Rocchio
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Attorney (Q)
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Attorney (Q)
|
Witness examiner |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Author of the document
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional contractual |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney (Q)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed colleague
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (unnamed)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Litigation Parties (Plaintiffs/Defendants/Prosecutors)
|
Professional contractual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness presented a list of 77 behaviors identified in literature as grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology methodology. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Guest editor role for a special issue of a journal. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Rocchio regarding expert opinion and methodology. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology credentials and definitions o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding psychology of false allegations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding grooming, trauma verification, and scientific lit... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding the psychology of delayed disclosure in childhood... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic evaluation procedures. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Participation in eating-disorder research group | Butler Hospital | View |
| N/A | N/A | Founding of independent psychology practice | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness worked with hundreds of patients dealing with eating disorders, grief, and traumatic stress. | Graduate school (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness worked for six months in a partial hospital program treating adults. | Yale New Haven Hospital | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony of witness Rocchio. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology definitions and document review. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio in court. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding clinical assessment of child sexual abuse victims. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding expert witness hiring practices and independence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Previous legal cases where Rocchio testified or was deposed. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding clinical opinions on child sexual abuse risk fact... | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | American Psychological Association Annual Conference | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The witness, Rocchio, met with the government multiple times in connection with the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A legal argument against the admissibility of Rocchio's proposed expert testimony in case 1:20-cr... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014932.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio discusses academic literature concerning 'grooming models,' referencing articles by Winters, Bennett, and O'Donohue. He explains that Winters' study attempted to statistically validate behaviors agreed upon by experts and begins to define 'error rates' in psychology using the analogy of a clinical drug trial.
DOJ-OGR-00014929.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, capturing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. Rocchio explains the psychological concepts of validity and reliability as they apply to identifying grooming behaviors, defining validity by the consistency between victim and offender reports and reliability by the consensus among professionals. The examination concludes with Ms. Pomerantz directing the witness to a specific section of another document.
DOJ-OGR-00014928.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Dr. Rocchio, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Dr. Rocchio is questioned about an article and states that he disagrees with its conclusions. He specifically identifies a highlighted portion of the text as being incomplete.
DOJ-OGR-00014926.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, dated January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features testimony, likely a direct examination by Rocchio, discussing a study on 'grooming' behaviors, including stages like gaining access, isolation, and trust development. The testimony validates the study's empirical approach to understanding and modeling the grooming process.
DOJ-OGR-00014925.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio describes a scientific study involving 18 highly qualified professionals who analyzed and rated offender behaviors to develop a model. The study resulted in identifying 43 specific behaviors categorized into a five-stage model, starting with victim selection.
DOJ-OGR-00014922.jpg
This document is page 46 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Rocchio, is testifying about an academic study regarding 'coercive control' and victimization tactics. The Judge interrupts to ask specifically about the comparison between 'trauma bonding' and the relationship between a pimp and a sex worker.
DOJ-OGR-00014919.jpg
This document is page 43 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the methodology of empirical studies regarding childhood sexual abuse, specifically addressing how professionals handle varying definitions of 'grooming' by looking for commonalities and overlaps between offender admissions and victim experiences. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00014918.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, showing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio describes various methodologies for conducting studies, such as interviewing offenders about their tactics, analyzing victims' experiences for treatment purposes, and surveying experts for consensus. The examination on this page concludes with a question about whether these studies use a consistent definition of 'grooming'.
DOJ-OGR-00014917.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, dated January 15, 2025, discussing studies related to sexual abuse. It highlights the remarkable consistency of strategies and techniques identified in such studies across various samples. The document also details the criteria used to evaluate the quality of articles and literature reviews, emphasizing peer review, study methodology, and sample selection.
DOJ-OGR-00014916.jpg
This is page 40 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed Jan 15, 2025) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Rocchio (likely Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is under direct examination discussing the differences between clinical and forensic psychology roles, specifically noting that in a clinical setting, she does not verify the truth of a victim's report via external evidence like newspaper articles. She testifies that there is 'remarkable consistency' regarding grooming tactics across her clinical work, forensic work, and scientific literature.
DOJ-OGR-00014914.jpg
This is page 38 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. The witness, Rocchio, is testifying on direct examination about their professional methodology for forensic evaluations, which includes reviewing police and medical records, conducting 8-10 hours of face-to-face evaluation, and collateral interviews. The witness specifically confirms experience evaluating issues of 'grooming' in civil cases involving allegations of childhood sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014911.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, dated January 15, 2025, from a case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features a Q&A session, likely a deposition or testimony, where an individual (the Answerer) discusses the concept of 'grooming' in relation to child sexual abuse, its historical presence in scientific literature since the 1980s, and the foundation of their expert opinions on the subject. The discussion emphasizes grooming as a process involving increasing dependency and coercion, rather than an isolated event.
DOJ-OGR-00014907.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 01/15/25) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Rocchio. The witness defines 'grooming the environment' as a tactic where sexual offenders manipulate a child's parents or community institutions (citing the Boy Scouts as an example) to gain trust, respectability, and access to victims. The testimony outlines the psychological strategies used to disarm guardians and normalize the offender's presence.
DOJ-OGR-00014906.jpg
Page 30 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. Witness Rocchio provides expert testimony defining 'grooming' as a series of tactics used by offenders to deceive children, build trust, and eventually abuse them. The testimony details strategies such as gaining access via organizations (e.g., schools, scouts), isolating victims, and using 'courtship' behaviors like gift-giving and affection to manipulate the child.
DOJ-OGR-00014904.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, filed on January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio discusses their professional background, specifically their experience providing training on complex trauma and childhood sexual abuse to clinicians and investigators, including those at the Department of DCYF. They also mention how they stay current with scientific literature through memberships in professional organizations.
DOJ-OGR-00014903.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who provides testimony regarding their professional training in trauma, childhood abuse, and forensic psychology. Rocchio also details their experience training others, including serving on ethics committees for psychological associations and supervising fellows at Brown University Medical School.
DOJ-OGR-00014902.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Rocchio, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on Rocchio's professional background in psychology, including their involvement with the division of trauma psychology and leadership roles in the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, as well as their methods for continuing education.
DOJ-OGR-00014901.jpg
This document is page 25 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness identified as Rocchio by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness describes their professional responsibilities as the president-elect of the Division of Trauma Psychology within the American Psychological Association.
DOJ-OGR-00014900.jpg
Page 24 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. The witness, identified in the header as Rocchio, is undergoing direct examination regarding their professional qualifications in the field of psychology. Rocchio testifies to holding leadership positions with the American Psychological Association (Division of Trauma Psychology and Ethics Committee) and the Rhode Island Psychological Association.
DOJ-OGR-00014899.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on establishing Rocchio's expertise, specifically their extensive experience as a peer reviewer for academic publications. Rocchio states they are on the editorial board for the journal of the Division of Trauma Psychology and also serve as a guest reviewer for other journals related to psychological injury and law.
DOJ-OGR-00014898.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio explains the peer-review process for professional presentations, comparing it to academic publication standards, and confirms that the majority of their presentations have focused on trauma psychology and interpersonal violence.
DOJ-OGR-00014897.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who explains the process of academic peer review for journals, describing it as a 'blind review' to prevent bias. Rocchio also confirms having given professional presentations and begins to define what they are.
DOJ-OGR-00014896.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on 01/15/25. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the witness's academic credentials at Brown University and their expertise in traumatic stress and childhood trauma. During the testimony, Government Exhibit 1 is admitted into evidence without objection from the defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca.
DOJ-OGR-00014895.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, showing Ms. Pomerantz conducting a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio states he is a clinical assistant professor at Brown University's Alpert School of Medicine since July 2020, where he supervises and teaches psychiatry fellows. The examination leads to the introduction of his curriculum vitae as Government Exhibit 1.
DOJ-OGR-00014894.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The witness testifies about their career experience in treating victims of childhood sexual abuse, stating they have worked with individuals aged 13 and up but currently focus on adults (18+) in both their clinical and forensic practices. The court interjects to clarify the distinction between these two areas of the witness's work.
Scientific Studies
Rocchio provided scientific literature (including Exhibit 3) to the government.
Cross-examination regarding Craven article
Discussion about the definition and understanding of 'sexual grooming of children' based on a 2006 article.
Cross-examination regarding grooming definitions
Discussion regarding the definition of grooming, the witness's lack of specific publications on the topic, and the intent required for an act to be considered grooming.
Forensic psychology
Issues relevant to the signs and practice of forensic psychology
Trauma Psychology
Monthly meetings to discuss issues relevant to the field of trauma psychology.
Cross-examination regarding a government contract
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Rocchio, about the terms of a government contract. Rocchio confirms the contract is for up to $45,000 at a rate of $450 per hour, and states that no payment has been received yet because an invoice has not been submitted.
Methodologies for conducting studies on offenders, victim...
An unknown questioner asks Rocchio to provide examples of how studies are conducted. Rocchio describes methods like interviewing offenders, studying victims' experiences and treatment, and surveying experts. The questioner then asks about the definition of 'grooming' in these studies.
Supervisory roles and clinical work in Rocchio's practice
An unnamed questioner asks Rocchio about their professional practice. Rocchio describes supervising seven clinicians, providing guidance on complex cases, leading weekly meetings, and treating adult patients who have experienced traumatic stress.
Scientific analysis of offender behavior
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to describe a scientific analysis where professionals rated offender behaviors to create a model. Rocchio explains the methodology and the resulting five-stage model.
Professional expertise in clinical psychology, traumatic ...
An unnamed questioner elicits testimony from Rocchio, a clinical psychologist, about their career specializations. Rocchio discusses their focus on traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, defines childhood sexual abuse, and quantifies their experience treating victims.
Clinical experience with disclosure of sexual abuse and a...
Rocchio explains that in clinical practice and training, it is more effective to use behavioral descriptors rather than labels like 'rape' or 'abuse' when asking about traumatic experiences. This is because individuals often do not apply these labels to themselves, even if the described events occurred.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Basis for opinions on disclosure-related issues in forens...
The witness, Rocchio, is questioned about the basis for their opinions on disclosure. Rocchio states their opinions are based on scientific and clinical literature, specifically studies and surveys that establish prevalence rates for experiences like rape, sexual assault, and childhood sexual abuse.
Factors contributing to personal vulnerability
An unidentified questioner cross-examines witness Rocchio about whether conditions like emotional disability, personality disorder, low self-esteem, drug/alcohol abuse, and prior sexual assault would place a person in a vulnerable population. Rocchio provides cautious responses, often citing the need for further research.
A study on the term 'predatory alienation'
An unnamed questioner is cross-examining Rocchio about a phenomenological study. The focus is on the term 'predatory alienation', which was allegedly created by an advocacy group, and the nature of the study itself (subjective vs. qualitative).
Peer-reviewed journals and professional presentations
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to define what a peer-reviewed journal is and what a professional presentation is. Rocchio provides a detailed explanation of the blind peer-review process for academic articles.
Study on grooming behaviors
Testimony discussing a study that identifies and empirically tests behaviors associated with grooming, including stages like gaining access, isolation, trust development, desensitization, sexual contact, and physical contact.
Study on grooming behaviors
Testimony discussing a study that identifies and empirically tests behaviors associated with grooming, including stages like gaining access, isolation, trust development, desensitization, sexual contact, and physical contact.
Cross-examination regarding studies on offender-generated...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Rocchio about the reliability of offender-generated data and the findings of studies, including one by McElvaney and Culhane, concerning who child victims disclose to first.
Direct Examination Testimony
Testimony explaining why adolescents aged 12-18 are statistically likely to delay disclosing sexual abuse until adulthood due to developmental factors and preference for peer communication.
Cross-examination regarding Government Exhibit 6
Discussion regarding a study of 322 articles, specifically regarding delayed reporting of psychological issues by males versus females.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Direct Examination regarding Grooming
Q&A regarding the definition of grooming, tactics used by offenders, and specific strategies such as isolation, gift giving, and affection.
Definitions of abuse and witness's clinical experience
A transcript of a direct examination where an unnamed questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to define 'childhood sexual abuse' and 'child', and to describe their clinical experience with patients during their graduate studies.
Direct Examination regarding grooming and coercive control
Witness defines coercive control and explains how the grooming process creates attachment and entrapment for victims of childhood sexual abuse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity