CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
EFTA00016203.pdf
An email dated November 3, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a redacted recipient, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330), specifically attaching a document regarding the disclosure of juror names.
EFTA00015968.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 17, 2020, between defense counsel (Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger) and government prosecutors regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' in attachments). The defense provides a proposed Protective Order and argues for specific terms, including the removal of a 'Highly Confidential' designation and the provision of a laptop to Maxwell in the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) so she can review discovery materials, as in-person legal visits were not allowed at the time. The email emphasizes the defense's desire to avoid trying the case in the press and cites concerns about witness harassment.
EFTA00015911.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi Sternheim to redacted officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at MDC. The email requests permission for Maxwell to use a laptop for reviewing discovery due to technical limitations of MDC computers and outlines several grievances, including invasive surveillance, freezing cell conditions, removal of bedding, excessive searches, and failure to deliver mail.
EFTA00015898.pdf
This document is an email metadata printout dated December 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The email is copied to other defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark S. Cohen) and a representative from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line references Ghislaine Maxwell and her Bureau of Prisons register number (02879-509).
EFTA00015882.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 29, 2020, with the subject line 'RE: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509'. The email appears to be sent from a government source (indicated by the 'USAHUB' Bcc) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, specifically Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, and Mark Cohen. The document contains technical metadata including message IDs but no body text.
EFTA00015823.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 16 evidence discs labeled as 'Epstein Encase Files.' The government identified these discs as containing a forensic image of a computer seized from Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2005. However, the government concluded that the original warrant authorized seizure but not the search of the computer's contents, and thus they lack the lawful authority to review the files or allow the defense to access them.
EFTA00015770.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence details negotiations over the location of the review (500 Pearl St vs. FBI Bronx Warehouse), the transportation of specific physical evidence (including excluding 'bulky' massage tables and cash), and protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' and 'obscene' electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The defense expresses concerns about missing items, the format of electronic surveillance, and the need for their client to meaningfully participate in the review.
EFTA00015753.pdf
This document contains a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Menninger, Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for case 20 Cr. 330. The discussions focus on scheduling physical evidence reviews at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx and electronic evidence reviews at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Key evidence items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts, cash, shredded paper, and thousands of 'highly confidential' nude or partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences.
EFTA00015636.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding discovery disputes. Key issues include the logistics of providing electronic discovery to Maxwell in prison (MDC) because she cannot use disks, missing email attachments, and metadata discrepancies for thousands of files and photos recovered from Epstein's devices and residences. The prosecution explains that 'carved' or deleted files lack original metadata and that certain photos came from seized CDs rather than devices processed by the FBI's CART unit.
EFTA00015185.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00014710.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.
EFTA00014699.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.
EFTA00014695.pdf
An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The email discusses the procedure for filing redacted versions of legal documents related to birth certificates, exhibit GX-52, and a motion to quash, referencing Docket Numbers 473, 474, and 476. The sender proposes a sequence for filing cover letters and redacted motions to the Court.
EFTA00014669.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
EFTA00014661.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.
EFTA00014650.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 20, 2021, accompanying a production of discovery materials. The production includes Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as statements from individuals the government does not currently plan to call. The letter also clarifies labeling protocols for confidential documents under the Protective Order to avoid confusion with classified material.
EFTA00014647.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between defense attorney Christian Everdell and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY. They are negotiating the specific wording of a legal stipulation regarding a partial transcript of a witness's trial testimony given on a February 26th. The names of several other attorneys (Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca) appear in the CC line.
EFTA00014585.pdf
An email chain originating from Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP on October 1, 2020, forwarding a 'Letter to Government re Discovery' to redacted recipients. A subsequent email on October 2, 2020, asks the recipients if they have time to discuss the attached letter. The document relates to legal proceedings, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case given Everdell's involvement, specifically regarding discovery issues with the government.
EFTA00013302.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 30, 2020, between Assistant US Attorney Maurene (Comey) and defense attorney Christian Everdell, with other legal team members CC'd. The correspondence concerns a recent order by Judge Nathan denying bail; the defense states they believe no redactions are necessary for the opinion, and the prosecution agrees, attaching a draft joint letter to the Court to convey this position. The document is marked with Bates stamp EFTA00013302.
EFTA00013277.pdf
This document is an email chain initiated by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, addressed to prison officials (MDC) and forwarded to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Sternheim alleges that Maxwell was physically mistreated during a body search, specifically claiming a guard groped her breast, while another threatened her with assault charges. The letter explicitly links the BOP's handling of Maxwell to the negligence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in the MCC.
EFTA00011417.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2020 involving the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, Laura Menninger, etc.). The email circulates a PDF attachment titled 'Letter to Government re Rule 16 and Brady Requests,' indicating legal maneuvering regarding evidence disclosure and discovery requests in a federal case.
EFTA00011266.pdf
An email dated February 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorney Christian Everdell regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The prosecutor informs the defense that additional discovery is ready and requests an FTP link to transmit the files.
EFTA00011259.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties providing Maxwell with discovery materials at the MDC (CDs vs. Hard Drives), a request for an unredacted 2006 FBI report found on Epstein's devices, and missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (specifically pages 1-27). The defense also questions the government about a Daily Beast article referencing a 'newly unsealed' affidavit regarding a cell-site simulator used to track Maxwell.
EFTA00011179.pdf
This document is an email dated December 8, 2020, from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of unredacted exhibits O through X, related to a Renewed Bail Motion in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The documents were filed under seal pursuant to a court order.
EFTA00011167.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan, dated December 8, 2020. It serves as a transmittal for filing a Renewed Bail Motion and several redacted exhibits (O-P, S, W-X) under seal in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email copies other members of the defense team including Mark Cohen, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger, as well as representatives from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USANYS).
RE: Discovery Requests
Government response to defense concerns regarding discovery hard drives, metadata, flight log pages, and unsealed warrants.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 points raised by defense regarding discovery, including hard drives, metadata, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to defense's Jan 7 letter. Addresses 4TB drive, metadata, FBI report redactions, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 discovery points raised by defense, including hard drive access, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and metadata issues.
RE: Bill of Particulars Request
Counsel, Please see attached. Best, [Redacted]
Discovery Requests
Letter outlining 9 specific discovery issues/deficiencies including missing flight logs pages, unreadable CDs at MDC, and request for unredacted FBI reports.
Discovery Requests
Detailed letter listing 8 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight logs, metadata gaps, and questions about a Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Defense request for status of hard drives for Maxwell, unredacted FBI reports, missing flight log pages (Rodgers), and clarification on Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Initial lengthy email raising 9 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight log pages, unredacted FBI reports, and Daily Beast article concerns.
Discovery Requests
Formal letter raising 8 discovery issues + 1 media issue. Key points: Hard drive delays preventing Maxwell's defense prep, unredacted FBI report request, missing Rodgers flight logs (pages 1-27), metadata gaps, and inquiry about unsealed affidavit.
RE: Redactions
Email header information regarding redactions. The body is an embedded message labeled 'RE: _Redactions.msg'.
Redactions
Stating that after reviewing Judge Nathan's order denying bail, they do not believe redactions are necessary and requesting the prosecution write the joint letter.
RE: Redactions
Agreement to write a joint letter to the Court conveying the parties' position regarding redactions.
Bill of Particulars Request
I hope you all had a good holiday. Please see attached a request for a Bill of Particulars.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of sealed documents including a cover letter, reply memorandum (redacted and unredacted), and exhibits A-B pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of accompanying exhibits O-X (unredacted) to the Court and counsel under seal pursuant to Court order (Dkt. 89).
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of a renewed bail motion and exhibits to be filed under seal in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of redacted exhibits O-P, S, and W-X under seal pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
Letter re: Briefing Schedule
Attached is a draft of the letter to Judge Nathan regarding the briefing schedule. Unless you have any comments, we will send it to the judge in the next hour or so.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
AUSA explains drive sizing and confirms consolidation of CD images (Epstein's iPhone) and hard drive documents onto a single new drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense complains about broken/missing hard drives, the 'patchwork' of drives, and the restricted access hours (7 hours vs 13 hours) at MDC.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense asks about drive size and questions why a CD was used alongside a hard drive, noting the laptop lacks a disk drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Informs that 'Your drive' is ready for pickup at 1 St. Andrews, and Ms. Maxwell's drive has been sent to the MDC. Attached a letter.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Email header information regarding discovery production in the US v. Maxwell case. The body content is embedded as an attachment and not visible on this page.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Confirms receipt of drives, states they are being loaded, and will update when 'yours' is ready for pickup and client's sent to MDC. Mentions agents will plan for Friday from 8am to 3pm.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity