guilty under that legal theory.
DOJ-OGR-00008578.jpg
This document is page 40 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 30 regarding 'Aiding and Abetting' for Counts Two, Four, and Six. The text explains the legal standard that allows the jury to convict Ms. Maxwell if she assisted, counseled, or induced another person to commit the charged crimes, even if she did not physically commit them herself.
DOJ-OGR-00008577.jpg
This legal document is a jury instruction from a court case, filed on December 18, 2021, concerning Ms. Maxwell. It defines the fourth element of Count Six, 'Sex Trafficking of an Individual Under the Age of 18,' specifically addressing the requirement of affecting interstate commerce. The instruction clarifies for the jury that the Government does not need to prove Ms. Maxwell intended to affect interstate commerce, only that her actions did so, even minimally, and that proof of actual travel across state lines is not required.
DOJ-OGR-00008576.jpg
This document is a jury instruction from a legal case filed on December 18, 2021, detailing the third element the prosecution must prove for a conviction on Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor. It specifies that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, must have known the victim, Carolyn, would be engaged in a commercial sex act, and clarifies that the victim's consent is not a defense if she was under 18.
DOJ-OGR-00008574.jpg
This document is a jury instruction (No. 26) from a federal criminal case, filed on December 18, 2021. It specifies the first element the government must prove for Count Six, Sex Trafficking of a Minor, which is that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, knowingly recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, or obtained a person named Carolyn.
DOJ-OGR-00008570.jpg
This legal document is a jury instruction (Instruction No. 22) from a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It specifies the third element the Government must prove for Count Four of an indictment: that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, knew the victim, referred to as 'Jane', was under seventeen years old at the time of the alleged illegal sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00008569.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 563) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines Jury Instruction No. 21 regarding Count Four: the transportation of a minor ('Jane') to engage in illegal sexual activity. The text clarifies the legal standard for intent, stating that the illegal activity must be a 'significant or motivating purpose' of the travel, though not necessarily the sole purpose, citing New York Penal Law Section 130.55.
DOJ-OGR-00008568.jpg
This document contains Jury Instruction No. 20 from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 18, 2021. It defines the first element of Count Four: Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity. The text outlines that the Government must prove Maxwell knowingly transported 'Jane' in interstate commerce, noting that personal transportation is not required if she made arrangements (like purchasing tickets), and that the victim's consent is irrelevant to the charge.
DOJ-OGR-00008564.jpg
This document is a jury instruction from a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It details the third element of Count Two, "Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity," which requires the government to prove Ms. Maxwell's intent. The instruction defines what constitutes acting "intentionally" and clarifies that the illegal activity must have been a "significant or motivating purpose" for encouraging the individual, Jane, to travel, rather than merely an incidental part of the trip.
DOJ-OGR-00008562.jpg
This document is a jury instruction from a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines the first element the government must prove against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, for Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity. The instruction defines key legal terms for the jury, including "interstate commerce" and the standard for acting "knowingly," explaining that intent can be inferred from conduct and circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00008558.jpg
This document is page 20 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 11 regarding 'Multiple Counts,' instructing the jury to consider each of the six counts separately. The text shows specific edits replacing the generic term 'Defendant' with 'Ms. Maxwell' and outlines the burden of proof required by the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00008554.jpg
This document is page 16 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains 'Instruction No. 8,' which defines the legal concept of 'Reasonable Doubt' for the jury, explaining the standards required to either convict or acquit Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00008553.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing from December 18, 2021, containing 'Instruction No. 7' for a jury in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. The instruction explains the legal principles of the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof. It explicitly states that Ms. Maxwell is presumed innocent, has pleaded not guilty, and that the Government bears the entire burden of proving her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, a burden which never shifts to the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00008533.jpg
This document is Page 77 (marked 76 internally) of a court filing dated December 17, 2021, containing Jury Instruction No. 58 for the trial of Ms. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The instruction directs jurors to determine guilt based solely on evidence and explicitly prohibits them from considering potential punishment during deliberations, noting that sentencing is the sole responsibility of the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00008524.jpg
This document is page 68 of 82 from a court filing (Document 562) dated December 17, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 49, which explicitly instructs the jury that Ms. Maxwell exercised her Constitutional right not to testify, that the burden of proof rests solely with the Government, and that no adverse inference can be drawn against her for not taking the witness stand.
DOJ-OGR-00008523.jpg
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 48) for a jury in the trial of Ms. Maxwell, filed on December 17, 2021. It provides guidance on how to handle 'Similar Act Evidence' introduced by the Government, which pertains to conduct not formally charged in the indictment. The instruction strictly limits the use of this evidence, forbidding the jury from using it to infer that Ms. Maxwell has a bad character or a propensity to commit crimes, but allowing its consideration for determining intent, knowledge, or a common scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00008517.jpg
This document is page 61 of a court filing (Document 562) from December 17, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the standard of proof, specifically warning jurors not to infer guilt based solely on association with others who committed wrongdoing or knowledge of others' wrongdoing. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00008517.
DOJ-OGR-00008516.jpg
This document is page 60 of court filing 562 (Jury Instructions) from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Instruction No. 43 regarding 'Inferences,' explaining to the jury how to logically deduce facts from evidence versus guessing. Crucially, it instructs the jury that they cannot infer Maxwell's guilt based solely on her presence at the scene of a crime or knowledge that a crime was being committed.
DOJ-OGR-00008513.jpg
This document is Instruction No. 40 regarding 'Venue' from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 17, 2021. It instructs the jury that the Government must prove, by a 'preponderance of the evidence,' that an act related to each charged crime occurred within the Southern District of New York, which includes several specified counties. The document clarifies that if the Government fails to meet this burden of proof for any specific charge, the jury must acquit the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, on that charge.
DOJ-OGR-00008508.jpg
This document is page 52 of a legal filing from December 17, 2021, in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It contains jury instructions regarding the legal definition and requirements for proving an "overt act" as part of a conspiracy. The instructions clarify that the government does not need to prove Maxwell herself committed the act, that the act does not have to be one specifically listed in the indictment, and that a conviction on certain counts cannot be based solely on the testimony of a witness named Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00008504.jpg
This legal document, page 48 of a court filing from December 17, 2021, appears to be part of jury instructions in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. It clarifies the legal standard for finding someone guilty of conspiracy, stating that the prosecution does not need to prove the defendant knew all details, all participants, or was involved from the start. The text emphasizes that as long as Ms. Maxwell was aware of the conspiracy's criminal aims and knowingly participated, even in a limited capacity, she can be held responsible for all acts of the conspiracy during her membership.
DOJ-OGR-00008496.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely jury instructions, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. It outlines the legal test for determining if the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, is guilty as an 'aider and abettor' in a criminal venture. The jury is instructed to consider whether she knowingly associated with the venture and acted to make it succeed, with a guilty verdict required for affirmative answers and a not guilty verdict for negative answers.
DOJ-OGR-00008495.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 17, 2021, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, provides jury instructions on the charge of aiding and abetting. It specifies that for the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, to be found guilty, the government must prove she willfully and knowingly took action to help another person's crime succeed. The document explicitly states that mere presence at the scene or knowledge of the crime is insufficient for a conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00008492.jpg
This document constitutes Jury Instruction No. 28 from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 17, 2021. It outlines the legal standards for 'Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor,' specifically regarding a victim named Carolyn. The instruction clarifies that consent is not a defense if the victim is under 18 and defines 'commercial sex act' broadly to include the exchange of anything of value.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Government/Victims | $0.00 | Restitution (Government is not seeking restitut... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Unspecified | $0.00 | Sale of 69 Stanhope Mews and purchase of Kinner... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $23,000,000.00 | Transfer of funds confirmed by bank statements. | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court/Government | $0.00 | Discussion regarding a court-imposed fine and M... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | the government | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine; amount not spec... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Attorney Escrow A... | $0.00 | Funds for legal services presently held in atto... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Proposed bond (amount not specified on this pag... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Escrow | $0.00 | Money currently held in escrow for legal fees. | View |
| 2020-12-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Reported assets in support of bail application. | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A (Reporting) | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Ms. Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Assets reported in support of bail application. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Deal closed for leasehold property. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Closing of the deal for property sale. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Contracts exchanged for leasehold property. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Exchange of contracts for property sale. | View |
Setting up massage appointments
Carolyn testified that Ms. Maxwell would call her to arrange massage appointments, which was considered important evidence for sex trafficking charges.
Legal matters
The document alleges that all of Ms. Maxwell's legal emails were erased from the CorrLinks system.
Denial of request
Judge Nathan denied Ms. Maxwell's request to share information with Judge Preska.
Events in Ms. Maxwell's life, including her father's deat...
The transcript details a court examination where the witness, Rodgers, is asked about conversations they had with Ms. Maxwell regarding when she moved between various apartments and a townhouse after her father's death.
Denial of stay
Judge Preska denied Ms. Maxwell's request for a stay, stating there was no factual basis.
Request for permission to share information
Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Nathan for permission to share information under seal with Judge Preska.
Legal Emails
Legal emails prematurely deleted by MDC in violation of policy.
Video conference
Monitor repositioned further away, impacting document review.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Request to stay unseal proceedings
Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to stay the unseal proceedings to allow her to get permission to share confidential information from a criminal case.
Video conference
Session reduced by 90 minutes; severe audio/video technical issues impacting confidentiality and visibility.
Upcoming flight information
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Upcoming flight information
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Discovery Disc
Federal Express envelope containing an unreadable discovery disc, delayed by two weeks.
CorrLinks emails
Ms. Maxwell's CorrLinks emails were allegedly erased by guards.
Non-legal personal matters
Her non-legal phone calls are monitored in real time, and information from them was used by staff to confront her about a personal matter (the death of someone close to her).
Legal consultation
Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.
Performance of duties at the residence
Ms. Maxwell provided instructions to Alessi regarding his duties at the residence, which involved tasks in various rooms and areas of the property.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Household duties
Ms. Maxwell gave the witness, Juan, many instructions on how to perform his duties, including cleaning the house, serving, managing the kitchen, preparing shopping lists, and maintaining cleanliness.
Detention conditions
Ms. Maxwell filed written complaints through internal prison procedures to her unit counselor, the warden, and the regional office to seek remediation for her conditions, but to no avail.
In-person legal conference
Four-hour legal conference marked by restrictions on water, earbuds, and privacy.
Something that happened between her move from a large apa...
The document references prior conversations between the witness (Rodgers) and Ms. Maxwell, which are the basis for a question from the attorney.
Something that happened between her move from a large apa...
The document references prior conversations between the witness (Rodgers) and Ms. Maxwell, which are the basis for a question from the attorney.
Needing something
Early on, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness by beeper if she needed something.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity