U.S. Supreme Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
President Wilson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board
|
Authority affirmed |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Pepper
|
Advocacy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Judicial review |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-21 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide on the lawfulness of President Trump ending a program. | Washington | View |
| 2021-10-13 | Legal proceeding | Oral argument was scheduled in the United States v. Tsarnaev case. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Legal action | Certiorari was granted in the United States v. Tsarnaev case. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-14 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court to explore Bridgegate case. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-06-01 | N/A | U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump bid to end 'Dreamers' immigration program. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-04-22 | N/A | Supreme Court arguments scheduled for the week regarding Census citizenship question, Title VII, ... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2013-06-26 | N/A | The Supreme Court decided United States v. Windsor, ruling Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage A... | United States | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in 'Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Re... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States, wh... | United States | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB. The decision is cited in an argument regarding an emp... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judge... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in American Hospital Association v. NLRB, which unanimously upheld an NLRB... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld t... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of specia... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special... | United States | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | The Supreme Court recognized the practice of presidential signing statements in the case of INS v... | N/A | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court ruling in INS v. Chadha, which recognized the practice of presidents approving legi... | N/A | View |
| 1974-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Bell Aerospace, which emphasized the existence of the Board's l... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Thorpe v. Housing Authority, which found that an expansive grant of rul... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., which emphasized the existence of the Board's... | United States | View |
| 1961-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. NLRB. The court rejected... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his ... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting ... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the court struck down a statute limiting the Pre... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal t... | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028448.jpg
This document is an Associated Press news article dated September 24, 2018, detailing President Trump's defense of his Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, against sexual assault allegations from Christine Blasey Ford. Trump is quoted calling the accusations politically motivated and unfair, while the article also notes the upcoming testimony of both Ford and Kavanaugh before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Although the prompt requests analysis of an 'Epstein-related document,' the content of this specific document pertains exclusively to the Kavanaugh confirmation and contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028444.jpg
This document is a capture of a digital article from 'The Cut', published on September 24, 2018, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028444'. The article analyzes the cultural and political impact of the #MeToo movement through the lens of Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination, referencing the stories of Deborah Ramirez and Christine Blasey Ford. Although the user prompt requested analysis of an 'Epstein-related document', this specific page does not mention Jeffrey Epstein and is focused entirely on the Kavanaugh confirmation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028442.jpg
This document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028442', is a commentary piece from circa late September 2018 analyzing the cultural impact of the #MeToo movement in the context of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation. It focuses on the allegations made by Deborah Ramirez, as reported in The New Yorker, arguing that women are increasingly demanding that their fragmented but deeply felt memories of trauma be taken seriously, even against staunch denials from powerful men. The author contrasts Ramirez's case with the past experiences of Anita Hill and the more recent, tragic story of Amber Wyatt to illustrate a shift in expectations about whose stories are heard and believed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028441.jpg
This document contains the underlying JSON data for a digital article by Rebecca Traister, titled "When the Muzzle Comes Off." Traister writes about the uncertainty surrounding Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination, speculating on various political outcomes while asserting with confidence that a significant, women-led social and political change is currently taking place.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028435.jpg
This document summarizes news reports and statements concerning Judge Brett Kavanaugh's high school conduct, focusing on a yearbook entry about classmate Renate Dolphin. It presents conflicting accounts from Kavanaugh's lawyer and Dolphin regarding their past interactions. Despite the user's prompt, the document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028434.jpg
This document, labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028434, is the source data for a web article about Brett Kavanaugh's 2018 Supreme Court nomination. It details controversial entries in his 1983 high school yearbook, specifically references to "Renate" (Renate Schroeder Dolphin), allegations of sexual assault by Christine Blasey Ford, and a letter of support for Kavanaugh that Dolphin co-signed. Despite the prompt's framing of the document as 'Epstein-related', its content is entirely about Brett Kavanaugh and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028429.jpg
This document is a political analysis article from 2018 concerning the Senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It details the political strategies and potential fallout for both Republicans and Democrats following the sexual assault accusation made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. The article includes quotes from political figures and commentators, discusses the risks for senators on the Judiciary Committee, and draws parallels to the 1992 confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028428.jpg
This document contains snippets of a news article detailing the political maneuvering surrounding Judge Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation. It describes the White House's aggressive response to accusations, President Trump's controversial remarks, and the delicate position of Republican senators who must balance party loyalty with the concerns of moderate voters and key uncommitted senators.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028427.jpg
This document is a news article, likely from September 2018, detailing President Trump's frustration with the Republican response to sexual assault allegations against his Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. The article covers Trump's public remarks urging a more aggressive defense, the political dynamics of the situation including Christine Blasey Ford's scheduled testimony, and the emergence of a new allegation published by The New Yorker. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028427' suggests this article was collected as evidence for a congressional committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028426.jpg
This document contains the underlying JSON-like data for a New York Times news analysis article dated September 23, 2018. The article, authored by Julie Hirschfeld Davis, discusses the turmoil in President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh's confirmation proceedings. Despite the query's framing, the document's content is not about Jeffrey Epstein but was likely included in a larger set of documents from the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028401.jpg
This document is a data snippet from a digital news article, likely from The New York Times around September 24, 2018, concerning the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It details the release of a letter from accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a responsive letter from Senator Grassley, and the emergence of a new allegation from Deborah Ramirez published in The New Yorker. The text includes direct quotes from the correspondence and descriptions of the events as they unfolded.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028400.jpg
This document is a news article, likely presented as a congressional exhibit, detailing the political response to sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It reports on Kavanaugh's planned Fox News interview to deny the claims, statements of support from Republicans like Senators Hatch and Cotton and President Trump, and the context of Christine Blasey Ford's allegations. The article also outlines the delicate political situation in the Senate, where a few key Republican votes will decide the confirmation outcome.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028399.jpg
This document is a digital news report, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028399, dated September 24, 2018. It details Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh's response to sexual misconduct allegations, including quotes from a letter he sent vowing not to withdraw, and Senator Mitch McConnell's defense of him on the Senate floor. The document is about the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028384.jpg
This document is a raw data file for a New York Times news briefing dated September 24, 2018, not an Epstein-related document. The briefing reports on Christine Blasey Ford's agreement to testify against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and the emergence of a second accusation from Deborah Ramirez, which Kavanaugh denied. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028384' indicates it is an exhibit from a U.S. House Oversight Committee document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028333.jpg
This document, an apparent news article or summary from around September 2018, analyzes the intense speculation and conflicting reports about whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had resigned or was about to be fired by President Trump. The chaos reportedly stemmed from news that Rosenstein had previously suggested recording Trump, with the article noting that Rosenstein's job status remained uncertain pending a scheduled meeting with the President.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.jpg
This document is an email exchange from August 3, 2018, between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein sends Bannon a political analysis discussing the 2018 midterms, the political climate under President Trump, and the need for a 'back-up plan' or 'chaos' candidate for 2020. Bannon replies by asking Epstein for the source of the text, indicating the analysis may not be Epstein's original writing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.jpg
This document is an email from political strategist Juleanna Glover to Jeffrey Epstein on August 3, 2018. Glover forwards an analysis she wrote about the 2018 political landscape, mentioning it was also sent to a "circle of third party thinkers." The memo discusses the divisiveness of the Trump presidency, the Kavanaugh nomination, the Mueller investigation, and posits the idea of a third-party "chaos" candidate for the 2020 presidential election.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026282.jpg
This document, from a House Oversight file, presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was tainted from its origin. It cites an inspector general's report on Peter Strzok's text messages as evidence of bias that cast a 'cloud' over the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation, arguing the entire effort became 'fruit of a poisonous tree.' The author supports this due process violation claim with several Supreme Court precedents regarding prosecutorial and judicial bias. The document does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026275.jpg
This document, from a source labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was fundamentally tainted and a violation of due process. The author contends that the preceding FBI 'Crossfire' investigation was politically motivated, and this bias rendered all subsequent activities, including Mueller's appointment and findings, as 'fruit of a poisonous tree'. The text does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its entire focus is on the Mueller investigation and related legal precedents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026248.jpg
This document is a letter from the White House to Chairman Devin Nunes, dated February 2, 2018, concerning the House Intelligence Committee's vote to release a classified memorandum (known as the 'Nunes Memo'). The letter affirms the President's constitutional authority over declassification and states that the Committee's action is being interpreted as a formal request for the President to declassify the memo. This document is related to disputes over FISA surveillance during the 2016 election and is not related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any of his known activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022400.jpg
This document is a collection of three news article summaries from a document labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022400'. The summaries cover President Trump's interactions with GOP critics over a health-care bill, comments from his Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, and the effects of his budget on rural programs. Despite the query's framing, the document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022380.jpg
This document outlines the proposed administrative agenda for the incoming Trump administration, focusing on its top priorities for the first 100 days. Key initiatives include infrastructure investment, tax reform, repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and immigration reform, alongside a list of specific acts to be enacted. The brief also discusses the procedural challenges of repealing existing regulations, plans to fill the Supreme Court vacancy, and intended actions on trade agreements like NAFTA and the TPP.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022375.jpg
This document is a one-page political analysis report from EY, dated 'Election 2016,' discussing the results and implications of the 2016 U.S. election. It analyzes the Republican majorities in the House and Senate, potential legislative challenges like the Senate's 60-vote cloture rule, and the change in the number of GOP House seats. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022372.jpg
This document is a post-election analysis from Washington Council Ernst & Young dated November 9, 2016. It details Donald Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the Republicans retaining control of Congress, and outlines potential policy agendas and political challenges, such as filling the Supreme Court vacancy. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022337.jpg
This document is a table of contents from a 2013 publication titled 'Tax Topics', listing various tax-related subjects, court cases, and legislative updates from 2003 and 2004. The topics primarily concern U.S. federal and state tax law, including trusts, estates, and tax planning strategies. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity