Jane
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jane's mother
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Matt
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Glassman
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's father
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michelle
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | Jane met Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Relocation | Jane moved to New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Jane's testimony is being compared to her prior statements regarding Ms. Maxwell's presence, a hi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The witness, Jane, describes spending time at Epstein's house in Palm Beach. | Epstein's house in Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Crime | The witness, Jane, testifies to being sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein when she was 14, 15, and... | A room, presumably in one o... | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Jane was allegedly taken alone into a pool house where Epstein masturbated on her. | pool room -- pool house | View |
| N/A | Visit | Maxwell and Epstein visited the witness's house prior to an instance of abuse. | witness's house | View |
| N/A | Flight | Transportation of Jane to New Mexico and a subsequent return flight, which are central to the jur... | to New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Death of a family member | Jane's father passed away suddenly. | Florida | View |
| N/A | Flight | Jane flew to New York on commercial flights and a private jet. | to New York | View |
| N/A | Camp application | Jane and her two brothers applied to attend an arts camp every summer for three years. | arts camp | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Jane was sexually abused by Maxwell and Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Personal hardship | Jane's father died and her family lost their home. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Mental health crisis | Jane experienced suicidal thoughts when she was 14, 15, and 16. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Jane spoke to a school guidance counselor when she was a kid. | School | View |
| N/A | Crime | Epstein sexually abused Jane during trips. | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Visit | Jane sometimes visited the office. | the office | View |
| N/A | Interaction | The witness saw Jane interact with Epstein in the office three or four times. | the office | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Victims Jane and Annie testified that they received money and gifts during their abuse. | Court | View |
| N/A | Crime | Alleged abuse of Jane while she was under the age of 17. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Crime | Alleged transport of Jane to New York for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity while she wa... | New York | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | Ms. Maxwell allegedly enticed Jane to travel across state lines with the intent to engage in sexu... | Across state lines | View |
| N/A | Flight | Jane's return flight to New Mexico, which the defendant allegedly aided. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Jane testified about Ms. Maxwell's involvement in her travel to New York. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Jane's travel to New York to engage in illegal sexual activity. | New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016754.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated August 10, 2022, detailing a judge's rulings on objections to a court transcript. The rulings assess the consistency of a witness named Jane's testimony against her prior statements concerning the presence of Ms. Maxwell, a past hike, and an instance of abuse in New York. The judge sustains some objections and overrules others, providing brief justifications for the decisions.
DOJ-OGR-00016710.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Aznaran by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The testimony establishes that travel records for individuals named Jane, Kate, and Annie before September 11, 2001, are not exhaustive. The witness confirms that prior to 9/11, airlines were not as complete in providing passenger manifests as they were afterward, suggesting a reason for the incomplete records.
DOJ-OGR-00016703.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. The questioning focuses on establishing the age of a person named Jane during two international flights: one on April 15, 1996, from Milan, Italy (MXP) to JFK, when she was 15, and another on June 21, 1997, when she was 16.
DOJ-OGR-00016687.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Aznaran. The witness confirms they were instructed to search the TECS system for border crossing records pertaining to individuals named Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer for the period between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2010. The proceedings are briefly interrupted when Mr. Everdell requests a sidebar, after which the judge calls for a 15-minute break for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00016548.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between individuals named Jane and Mr. Epstein. Espinosa testifies to seeing them interact in an office three or four times and describes their impression of the relationship as "loving."
DOJ-OGR-00016547.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on an individual named Jane, her relationship as Jeffrey's goddaughter, and how this status influenced her treatment in 'the office' where her mother also worked. The examination also inquires about Jane's siblings and the extent of contact between Jane's mother and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016507.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over evidence. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, seeks to admit photographs given to him by Ms. Espinosa, which were sent to her by a soap opera star named Jane. The government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the admission of these photographs, questioning their relevance to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00016455.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney argues the legal definitions of "persuade," "induce," and "entice." Citing the case U.S. v. Broxmeyer and the Random House Dictionary, the speaker asserts these words imply causation, requiring an action by the defendant to bring about an effect. The attorney concludes by stating that the only evidence linking their client, Ms. Maxwell, to a trip taken by "Jane" to New York is Jane's own testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00013284.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between attorneys and a judge about witness strategy. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, states she cannot yet confirm which witnesses her side will call, while the government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, flags the possibility of calling 'victim 2' later that day. The discussion highlights the fluid nature of trial proceedings and witness scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00013271.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys and a judge about scheduling witnesses for an upcoming hearing. The primary issue raised is a request by attorney Ms. Menninger for the court to order a witness named Jane and her attorney not to discuss her testimony with another subpoenaed witness, who is Jane's younger sibling. The judge also proposes several dates for the hearing to avoid interfering with jury time.
DOJ-OGR-00013018.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a discussion between attorney Ms. Moe and the judge regarding a conversation between two siblings, one of whom was a witness named Jane. Ms. Moe explains that one sibling described her court testimony as an 'unpleasant experience' to the other. The judge inquires about whether the government had instructed witnesses not to discuss testimony, and Ms. Moe recounts her own conversation with Jane's attorney on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00010546.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, details the sexual abuse of two victims, identified as Jane and Kate, by the defendant and Epstein. It describes how the abuse of Jane began when she was 14, with the defendant abusing a position of trust, and continued for years in multiple locations including Palm Beach, New York City, and New Mexico. The document also states that the abuse of another victim, Kate, began around the same time in 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00010537.jpg
This document is a Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 670, filed 06/22/22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It outlines sections pertaining to a criminal case, including background, charges, summary of proof at trial concerning the sexual abuse of multiple individuals (Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, Melissa), pre-sentence report and sentencing guidelines, discussion on the defendant's conduct warranting imprisonment, and financial penalties. The document details various sentencing enhancements and arguments related to the defendant's sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00010534.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. The letter confirms that the government has complied with a court order by notifying the six victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) of their rights to be heard at the upcoming sentencing on June 28, 2022, as stipulated by the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00009130.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on February 24, 2022, analyzes post-trial interviews given by 'Juror 50' in the Maxwell case. The document recounts the juror's statements to media outlets like Reuters and The Independent, where he discussed his initial impartiality, his handling of the juror questionnaire regarding his own experience of sexual abuse, and the jury's reasoning for their verdict. The filing argues that a full review of the juror's interviews demonstrates his impartiality and the care taken during deliberations, countering the defendant's claims of bias.
DOJ-OGR-00008957.jpg
This legal document argues that the defense was hindered by the unavailability of contemporaneous phone and property records for Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and accusers. It cites two examples: the inability to challenge Carolyn's testimony that Maxwell called her to set up appointments, and the inability to rebut accuser Jane's testimony about the timing of her sexual abuse at Epstein's New York townhouse, which she described in detail.
DOJ-OGR-00008955.jpg
This legal document discusses the significance of flight records in a trial, arguing that contemporaneous passenger manifests and travel records were crucial for verifying accusers' timelines. It highlights the inadequacy of the flight logs kept by David Rodgers, which were incomplete and used generic identifiers. The document also references testimony from Cimberly Espinosa and Annie Farmer regarding travel arrangements made by Epstein, including flights for accuser 'Jane' when she was 16 and a trip for Annie Farmer to New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00008943.jpg
This legal document analyzes a jury's deliberation, focusing on how flight logs kept by Epstein's pilot, Dave Rodgers, were used to corroborate testimony from a victim named Jane. The jury appears to have found no corroborating evidence for Ms. Maxwell's involvement in Jane's trips to New York, but did find evidence in the flight logs that Maxwell was a passenger on a trip with Jane to New Mexico. This distinction led the jury to focus its evaluation on Ms. Maxwell's involvement in the conduct that occurred in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00008942.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell's conviction on Count Four was likely improper. The argument centers on a note from the jury, which suggests they based the conviction on sexual abuse that victim 'Jane' experienced in New Mexico, facilitated by Maxwell. However, the charge required the intended sexual activity to be a violation of New York Penal Law, a condition the New Mexico events did not satisfy.
DOJ-OGR-00008936.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 11, 2022, details the defense's request for an additional jury instruction concerning Mann Act counts, arguing against conviction based solely on New Mexico conduct. The Court declined this instruction, and the jury subsequently convicted Ms. Maxwell on Count Four, with charges also in Counts One and Three. The document also cites applicable law regarding constructive amendments, defining them and explaining their impact on a defendant's Grand Jury Clause rights.
DOJ-OGR-00008935.jpg
This legal document from a court case, filed on February 11, 2022, details arguments over jury instructions concerning whether an offense must be a violation of New York law, even if events occurred in New Mexico. It highlights a specific note from the deliberating jury asking for clarification on Count Four, questioning if defendant Ms. Maxwell could be convicted for aiding a victim's (Jane's) return flight if the criminal intent was tied to the initial flight to New Mexico. The court declined to provide clarifying instructions, referring the jury back to the original charge.
DOJ-OGR-00008931.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to vacate her convictions and grant a new trial. The argument is that the jury improperly convicted her on charges based on testimony about events in New Mexico, which was outside the scope of the original indictment premised on violations of New York law. The filing contends this constituted a 'constructive amendment' of the indictment, making the conviction invalid.
DOJ-OGR-00017322.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger, regarding the legal standard for finding a defendant guilty of aiding in the transportation of a person named 'Jane'. The discussion specifically focuses on whether a flight to New Mexico must have had a 'significant or motivating purpose' for illegal sexual activity to meet the criteria for a conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, dated August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a discussion between MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE, addressing 'Your Honor,' regarding a defendant's alleged role in transporting 'Jane' to and from New Mexico. The central issue is whether these flights were intended for illegal sexual activity and if the defendant's actions constitute aiding and abetting, with the jury currently deliberating on these points for a potential conviction on Count Four.
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the purpose of travel undertaken by a person named Jane. An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present, while another speaker, Ms. Moe, counters that the evidence is ambiguous as to which flight is being discussed. The conversation centers on interpreting Jane's intent and whether her travel meets the elements of a crime.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane | $200.00 | Payment for her time visiting his mansion while... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane | $0.00 | Settlement award discussed in the context of cr... | View |
| N/A | Received | defendants | Jane | $0.00 | Discussion of a plan to 'get more money from th... | View |
Photographs from soap opera
Jane, a soap opera star, sent photographs of herself and other cast members in an envelope to her fan, Ms. Espinosa.
Cooperating with the government
Mr. Glassman advised Jane on whether cooperating with the government and testifying against Ms. Maxwell would 'help her case.' This advice was later revealed by Mr. Glassman in his communications with the government.
Filing a claim
Jane filed a claim with the EVCP.
Initial meeting with Epstein
The witness, Jane, was questioned about a conversation with her younger brother where she allegedly told him she only met Epstein.
Initial meeting with Epstein
The witness, Jane, confirmed giving an interview to a news source about her initial meeting with Epstein, where she stated she was approached by him.
Names of participants in group massages
The witness confirms that she previously told the government the names of other women who participated in the group massages.
A document shown to Jane on the witness stand.
Jane communicated with Brian about a document she had been shown while on the witness stand. Ms. Menninger wants to know the full extent of this communication.
Question regarding testimony
The government communicated a question to Jane through her attorney.
Timeline of 'The Lion King'
The government communicated to Jane through her attorney that 'The Lion King' Broadway show did not come out until 1997.
Information for the government
Jane communicated information to Mr. Glassman with the knowledge that he intended to share it with the government.
Unknown content
The content of this communication is the subject of the legal debate; Menninger wants to exclude the specific content while allowing the witness to state how she felt.
Legal Strategy
Communications regarding the impact of criminal testimony on the civil case.
Benefit of testifying
Communication that testifying would benefit her in the criminal case.
Receiving financial help from Jeffrey Epstein
Jane told the witness that she had received financial help from Jeffrey Epstein. The exact timing and details of the conversation are not fully specified in this excerpt.
Request to take extra classes
The questioner refers to a letter the witness (Jane) had submitted asking to take extra classes the next summer.
Potential abuse in New Mexico
The document describes how the government repeatedly questioned Jane about abuse in New Mexico, despite her initial statements of having no memory of such events.
No Subject
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Trip to New Mexico and sexual abuse
Jane previously told the FBI about a trip to New Mexico but denied being sexually abused there.
Confirming Maxwell's identity
After Matt learned that Maxwell had been arrested, he called Jane to ask if she was the woman Jane had told him about years ago. Jane confirmed that she was.
Harassment
People calling and harassing Jane.
Jane's family living in her house
The witness is questioned about telling Matt that her family was living in her house.
A woman making her feel comfortable
Jane told her boyfriend from a decade ago, Matt, about the woman who would make her feel comfortable in the room.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Abuse suffered in New Mexico
Maxwell received notes from Jane's interview, which recorded the abuse she suffered in New Mexico, over three weeks before her trial.
Making arrangements
The questioner alleges that the witness, Jane, previously told the government she recalled Emmy calling her home phone in Florida between the ages of 14 and 16 to make arrangements. The witness denies ever making this statement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity