Rocchio
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Attorney (Q)
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Attorney (Q)
|
Witness examiner |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Author of the document
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional contractual |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney (Q)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed colleague
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (unnamed)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Litigation Parties (Plaintiffs/Defendants/Prosecutors)
|
Professional contractual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness presented a list of 77 behaviors identified in literature as grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology methodology. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Guest editor role for a special issue of a journal. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Rocchio regarding expert opinion and methodology. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology credentials and definitions o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding psychology of false allegations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding grooming, trauma verification, and scientific lit... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding the psychology of delayed disclosure in childhood... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic evaluation procedures. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Participation in eating-disorder research group | Butler Hospital | View |
| N/A | N/A | Founding of independent psychology practice | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness worked with hundreds of patients dealing with eating disorders, grief, and traumatic stress. | Graduate school (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness worked for six months in a partial hospital program treating adults. | Yale New Haven Hospital | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony of witness Rocchio. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology definitions and document review. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio in court. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding clinical assessment of child sexual abuse victims. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding expert witness hiring practices and independence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Previous legal cases where Rocchio testified or was deposed. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding clinical opinions on child sexual abuse risk fact... | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | American Psychological Association Annual Conference | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The witness, Rocchio, met with the government multiple times in connection with the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A legal argument against the admissibility of Rocchio's proposed expert testimony in case 1:20-cr... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014893.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a clinical psychologist named Rocchio. Rocchio testifies about their career specialization in traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, provides a clinical definition of "childhood sexual abuse," and states they have treated "hundreds upon hundreds" of victims. The testimony serves to establish Rocchio's expertise on the subject for the court.
DOJ-OGR-00014891.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, identified as Rocchio (Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is testifying on direct examination about her professional background. She distinguishes her clinical practice, which focuses on treatment and therapy, from her forensic practice, which involves investigative roles, expert testimony, and objective evaluations in civil and criminal cases involving traumatic stress.
DOJ-OGR-00014890.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on January 15, 2025, capturing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio describes their professional practice, stating they supervise seven clinicians and their primary clinical work involves treating adult patients for traumatic stress, including victims of interpersonal violence and first responders.
DOJ-OGR-00014889.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Jan 15, 2025) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony covers Rocchio's professional background, specifically their postdoctoral work at Butler Hospital in an eating-disorder research group and a trauma psychology group, followed by the founding of their own independent psychology and forensic practice.
DOJ-OGR-00014888.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio describes their professional experience after obtaining a Ph.D., including a six-month period working at Yale Psychiatric Institute and a year-long postdoctoral fellowship in Rhode Island at Butler Hospital. During the fellowship, their primary focus was on dialectical behavior therapy for treating chronically suicidal and self-injurious women.
DOJ-OGR-00014887.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony covers Rocchio's professional background, specifically their graduate studies and a predoctoral fellowship at Yale University School of Medicine, focusing on their experience treating patients with severe mental health issues, traumatic stress, and childhood violence.
DOJ-OGR-00014886.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed Jan 15, 2025) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who defines 'interpersonal violence' and 'forensic psychology' for the court. Rocchio also testifies to having completed between 500 and 1,000 hours of clinical face-to-face work with patients during their Master's and Ph.D. studies.
DOJ-OGR-00005644.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a motion or argument against allowing the proposed expert testimony of an individual named Rocchio. The author contends that Rocchio's opinions on why sexual abuse victims may delay reporting are unreliable, subjective, untestable, and inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The document cites legal precedent, specifically *Schneider, 2010 WL 3734055*, to support its claims that Rocchio's testimony would not be helpful to a jury.
DOJ-OGR-00005642.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Document 386) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 29, 2021. It argues against the admissibility of testimony from an expert witness named Rocchio, specifically challenging her opinions on victim credibility and long-term psychological consequences of abuse as irrelevant, prejudicial, and violating Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, 403, and 704.
DOJ-OGR-00005639.jpg
This document is a legal filing, specifically page 15 of Document 386 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The author argues that the expert testimony of an individual named Rocchio regarding 'grooming' should be deemed inadmissible because it is not based on scientific studies, is too general, and will not help the jury understand the specific facts of the case. The argument relies on legal precedents from cases like Daubert, Raymond, and Gonyer to assert that Rocchio's opinions do not meet the standard for expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00005637.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Document 386 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021) arguing against the reliability of certain expert testimony. It cites the precedent of *United States v. Raymond*, where the court excluded expert Ken Lanning's testimony on grooming because it lacked objective benchmarks and was deemed unreliable. The filing suggests the current court should follow this precedent and also notes that another individual, Rocchio, while a treatment provider for victims, lacks experience in evaluating perpetrators.
DOJ-OGR-00005636.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on October 29, 2021. It is a legal argument seeking to exclude the testimony of an expert witness named Rocchio, arguing that her opinions on 'grooming' and sexual abuse are based on unverified personal beliefs rather than scientific methodology or representative studies. The text cites various legal precedents (including Supreme Court rulings) to support the claim that Rocchio's testimony is unreliable and 'virtually impregnable for purposes of cross-examination.'
DOJ-OGR-00005635.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from October 29, 2021, argues against the admissibility of expert opinions from a treatment provider named Rocchio. The filing contends that Rocchio's opinions on grooming are based solely on personal experience, lack a reliable methodology, and are not supported by scientific literature. It cites various legal precedents and an academic article to assert that her testimony fails to meet the standards for expert witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00005634.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Document 386) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It is a defense argument seeking to exclude the testimony of an expert witness named Rocchio regarding 'grooming' patterns in sexual abuse cases. The text cites Federal Rules of Evidence 704, 403, and 404 to argue that such opinions are unreliable, prejudicial, and not based on scientific data.
DOJ-OGR-00005631.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) arguing to preclude Dr. Rocchio from testifying as a government expert witness. It details the government's intent to have Rocchio testify generally about the psychology of sexual abuse, grooming, delayed disclosure, and trauma, while noting she has not evaluated any specific victims in the case.
Cross-examination regarding Craven article
Discussion about the definition and understanding of 'sexual grooming of children' based on a 2006 article.
Forensic psychology
Issues relevant to the signs and practice of forensic psychology
Cross-examination regarding grooming definitions
Discussion regarding the definition of grooming, the witness's lack of specific publications on the topic, and the intent required for an act to be considered grooming.
Scientific Studies
Rocchio provided scientific literature (including Exhibit 3) to the government.
Trauma Psychology
Monthly meetings to discuss issues relevant to the field of trauma psychology.
Direct Examination Testimony
Testimony explaining why adolescents aged 12-18 are statistically likely to delay disclosing sexual abuse until adulthood due to developmental factors and preference for peer communication.
Cross-examination regarding Government Exhibit 6
Discussion regarding a study of 322 articles, specifically regarding delayed reporting of psychological issues by males versus females.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Direct Examination regarding Grooming
Q&A regarding the definition of grooming, tactics used by offenders, and specific strategies such as isolation, gift giving, and affection.
Scientific analysis of offender behavior
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to describe a scientific analysis where professionals rated offender behaviors to create a model. Rocchio explains the methodology and the resulting five-stage model.
Professional expertise in clinical psychology, traumatic ...
An unnamed questioner elicits testimony from Rocchio, a clinical psychologist, about their career specializations. Rocchio discusses their focus on traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, defines childhood sexual abuse, and quantifies their experience treating victims.
Clinical experience with disclosure of sexual abuse and a...
Rocchio explains that in clinical practice and training, it is more effective to use behavioral descriptors rather than labels like 'rape' or 'abuse' when asking about traumatic experiences. This is because individuals often do not apply these labels to themselves, even if the described events occurred.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
A study on the term 'predatory alienation'
An unnamed questioner is cross-examining Rocchio about a phenomenological study. The focus is on the term 'predatory alienation', which was allegedly created by an advocacy group, and the nature of the study itself (subjective vs. qualitative).
Basis for opinions on disclosure-related issues in forens...
The witness, Rocchio, is questioned about the basis for their opinions on disclosure. Rocchio states their opinions are based on scientific and clinical literature, specifically studies and surveys that establish prevalence rates for experiences like rape, sexual assault, and childhood sexual abuse.
Factors contributing to personal vulnerability
An unidentified questioner cross-examines witness Rocchio about whether conditions like emotional disability, personality disorder, low self-esteem, drug/alcohol abuse, and prior sexual assault would place a person in a vulnerable population. Rocchio provides cautious responses, often citing the need for further research.
Peer-reviewed journals and professional presentations
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to define what a peer-reviewed journal is and what a professional presentation is. Rocchio provides a detailed explanation of the blind peer-review process for academic articles.
Study on grooming behaviors
Testimony discussing a study that identifies and empirically tests behaviors associated with grooming, including stages like gaining access, isolation, trust development, desensitization, sexual contact, and physical contact.
Study on grooming behaviors
Testimony discussing a study that identifies and empirically tests behaviors associated with grooming, including stages like gaining access, isolation, trust development, desensitization, sexual contact, and physical contact.
Cross-examination regarding studies on offender-generated...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Rocchio about the reliability of offender-generated data and the findings of studies, including one by McElvaney and Culhane, concerning who child victims disclose to first.
Cross-examination regarding a government contract
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Rocchio, about the terms of a government contract. Rocchio confirms the contract is for up to $45,000 at a rate of $450 per hour, and states that no payment has been received yet because an invoice has not been submitted.
Methodologies for conducting studies on offenders, victim...
An unknown questioner asks Rocchio to provide examples of how studies are conducted. Rocchio describes methods like interviewing offenders, studying victims' experiences and treatment, and surveying experts. The questioner then asks about the definition of 'grooming' in these studies.
Supervisory roles and clinical work in Rocchio's practice
An unnamed questioner asks Rocchio about their professional practice. Rocchio describes supervising seven clinicians, providing guidance on complex cases, leading weekly meetings, and treating adult patients who have experienced traumatic stress.
Neuropsychology, toxicology, memory, and disclosure
An attorney cross-examines a witness named Rocchio, establishing the definition of neuropsychology, confirming the witness is not a toxicologist, and questioning them about the relationship between memory and delays in disclosure.
Witness's professional background and employment
An unnamed questioner interviews the witness, Rocchio, about their current employment. Rocchio states they are a Clinical Assistant Professor at Brown University School of Medicine's department of psychiatry, a position they have held since June 2020.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity