Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Conrad
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Wallace
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Government Counsel (Redacted)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISAINE MAXWELL
|
Represented by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Professional adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted BOP Official]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AJN (Judge Nathan)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
EFTA00017817.pdf
This document is an email chain dated November 20, 2020, between Bobbi C. Sternheim (defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell) and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim sent an urgent request for a call regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The AUSA replied indicating they had missed a call and provided windows of availability.
EFTA00017813.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in November 2020. The defense expresses significant frustration regarding technical issues with hard drives provided to Maxwell at the MDC, including broken drives and a lack of consolidation, as well as severe restrictions on the hours Maxwell is permitted to use a laptop to review over 2 million pages of evidence. The prosecution responds by offering to consolidate materials onto a single drive and explaining that the limited laptop access (8:30am-3:30pm) is due to MDC security protocols requiring lieutenant supervision.
EFTA00016958.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated October 20, 2021, regarding a telephonic court conference scheduled for the following day at noon. Sternheim requests confirmation that arrangements are in place for Ghislaine Maxwell's participation in the conference.
EFTA00016726.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (20cr330). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim provides a list of attendees, including legal counsel and Maxwell's family members (Ian, Kevin, Pandora, Philip, Isabel, Christine), for an October 21 teleconference and a November 1 in-person pretrial conference. The email responds to a request from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers regarding logistics, COVID-19 protocols, and speaking rules for the upcoming hearings.
EFTA00016723.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim filed a letter with the court, prompting Judge Nathan to order the prosecution (USANYS) to respond by 5 PM the following day. The prosecution notes internally that they have contacted the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to set up a call, likely to gather information needed for their response.
EFTA00016492.pdf
Email correspondence from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, et al.). The prosecution confirms they spoke with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, who denied reports that their client (name redacted) intended to give press briefings during the upcoming trial, affirming compliance with court rules regarding extrajudicial statements.
EFTA00016262.pdf
An email chain from October 29, 2021, regarding urgent issues with Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. Attorney Bobbi Sternheim threatens an order to show cause because Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week despite USPO tracking showing items available for pickup. The document includes a signature block for Isabel Maxwell acting as a paralegal for Leah Saffian, Inc.
EFTA00016259.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding urgent issues with legal mail delivery to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim provides USPS tracking evidence showing four items waiting for pickup in Brooklyn and threatens court action if the MDC does not retrieve them. The document includes screenshots of the tracking information and a signature block for Isabel Maxwell, a paralegal.
EFTA00016206.pdf
This document is a motion in limine filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on October 18, 2021, seeking to exclude evidence offered by the government under Rule 404(b) due to lack of proper notice. The defense argues the government failed to identify specific evidence or articulate a non-propensity purpose for its admission. The motion references disputed evidence including emails between Maxwell and 'influential men' regarding dates, testimony from a former Epstein employee (2005-06) regarding 'sexualized massages,' and various exhibits including flight logs (GX-661 & 662) and financial statements.
EFTA00016204.pdf
This document contains an email chain dated November 3, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates courtesy copies of Electronic Case Files (ECF) filings, specifically a bail application and a document regarding the disclosure of juror names. The email is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00016203.pdf
An email dated November 3, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a redacted recipient, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330), specifically attaching a document regarding the disclosure of juror names.
EFTA00016032.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated December 18, 2020. The letter corrects Bates stamping errors in prior discovery productions and provides replacement copies of Deutsche Bank materials relating to Jeffrey Epstein and a UBS subpoena return. It confirms ongoing discovery obligations and mentions physical evidence in FBI custody.
EFTA00015911.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi Sternheim to redacted officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at MDC. The email requests permission for Maxwell to use a laptop for reviewing discovery due to technical limitations of MDC computers and outlines several grievances, including invasive surveillance, freezing cell conditions, removal of bedding, excessive searches, and failure to deliver mail.
EFTA00015898.pdf
This document is an email metadata printout dated December 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The email is copied to other defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark S. Cohen) and a representative from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line references Ghislaine Maxwell and her Bureau of Prisons register number (02879-509).
EFTA00015856.pdf
An email thread from August 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and likely MDC or prosecution officials. Sternheim reports a security breach where third parties accessed a Zoom room during privileged attorney-client communication and requests a return to WebEx. The respondent denies a breach occurred, attributing the issue to an internal miscommunication where a secure line was already in use.
EFTA00015804.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The discussions concern protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' materials, including nude images and physical evidence (such as massage tables and plaster busts) seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The parties negotiate the location of the review (FBI Bronx warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), the presence of the defendant, and the use of electronic devices by defense counsel during the review.
EFTA00015770.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence details negotiations over the location of the review (500 Pearl St vs. FBI Bronx Warehouse), the transportation of specific physical evidence (including excluding 'bulky' massage tables and cash), and protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' and 'obscene' electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The defense expresses concerns about missing items, the format of electronic surveillance, and the need for their client to meaningfully participate in the review.
EFTA00015753.pdf
This document contains a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Menninger, Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for case 20 Cr. 330. The discussions focus on scheduling physical evidence reviews at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx and electronic evidence reviews at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Key evidence items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts, cash, shredded paper, and thousands of 'highly confidential' nude or partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences.
EFTA00015723.pdf
This document is a Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding the case United States v. Maxwell (Case No. 21-770), dated April 5, 2021. It notifies attorneys of record, including David Oscar Markus and Bobbi C. Sternheim, that a 'Defective Document' (Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance) was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes standard PACER warnings and technical metadata regarding the file transaction.
EFTA00015303.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to a third party (name redacted) and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment. The defense argues that the subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment due to overbreadth and lack of a warrant, violated the 'Martindell' doctrine regarding the sanctity of protective orders in civil litigation, and infringed upon Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination regarding her 2016 civil deposition testimony.
EFTA00015019.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 18, 2020, involving attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim is inquiring about her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, who reportedly received a Covid-19 nasal swab and was placed in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) for a 14-day quarantine. Sternheim is seeking confirmation on whether scheduled legal calls and in-person visits will proceed despite the quarantine.
EFTA00014710.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.
EFTA00014699.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.
EFTA00014669.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
EFTA00014647.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between defense attorney Christian Everdell and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY. They are negotiating the specific wording of a legal stipulation regarding a partial transcript of a witness's trial testimony given on a February 26th. The names of several other attorneys (Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca) appear in the CC line.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Unknown
Standard legal disclaimer and Covid-19 office closure notice found in an email signature/footer.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Maurene Comey (maurene.comey@usdoj.gov) and Andrew Rohrbach (andrew.rohrbach@usdoj.gov).
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via U.S. mail (postage prepaid) to Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Hon. John M. Leventhal (judgeleventhal@aidalalaw.com).
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter opposing the motion filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to give oral victim impact statements at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing. The letter argues that neither individual qualifies as a statutory crime victim under the CVRA.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim informs Judge Nathan that her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been unjustifiably placed on suicide watch by the MDC, preventing her from preparing for her sentencing. Sternheim states Maxwell is not suicidal and warns that she will move for an adjournment if the situation persists.
No Subject
This is the signature page of a letter or legal filing from Bobbi C. Sternheim, indicating that attachments are included and that Counsel of Record have been copied.
Challenge to standing under CVRA
No preview available
Sentencing Procedures / Victim Statements
Request regarding the manner of sentencing and opposition to impact statements from individuals not identified as victims in the charged offenses.
Defense counsel letter regarding sealing of certain docum...
No preview available
Defense counsel writes regarding sealing of certain docum...
Letter dated 6/17/2022 entered on 6/21/2022.
2-day extension to file sentencing submission
Request for extension (Denied by court on 05/11/2022).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for a two-day extension to file sentencing submission due to attorney travel.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Requesting a stay of ruling pending review of a new interview given by Juror 50 to Paramount Plus.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter arguing for a new trial for Ghislaine Maxwell based on the assertion that Juror 50 gave false answers on a juror questionnaire regarding his own past sexual abuse, which should have disqualified him from the jury.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting a proffer from Juror 50's counsel to explain the basis for the juror's assertion of the Fifth Amendment, in light of the juror's public statements and the government's consideration of immunity.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request regarding Juror 50's assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege and government immunity.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order, in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610) from the same day.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610).
Response to Dkt. 605
Letter in response to Order 605.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussion regarding proposed redactions to documents related to Juror 50's conduct and motion for a new trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in response to a previous docket entry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity