Rocchio
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Attorney (Q)
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Attorney (Q)
|
Witness examiner |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Author of the document
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional contractual |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney (Q)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed colleague
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (unnamed)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Litigation Parties (Plaintiffs/Defendants/Prosecutors)
|
Professional contractual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness presented a list of 77 behaviors identified in literature as grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology methodology. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Guest editor role for a special issue of a journal. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Rocchio regarding expert opinion and methodology. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology credentials and definitions o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding psychology of false allegations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding grooming, trauma verification, and scientific lit... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding the psychology of delayed disclosure in childhood... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic evaluation procedures. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Participation in eating-disorder research group | Butler Hospital | View |
| N/A | N/A | Founding of independent psychology practice | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness worked with hundreds of patients dealing with eating disorders, grief, and traumatic stress. | Graduate school (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness worked for six months in a partial hospital program treating adults. | Yale New Haven Hospital | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony of witness Rocchio. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology definitions and document review. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio in court. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding clinical assessment of child sexual abuse victims. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding expert witness hiring practices and independence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Previous legal cases where Rocchio testified or was deposed. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding clinical opinions on child sexual abuse risk fact... | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | American Psychological Association Annual Conference | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The witness, Rocchio, met with the government multiple times in connection with the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A legal argument against the admissibility of Rocchio's proposed expert testimony in case 1:20-cr... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015008.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning centers on an academic article, "Validation of Sexual Grooming Model of Child Sex Abusers" by Winters and Jeglic, which Rocchio had provided to the government as support for testimony. Rocchio clarifies their assessment of the authors' work and explains the two-part methodology of the study mentioned in the article.
DOJ-OGR-00015006.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing a cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the conclusion and methodology of a study. The judge interrupts the proceedings to call for a 30-minute lunch recess and advises the attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, to focus his questioning more on underlying 'Daubert questions' rather than points for a jury to make better use of the court's time.
DOJ-OGR-00015005.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on 'Exhibit 3,' a scientific study accepted in May 2020, specifically discussing the lack of a universally accepted model for defining behaviors that constitute 'sexual grooming' in child sexual abuse cases. The witness clarifies that this study is just one example of the literature informing their opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00015003.jpg
This document is page 127 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding the methodology of a social science study, specifically debating 'response rates' versus 'dropout rates' and the nature of an interview guide used on 22 expert subjects. The questioning attorney also makes a point about the definition and use of 'leading questions' during the testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the methodology of a study or article, specifically the demographic characteristics of the "experts" and professionals involved, and challenges the response rate of the data collection, which the questioner labels a "dropout rate."
DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The questioning centers on a study about "predatory alienation," a term the questioner asserts was created by an advocacy group. Rocchio clarifies that the study is qualitative rather than subjective, while the questioner probes its methodology and origins.
DOJ-OGR-00014996.jpg
This document is page 120 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell case). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert) regarding academic studies on 'delayed disclosures' of abuse. The testimony distinguishes between 'disclosure' (to friends, parents, teachers) and 'reporting' (to law enforcement), and discusses how studies define 'delay' ranging from one week to one year.
DOJ-OGR-00014992.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, focusing on the distinction between normal parenting behaviors (providing food, education, presents) and 'grooming.' The witness testifies that grooming requires a coercive or controlling context/intent.
DOJ-OGR-00014991.jpg
This document is page 115 of a court transcript (Document 782) filed on January 15, 2025, from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, who is testifying about the clinical and legal definitions of 'grooming' versus 'normative behaviors.' The dialogue focuses on the necessity of 'intent to sexually abuse' to distinguish grooming tactics from normal relationship-building or parenting.
DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert witness). The questioning focuses on the witness's academic or professional definition of 'grooming,' noting that while they haven't published a specific definition, they rely on common literature. The dialogue references a list of '77 specific behaviors' associated with grooming and debates whether intent and context determine if an act constitutes grooming.
DOJ-OGR-00014989.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the connection between vulnerability factors and becoming a victim of sexual abuse. The witness provides a formal definition of 'grooming' as a set of deceptive strategies used to establish coercion and control for the purpose of sexual exploitation and abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014988.jpg
This page contains a cross-examination transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. A witness named Rocchio is being questioned regarding the definition and implications of 'vulnerable populations,' specifically regarding risks of sexual abuse, physical assault, substance abuse, and school drop-out rates. Rocchio pushes back against the attorney's broad generalization of risk, emphasizing specific research contexts regarding sexual victimization.
DOJ-OGR-00014987.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions a witness, Rocchio, about the existence of a definitive list of vulnerable populations, referencing the DSM 5 and the American Psychological Association. The witness states that while such lists exist in scientific literature, they have not personally written one down but are aware of these populations through their professional training and knowledge.
DOJ-OGR-00014986.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio about factors that could make an individual vulnerable, including emotional disabilities, personality disorders, unstable lives, low self-esteem, drug abuse, and past sexual assault. The witness consistently qualifies their answers, stating a need to consult scientific literature before making definitive connections between these factors and vulnerability.
DOJ-OGR-00014985.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a cross-examination filed on January 15, 2025. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions a witness named Rocchio about a letter from the government dated April 23, 2021. The questioning establishes and confirms various categories of vulnerable individuals who are often targeted for sexual abuse, including the economically disadvantaged, those without family, and individuals with cognitive or emotional disabilities.
DOJ-OGR-00014984.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, a psychologist, regarding the definition of forensic psychology versus therapeutic roles and the potential for 'dual roles' or boundary violations. The witness confirms they are testifying in a forensic capacity subject to APA guidelines and acknowledges reviewing a letter sent by the government on April 23rd that outlined their opinions.
DOJ-OGR-00014983.jpg
This document is page 107 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, focusing on the independence of their investigations and the specific instructions given by the lawyers who hire them. The questioning seeks to establish the boundaries of the witness's independence when hired by a specific party in litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00014982.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Rocchio) filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The questioning focuses on Rocchio's qualifications as a forensic psychologist, specifically challenging whether they were explicitly qualified as an expert on 'grooming' in previous cases. Rocchio argues that grooming falls under 'interpersonal violence,' but admits to only testifying as a forensic psychologist approximately six times and being deposed four times.
DOJ-OGR-00014980.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the definition of "trauma," referencing the DSM and PTSD criteria, and clarifies the scope of Rocchio's duties as a clinical psychologist beyond just treating clients.
DOJ-OGR-00014978.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated January 15, 2025, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on a phone call in April 2021 where Rocchio allegedly defined terms such as 'child,' 'sexual abuse,' and 'nonconsensual' to a group of Assistant US Attorneys (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). Rocchio states they do not specifically recall the definitions given or the context of the notes taken by the AUSAs.
DOJ-OGR-00014976.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. In it, an attorney named Mr. Pagliuca requests the time records of a witness, Rocchio, to establish potential financial motive and bias related to a contract. The judge questions the legal basis for this request, prompting Mr. Pagliuca to argue his entitlement under the legal precedents of Brady and Giglio.
DOJ-OGR-00014975.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions a witness, Rocchio, about a contract with the government. Rocchio confirms the contract is for up to $45,000 at a rate of $450 per hour, but clarifies that they have not yet been paid because an invoice has not been submitted.
DOJ-OGR-00014974.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. Mr. Pagliuca argues that under Rule 16, he should be able to examine all materials a witness, Dr. Rocchio, used to prepare her testimony. The judge challenges this broad interpretation, clarifying that only materials that form the actual basis of her opinion, not discarded notes or unrelated contracts, are relevant.
DOJ-OGR-00014972.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The questioning focuses on the witness's note-taking practices during prior interviews with the government. Rocchio admits to taking temporary notes on topics like "grooming" to research later and then discarding them, but confirms maintaining a file related to their retention in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00014970.jpg
This is page 94 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on Jan 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who is testifying as an expert on the link between childhood sexual abuse and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The testimony covers the risk factors for PTSD and the criteria used to evaluate the scientific quality of literature and studies on the subject.
Scientific Studies
Rocchio provided scientific literature (including Exhibit 3) to the government.
Cross-examination regarding Craven article
Discussion about the definition and understanding of 'sexual grooming of children' based on a 2006 article.
Cross-examination regarding grooming definitions
Discussion regarding the definition of grooming, the witness's lack of specific publications on the topic, and the intent required for an act to be considered grooming.
Forensic psychology
Issues relevant to the signs and practice of forensic psychology
Trauma Psychology
Monthly meetings to discuss issues relevant to the field of trauma psychology.
Cross-examination regarding a government contract
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Rocchio, about the terms of a government contract. Rocchio confirms the contract is for up to $45,000 at a rate of $450 per hour, and states that no payment has been received yet because an invoice has not been submitted.
Methodologies for conducting studies on offenders, victim...
An unknown questioner asks Rocchio to provide examples of how studies are conducted. Rocchio describes methods like interviewing offenders, studying victims' experiences and treatment, and surveying experts. The questioner then asks about the definition of 'grooming' in these studies.
Supervisory roles and clinical work in Rocchio's practice
An unnamed questioner asks Rocchio about their professional practice. Rocchio describes supervising seven clinicians, providing guidance on complex cases, leading weekly meetings, and treating adult patients who have experienced traumatic stress.
Scientific analysis of offender behavior
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to describe a scientific analysis where professionals rated offender behaviors to create a model. Rocchio explains the methodology and the resulting five-stage model.
Professional expertise in clinical psychology, traumatic ...
An unnamed questioner elicits testimony from Rocchio, a clinical psychologist, about their career specializations. Rocchio discusses their focus on traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, defines childhood sexual abuse, and quantifies their experience treating victims.
Clinical experience with disclosure of sexual abuse and a...
Rocchio explains that in clinical practice and training, it is more effective to use behavioral descriptors rather than labels like 'rape' or 'abuse' when asking about traumatic experiences. This is because individuals often do not apply these labels to themselves, even if the described events occurred.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Basis for opinions on disclosure-related issues in forens...
The witness, Rocchio, is questioned about the basis for their opinions on disclosure. Rocchio states their opinions are based on scientific and clinical literature, specifically studies and surveys that establish prevalence rates for experiences like rape, sexual assault, and childhood sexual abuse.
Factors contributing to personal vulnerability
An unidentified questioner cross-examines witness Rocchio about whether conditions like emotional disability, personality disorder, low self-esteem, drug/alcohol abuse, and prior sexual assault would place a person in a vulnerable population. Rocchio provides cautious responses, often citing the need for further research.
A study on the term 'predatory alienation'
An unnamed questioner is cross-examining Rocchio about a phenomenological study. The focus is on the term 'predatory alienation', which was allegedly created by an advocacy group, and the nature of the study itself (subjective vs. qualitative).
Peer-reviewed journals and professional presentations
A questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to define what a peer-reviewed journal is and what a professional presentation is. Rocchio provides a detailed explanation of the blind peer-review process for academic articles.
Study on grooming behaviors
Testimony discussing a study that identifies and empirically tests behaviors associated with grooming, including stages like gaining access, isolation, trust development, desensitization, sexual contact, and physical contact.
Study on grooming behaviors
Testimony discussing a study that identifies and empirically tests behaviors associated with grooming, including stages like gaining access, isolation, trust development, desensitization, sexual contact, and physical contact.
Cross-examination regarding studies on offender-generated...
An unnamed questioner cross-examines a witness named Rocchio about the reliability of offender-generated data and the findings of studies, including one by McElvaney and Culhane, concerning who child victims disclose to first.
Direct Examination Testimony
Testimony explaining why adolescents aged 12-18 are statistically likely to delay disclosing sexual abuse until adulthood due to developmental factors and preference for peer communication.
Cross-examination regarding Government Exhibit 6
Discussion regarding a study of 322 articles, specifically regarding delayed reporting of psychological issues by males versus females.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Direct Examination regarding Grooming
Q&A regarding the definition of grooming, tactics used by offenders, and specific strategies such as isolation, gift giving, and affection.
Definitions of abuse and witness's clinical experience
A transcript of a direct examination where an unnamed questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to define 'childhood sexual abuse' and 'child', and to describe their clinical experience with patients during their graduate studies.
Direct Examination regarding grooming and coercive control
Witness defines coercive control and explains how the grooming process creates attachment and entrapment for victims of childhood sexual abuse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity