U.S. Supreme Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
President Wilson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board
|
Authority affirmed |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Pepper
|
Advocacy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Judicial review |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-21 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide on the lawfulness of President Trump ending a program. | Washington | View |
| 2021-10-13 | Legal proceeding | Oral argument was scheduled in the United States v. Tsarnaev case. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Legal action | Certiorari was granted in the United States v. Tsarnaev case. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-14 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court to explore Bridgegate case. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-06-01 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump bid to end 'Dreamers' immigration program. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-04-22 | N/A | Supreme Court arguments scheduled for the week regarding Census citizenship question, Title VII, ... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2013-06-26 | N/A | The Supreme Court decided United States v. Windsor, ruling Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage A... | United States | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in 'Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Re... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States, wh... | United States | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB. The decision is cited in an argument regarding an emp... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judge... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in American Hospital Association v. NLRB, which unanimously upheld an NLRB... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld t... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of specia... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special... | United States | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | The Supreme Court recognized the practice of presidential signing statements in the case of INS v... | N/A | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court ruling in INS v. Chadha, which recognized the practice of presidents approving legi... | N/A | View |
| 1974-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Bell Aerospace, which emphasized the existence of the Board's l... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Thorpe v. Housing Authority, which found that an expansive grant of rul... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., which emphasized the existence of the Board's... | United States | View |
| 1961-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. NLRB. The court rejected... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his ... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting ... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the court struck down a statute limiting the Pre... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal t... | United States | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002826.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (filed March 24, 2021) outlining 'Applicable Law' under the Sixth Amendment regarding jury selection. It details the requirements for establishing a 'fair cross-section' of the community in a jury pool, citing precedents such as *Taylor v. Louisiana* and *Duren v. Missouri*. The footer indicates this document was processed by the Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.jpg
This document is a March 2017 legal newsletter from Sadis Goldberg LLP. It features two main articles: one by Samuel J. Lieberman discussing a Supreme Court ruling (Salman v. U.S.) that makes it easier to prosecute insider trading involving gifts of information to family/friends, and another by Daniel G. Viola discussing the impact of the new Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule on financial advisers. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production, indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019273.jpg
This document appears to be page 39 of a Freedom House report analyzing the rise of illiberal regimes in Poland, Turkey, and Venezuela, while contrasting these with the state of democracy in the United States. The text discusses political shifts, the weakening of democratic institutions, and citing polling data regarding American attitudes toward democracy and military rule. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various articles and speeches from 2011 to 2017, primarily concerning Hungary and Poland, and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031671.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from the law firm Covington to Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner regarding General Michael Flynn. It argues that General Flynn is exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege to decline a Congressional subpoena for documents, citing that the act of production is testimonial in nature and could be used against him in ongoing investigations, including one by a newly appointed special counsel. The document cites legal precedents including *Watkins v. United States* and *United States v. Hubbell* to support the refusal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016541.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of prosecutorial discretion, federal versus state enforcement redundancy, and political accountability in the context of police violence and other crimes. It highlights the 'executive separation of powers' model and the limitations of democratic accountability for elected state prosecutors. The page also contains numerous footnotes citing legal precedents, government reports, and academic works related to the Department of Justice and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016537.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) discussing the systemic underenforcement of sexual assault laws in the United States and the failure of state criminal justice systems to adequately address the issue. It includes extensive footnotes citing legal precedents and state statutes regarding prosecutorial discretion and victim rights. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016530.jpg
This page from the Minnesota Law Review discusses the legal concept of "dual sovereignty" and the Double Jeopardy Clause, specifically focusing on federal oversight of state prosecution decisions. It highlights the Department of Justice's policy of reviewing state enforcement practices in areas like civil rights violations and notes the upcoming Supreme Court case United States v. Gamble. The footnotes provide comparative legal analysis regarding victim rights to review non-prosecution decisions in Scotland, England, France, and Ireland.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016514.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of criminal prosecution jurisdiction between state and federal levels, particularly regarding police misconduct and sexual assault. It argues that federal oversight is an imperfect backstop due to higher legal standards and political shifts, and highlights the lack of safeguards against unjustified decisions not to prosecute compared to the robust protections against improper charging. The text includes extensive footnotes citing legal cases, statutes, and articles related to police violence and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.jpg
An email from 'jeffrey E.' (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com) to 'BS Stern' dated August 9, 2018. The sender discusses the political climate involving Donald Trump, the Mueller investigation, and Brett Kavanaugh, while proposing the idea of a 'third choice presidential run' and a 'chaos candidate' for 2020 as a back-up plan to the traditional two-party system.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026494.jpg
This document is a page from a House Oversight report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026494) arguing that the 'Crossfire' (Crossfire Hurricane) investigation into the Trump campaign was politically motivated rather than based on national security. It cites a 2012 Eric Holder memo regarding DOJ impartiality during election years and contrasts the handling of the Clinton email server investigation with the Trump-Russia probe. It asserts there was no discernible evidence of collusion when Crossfire was launched and notes that the Clinton campaign funded the Steele dossier.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026493.jpg
This document discusses the findings of Inspector General Horowitz regarding political bias in FBI investigations involving James Comey and Peter Strzok, arguing that this bias taints the subsequent Mueller investigation. It cites legal precedents, such as *U.S. v. Russell* and *Blackledge v. Perry*, to argue that due process violations stemming from biased investigations function as "fruit of a poisonous tree," potentially invalidating convictions and indictments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026486.jpg
The text argues that political bias among FBI officials tainted the Russia investigation and the subsequent appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, likening the situation to the "fruit of a poisonous tree" legal doctrine. It cites several Supreme Court precedents regarding due process to suggest that such governmental bias creates an unfair process that should invalidate legal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020967.jpg
This document consists of two slides (pages 251 and 252) from a presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?' produced by KPCB. The content analyzes US government entitlement programs (Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid) as business liabilities, arguing they are not legal contracts and can be modified by Congress. It proposes a turnaround strategy focusing on expense reduction (reforming entitlements) and revenue generation (economic growth and tax policy).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016972.jpg
This document discusses the intersection of emerging artificial intelligence technologies and established human rights frameworks. It explores the ethical challenges of integrating non-human intelligences into society, referencing historical declarations of rights and debating whether machines can or should replace humans in roles requiring dignity and care. The text also touches on the necessity of making ethical decision-making explicit and algorithmic in the age of autonomous systems.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016794.jpg
This document is a printout of a Reuters web article with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016794. It features a snippet by Lawrence Hurley reporting on the U.S. Supreme Court agreeing to review a Trump administration action, and a headline announcing the appointment of Melania Trump's spokeswoman as the new White House press secretary. A large image is missing from the top of the document due to a display error.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016793.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a news digest or email newsletter printed as part of a House Oversight production (ID: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016793). It contains snippets of news stories from approximately June 2019, specifically covering the passage of a $4.6 billion border spending bill by the House and the Supreme Court's decision to hear a case regarding the DACA/'Dreamers' program. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017931.jpg
This document is page 28 of a Westlaw legal report regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). It discusses a legal motion for reconsideration filed by NCB (National Commercial Bank) regarding personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA. The text analyzes legal standards for reconsideration and jurisdiction, citing various precedents (Steel Co., Bush, etc.), but does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page, despite the House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017860.jpg
This document is page 795 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal arguments surrounding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and whether the court has jurisdiction over Saudi Arabia ('The Kingdom'), Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki. The text details allegations that these defendants provided material support to charities that funded al Qaeda and willfully ignored the threat of Osama bin Laden. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Federal Supplement) included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855). It analyzes the legal status of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically referencing the 'Dole Food' Supreme Court standard for direct ownership. The text argues that for the National Commercial Bank (NCB) to enjoy immunity, the PIF (its owner) must be proven to be an organ or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, citing affidavits from the Saudi Ministry of Finance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017854.jpg
This page is from a 2005 court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding the immunity of Saudi officials and entities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court rules that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki are immune from suit for official acts. It also discusses the National Commercial Bank's (NCB) claim to immunity as a government instrumentality of Saudi Arabia, analyzing share ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and transactions involving the bin Mahfouz family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017710.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding victims' rights (CVRA). It details changes to Rules 1, 5, 12.1, 12.3, and 17 proposed by the Advisory Committee in 2007, specifically focusing on victim representation, protection during detention hearings, and subpoena notifications. The document bears the name of David Schoen, Epstein's attorney, and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of legal materials submitted to Congress regarding the handling of the Epstein case and victims' rights statutes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017695.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (pages 945-946) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It analyzes the legal obligations of courts and prosecutors to consider a victim's views when dismissing charges, arguing that victims must be treated with fairness and their views heard. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or evidence regarding the application of the CVRA (likely in relation to Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017692.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article or legal filing, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (likely related to the Epstein case given David Schoen's involvement). It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and argues for a new rule (Rule 44.1) allowing courts discretionary authority to appoint counsel for victims. The text analyzes Judge Kenna's interpretation of the CVRA and cites various legal precedents and statutes supporting the inherent authority of courts to appoint counsel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017681.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 46 of 78 in the exhibit) submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017681). The text analyzes the legal rights of crime victims to attend trials and have input on venue transfers, citing Supreme Court precedents and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It specifically discusses the New Jersey case *State v. Timmendequas* as an example of prioritizing victims' convenience by importing a jury rather than moving the trial location.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity