Trove
Sign In Sign Up

THE COURT

Person
Mentions
4828
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2363
Also known as:
THE COURT, MR. DONALDSON
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00018065.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, filed Aug 10, 2022) detailing a sidebar conversation during the direct examination of witness Alessi (likely Juan Alessi). The prosecutor, Ms. Comey, and the Judge discuss the admissibility of Alessi reading from an exhibit not in evidence; Alessi claims the document is a 'later version' because his name and his wife's name are missing from it.

Court transcript (sidebar conference)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018063.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on authenticating 'Government Exhibit 52,' a directory containing the date range 2004-2005, which Alessi identifies as a later version of a directory he saw while working for Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor also attempts to ask Alessi if Sarah Kellen's name appears in the exhibit, though the Court interrupts to sustain an objection regarding authentication foundation.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018062.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. An attorney, Ms. Comey, questions Alessi about whether his name, his wife's name, or Sarah Kellen's name appears in a specific book or binder. Another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning as leading, which the court sustains before permitting a rephrased version of the question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018060.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of witness Juan Alessi by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The Judge sustains a defense objection regarding a lack of foundation for Alessi's claim that an object was a 'later version of the book,' instructs the jury to disregard that statement, and allows the examination to proceed regarding a 'booklet.'

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018059.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca. The conversation centers on a foundational objection to an exhibit, specifically a book. The judge recounts the testimony of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who claimed the book in question is a later, thinner version of one he saw while employed by Mr. Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018058.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. The conversation centers on whether to admit an exhibit into evidence immediately or reserve it for a later time. Ms. Comey gives contradictory answers, first agreeing to reserve and then stating she wants to admit it now, which she explains by saying she misunderstood the judge's question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018057.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed August 10, 2022) during the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. A procedural discussion occurs between the Judge (The Court), Defense Attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding an objection to the foundation of the witness's knowledge about a specific 'book' created after the witness left employment in 2002. The Court decides to allow the question provisionally, noting the testimony will be stricken if proper foundation is not established.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018056.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange between the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Comey, where they agree that a witness is not needed to verify copies. The judge then announces a short recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018055.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the admission of Exhibit 52 (and sub-exhibits A, D, E, F, G, H) in redacted form. The header indicates this occurred during the direct examination of witness Alessi.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the presiding judge. The parties agree on a method for admitting exhibit 52 into evidence, deciding to use a redacted version consisting of specific pages (52A, D, E, F, G, H) for the jury. The agreement clarifies that the exhibit will be authenticated and admitted in this limited form.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018053.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between two attorneys, Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey, in front of a judge. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the method of having a witness compare a copy of a document to a book, arguing about the lack of foundation for the evidence. The judge finds the objection reasonable and instructs Ms. Comey to address the procedural issue.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018052.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and attorneys (Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca) about the witness having compared Government Exhibits 52A and 52 before taking the stand. Ms. Comey describes this as 'homework' to confirm the documents were copies, a practice the judge acknowledges.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018051.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey, regarding the identification of Government Exhibit 52A as a copy of a page from Government Exhibit 52. The exchange includes a legal objection for 'lack of foundation' by another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and a discussion with the judge to clarify the nature of the exhibits.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018050.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about a book, which he identifies as a later, thinner version of a previous one, and notes that his name, which was listed in connection with a house in Palm Beach, is absent. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning but is overruled by the court before the proceedings turn to a sealed government exhibit.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018049.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is being questioned about a book he saw while working for a 'Mr. Epstein' and confirms that a version he recently reviewed is a later version, printed after he left his employment. The transcript also records objections from an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and rulings from the court.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018047.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Ms. Comey presents Government Exhibit 52, which Mr. Alessi identifies as a directory belonging to Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms he had reviewed the directory the previous night.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018031.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness confirms seeing two underage females at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence; one is referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane' to protect her identity, and the witness explicitly identifies the second female as Virginia Roberts.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018019.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who is being questioned about his knowledge of an 'Exhibit 606' and confirms that he threw away a document he received after leaving a position in 2002. The transcript includes objections from an attorney, Ms. Comey, and rulings from the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018015.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The dialogue focuses on a procedural confusion regarding an exhibit where the pages are out of numerical order (jumping from page 42 to 49, then 50, 51, and back to 43). Ms. Comey is the attorney questioning the witness, with the Judge (The Court) intervening to clarify the document structure.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018009.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who is being asked to identify portions of a multi-page list he recognizes. After an objection for a leading question is sustained by the court, Mr. Alessi confirms that he recognizes the entire contents of pages 1, 2, and 3 of the document in question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018008.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Alessi identifies a 58-page exhibit as a booklet of instructions he was required to follow to maintain 'the house' during his employment with Mr. Epstein.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018002.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Alessi details Jeffrey Epstein's various properties, including Zorro Ranch, Little St. James (referred to as 'Little St. Jeff'), a New York home, a Paris home, and a home in Columbus, Ohio. Alessi also describes flying once with Ghislaine Maxwell to Miami on Epstein's first plane, identified as a Hawker.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017999.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Alessi is being questioned by Ms. Comey regarding their 12-year employment with Mr. Epstein. Alessi testifies to seeing female guests (estimated to be in their twenties) hundreds of times, noting that they were topless by the pool approximately 75-80% of the time.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017998.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript involving the direct examination of a witness named Alessi by Ms. Comey. Alessi testifies that while working for Epstein in Palm Beach between 1991 and 2002, Ghislaine Maxwell slept in Epstein's master bedroom and had a desk in the garden room. The witness also confirms observing 'many, many, many females' visiting the residence, and the questioning ends just as the witness is asked about the age of these females.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017995.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Alessi by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on identifying the layout of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach property, specifically describing the 'cabana' or 'pool house' where Epstein's desk, a couch, and stereo equipment were located. Government's Exhibit 299 (GX-299), a depiction of the property layout, was admitted into evidence without objection from the defense.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$162,555,000.00
16 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$162,555,000.00
16 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $9,500,000.00 Value of real property offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received security company THE COURT $1,000,000.00 Bond co-signed by a security company. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $550,000.00 Cash offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... THE COURT $28,500,000.00 Proposed total bond amount. View
2020-12-14 Received Sureties (Family/... THE COURT $0.00 Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... View
2020-07-13 Received Unidentified co-s... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... View
2020-07-10 Received Defense/Co-signers THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. View
2020-07-10 Received Ms. Maxwell / Ass... THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... View
2020-01-01 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $22,500,000.00 Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... View
2019-07-18 Received MR. EPSTEIN THE COURT $0.00 Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... View
2019-07-11 Received Jeffrey Epstein THE COURT $77,000,000.00 Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... View
2010-07-01 Received Epstein's counsel THE COURT $5,000.00 Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. View
As Sender
409
As Recipient
1009
Total
1418

Flight Risk Argument

From: Government officials
To: THE COURT

Argument that Epstein could earn millions abroad from a computer terminal beyond extradition reach.

Legal filing (dkt. 11)
N/A
Communication Source

Status of deliberations

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Deliberations are moving along, making progress, request to end at 5:00 p.m. and continue tomorrow at 9:00 a.m.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed motion for bail

From: Defendant (Maxwell)
To: THE COURT

Referenced as 'Def. Mot. at 7-9'

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to unseal

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Claimed Maxwell grand jury materials contained significant undisclosed information.

Motion
N/A
Communication Source

Order to provide materials

From: THE COURT
To: the government

Ordered submission of grand jury transcripts and exhibits for in camera review.

Order
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Instructions

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Request regarding instructions for jurors opening binders.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Clarification on how nonsealed exhibits will be shown (on screen).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether personnel forms constitute hearsay or business records.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Question 25

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 gave a negative response to the question whether he or relatives or close friends have been the victim of a crime.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Proposal

From: Defense counsel
To: THE COURT

Discussion about when a letter regarding a proposal would be submitted.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Fifth Amendment Invocation

From: witness
To: THE COURT

A witness wrote to the Court stating they planned to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights.

Written correspondence
N/A
Communication Source

Welcome and Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: Jury

Judge welcomes jurors, apologizes for delay, has them sworn in, and explains opening statements.

Court speech
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification on Count Four

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Asked if conviction on Count Four was possible if Maxwell assisted with Jane's return trip but not the flight to NM, and regarding intent for sexual activity in NM.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Question

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Question regarding evidence/procedure; Judge answers 'Yes, you may consider it.'

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Dismissal and Timing

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Regarding dismissal at 5 p.m. and timing for the next day.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Mask Mandate

From: chief judge
To: THE COURT

Reminder to wear masks at all times due to the variant.

Reminder
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Br. at 53

From: the defendant
To: THE COURT

Argument that disclosure will color Juror 50's testimony.

Brief
N/A
Communication Source

Gov. Br. at 42

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Argument that there is no legitimate interest in limiting access.

Brief
N/A
Communication Source

Immunity and Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

The Court explains the immunity order, the requirement to testify truthfully, and instructs the juror not to discuss jury deliberations.

Court examination
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Objections

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the scheduling of arguments concerning offense level calculations and financial penalties.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Submission of letter

From: Ms. Trzaskoma
To: THE COURT

Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it appropriate, we can submit a letter

Statement
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Defense Team (implied)
To: THE COURT

A letter submitted to the court that Ms. Brune says they 'worked very hard to submit... that was accurate.'

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Transportation/Instructions

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

A note from the jury regarding transportation, aiding and abetting, and intent regarding sexual activity.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Details regarding any material changes to confinement conditions, specifically access to legal materials and defense counsel.

Order for written status updates
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibit 52 issue

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Briefing received by the court at 9:45.

Briefing
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search