| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
President Wilson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board
|
Authority affirmed |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Pepper
|
Advocacy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Judicial review |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-21 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide on the lawfulness of President Trump ending a program. | Washington | View |
| 2021-10-13 | Legal proceeding | Oral argument was scheduled in the United States v. Tsarnaev case. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Legal action | Certiorari was granted in the United States v. Tsarnaev case. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-14 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court to explore Bridgegate case. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-06-01 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump bid to end 'Dreamers' immigration program. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-04-22 | N/A | Supreme Court arguments scheduled for the week regarding Census citizenship question, Title VII, ... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2013-06-26 | N/A | The Supreme Court decided United States v. Windsor, ruling Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage A... | United States | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in 'Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Re... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States, wh... | United States | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB. The decision is cited in an argument regarding an emp... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judge... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in American Hospital Association v. NLRB, which unanimously upheld an NLRB... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld t... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of specia... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special... | United States | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | The Supreme Court recognized the practice of presidential signing statements in the case of INS v... | N/A | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court ruling in INS v. Chadha, which recognized the practice of presidents approving legi... | N/A | View |
| 1974-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Bell Aerospace, which emphasized the existence of the Board's l... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Thorpe v. Housing Authority, which found that an expansive grant of rul... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., which emphasized the existence of the Board's... | United States | View |
| 1961-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. NLRB. The court rejected... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his ... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting ... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the court struck down a statute limiting the Pre... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal t... | United States | View |
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, implied by context) submitted as evidence in House Oversight proceedings. It details the narrator's early years at Harvard Law School, focusing on friction with Dean Erwin Griswold regarding the narrator's Jewish identity, kosher practices, and refusal to teach on Saturdays. The text also recounts an incident where the narrator declined an invitation to the restricted 'Club of Odd Volumes' offered by Judge Aldrich, leading to a confrontation with Dean Griswold about tenure implications.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of clerking for Goldberg and the name 'Alan') stamped by House Oversight. It details anecdotes about Supreme Court Justices Thurgood Marshall (alleging compromised behavior known to Hoover) and Arthur Goldberg (his resignation from the Court and failed gubernatorial run). It also highlights the narrator's close friendship with Stephen Breyer, describing efforts to help Breyer get appointed to the Supreme Court.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of clerking for Justice Goldberg in 1963-64) submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It recounts anecdotes from the narrator's time as a Supreme Court clerk, including advising Justice Goldberg on Jewish law regarding head coverings and working on Yom Kippur, playing basketball with Justice White, and drafting the influential 'Escobedo' opinion regarding the right to counsel.
This document is a page from a manuscript (Chapter 3) written by Alan (likely Dershowitz), dated April 2, 2012. It details the author's experience at Yale Law School around 1962, specifically focused on the fierce competition for Supreme Court clerkships and the specific biases of various Justices. The narrative highlights the author's conflict with Professor Fred Rodel over a men-only seminar location and his mentorship under Professor Alex Bickel.
These pages from the book "Filthy Rich" describe Chief Reiter's frustration with the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, leading him to contact the FBI and federal prosecutor R. Alexander Acosta. The text details Reiter's initial hope in Acosta, Acosta's background working under Ken Starr and clerking for Samuel Alito, and the pushback Reiter received for pursuing the investigation so aggressively.
This document is page 43 of a legal opinion or brief from 2012 titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal liability of entities under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) for providing material support and financing to al-Qaeda. The text argues that the District Court erred in dismissing claims against banks (Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, National Commercial Bank) on the grounds that corporations cannot be sued as individuals under the TVPA, citing various precedents including 'Khulumani' and 'Mohamad v. Rajoub'. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation production.
This document appears to be page 24 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the Second Circuit's review of a district court's dismissal of claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Statute (ATS), and Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA). The text critiques the lower court for applying incorrect legal standards regarding 'material support' to al-Qaeda. While the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384' suggests this was part of a congressional investigation (possibly included in a larger production of documents), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific activities.
In an email thread from December 7, 2015, Lisa New corresponds with Jeffrey Epstein regarding a film project/online course. New provides Epstein with a list of high-profile politicians and figures she has taped (including Bill Clinton and Al Gore) or scheduled (including Joe Biden) after Epstein requests a 'list of polieticans'. The context of the thread involves New seeking advice because Woody Allen's legal team has blocked the use of footage she filmed, an event she credits Epstein for facilitating.
This text discusses the cultural battle over censorship and indecency in American media, contrasting government crackdowns led by figures like Senator Ted Stevens with the raw expression found in works like the documentary "The Aristocrats" and the HBO series "Deadwood." The author argues that "Deadwood" accurately reflects the vulgarity and energy of the historical American West, which was previously sanitized by Hollywood's Hays Code.
This page appears to be an excerpt from a memoir or report (possibly by Paul Krassner) contained within a House Oversight document production. It details correspondence with US Attorney James L. Browning, Jr. concerning whether comments made by comedian Groucho Marx constituted a threat against Richard Nixon. The text notes that the FBI had opened a file on Marx, labeling him a 'national security risk,' and recounts a 1976 appearance by Marx at the Los Angeles Book Fair.
This document appears to be a page from an article or memoir (likely by Paul Krassner) titled 'Remembering Lenny Bruce.' It discusses the 50th anniversary of the comedian's death, asserting it was not a suicide, and recounts a 1959 meeting between the author and Bruce regarding obscenity laws and the magazine 'The Realist.' While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger government document production, the text on this specific page does not contain references to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document appears to be a page from a narrative or memoir describing a counter-culture or Neo-Pagan festival called 'Starwood.' The narrator describes workshops ranging from drug policy to ritual pleasure, recounts a performance where they used a risqué opening line, and mentions returning to the festival in the summer of 1998. The page ends mid-sentence referencing the arrest of two Amish men. The footer indicates this is part of a House Oversight Committee document production.
This document page appears to be an excerpt from a narrative or interview (possibly a book or article included in evidence) labeled with a House Oversight footer. It details an interview with Patti Thomas, representing an entity called 'Connection' (likely a publication related to 'alternative lifestyles' or swinging). The text outlines a legal battle starting in 1995 regarding First Amendment rights and the constitutionality of a specific law affecting the swinger community, mentioning appeals and potential escalation to the Supreme Court.
The document outlines conspiratorial political strategies involving the potential assassination of Jimmy Carter and the manipulation of Gerald Ford's presidency. It also discusses using blackmail material regarding G. Harrold Carswell's sexuality and claims responsibility for dosing George McGovern's daughter with LSD to gain political leverage.
This document is page 82 of a Cannabis Investment Report produced by Ackrell Capital in December 2017. The text analyzes the legal and financial complexities of the cannabis industry, specifically focusing on the inability to file for federal bankruptcy protection and the tax implications of IRC Section 280E, which limits business deductions for entities trafficking in controlled substances. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger congressional inquiry, though the specific page content does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document appears to be a page from a news article or profile regarding investor Peter Thiel, included in House Oversight records. It discusses Thiel's role on the board of Facebook (amidst Russian election interference scandals), his support for Donald Trump, his move from San Francisco to Los Angeles, and his New Zealand citizenship. The text notes that while Thiel claims he can access the President anytime, their relationship seems to have cooled since the 2016 election.
This document is page 10 of a 2013 'Expert Analysis' Tax Briefing published by Wolters Kluwer CCH. It discusses the tax implications of the Supreme Court's Windsor decision (regarding same-sex marriage) on joint returns, amended returns, and IRS audit policies for the 2009, 2012, and 2013 tax years. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029314' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document is page 5 of a CCH Tax Briefing dated June 27, 2013, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029309. It details 2013 Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) phaseout thresholds, capital gains taxes, and net investment income taxes. It specifically addresses income tax issues for same-sex couples following the Supreme Court's Windsor decision, including filing status strategies and dependency exemptions.
This document is page 4 of a 2013 CCH Tax Briefing analyzing the tax implications of the Supreme Court's decision regarding same-sex marriage (United States v. Windsor) and the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. It details technical tax rules concerning filing status, 'marriage penalties,' innocent spouse relief, and Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) floors and thresholds. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029308, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely in relation to an investigation involving Jeffrey Epstein's financial or tax records, though no specific individuals are named in the text.
This is page 3 of a CCH Tax Briefing dated June 27, 2013, analyzing the tax implications of the Supreme Court's *Windsor* decision which struck down Section 3 of DOMA. It details changes to filing status, income tax benefits/disadvantages, and the 'Marriage Penalty' for same-sex couples. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger discovery production, likely related to financial records, though no specific individuals (like Epstein) are named on this page.
This document is a letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, Esq., dated June 19, 2008, arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The firm requests a 'de novo' independent review, citing the existence of a Non-Prosecution Agreement and a State plea deal, while accusing AUSA Villafana of misconduct for re-initiating a grand jury investigation and subpoenaing a redacted individual for documents including photos and emails.
This document appears to be a page from a report, book, or detailed memo obtained by the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030252). It analyzes the legal strategies and tensions between the Trump White House and the Mueller Special Counsel investigation. Key topics include the President's potential to unilaterally fire Rod Rosenstein or the Attorney General, the strategic use of presidential pardons (specifically regarding Michael Flynn), and the Special Counsel's view that using pardons to protect oneself constitutes obstruction of justice.
This document appears to be a page (169) from a manuscript, essay, or book discussing transhumanism, artificial intelligence ethics, and the definition of human rights in the context of 'non-Homo intelligences.' It references historical legal frameworks like the Bill of Rights and the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, while debating the capacity of machines to make ethical decisions compared to humans. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of materials reviewed during a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or associates connected to the Epstein case.
This document contains the raw data for a news briefing, likely from a content management system or API. The briefing covers Christine Blasey Ford's agreement to testify against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and separate reports of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggesting to secretly record President Trump. Other news includes pressure for a second Brexit referendum and Comcast's successful bid for Sky.
This document is a JSON data representation of a digital news briefing from circa September 2018, likely sourced from an application like Apple News. The content focuses on two major U.S. political stories: the precarious position of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein following reports he discussed taping President Trump, and a second sexual misconduct allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Contrary to the user's prompt, this specific document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity