CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
EFTA00011133.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 13, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The Government asserts that Maxwell has waived her right to use an insanity or mental condition defense (Rule 12.2) because she failed to provide notice by the pretrial motion deadlines in early 2021. The letter demands that if the defense intends to use such evidence despite the waiver, they must provide notice by October 20, 2021.
EFTA00011132.pdf
This document is an email dated October 13, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger). The email serves to transmit an attached letter regarding a '12.2 Notice,' which refers to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2 concerning notice of an insanity defense or expert evidence of a mental condition. The filename of the attachment includes 'GM,' likely referring to Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00010410.pdf
This document contains an email chain between defense attorney Christian Everdell and US Attorney's Office prosecutors (Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, et al.) dated June 30, 2021, regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that the defense has no redactions to propose regarding a court opinion and coordinates the filing of a joint letter to the court. The document also includes the official Notice of Electronic Filing (Order 305) from Judge Alison J. Nathan, which set the deadlines for these redaction proposals.
EFTA00010180.pdf
A discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 11, 2021. The letter details the production of 'Amazon records' (Bates SDNY_GM_02771981-02771983) which were sourced from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and potentially duplicate materials previously produced from the Florida FBI file.
EFTA00010164.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 9-10, 2021, between defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser) and prosecutors from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the coordination of three joint letters due to the court regarding the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, limiting instructions, and voir dire procedures in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The parties also discuss the logistics of exchanging four hard drives containing data, arranging a hand-off at a security tent near the courthouse.
EFTA00010162.pdf
A letter dated November 16, 2021, from US Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as materials related to individuals the government does not currently intend to call. It specifies that these materials are subject to a protective order and explains the specific labeling used to distinguish them from classified documents.
EFTA00010160.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 16, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves as a cover letter for the production of discovery materials, specifically AT&T records, phone records, and photographs, noting that these materials are subject to a protective order.
EFTA00010159.pdf
This document is an email dated November 16, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to notify the defense of an additional discovery production, including testifying and non-testifying witness materials, sent via USAfx. It also notes that a hard drive provided by the defense will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell's use.
EFTA00010133.pdf
This document is a discovery letter dated November 9, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It details the production of 'SDFL Files' (likely Southern District of Florida files) with Bates numbers SDNY_GM_02767074 through SDNY_GM_02771980. The letter notes these materials are confidential under a protective order and appear to be duplicative of previous discovery.
EFTA00010017.pdf
A discovery letter dated November 9, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of 'Business Records from SDFL Files' (Bates SDNY_GM_02767074 - 02771980), which the government notes are likely duplicative of materials previously produced from Florida FBI files in 2020. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.
EFTA00010016.pdf
An email dated November 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of an ECF filing ('Reply_to_Dkt_423.pdf') related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330) and to update recipients on Sternheim's new office address, which is redacted in the document.
EFTA00009985.pdf
An email dated November 9, 2021, from defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) providing a Rule 16 Disclosure. The email includes attachments referencing AT&T certifications, FedEx records/invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
EFTA00009980.pdf
An email dated November 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (referenced as 'fling') related to an attachment titled 'Suggestion_to_Dkt_404.pdf' and provides notice of Sternheim's new office address. Recipients include co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00009895.pdf
An email dated April 20, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves filing notice for a letter regarding redactions to the defense's reply briefs in the case US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
EFTA00009831.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell on April 13, 2021. Sternheim inquires if the recipient can persuade the Marshal to allow Maxwell access to legal materials while in the cell block, noting that Maxwell sat idle for over three hours that morning. Sternheim suggests she may seek a Court order if the issue cannot be resolved.
DOJ-OGR-00018362.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a stipulation agreed upon by the prosecution and defense regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson to avoid recalling him to the stand. Defense attorney Christian Everdell reads the stipulation into the record, which concerns a cardboard box (Government Exhibit 294) recovered during a search.
DOJ-OGR-00014878.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The judge outlines the case schedule, noting that jury selection began on November 4th and the trial is set to commence on November 29th, and sets the agenda to address the defendant's motions to exclude evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on December 17, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Judge discusses procedural matters regarding background information for the jury and addresses 'No. 6, evidence that goes to consent issues.' Attorneys Ms. Moe (Government) and Christian Everdell (Defense) are present, and the court suggests deferring the consent argument to the discussion of the Rule 412 motion due to overlapping issues.
DOJ-OGR-00008312.jpg
This document is a transcript from a final pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 10, 2021. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The court outlines the plan for jury selection, which is scheduled to conclude on "Monday morning, the 29th," and notes that unused jurors are being kept on call at the recommendation of the jury department.
DOJ-OGR-00008246.jpg
This document is a transcript from a pretrial conference held on December 8, 2021, for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the session, with legal teams for both the government (led by Maurene Comey) and the defense (led by Bobbi C. Sternheim) introducing themselves. The primary purpose of the conference is to discuss the logistics of jury selection (voir dire) and review lists of prospective jurors based on questionnaires administered in November.
DOJ-OGR-00001641.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 7 of 7) of a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, with copies sent to prosecutors at the SDNY (Moe, Rossmiller, Comey) and other defense counsel (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger).
DOJ-OGR-00001539.jpg
Page 2 of a court filing (Document 9) dated July 7, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Assistant United States Attorneys (Rossmiller, Moe, Comey) inform Judge Nathan that they have conferred with defense counsel (Everdell and Cohen), who consent to a request regarding the timeline for discovery production.
DOJ-OGR-00001498.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on July 5, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The US Attorney's office requests Judge Nathan exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for the transportation of the defendant from another district and to facilitate discussions regarding a protective order to shield the identities of victims and third parties during discovery. Defense counsel consented to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00001497.jpg
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing for July 10, 2020, following the defendant's arrest in New Hampshire, and discusses Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.
DOJ-OGR-00021035.jpg
A page from a court transcript (likely the sentencing hearing in US v. Maxwell, filed in the 2023 appeal) debating sentencing enhancements. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues that testimony from pilots proves Maxwell had supervisory authority over Sarah Kellen within the conspiracy. Defense attorney Everdell rebuts that Maxwell's presence while Kellen scheduled 'massage appointments' does not constitute supervision. The defense also mentions a 'five-point enhancement for repeated and dangerous sex offenders.'
RE: Discovery Requests
Government response to defense concerns regarding discovery hard drives, metadata, flight log pages, and unsealed warrants.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 points raised by defense regarding discovery, including hard drives, metadata, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to defense's Jan 7 letter. Addresses 4TB drive, metadata, FBI report redactions, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 discovery points raised by defense, including hard drive access, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and metadata issues.
RE: Bill of Particulars Request
Counsel, Please see attached. Best, [Redacted]
Discovery Requests
Initial lengthy email raising 9 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight log pages, unredacted FBI reports, and Daily Beast article concerns.
Discovery Requests
Formal letter raising 8 discovery issues + 1 media issue. Key points: Hard drive delays preventing Maxwell's defense prep, unredacted FBI report request, missing Rodgers flight logs (pages 1-27), metadata gaps, and inquiry about unsealed affidavit.
Discovery Requests
Letter outlining 9 specific discovery issues/deficiencies including missing flight logs pages, unreadable CDs at MDC, and request for unredacted FBI reports.
Discovery Requests
Defense request for status of hard drives for Maxwell, unredacted FBI reports, missing flight log pages (Rodgers), and clarification on Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Detailed letter listing 8 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight logs, metadata gaps, and questions about a Daily Beast article.
Redactions
Stating that after reviewing Judge Nathan's order denying bail, they do not believe redactions are necessary and requesting the prosecution write the joint letter.
RE: Redactions
Email header information regarding redactions. The body is an embedded message labeled 'RE: _Redactions.msg'.
RE: Redactions
Agreement to write a joint letter to the Court conveying the parties' position regarding redactions.
Bill of Particulars Request
I hope you all had a good holiday. Please see attached a request for a Bill of Particulars.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of sealed documents including a cover letter, reply memorandum (redacted and unredacted), and exhibits A-B pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of a renewed bail motion and exhibits to be filed under seal in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of accompanying exhibits O-X (unredacted) to the Court and counsel under seal pursuant to Court order (Dkt. 89).
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of redacted exhibits O-P, S, and W-X under seal pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
Letter re: Briefing Schedule
Attached is a draft of the letter to Judge Nathan regarding the briefing schedule. Unless you have any comments, we will send it to the judge in the next hour or so.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
AUSA explains drive sizing and confirms consolidation of CD images (Epstein's iPhone) and hard drive documents onto a single new drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense asks about drive size and questions why a CD was used alongside a hard drive, noting the laptop lacks a disk drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense complains about broken/missing hard drives, the 'patchwork' of drives, and the restricted access hours (7 hours vs 13 hours) at MDC.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Informs that 'Your drive' is ready for pickup at 1 St. Andrews, and Ms. Maxwell's drive has been sent to the MDC. Attached a letter.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Email header information regarding discovery production in the US v. Maxwell case. The body content is embedded as an attachment and not visible on this page.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Confirms hard drives delivered just after 1pm. Asks for confirmation of receipt. Also mentions request for a prison visit from 8am-3pm on Friday for secure laptop review and asks agents to plan for Friday.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity