CAROLYN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Friend |
12
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Romantic |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
location
Virginia
|
Recruiter recruit |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruiter victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trial | The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where this summation was delivered. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| N/A | Crime | Maxwell and Epstein used their wealth and privilege to manipulate, groom, and sexually abuse youn... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Scheduling | Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages. This is related to counts Five and Six. | New York | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony from four witnesses (Carolyn, Jane, Kate, Mr. Alessi) regarding... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Carolyn and Juan Alessi provided testimony during a trial regarding the roles of Ms. Maxwell and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Virginia told Carolyn about an opportunity to make money by giving massages to a man in Palm Beach. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | A group traveled to Jeffrey Epstein's house. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Trip | Maxwell and Epstein invited Carolyn, under the age of 17, to travel from Florida to a place outsi... | from Florida to a place out... | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Carolyn had meetings with lawyers about the lawsuits before they were filed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Sean allegedly brought Melissa to a house with Carolyn. | Carolyn's boyfriend's house | View |
| N/A | Legal action | Carolyn hired an attorney and sued Epstein and his assistant, Sarah Kellen. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | Carolyn brought a second lawsuit against Epstein and Kellen. | federal court in Florida | View |
| N/A | Drug abuse | Shawn stated that he and Carolyn were abusing marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, and other pills during... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment/exploitation | Epstein and Maxwell recruited Carolyn to engage in sex acts with Epstein, for which Maxwell paid ... | Palm Beach Residence | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | Epstein and Maxwell encouraged and enticed Carolyn to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex a... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial testimony | Carolyn testified, recalling that Sarah Kellen scheduled massages and Maxwell was present at the ... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn brought friends Amanda, Tatum, and Julie to Jeffrey Epstein's house. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Birthday | Carolyn's 18th birthday is mentioned as a significant date that may mark the end of the conspirac... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | A decade-long conspiracy of sexual abuse and federal sex-trafficking, which the government charge... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Personal event | Carolyn turned 18, which is legally significant as she could no longer be deemed a victim under t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial was held where Carolyn provided testimony and a jury was present. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | Carolyn was interviewed by the FBI about Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Carolyn brought her friends Amanda, Tatum, and Julie to Jeffrey Epstein's house on separate occas... | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Activity | Carolyn and a friend entered Jeffrey Epstein's house through the kitchen and went upstairs to a m... | massage room | View |
| N/A | Introduction | Carolyn was introduced to Epstein by Virginia Roberts. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018815.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures a legal debate between attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca before the Judge regarding the admissibility of specific testimony or evidence (items 20 and 21). The discussion focuses on whether seeing a female naked in a massage room before Jeffrey Epstein entered constitutes 'lewd and lascivious conduct' or mere nudity.
DOJ-OGR-00018814.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Comey, and the judge. They are debating inconsistencies in the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, specifically regarding the timeframe of payments she allegedly received from Mr. Epstein and whether her testimony described sexual contact or merely being seen naked in a massage room. The judge ultimately suggests checking the official transcript to resolve the dispute.
DOJ-OGR-00018813.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. They are discussing the admissibility of specific questions (16 and 17) to be asked during a cross-examination, which concern visits to Mr. Epstein's home and any financial compensation received. The judge sustains an objection but ultimately indicates a willingness to allow the questions for a person identified as Ms. Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00018812.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to introduce paragraphs 207 and 208 regarding Sarah Kellen as impeachment evidence, but the Court sustains the objection. The judge rules the paragraphs inadmissible, distinguishing them from prior evidence because they do not mention Ms. Maxwell or other unnamed employees.
DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey before a judge. The discussion centers on whether a complaint's allegations are limited to a period ending in August 2003, which Mr. Pagliuca asserts is inconsistent with testimony. Ms. Comey counters that the complaint is consistent and suggests how to question the witness, Carolyn, on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00018809.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The judge sustains a series of objections from Mr. Pagliuca related to specific numbered paragraphs (57, 63, 69, 75, 81, 87, 93) of testimony or evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018806.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, presided over by a judge. The discussion centers on whether a witness's testimony about the frequency of an act (up to four times a week) is inconsistent with a complaint stating it occurred twice a month. The attorneys debate the significance of the time frame and the conflicting frequencies mentioned in the testimony versus the complaint.
DOJ-OGR-00018805.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, before a judge. Ms. Comey defends a legal complaint against claims of inconsistency with a witness's testimony, particularly regarding the omission of certain details about 'sex acts'. The judge ultimately rules on the matter related to 'paragraph 39', sustaining an objection by finding a testified detail to be significant.
DOJ-OGR-00018804.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the cross-examination regarding a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court about inconsistencies in testimony regarding incidents in July 2002, specifically noting a lack of allegations regarding sexual penetration versus fondling. The Judge clarifies which paragraph of the legal document is being discussed (moving from 33 to 39) before turning to prosecutor Ms. Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00018803.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. They are discussing the consistency of testimony from a witness named Carolyn, specifically focusing on a discrepancy in the date of an incident. The judge points out that a complaint states the incident occurred in 2002, while Carolyn's testimony places it in 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00018802.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a dialogue between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the court. Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to impeach a witness's testimony by highlighting a chronological inconsistency regarding the start date of alleged incidents, claiming they occurred from 2002-2003 rather than starting in 2001 as stated in the indictment and the witness's direct testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00018801.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, involving the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca discusses procedural matters with the Judge (The Court), specifically agreeing not to admit a certain item and mentioning a sidebar discussion needed to address where they left off.
DOJ-OGR-00018800.jpg
This document is page 202 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the admissibility of specific paragraphs describing Jeffrey Epstein's 'systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior' utilizing a network of employees. The Judge sustains an objection regarding paragraph 206, ruling it is not inconsistent with testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00018796.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the cross-examination context of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court that there are factual omissions in the complaint compared to the witness's live testimony, specifically noting that the witness testified to 'penetration and intercourse by Epstein,' which was not included in Paragraph 8 of the complaint. The Judge questions Pagliuca on his theory of inconsistency versus omission and prepares to hear from prosecutor Ms. Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument held without the jury present between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the admissibility of a 'state complaint' (Exhibit C4). The defense argues that the complaint should be admitted to show that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was not mentioned in it, while the prosecution objects on the grounds that this fact is not inconsistent with the witness's testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00018793.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The page captures the moment the judge announces a 15-minute afternoon break to the jury, following the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The transcript was produced by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00018792.jpg
This document is page 194 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, focusing on verifying her signature on page 19 of Exhibit C8. The defense moves to admit Exhibits C8 and C9, to which prosecutor Ms. Comey objects, and the Court defers the ruling until a break.
DOJ-OGR-00018791.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to refresh the witness's memory regarding prior statements made under oath in 2009 and her answers to interrogatories, but the witness expresses confusion. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, and the court sustains her objections.
DOJ-OGR-00018790.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions her about her memory of answering written interrogatories for a lawsuit, which she claims not to recall. The attorneys and the judge then discuss showing Carolyn a portion of her deposition transcript to potentially refresh her recollection.
DOJ-OGR-00018787.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint Carolyn previously filed against Mr. Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Carolyn states she does not recall certain details of the complaint and denies having reviewed or approved it before her lawyers filed it in federal court.
DOJ-OGR-00018786.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examining a witness named Carolyn. The questioning centers on a paragraph from a 2009 federal complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, which alleges Epstein paid Carolyn $300 after an encounter. The transcript captures a legal objection by another attorney, Ms. Comey, which the judge sustains.
DOJ-OGR-00018785.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony, read from a legal filing, describes an incident where Carolyn was paid $300 by Epstein to observe a sexual act performed by her friend on him. It also mentions a subsequent telephone call where Epstein requested Carolyn return to his residence to give him a massage.
DOJ-OGR-00018782.jpg
This document is page 184 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is cross-examining a witness named Carolyn regarding a complaint filed on her behalf by attorney Mr. Willits in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully objects to the admission of defense exhibit C4 on the grounds that it is 'not inconsistent,' leading the defense to request a sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00018781.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, where they are trying to locate Exhibit C4. The witness states the exhibit is related to her arrest, and another attorney, Ms. Comey, requests to approach the bench.
DOJ-OGR-00018780.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a previous legal complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf by an attorney named Mr. Willits in state court; specifically, Pagliuca establishes that this 91-page, 209-paragraph complaint did not contain a single mention of Ms. Maxwell's name.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Sarah Kellen / Je... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Massage book for dummies | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $400.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Victims' Compensa... | CAROLYN | $2,800,000.00 | Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant (Ma... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein sent her gifts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. | View |
| N/A | Received | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | CAROLYN | Shawn | $0.00 | Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money received for attending 'appointments'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Over 100 paid sexualized massages. | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money for engaging in sex acts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | General statement that 'we could make money' by... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unnamed Older Man... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Virginia... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus | View |
Prior Oath
Answers given under oath regarding drug use and Epstein's instructions.
Deposition Testimony
Witness testified under oath regarding whether she told the truth to the FBI.
Deposition testimony
Carolyn described Maxwell in her deposition.
Escort Service
Deposition where Carolyn was not asked about working for an escort service.
Testimony
Carolyn mentioned Maxwell twice without prompting regarding scheduling massages.
Deposition
Witness confirms testimony said nothing about Ms. Maxwell other than two specific words.
Interrogatories/Deposition/Complaint
Detailed answers to interrogatories, deposition testimony, and a 91-page complaint that allegedly did not include Ms. Maxwell.
Lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen
A 290-paragraph lawsuit that allegedly did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell.
Sexual Abuse
Witness was interviewed by the FBI about the same subject matter with counsel.
Lawsuits
Meetings with lawyers regarding civil complaints.
FBI Statement/Interview
Interview conducted at Carolyn's house.
Events at Mr. Epstein's house in 2002
FBI Special Agents Nesbitt and Kuyrkendall interviewed Carolyn at her house in August 2007.
Statement about being instructed to lie about age
Carolyn confirms that she told the FBI in August 2007 that she had been instructed to say she was 17.
Maxwell description
Carolyn mentioned meeting a woman with short black hair and an accent.
Sex assault inquiry
Statement given to FBI regarding events with Epstein.
Mr. Epstein
Witness confirms speaking to the FBI/law enforcement about Mr. Epstein for the first time.
Statement regarding Epstein
Carolyn told FBI that Epstein returned her call.
Discussion/Interview
Witness met with the FBI prior to filing lawsuits.
Investigation related to Epstein
A discussion in 2007 between the witness (Carolyn) and the FBI, where topics included Virginia Roberts, Sarah, Sean, Epstein, and a cook, but not Ghislaine Maxwell.
Witness Statement
Discussion regarding what Virginia Roberts told Carolyn about making money providing massages.
Recruitment
Carolyn detailed how she was recruited by Virginia Roberts.
Observation at Epstein's residence
Carolyn told the FBI in 2007 that she noticed an older lady with short black hair and an unknown accent at Epstein's residence.
Recruitment details
Carolyn detailed how she was recruited by Virginia Roberts.
N/A
Carolyn did not contact the Government during this period
Instruction from Virginia regarding age
The witness, Carolyn, confirms that she told the FBI in August 2007 that she was previously instructed by Virginia to tell Epstein she was 17.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity