MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness 'Kate' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Calling of witness David Mulligan. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lisa Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013232.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The judge and attorneys briefly discuss the arrival of a witness before the judge addresses the jury to apologize for a delay and outline the court's schedule for the next several weeks, which includes days off due to a scheduling conflict and the Christmas holiday.
DOJ-OGR-00013096.jpg
This document is page 83 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley, who is subsequently excused by the judge while the jury is not present. The court then communicates with Ms. Pomerantz (representing the government) before declaring a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00013095.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the end of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by attorney Ms. Pomerantz regarding technical details of how email clients populate messages when connected to the internet. Following the questioning, the Court excuses Mr. Flatley and dismisses the jury for a 15-minute break.
DOJ-OGR-00013094.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect and recross examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. Attorney Pomerantz questions him about emails he reviewed in Government Exhibit 54, specifically concerning the email address gmax1@mindspring.com. Attorney Menninger then conducts a recross examination, focusing on Mr. Flatley's technical understanding of email clients like Outlook and Mail.
DOJ-OGR-00013093.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony centers on a computer which had only one non-default user account belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that other people could have accessed the computer, but the witness repeatedly states they do not know who had access or where the computer was located.
DOJ-OGR-00013092.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on the creation of a document, with the attorney trying to establish that the witness does not know who created it, where the computer was, or if a person named 'gmax' was present. The witness confirms their lack of knowledge on these points, while an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on digital forensics, specifically establishing that the witness cannot determine the physical 'geo location' (whether Florida, New York, or elsewhere) of a desktop computer used to create specific exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00013086.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on a hard drive Flatley examined, establishing that it originated from a desktop computer and was a clone of another hard drive. The questioning culminates in the attorney asking if the witness, therefore, created a "clone of a clone".
DOJ-OGR-00013083.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning concerns a hard drive (exhibit GX54) found in Mr. Epstein's New York home. Prior to the cross-examination, Mr. Flatley reads a quote describing a very close partnership and friendship between individuals named 'Jeffrey' and 'Ghislaine'.
DOJ-OGR-00013082.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Mr. Flatley is instructed to read passages from Government Exhibit 422, which describe a close, long-term relationship between individuals named Jeffrey and Ghislaine, portraying them as an intelligent and inseparable couple.
DOJ-OGR-00013081.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on the authentication of Government Exhibits 421/421B and 422/422B. Specifically, Exhibit 421 is identified as a 'Help wanted' ad for a massage therapist in Palm Beach, and the digital metadata (Exhibit 421B) links the document's creation and saving on September 17, 2001, to a user named 'gmax'.
DOJ-OGR-00013080.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony reviews documentary evidence identifying 'John and Mary Alessi' as full-time workers and discusses 'Palm Beach House Maintenance' details, including a FedEx account number (114420816). Significantly, the testimony analyzes digital metadata for a document labeled '418B,' revealing that the author and last saver was 'gmax' (referencing Ghislaine Maxwell) and that the document was created and printed on January 29, 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013078.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata of a Microsoft Word document (Exhibit 420B). The witness testifies that the document's author and 'last saved by' user are listed as 'gmax,' a digital alias associated with the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00013075.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the authentication of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422, which are identified as Word documents printed from Government Exhibit 54. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the exhibits are admitted into evidence by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00013074.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley testifies that he reviewed evidence using forensic software, and Ms. Pomerantz successfully enters Government Exhibit 418B into evidence without objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger. Ms. Pomerantz then prepares to present additional exhibits (420, 421, and 422) for the witness's review.
DOJ-OGR-00013073.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by counsel Ms. Pomerantz. During the testimony, Government Exhibits 418 and 418R are admitted into evidence, with the court noting that 418 is sealed due to third-party phone numbers, and Mr. Flatley identifies another exhibit (418B) as showing the properties of exhibit 418.
DOJ-OGR-00013072.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz questions witness Mr. Flatley to authenticate Government Exhibits 418 (unredacted) and 418R (redacted), establishing they were printed from 'Government 54' (a master evidence source). The government moves to offer Exhibit 418 under seal and 418R publicly.
DOJ-OGR-00013071.jpg
This document is page 58 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Witness Mr. Flatley is being questioned by Ms. Pomerantz regarding an email sent by 'gmax' (gmax1@mindspring.com) to 'MarkhamCPM@earthlink.net'. The email discusses the creation of a 'household manual,' specifically detailing where to buy cleaning supplies (Publix and Sam's Club in Palm Beach Gardens) and specific brands of laundry products to use.
DOJ-OGR-00013070.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, an attorney named Ms. Pomerantz questions a witness, Mr. Flatley, about an email from May 25, 2001. The email, sent by "Sally" to "Ms. Maxwell," inquires about the status of a "PB manual" and mentions a specific conversation with someone named "John".
DOJ-OGR-00013069.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley. He is asked to read from an email dated May 25, 2001, sent from 'gmaxl@mindspring.com' to Sally Markham. The email contains a detailed list of complaints about the poor work performance of an individual named John, expressing the dissatisfaction of another individual referred to as 'JE'.
DOJ-OGR-00013068.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The primary action is the successful authentication and admission of an email, labeled Government Exhibit 424, into evidence. The court admits the exhibit without objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013066.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 419 as software registry information derived from Government Exhibit 54 and explains that a registry is a database used by Windows. The exhibit is subsequently admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013063.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing counsel Ms. Pomerantz questioning a witness, Mr. Flatley. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive he examined, explaining his evidence identification method which includes a unique 'NYC number' (NYC024350), his initials, the case number, and the date.
DOJ-OGR-00013061.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Flatley. Flatley identifies themselves as the CART (Computer Analysis Response Team) coordinator and a digital forensic examiner for the FBI with over 16 years of experience. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of the testimony relative to Rule 702 (expert vs. fact testimony).
DOJ-OGR-00013060.jpg
This document is a court transcript page (Document 753, filed 08/10/22) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the swearing-in and initial direct examination of government witness Stephen Flatley. Flatley identifies himself as an employee of the FBI, specifically working in the New York division's Computer Analysis Response Team.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Clarification on Detective Byrne
Disputing a representation regarding Detective Byrne and noting tech support was available.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding Government Exhibits 16 and 18.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding memory of abuse and reliance on documentation.
Scheduling and Scope of Cross-Examination
Ms. Pomerantz asks about the timing for the next witness and flags an issue regarding 'hindsight bias' questions being asked of a lay witness who happens to be a psychologist.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding the emotional significance of compensation funds and potential financial interest in the trial outcome.
CBP Record Keeping
Questioning regarding whether CBP records in the 1990s were paper and if they were logged in systems prior to 9/11.
Evidence Request
Requesting jurors view Government Exhibit 16.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding travel logistics to New York and payment of flight.
Witness Transition
Pomerantz ends questioning of Farmer and calls David Mulligan; Sternheim requests a sidebar.
Clarification of questioning regarding grooming
Discussion regarding a distinction between third-party presence and sexual gratification in the context of grooming strategies.
Direct Examination regarding 1995 trip
Q&A regarding a trip to NY in 1995, meeting Epstein, and identifying a photo.
Work location cross-examination
Pomerantz confirms Espinosa worked at the Madison Ave office, not the homes or Palm Beach house.
Objection Ruling
Judge sustains an objection regarding the line of questioning, prohibiting the attorney from drawing associations with other defendants the witness has testified for to avoid prejudice under Rule 403.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity