| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
238
Very Strong
|
470 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Client |
64
Very Strong
|
183 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
61
Very Strong
|
255 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
49
Very Strong
|
141 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
38
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
37
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
30
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Client |
28
Very Strong
|
79 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Client |
25
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator alleged |
24
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Prosecutor defendant |
24
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
24
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Client |
24
Very Strong
|
47 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
Bobbi Sternheim
|
Client |
22
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Adversarial |
22
Very Strong
|
33 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in managing the lives of people, specifically maki... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Family businesses were lost after Ghislaine Maxwell's father's passing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states no one from the government had spoken to her about her case or Mr. Epste... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Reid (potentially Reid Hoffman) being a 'Silicon Valley guy' and how Ghislaine M... | San Francisco (mentioned) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lack of knowledge about law enforcement interest in her. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Ghislaine Maxwell and Ms. Mills, after President Clinton left office. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conversation between Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche regarding past events, specifically massa... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's non-prosecution deal made by the U.S. Attorney in Florida. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the S1 superseding... | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Business meetings on a plane involving Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner, attended by Ghislaine Maxw... | on the plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell discusses finding a house for rent for someone in New York, which she initially... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's financial success and how he accumulated his money. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's past as a math teacher at Dalton and his work at Bear Stearns. | N/A | View |
This document is a Notice of Deposition filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 24, 2020. The plaintiff (name redacted) notifies the defendants that the oral deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for April 29, 2020, at the offices of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The document lists the legal counsel representing the plaintiff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
This document is an email chain from March 24, 2020, originating from Aneisha Christie and forwarded by Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The email serves as a formal service of a 'Notice of Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell' in the civil case '[Redacted] v. Indyke, et al.' The recipients include Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, presumably opposing counsel.
This document contains email metadata from December 21, 2020, regarding an urgent request for Video Teleconferences (VTCs) for Ghislaine Maxwell. The email was routed through the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) server, as indicated by the Message-ID. The sender and recipient information has been redacted.
A cover letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the Metropolitan Detention Center dated March 16, 2021. The letter encloses discovery materials for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell regarding case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) and requests that she be granted access to these materials.
A cover letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated March 12, 2021. The letter accompanies a discovery production of photographs and documents received from victims not referenced in the indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330), designated as confidential under a protective order.
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production. The email confirms the production of materials related to victims not referenced in the specific indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), pursuant to a court order from November 2020. The prosecutor requests an FTP link for transfer and notes that a CD copy will be sent to the MDC for Maxwell to review.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). They are coordinating to assemble a comprehensive list of all Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests the office has ever received regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion reveals limitations in their internal tracking database, specifically regarding requests made to the FBI that resulted in litigation defended by the SDNY, and identifies a missing record involving the media outlet Radar Online.
This document is an email chain from March 9, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Laura Menninger submits a letter to Judge Nathan detailing objections to the government's proposed redactions in an Omnibus Response. Subsequent emails in the chain involve coordination between the defense and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the exchange of proposed redactions.
An email dated March 8, 2021, from attorney Laura Menninger to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and other defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell, Sternheim). The email serves as a cover letter for an attached PDF concerning a request to view evidence and highly confidential materials in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email chain from late December 2020 discussing disparities in counsel and discovery access for Ghislaine Maxwell (detained at MDC) and Justin Rivera (detained at MCC). Judge Engelmayer requested a declaration from the Bureau of Prisons to explain why Maxwell's accommodations were 'strikingly different and far superior' to Rivera's, citing differences in case complexity, housing situations, and inmate populations at the respective facilities. The emails detail the efforts to draft this declaration and address specific questions and concerns regarding the document's content and timeline.
This document is an email thread among US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff regarding a court order from Judge Engelmayer in the case of United States v. Justin Rivera. The Judge required the BOP to explain why Ghislaine Maxwell (detained at MDC) received significantly better access to legal counsel and laptops than Rivera (detained at MCC), specifically citing 'terrible optics' and potential disparity based on class/race. The emails detail the drafting of a declaration to explain that the differences are due to Maxwell's protective custody status and the sheer volume of discovery in her case, compared to Rivera's placement in the general population.
This document contains a series of internal emails from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) dated December 29-30, 2020, discussing case summaries ('blurbs') prepared for the incoming presidential transition team. The emails include draft summaries for two major cases: *United States v. Turkiye Halk Bankasi AS* (Halkbank), involving sanctions evasion, and *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*, regarding her role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors. The document outlines the charges, case status, and trial schedules for both matters as they stood in late 2020.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials (specifically nude images and videos seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices), the transport of physical evidence (including massage tables, plaster busts, and a stuffed dog) from the FBI Bronx warehouse to the courthouse, and the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street. The prosecution refuses to transport bulky items or obscene digital material freely, requiring the defense to view some items at the warehouse or on specific laptops under supervision.
Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim writes to Judge Alison Nathan objecting to a second superseding indictment filed against Ghislaine Maxwell just months before the scheduled July 2021 trial. The defense argues this expansion of charges (covering 1994-2004) constitutes tactical gamesmanship and abuse of power, potentially necessitating a delay in the trial. The letter also requests an in-person arraignment and a new bail hearing, citing issues with remote proceedings and referencing Maxwell's difficult detention conditions.
This document is an email sent on March 18, 2020, containing a link to a New York Times article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein’s Ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sues His Estate for Legal Fees'. The sender and recipient identities are redacted. The email appears to be a forwarded news alert or information sharing regarding ongoing litigation involving Maxwell and the Epstein estate.
This document is an email chain from June 30, 2020, between officials at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). An Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) circulates a draft press release regarding the imminent arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, aiming for release 'tomorrow or Thursday at the latest.' A follow-up email corrects typos in the draft, specifically noting the misspelling of 'CONSPIRACY'.
This document consists of two slides from the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case, likely used for victim outreach or public information. It outlines the charges against Maxwell regarding the facilitation of sexual abuse for Jeffrey Epstein and lists the specific locations where the alleged conduct occurred: New York, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and London. It provides photos of Epstein's properties in these locations and includes a call to action for potential victims to contact the FBI.
This document is an internal SDNY email dated November 23, 2020, containing press clippings. It lists various news articles, highlighting a Law & Crime piece about the unsealing of a deposition in the Ghislaine Maxwell civil case, along with other political and financial news items involving figures like Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and Antony Blinken.
This document consists of two slides from a Department of Justice/FBI presentation titled 'U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell'. The slides serve as a public outreach tool seeking potential victims, listing the locations where alleged abuse occurred (New York, Florida, New Mexico, London) and displaying photos of Epstein's properties. It provides the FBI hotline number for individuals who recognize Maxwell or Epstein and believe they may be victims.
This document is an email thread from June 24, 2020, discussing the preparation and editing of a 'briefing book' containing 'talking points'. The attachments listed reveal the subjects of these talking points, which include 'Maxwell_1-Jeffrey_Epstein_Co-Conspirators', 'Global Energy Producers', 'The Presidential Coalition', 'NRA', 'AOC Investigation', and 'NYPD'. The participants are coordinating the format of these documents for editing purposes.
A letter dated November 9, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the Legal Department at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The letter transmits the password for a drive containing discovery materials related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The password and specific attorney names are redacted.
A cover letter dated November 18, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The letter encloses discovery materials for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell (Register No. 02879-509) in relation to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, requesting that she be allowed access to the documents.
Internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 17, 2020, coordinating 'Production 7' of discovery materials for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence details the preparation of encrypted drives from PAE and iPhone images, including a table of Bates ranges (SDNY_GM_00536837 to SDNY_GM_02742043) primarily labeled as 'Search Warrant Returns'. The emails mention a specific password for a drive (WO-6290_20201104) and discuss logistics for providing copies to both the defense counsel and the defendant.
Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 25, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's requests to immediately disclose the identities of three alleged victims and to be released into the general prison population. The court ruled the request for victim identities was premature as discovery had just begun, and found that the Bureau of Prisons was already providing sufficient access to legal materials (13 hours a day). The court ordered the Government to provide status updates on Maxwell's confinement conditions every 90 days.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers characterized by government as 'funne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Annie | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots during shopping trip | View |
| N/A | Received | Trust Fund | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $80,000.00 | Annual income from trust fund | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Finances received by Maxwell for participating ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $30,000,000.00 | Total amount Maxwell received from Epstein acco... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of huge black helicopter. | View |
| N/A | Received | buyer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Proceeds from the sale of Ms. Maxwell's London ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Clerk of the Cour... | $300.00 | Lump sum payment of criminal monetary penalties. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse for Ms. Maxwell. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Airline/Travel pr... | $0.00 | Flew to France at her own expense to help mother. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of helicopter, homes in NY and London,... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed by District Court | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $300.00 | Mandatory special assessment | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | The Terramar Project | $0.00 | Ghislaine devoted her own financial resources t... | View |
| N/A | Received | A. Farmer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Witness filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Buying a helicopter and paying for flight lessons. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers to a trust/spouse characterized by go... | View |
| N/A | Received | Lender (implied) | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Significant loans procured on the basis of a ne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a helicopter, homes in NY and Londo... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Henri Bendel | $0.00 | Purchases made at the store which led to the de... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
An essay authored by the defendant.
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Denial of application (Ex. H)
Essay where Maxwell described her relationship with Epstein.
Directives given by agents when they announced themselves.
Defendant reported assets of approx $3.8 million.
Argument that confinement impairs ability to communicate effectively with counsel.
Maxwell would call and set up appointment times.
Maxwell calling to schedule massage appointments.
Rules regarding service, stationery, breakfast, and household management.
Video screen meetings to review discovery documents projected on a wall.
Request for personal references/letters of reference for future jobs.
Birthday wishes and Christmas wishes.
Did you have fun? You're such a good girl. And I'm so happy you were able to come. This is really great. And he obviously likes you a lot.
Asked to make appointment because TV in Blue Room has poor reception.
Question confirms this call did NOT happen.
Witness confirms she had never talked to Maxwell before coming to New York.
Ghislaine would tell the witness who she needed to talk to in a day (landscapers, designers, etc.).
Phone number on a piece of paper
Maxwell called Kate after receiving the number.
Invitation to go to tea at Maxwell's house.
Complaint that nighttime security checks interfere with ability to prepare for trial; request to modify procedures.
Interviewing personal assistants in the back of a limo.
Complaints about lack of privacy in open areas and poor ventilation in visiting rooms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity