Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Comey

Person
Mentions
1419
Relationships
127
Events
630
Documents
693
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
127 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person STEPHEN FLATLEY
Witness presented by counsel
1
1
View
person Kimberly Meder
Witness presented by counsel
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Shawn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of David Rodgers Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey Courtroom View
N/A N/A Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Michael Dawson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00016744.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument about a witness the defense has been unable to contact. The defense attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger, detail their efforts, including issuing a subpoena and providing contact information. Opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, argues that the defense is raising this issue improperly late in the proceedings.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016743.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Everdell, and the judge. The conversation centers on the late introduction of a deposition transcript from 2019, the judge's firm stance against delaying the trial, and a potential issue with the marshal's ability to produce a subpoenaed witness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016740.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument regarding the defense's request to introduce a new, 81-year-old witness. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, claims the witness is crucial for testifying about property records to challenge the timeline of events described by someone named Kate. The opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, objects, arguing that the late introduction constitutes a delayed disclosure and is prejudicial to her side.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016739.jpg

This court transcript excerpt from August 10, 2022, discusses an upcoming witness from the U.K. and a declaration provided by an unnamed witness. This witness, who owns the Nags Head Pub, has direct knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell's ownership and residency at a Kinnerton Street property, having observed her presence there daily and noting her occupancy timeline. The document also includes a brief comment from MS. COMEY regarding the defense's preparation time.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016738.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and attorneys Ms. Menninger, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on scheduling, with the defense arguing they cannot conclude their case until the following Monday due to outstanding stipulations and a witness who is only available on that day. The identity of this witness is apparently unknown to at least one of the parties, prompting a question from the judge.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016737.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript details a discussion where defense attorney Ms. Sternheim confirms the defense will not call a witness named Mr. Hamilton, citing concerns over public access limitations during remote testimony. Additionally, prosecutor Ms. Comey discusses the scheduling of custodian witnesses for a brief rebuttal presentation.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016727.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Attorney Ms. Menninger expresses concern that the government's rebuttal might become a second closing argument and requests the court enforce a rule to limit its scope. In response, attorney Ms. Comey assures the judge that the rebuttal will be significantly shorter than the closing, adhering to the standard practice in the district, a position the court affirms.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue captures a procedural discussion between the Judge, Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the timing of the jury charge draft and estimates for closing arguments (summations). Ms. Sternheim makes a remark about the government getting 'two cracks' at closing arguments.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016725.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge and two lawyers, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on procedural issues, specifically the potential need to docket an exhibit for an unavailable witness and the judge's refusal to act on a previously submitted letter because its application was unclear. The judge states that the item will only be docketed if it is used as a judicial document in the proceedings.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016724.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and attorneys Comey, Pagliuca, and Menninger. The discussion covers logistical matters, including deadlines for a decision and a legal brief set for that evening. The judge also brings up a letter received the previous day from counsel for a potential defense witness, leading to confusion among the attorneys about who received it.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016723.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features a procedural discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense attorneys (Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Sternheim), and the Prosecution (Ms. Comey). The primary topic is whether the government intends to call a rebuttal witness; Ms. Comey indicates they are leaning against it but will decide by the next morning.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016720.jpg

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Counsel for the government, Ms. Comey, offers to stipulate to the testimony of a witness named Hyppolite, which opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger, agrees to discuss. The judge then instructs both parties to confer and identify all remaining issues in dispute by 7:30.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016692.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In it, attorneys discuss procedural matters with the judge, including a successful request for a one-hour filing extension and an announcement that the parties have reached a stipulation regarding Mr. Glassman, which avoids the need for his live testimony. The transcript concludes as the court prepares to bring in a witness and the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016627.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The dialogue involves the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Comey discussing procedural matters, including agreed-upon witnesses, a potential government rebuttal expert, and an affidavit by a Mr. Hamilton that the court is reviewing.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016625.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding the testimony of a witness named Loftus and the admission of an FBI 302 report. The defense argues for a live witness to highlight an inconsistent statement regarding whether 'Virginia' approached 'Carolyn' to offer $300 at a party or at a house in Virginia.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016624.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Menninger, Comey, and Pagliuca discuss scheduling and stipulations regarding 'prior inconsistent statements' found in FBI 302 reports for witnesses identified as Carolyn, Jane, and Annie. The court focuses on resolving issues related to 'Carolyn' immediately as she is an out-of-state witness present to testify that afternoon.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016511.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022. The attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Comey, Ms. Sternheim) and the judge discuss procedural issues, including who will make photocopies and a request for a recess. Ms. Sternheim also informs the court about the need for a screen for an upcoming witness, potentially Dr. Loftus.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013276.jpg

This document is an index page (Page 263 of 264) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the examination of witnesses Kimberly Meder, Stephen Flatley, and Carolyn by attorneys Comey, Menninger, Pomerantz, and Pagliuca. It also tracks the receipt of Government Exhibits 304, 306, 307, 320, 321, 322, and 324 into evidence.

Court transcript index (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013275.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022, covering proceedings that adjourned to December 8, 2021. The Judge admonishes the legal teams regarding proper objection protocols, specifically forbidding 'speaking objections' meant to communicate with the jury or witnesses. The session concludes with both the government (Ms. Moe) and defense (Ms. Menninger) confirming they have no further briefings for the evening.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013267.jpg

This document is a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the recross-examination of a witness, Carolyn, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, concerning $446,000 she received in 2009. The witness states she does not recall the exact dates the money was spent but used it for a house, car, and food, after which she is excused and the court adjourns until the next day.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013262.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by suggesting she has an incentive to lie and questioning her about schizophrenia, substance abuse, and fears of losing custody of her children—allegations the witness denies. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) objects to the line of questioning regarding incentives.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013255.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca regarding her communications with the government in 2020. The questioning attempts to link her cooperation with the government to the timeline of the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund opening in June 2020.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013254.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on voice messages left for the witness by a Mr. Scarola in 2019 and 2020 concerning contact with the government. The opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, repeatedly objects to this line of questioning on the basis of privilege, and the court sustains her objections, preventing the witness from answering.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013251.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on establishing that Carolyn had never previously mentioned a 'Ms. Maxwell' in several key instances: to FBI agents in 2007, in two lawsuits involving Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, or in a 2009 deposition. The witness is also questioned about a 2007 meeting in Florida with a 'Ms. Villaflana,' whom she claims not to recall.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013246.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. During cross-examination by Mr. Pagliuca, a witness named Carolyn is confronted with prior testimony where she denied having sexual intercourse with Mr. Epstein. Carolyn clarifies to the court that she answered 'no' previously because she was not a willing participant, explicitly stating, 'He had intercourse with me and I stopped it.'

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
113
As Recipient
4
Total
117

Missing Jurors

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Asking if the Court has attempted to call the missing jurors.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussing the redaction of phone numbers for Carolyn and third parties.

Court dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Ending the day

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Stopping the examination because it is 4:59 PM.

Court instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding Exhibit 662

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding the columns in a logbook exhibit.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding Melissa and Amanda's visits to Epstein's house.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Clarification on how nonsealed exhibits will be shown (on screen).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Witness testimony issue

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Comey requests permission to submit a letter to the court to look into the issue being discussed regarding witnesses.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Search of 358 El Brillo Way

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["Mr. Parkinson"]

Ms. Comey questions Mr. Parkinson about a search conducted on October 20, 2005, at 358 El Brillo Way. The questioning clarifies the timeline of events, distinguishing between an incident in 2003 and the 2005 search, and details the rooms Mr. Parkinson observed.

Direct examination testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Property Layout

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Alessi

Direct examination regarding the physical layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding a specific female passenger on Epstein's planes who attended Interlochen.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Video Evidence Presentation

From: Ms. Comey
To: The Court / Ms. Drescher

Discussion regarding the playback of a video on Ms. Drescher's laptop and pausing at specific timestamps.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admission of Evidence

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Requesting admission of exhibits 11-16 and 1004, and requesting jurors view sealed binders.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a moment

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey asks for a moment, Judge grants it, counsel confers.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Photograph Identification

From: Ms. Comey
To: Parkinson

Questioning regarding a photograph of a work area containing the name Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding witness background, education, and past relationships.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Transcript availability

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Not necessarily, your Honor. We're not being recorded right now and we're getting a transcript.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary Ruling

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

The Court sustains a foundation objection regarding witness testimony about a book version, instructing the jury to disregard specific beliefs of the witness.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey requests a ruling on whether the government needs to 'draw the sting' on direct examination regarding a witness's juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photograph (Exhibit 250)

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Argument describing a photo of Epstein and a girl, arguing its probative value because it was displayed in the house the defendant ran.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect Examination

From: Rodgers
To: Ms. Comey

Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Timing of evidence release

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the timeline for releasing redacted photographs (by Sunday) and videos (by Tuesday) due to IT staff schedules.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: CAROLYN

Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 313

From: Ms. Comey
To: Ms. Meder

Questioning regarding a photo found on a CD (1B75) from the Epstein/Maxwell investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Meder

Questioning regarding the identification of a photo found on a CD during the investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search