Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror No. 50

Person
Mentions
232
Relationships
57
Events
118
Documents
110
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
57 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Ms. Maxwell
Juror defendant
12 Very Strong
7
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
35
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
7
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person second juror
Co jurors
8 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Defendant juror
8 Strong
4
View
person Annie Farmer
Communication
8 Strong
3
View
organization The Court
Juror court
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant juror
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional potential bias
6
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional juror defendant
6
1
View
person Lucia Osborne-Crowley
Professional interviewer interviewee
6
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Juror defendant
6
2
View
organization The government
Adversarial
6
1
View
person Annie Farmer
Social media interaction
6
2
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Adversarial
5
1
View
organization The Court
Judicial
5
1
View
person CAROLYN
Juror witness
5
1
View
person Dr. Elizabeth Loftus
Adversarial juror vs expert witness
5
1
View
person Judge Nathan
Judicial oversight
5
1
View
person JANE
Juror witness
5
1
View
person Luc Cohen
Interview subject interviewer
5
1
View
person Ms. Osborne-Crawley
Interviewee interviewer implied
5
1
View
person Lucia Osborne-Crowley
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Personal experience Juror No. 50 was a victim of sexual assault and abuse. N/A View
N/A Jury deliberation Juror No. 50 disclosed his history of sexual abuse to fellow jurors to persuade them. N/A View
N/A Documentary interview Juror No. 50 sat for an interview as part of an hour-long documentary called “Ghislaine, Prince A... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Juror No. 50 gave false answers to questions 25 and 48 during voir dire, specifically about his s... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A prospective juror, Juror No. 50, allegedly gave deliberately false answers during voir dire for... N/A View
N/A Questionnaire completion Juror No. 50 completed a jury questionnaire. He later claimed he 'flew through' it, but the docum... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The trial of Ms. Maxwell, where it is argued that Juror No. 50 made a false denial similar to the... N/A View
N/A N/A Post-trial Hearing regarding Juror Misconduct Court View
N/A Legal proceeding The voir dire (jury selection) for Ms. Maxwell's trial, during which Juror No. 50 allegedly gave ... N/A View
N/A Media appearance Juror No. 50 participated in several interviews with journalists and allowed himself to be videot... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The voir dire process for Juror No. 50, intended to evaluate whether he could be a fair and impar... N/A View
N/A Media tour Juror No. 50's post-verdict media press tour where he promoted himself and discussed his experien... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Juror No. 50 underwent voir dire, answering questions about his ability to assess credibility and... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The process of questioning prospective jurors, during which a juror in the Sampson case and Juror... N/A View
N/A Jury selection The process of selecting the jury, including the use of a questionnaire and voir dire for Juror N... N/A View
N/A Legal analysis Argument that Juror No. 50 was impliedly biased based on two legal theories: lying during voir di... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Juror No. 50 provided false answers during a legal proceeding. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Juror No. 50 seeks to intervene in a criminal matter. N/A View
N/A Disclosure Juror No. 50 publicly admitted he is a victim of sexual assault and sexual abuse. N/A View
N/A Questionnaire response Juror No. 50 completed a juror questionnaire under penalty of perjury, answering questions about ... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Motion by Ms. Maxwell to conduct an inquiry into juror bias and misconduct. Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A legal argument for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell. N/A View
N/A N/A Hearing to question Juror No. 50 Court View
N/A Legal proceeding Voir dire (jury selection) during which Juror No. 50 allegedly did not truthfully answer material... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A potential future evidentiary hearing where Juror No. 50 would be compelled to give truthful ans... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00009711.jpg

This legal document details a post-verdict interview given by Juror No. 50 (using the name Scotty David) to The Independent on January 4, 2022. The juror revealed that he was a victim of sexual abuse, shared this personal story with the jury during deliberations, and used his own experience to validate the accusers' testimonies. He explicitly stated that he disregarded the testimony of defense expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on memory, influencing the jury based on his personal beliefs.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009710.jpg

This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, alleges juror misconduct. It claims that Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury questionnaires by denying they had been victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. The document contrasts this with the other alternate and deliberating jurors, none of whom disclosed such a history.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009708.jpg

This is page 16 of a legal document filed on March 11, 2022, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document discusses the final composition of the jury, noting that 694 potential jurors answered a questionnaire. A footnote explains that defense counsel was unable to find the Twitter account of 'Juror No. 50' during the voir dire process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009707.jpg

This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It argues that Juror No. 50 was dishonest about deleting his Instagram account and his ability to be impartial, noting he posted about the trial post-verdict. The defense explains they did not ask follow-up questions during voir dire because the juror denied bias, contrasting this with other jurors who disclosed abuse histories.

Legal filing / court motion
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009704.jpg

This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022, detailing the jury selection process for the trial of Ms. Maxwell. It specifically focuses on 'Juror No. 50', listing their responses to questionnaire items 13, 25, 42, 43, and 44, wherein the juror denied being a victim of a crime or having biases that would affect impartiality under penalty of perjury. The document notes that 694 individuals originally answered the questionnaire.

Court filing / legal brief
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009701.jpg

This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, argues for a new trial for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The basis for the request is the allegation that Juror No. 50 provided a false answer on a jury selection questionnaire regarding personal experience with sexual assault, which was a core issue in the case. This alleged dishonesty is claimed to have resulted in an unfair and impartial jury, thereby depriving Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009695.jpg

This document is page 3 (Table of Contents) of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated March 11, 2022. It outlines arguments claiming Ghislaine Maxwell is entitled to a new trial because 'Juror No. 50' allegedly answered voir dire questions (specifically 25 and 48) falsely. The document also argues against Juror No. 50's right to intervene or receive discovery, noting the juror is currently under investigation.

Legal filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009694.jpg

This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. The filing argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct. The primary focus is on "Juror No. 50," who allegedly was untruthful during voir dire and subsequently gave media interviews; it also mentions a second juror who disclosed during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014743.jpg

This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, where the defendant is found 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three through Six. Following the reading, the court polls individual jurors (identified by number) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008822.jpg

This is a legal letter dated January 19, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves to inform the court that Maxwell's counsel has filed a Motion for a New Trial and requests that all materials concerning Juror No. 50 be kept under seal until the court rules on the motion.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
58
As Recipient
15
Total
73

Jury Service

From: Juror No. 50
To: Public/Followers

Posted about his jury service after the verdict was returned on Instagram

Social media post
N/A
Communication Source

Impartiality

From: THE COURT
To: Juror No. 50

Asked if he had any doubt about ability to be fair; Juror 50 said 'no'.

Court examination
N/A
Communication Source

Trial/Verdict

From: Juror No. 50
To: the press

Juror publicized interviews with the press.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Juror No. 50
To: THE COURT

False denials regarding victim status and social media usage.

Questionnaire/testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Screening

From: THE COURT
To: Juror No. 50

Written questionnaire and in-person questioning.

Questionnaire/interview
N/A
Communication Source

Voir Dire / Background check

From: THE COURT
To: Juror No. 50

Questioning regarding age, residence, education, and employment history.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Role on jury and experience as a victim

From: Juror No. 50
To: Chinese-language media...

Juror No. 50 promoting himself and his experience.

Media interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror No. 50
To: Alleged victim or witness

Request for subpoenas covering emails or written communications between Juror No. 50 and any alleged victim or witness.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror No. 50
To: other jurors

Request for subpoenas covering emails or written communications between Juror No. 50 and any other juror in the case.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror No. 50
To: Annie Farmer

Juror No. 50 used Twitter to communicate directly to Annie Farmer.

Social media/direct communication
N/A
Communication Source

Press Tour

From: Juror No. 50
To: reporter

Revealed he was not alone in disclosing victim status to jurors.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror No. 50
To: Annie Farmer

Direct communication via Twitter.

Social media message
N/A
Communication Source

Disclosure of second juror's history

From: Juror No. 50
To: media

Statement that a second juror disclosed they were a victim of childhood sexual abuse.

Media statement
N/A
Communication Source

Press tour

From: Juror No. 50
To: Reporters

Revealed disclosure of abuse history during deliberations.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire Question 48

From: Juror No. 50
To: THE COURT

Failure to disclose being a victim of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire response
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire Question 25

From: Juror No. 50
To: THE COURT

Failure to disclose being a victim of a crime.

Questionnaire response
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Disclosures

From: Juror No. 50
To: Media/Public

Statement that a second juror disclosed they were also a victim of childhood sexual abuse.

Media statement
N/A
Communication Source

Voir Dire Answers

From: Juror No. 50
To: Media / Social Media

Admitting to having provided false answers during voir dire.

Media statement
N/A
Communication Source

Motion for intervention and discovery

From: Juror No. 50
To: THE COURT

Requests regarding judicial document status, currently under seal.

Legal submission
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire Response

From: Ms. Osborne-Crawley
To: Juror No. 50

Interviewer challenges Juror No. 50 regarding question 48 about being a victim of abuse.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror No. 50
To: Annie Famer

The document notes that Juror No. 50 communicated with Annie Famer (Farmer).

Communication
N/A
Communication Source

Verdict

From: Juror No. 50
To: Public/Media

Proclaimed that the verdict against Ms. Maxwell was a verdict 'for all the victims.'

Statement
N/A
Communication Source

Juror's beliefs on memory and abuse

From: Juror No. 50
To: media

Disclosed beliefs such as 'the abusive event is like a video and victims remember the event accurately'.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Potential legal trouble

From: the government
To: Juror No. 50

Alerted the juror that he 'may be in trouble' regarding his disclosures/conduct.

Alert/warning
N/A
Communication Source

Twitter handle @ScottyDavidNYC

From: Juror No. 50
To: public

Defense counsel was unable to locate the Twitter account of Juror No. 50, with the handle @ScottyDavidNYC, during voir dire.

Social media account
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search