CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020930.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) filed on March 9, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The juror confirms they have no personal or familial relationships with the defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document contains handwritten 'X' marks indicating negative responses to questions regarding potential conflicts of interest.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020720.jpg
This court docket page from the SDNY details proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between April and June 2022. Key entries include an April 29 opinion where Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion for acquittal but granted a motion regarding 'multiplicity,' resulting in convictions being consolidated into Counts Three, Four, and Six. The document explicitly links Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein as a 'continuous coconspirator' in grooming and abusing underage girls. It also documents scheduling for her sentencing on June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse.
DOJ-OGR-00020713.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 11 and February 24, 2022. It details motions for a new trial filed by the defense, communications regarding redactions to protect juror anonymity (specifically Juror 50), and the granting of an amicus curiae brief. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (USA), the defense team (Sternheim, Everdell), and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020708.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log detailing proceedings in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 27, 2021, and January 5, 2022. It records the conclusion of the jury trial, the guilty verdict on multiple counts, and subsequent orders regarding post-trial motions and scheduling. Additionally, it notes correspondence regarding juror issues and a request for a vaccine booster for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020707.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 19, 2021, to December 22, 2021. It details various motions, orders regarding public access to trial exhibits and closing arguments, and minute entries for the jury trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020706.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 17 and 19, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding jury charges and verdict sheets, and various letters filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning jury instructions, testimony preclusion (specifically regarding Alexander Hamilton), and closing logistics. The document highlights specific judicial edits to legal definitions, such as defining a 'minor' as an individual under the age of 18.
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020704.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings between December 11 and December 15, 2021. It details various filings including letters regarding witness orders, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as a significant Memorandum Opinion denying a defense motion to allow witnesses to testify anonymously. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense, along with Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings during this trial period.
DOJ-OGR-00020703.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00020702.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 6 to December 8, 2021. It details minute entries for the jury trial proceedings, identifying the attorneys present for both the defense (Sternheim, Pagliuca, Everdell, Menninger) and the prosecution (Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, Rohrbach). The document also includes an order regarding the reimbursement of transportation costs for Juror Number 70 and notes the filing of a transcript for a conference held on November 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020701.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 2, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding witness anonymity and juror transportation, and various correspondence regarding witnesses 'Jane', 'Michael Dawson', and 'Witness-3'. The document tracks the legal motions and daily trial activities involving the prosecution team, defense team, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020700.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the SDNY regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events on November 29 and 30, 2021. It details the beginning of the jury trial, orders regarding the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and the handling of witness privacy and pseudonyms. It lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020692.jpg
This document is a court docket report (SDNY) covering November 15-17, 2021, detailing pretrial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the filing of transcripts for prior conferences, a memo endorsement ordering the government to use FedEx for disclosures due to mail delays at the MDC, and minute entries for a pretrial conference, voir dire, and the beginning of jury selection. The document lists the full legal teams for both the defense and the prosecution present during these proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020687.jpg
This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020682.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 1-3, 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present and remanded, as well as various filings including motions for reconsideration regarding bond and juror disclosure. The Judge also issued orders regarding voir dire instructions and scheduled a hearing for November 10, 2021, to discuss evidentiary rules (Rule 412 and 702/Daubert).
DOJ-OGR-00020680.jpg
This document is a court docket from October 29, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing numerous pre-trial motions in limine filed by her defense team. The motions aim to exclude various forms of evidence, including testimony about an alleged flight, items from a 2005 search, and any mention of an alleged 'Rape' by Jeffrey Epstein. The docket also records the prosecution's (USA) formal opposition to these motions, illustrating the legal strategies employed by both sides before the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020677.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the SDNY regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell appeared via telephone and sets forth a comprehensive order regarding jury selection protocols, including the use of questionnaires, anonymized juror numbers, and schedules for voir dire in November 2021. The Judge explicitly denied a request to seal the proposed jury questionnaires, citing the First Amendment right to public access despite the case's significant media attention.
DOJ-OGR-00020673.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings and orders between late August and early October 2021. It details scheduling for jury selection and pretrial conferences, handles redaction requests regarding third-party identities, and includes a significant order requiring the government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators. The document also outlines the trial schedule, anticipating opening statements to begin on November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020666.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between May 14 and May 21, 2021. It details legal maneuvering regarding redactions to protect third parties and victims, as well as defense motions to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena and to strike surplusage from the indictment. Notably, it includes a judge's order admonishing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to ensure Maxwell's security protocols are necessary and neutral, and urging them to reduce sleep disruption.
DOJ-OGR-00020655.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 16 to April 19, 2021. It details various motions to dismiss and suppress evidence filed by Maxwell's defense team, orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting an arraignment date for April 23, 2021, and procedural orders regarding the severance of perjury counts and the handling of redacted documents. The document highlights the legal maneuvering regarding the S2 Superseding Indictment and disputes over evidence obtained via subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00020653.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 16, 2021. It lists filings including the Government's opposition to various defense motions to dismiss and suppress evidence, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing of reply briefs, and a defense reply memorandum. The document also references the underlying indictment charging Maxwell with facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg
This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020572.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) covering proceedings related to United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between March 10, 2022, and April 1, 2022. It details various motions including a Motion for New Trial filed by the defense, the government's opposition, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions to protect juror anonymity. The document also lists legal team members for both sides and references transcripts and sealed documents.
RE: Discovery Requests
Government response to defense concerns regarding discovery hard drives, metadata, flight log pages, and unsealed warrants.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 points raised by defense regarding discovery, including hard drives, metadata, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 discovery points raised by defense, including hard drive access, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and metadata issues.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to defense's Jan 7 letter. Addresses 4TB drive, metadata, FBI report redactions, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Bill of Particulars Request
Counsel, Please see attached. Best, [Redacted]
Discovery Requests
Letter outlining 9 specific discovery issues/deficiencies including missing flight logs pages, unreadable CDs at MDC, and request for unredacted FBI reports.
Discovery Requests
Initial lengthy email raising 9 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight log pages, unredacted FBI reports, and Daily Beast article concerns.
Discovery Requests
Detailed letter listing 8 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight logs, metadata gaps, and questions about a Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Defense request for status of hard drives for Maxwell, unredacted FBI reports, missing flight log pages (Rodgers), and clarification on Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Formal letter raising 8 discovery issues + 1 media issue. Key points: Hard drive delays preventing Maxwell's defense prep, unredacted FBI report request, missing Rodgers flight logs (pages 1-27), metadata gaps, and inquiry about unsealed affidavit.
Redactions
Stating that after reviewing Judge Nathan's order denying bail, they do not believe redactions are necessary and requesting the prosecution write the joint letter.
RE: Redactions
Agreement to write a joint letter to the Court conveying the parties' position regarding redactions.
RE: Redactions
Email header information regarding redactions. The body is an embedded message labeled 'RE: _Redactions.msg'.
Bill of Particulars Request
I hope you all had a good holiday. Please see attached a request for a Bill of Particulars.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of sealed documents including a cover letter, reply memorandum (redacted and unredacted), and exhibits A-B pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of accompanying exhibits O-X (unredacted) to the Court and counsel under seal pursuant to Court order (Dkt. 89).
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of redacted exhibits O-P, S, and W-X under seal pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of a renewed bail motion and exhibits to be filed under seal in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Letter re: Briefing Schedule
Attached is a draft of the letter to Judge Nathan regarding the briefing schedule. Unless you have any comments, we will send it to the judge in the next hour or so.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
AUSA explains drive sizing and confirms consolidation of CD images (Epstein's iPhone) and hard drive documents onto a single new drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense complains about broken/missing hard drives, the 'patchwork' of drives, and the restricted access hours (7 hours vs 13 hours) at MDC.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense asks about drive size and questions why a CD was used alongside a hard drive, noting the laptop lacks a disk drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Informs that 'Your drive' is ready for pickup at 1 St. Andrews, and Ms. Maxwell's drive has been sent to the MDC. Attached a letter.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Email header information regarding discovery production in the US v. Maxwell case. The body content is embedded as an attachment and not visible on this page.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Confirms receipt of drives, states they are being loaded, and will update when 'yours' is ready for pickup and client's sent to MDC. Mentions agents will plan for Friday from 8am to 3pm.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity