MR. COHEN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
his client
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the client
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
his client
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Client (Defendant)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed client ('she')
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
client (unnamed)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chris Everdell
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
client (defendant)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judiciary counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Our Client (Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alleged Victims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing to discuss scheduling for an upcoming trial, including setting deadlines and hear... | Southern District Court | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A discussion in court to establish a motion schedule for a legal case. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bail Proceeding where defense argues against the weight of evidence and government tactics. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Bail Proceeding | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail/sureties and detention conditions. | Court (Southern District of... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | A hearing where attorney Mr. Cohen discusses with the judge the difficulties in obtaining financi... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | The court orders the defendant to be detained pending trial and then adjourns the hearing. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Bail hearing | An attorney, MR. COHEN, makes a concluding argument to a judge to grant bail for his client. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing (Bail/Detention) | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Arraignment, scheduling conference, and bail hearing | Remote Proceeding (Southern... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Proceeding / Bail Hearing | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail application | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A discussion during a legal proceeding about whether the substance of alleged victim statements s... | Court in the Southern Distr... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court proceeding (likely a bail hearing or appeal) where defense counsel argues against the gover... | Southern District (Likely S... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | A court hearing where defense counsel (Mr. Cohen) is arguing a point to the judge (THE COURT). | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 21-770) | Southern District (implied NY) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Arraignment on the S1 (Superseding) Indictment | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Status Conference and Bail Hearing | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | A court hearing where the judge performs a technology check with the defendant and discusses issu... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-01-04 | N/A | Court hearing via videoconference regarding waiver of presence. | Virtual/Remote (MDC Brookly... | View |
| 2020-12-10 | N/A | Court Hearing / Bail Hearing | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding the defendant's pretrial detention, focusing on the legal arguments abo... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Bail hearing | An attorney, Mr. Cohen, makes a concluding argument to the court to grant bail for his client. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001007.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on April 1, 2021, in Case 21-770. The judge begins by confirming that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, has a working audio and video connection. The discussion then turns to a technical issue raised by Ms. Moe, who reports that the public call-in line is full, and the court expresses concern about an alternative listening arrangement involving a speakerphone.
DOJ-OGR-00001953.jpg
This document is page 76 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell case) filed on December 10, 2020. The Court questions Ms. Moe (Government) about whether statements made by alleged victims should be considered in the '3142 analysis' (bail determination). Ms. Moe clarifies that while victims have a right to speak under the Crime Victims Rights Act, the government is not using their testimony to support its specific motion, leading the Court to conclude it should not consider the substance of those statements for the bail analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00001952.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, detailing a discussion about a defendant's pretrial detention. The judge questions the prosecutor, Ms. Moe, about legal arguments raised by the defense attorney, Mr. Cohen, concerning the burden of proof for flight risk. Ms. Moe argues that the defendant has the burden to rebut the presumption of detention and has failed to do so, justifying the government's request to keep her detained.
DOJ-OGR-00001948.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 10, 2020. In it, a government prosecutor, Ms. Moe of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, argues that the government's presentation is based on undisputed facts from a grand jury indictment, not media 'spin'. She references the indictment's 'chilling' allegations, including the trafficking of underage girls and the defendant's undisputed actions of living in hiding.
DOJ-OGR-00001947.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, concludes his argument for his client's bail, asserting the government has failed to prove the client is a flight risk. He asks the judge to grant bail or to keep the proceeding open for a week to allow for the submission of more information.
DOJ-OGR-00001944.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, discussing a client's detention and the discovery process. Mr. Cohen argues that his client's arrest, despite voluntary surrender, limits access and that the COVID crisis complicates gathering financial information. He also highlights the government's request for an extended discovery period until November.
DOJ-OGR-00001941.jpg
This document is page 64 of a court transcript from a bail proceeding filed on December 10, 2020 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues that the government is using tactics to circumvent the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by indicting conduct that is 25 years old. He cites the 'Annabi case' regarding the reach of plea agreements binding U.S. Attorney offices.
DOJ-OGR-00001931.jpg
This document is page 54 of a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues that the defense had previously urged the government not to indict and had made it clear they were available for voluntary surrender, yet the government arrested Maxwell without prior contact. Cohen notes that the government was fully aware that his firm and Haddon Morgan represented Maxwell, and he criticizes the prosecution for trying to 'throw some more dirt' on his client in a reply brief.
DOJ-OGR-00001925.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where an attorney, Mr. Cohen, references past high-profile cases (Madoff, Dreier, Esposito) to support his arguments. The presiding judge questions the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections. Mr. Cohen concedes that they did not, highlighting a key factual distinction from the current case.
DOJ-OGR-00001920.jpg
This document is page 43 of a court transcript from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330), dated December 10, 2020. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues that the government has unfairly introduced new facts late in the proceeding, preventing a written response. He attempts to distance his client from Jeffrey Epstein, stating she is 'not the monster' portrayed by the media and emphasizes her strong family and professional ties, noting that supporters are present on the call anonymously for safety reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00001918.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It captures the conclusion of a statement by Ms. Farmer (a victim), who argues Maxwell is a flight risk due to global associates and wealth, and urges her continued detention. Following this, the Judge questions prosecutor Ms. Moe to confirm there are no other victims wishing to speak and clarifies that the government is not relying on 'danger to the community' arguments for pretrial detention.
DOJ-OGR-00001900.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues for the continued detention of the defendant pending trial, citing 'extreme risk of flight,' 'significant financial means,' lack of candor with Pretrial Services regarding finances, and 'strong international ties.' The prosecution emphasizes the seriousness of the charges involving the sexual abuse of minors and the defendant's lack of community ties or stable residence.
DOJ-OGR-00001892.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on December 10, 2020, in which the judge questions an attorney, Ms. Moe, about the completeness of discovery materials provided by the F.B.I. in Florida. The judge emphasizes the need for proactive and critical efforts to ensure full disclosure, rather than simply accepting initial representations. The judge then directs Ms. Moe to present a proposed discovery schedule that she has already discussed with another party, Mr. Cohen.
DOJ-OGR-00001885.jpg
This page is a transcript from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 10, 2020. The Court is establishing logistical protocols for a hearing on pretrial detention, citing COVID-19 as a reason for specific remote access arrangements. The Judge details provisions for video feeds for the press and audio lines for the public (1,000 callers), alleged victims, and the defendant's family.
DOJ-OGR-00001884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, for case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The judge, government counsel Ms. Moe, and defense counsel Mr. Cohen agree to conduct the day's proceedings remotely due to the pandemic. The judge rules that the hearing cannot be delayed, emphasizing the interests of justice and the fact that the detained defendant is seeking release on bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001882.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The proceeding is conducted via videoconference due to remote access protocols, with Maxwell participating from the MDC in Brooklyn. The Judge establishes technical connectivity and explains the procedure for Maxwell to speak privately with her attorney, Mr. Cohen, in a digital breakout room, before moving to discuss a waiver of physical presence.
DOJ-OGR-00019989.jpg
A transcript page from a court hearing dated April 1, 2021, likely involving Ghislaine Maxwell (represented by Mr. Cohen). The defense argues that the client's arrest, detention, and the COVID-19 crisis have made it difficult to provide financial information requested by Pretrial Services, specifically regarding a real estate transaction. The text also notes the government requested until November to complete discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00002885.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated March 31, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that any delay in the trial schedule is the fault of the government for filing a late superseding indictment despite previous assurances (cited from a July 14, 2020 transcript) that they did not anticipate doing so. The defense claims this expansion of the case prejudices Maxwell, prolongs her detention, and transforms the proceedings from a 'two-week' trial into a much longer affair.
Proposed Schedule
Discussion regarding the scheduling of the case.
Bail Application Argument
Defense argument regarding the NPA, the age of the alleged conduct (1994-1997), lack of physical evidence, and request for bail.
Bail Hearing/Court Proceeding
Oral argument regarding the government's submission of facts and the character of the defendant.
Bail Application
Argument for release on bail, citing COVID difficulties and media bias.
Attorney-Client Discussion
Confirming if the attorney discussed the changes with the defendant.
Bail application and detention conditions
Cohen argues for more time to arrange sureties and describes the harsh conditions hindering the defense's preparation.
Detention and Financial Disclosures
Argument regarding the impact of detention and COVID-19 on the defense's ability to gather financial information.
Argument for bail
MR. COHEN makes a concluding argument to the judge, stating that the government has not met its burden of proving his client is a flight risk and requests that the court grant bail.
Client's detention, access to client, and discovery sched...
Mr. Cohen argues that his client's detention, compounded by the COVID crisis, has made it difficult to gather financial information. He also discusses the discovery schedule, noting the government needs until November to complete it.
Procedural fairness and client characterization
Cohen argues that the government introduced facts late, depriving the defense of a written response. He also defends his client's character, distinguishing her from Epstein.
Relevance of cited cases
Mr. Cohen responds to the Court's question, stating that he does not believe the cited cases involved defendants with substantial international connections.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity