Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MS. MENNINGER

Person
Mentions
1436
Relationships
123
Events
528
Documents
700
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
123 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person A. Farmer
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
16
View
person JANE
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
11
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
13 Very Strong
11
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
12
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
10
View
person JANE
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person A. Farmer
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person your Honor
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
23
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
144
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Mr. Everdell
Co counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
organization The government
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person JANE
Adversarial
8 Strong
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
8 Strong
4
View
person Meder
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Jane
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court examination Cross-examination of witness JANE by Ms. Menninger. N/A View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Jane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Stephen Flatley Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of female witness Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Defense summation (closing argument) regarding memory science and conspiracy charges. Court View
N/A N/A Closing arguments/Summation where Ms. Menninger allegedly argued Maxwell was a substitute for Eps... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding witness recall and sequestration violations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar regarding cross-examination of witness 'Jane'. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' regarding prior statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court discussion regarding jury deliberations and note interpretation Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of technical testimony about CD burning and file dates (cre... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Hearing/Sidebar Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Paul Kane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Identification of Exhibit AF9 (Cowboy boots). Courtroom View
N/A Trip Ms. Menninger and her sister visited New York and engaged in various activities like seeing a pla... New York View
N/A Meeting Ms. Menninger and her sister met with Epstein in his office to discuss her college applications. Epstein's office, New York View
N/A Alleged sexual abuse While watching a movie she remembers as 'Five Monkeys', Epstein caressed and held Ms. Menninger's... A movie theater in New York View
N/A Trial testimony A witness gave testimony about her encounters with Maxwell and Epstein, which is now being discus... Courtroom View
N/A Trial Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th. Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00016311.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger introduces defense exhibit 'AF1'—identified as a page from a journal—which the government prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, does not object to. The Court admits the exhibit temporarily under seal while the attorneys discuss potential redactions.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016310.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about journals she kept during a trip to Thailand and her senior year, as well as her use of these journals during 2020 media appearances. The defense then moves to introduce 'Defendant's Exhibit AF1,' claiming it contains a page omitted from the government's corresponding exhibit.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016309.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about the consistency of her journaling habits during high school, specifically referencing journals from trips to Thailand and New York. The attorney also challenges the witness regarding a statement made to the government in September 2019 about maintaining a journal throughout high school.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016308.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a personal journal that Farmer used to refresh their memory before a meeting with the government in September 2019. The questioner confirms this fact and notes that the government has already introduced specific pages from the journal as evidence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016307.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about a trip to New York during her junior year (age 16) and whether she used a journal to refresh her memory during a September 2019 meeting with the government. Farmer contests the interpretation of a summary document presented by the defense regarding exactly how she determined her age at the time.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016304.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to Mr. Epstein's New York home for a New Year's party after Christmas 1995. Farmer confirms that no sexual activity occurred and no one physically touched them during the visit, and also discusses the possibility that the home was under renovation at the time.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016303.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry from January 7, 1996. The testimony confirms the witness returned from a week-long trip to New York on that date.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016302.jpg

This document is page 86 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a brief recess during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger confirm they have no procedural matters to discuss during the break before the witness returns to the stand.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016301.jpg

This document is a single page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a session during the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer, where Ms. Menninger speaks briefly before the Judge (The Court) announces a 15-minute morning break for the jury. The page is largely blank space following the announcement of the break.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016300.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by Ms. Menninger. The testimony concerns a visit Farmer made to Jeffrey Epstein's home in late 1995 or early 1996, specifically recalling an office area with a desk and noting the home appeared to be under renovation. The witness discusses a journal entry dated January 7th regarding her return from this trip, which lasted about a week over the Christmas period.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016292.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding a flight Farmer took alone in September 2019. The witness confirms the flight and explains it was to visit family, while another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes objections on the witness's behalf.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016291.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript showing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on A. Farmer's travel to New York, specifically whether she traveled alone, and contrasts this with her usual habit of traveling with her younger sister. Ms. Menninger also confronts the witness with a prior statement allegedly made to law enforcement in September 2019 regarding her travel habits.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016290.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of a cross-examination where an attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions a witness, Ms. Farmer, about a trip she took to New York at age 16 to visit her older sister. The court suggests taking a break soon.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016289.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms that their prior civil lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein is concluded, having received a settlement from a fund in exchange for dismissing the case. Farmer also testifies that they have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016287.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, A. Farmer. Farmer confirms being interviewed by law enforcement in New York in 2019 and by the government five or six times since then. The witness also affirms having sued individuals named Maxwell and Epstein, stating the motivation was to seek accountability.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016286.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). She testifies about the psychological impact of wearing specific boots to reclaim a 'dark memory' of being taken advantage of by Maxwell and Epstein. She also details her history of speaking with the FBI (2006/2007) and the media (2016 off-record, 2019 on-record), confirming she was not paid for these interviews.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016282.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys (Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, Ms. Sternheim) and the judge. The core issue is the admissibility of a witness's prior statement, specifically the use of the word 'rape', with one side arguing it is highly prejudicial and the judge ultimately overruling the objection. The discussion highlights the strategic use of witness statements and the legal standards for evidence in a trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016281.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger. The discussion centers on the admissibility of a witness's 'prior consistent statement.' Ms. Menninger argues it is premature as the witness has not been impeached, and reveals the anticipated testimony is that the witness told her mother, 'I wasn't raped.'

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016265.jpg

This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer. Farmer testifies about her reluctance to go to New Mexico to see Jeffrey Epstein due to a prior incident in a New York movie theater, stating she only felt comfortable going because her mother told her Maxwell (whom she viewed as Epstein's romantic partner) would be present. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises a hearsay objection regarding the mother's statement, which the judge overrules with a limiting instruction.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016263.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that in the spring of 1996 (likely April), she flew commercially to New Mexico for a weekend trip, noting that she did not pay for the ticket and thanked Jeffrey Epstein for it upon arrival. She describes being met at the airport by a driver holding a sign with her name who drove her to 'the ranch.'

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016261.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a sidebar discussion between attorneys and the judge. The attorneys are debating how to question a witness about her reasons for returning to visit Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico, with the court ruling that testimony about what the witness's mother said is inadmissible hearsay. An attorney then proposes an alternative line of questioning focused on the witness's own feelings to circumvent the objection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016260.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between attorneys Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, and the judge. The discussion revolves around the admissibility of a witness's testimony concerning her reasons for feeling comfortable going on a trip to New Mexico. The judge sustains Ms. Menninger's objection, ruling that testimony about what the witness's mother told her regarding who would be on the trip constitutes inadmissible hearsay, and instructs counsel on how to rephrase the questions to avoid this issue.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016257.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named A. Farmer (also called Annie). The witness states she spoke with Jeffrey Epstein by phone two or three times and saw him in person in New Mexico in April 1996. A photograph of the witness from the spring of 1996, showing her getting ready for prom, is identified and admitted into evidence as Government Exhibit 102.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016254.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Annie Farmer is questioned by attorney Ms. Pomerantz and reads a diary entry from January 25, 1996, for the jury. The entry, admitted as Government's Exhibit 604, describes the witness's activities in New York, including attending a New Year's Eve party at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016251.jpg

This document is page 35 of 267 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page details the direct examination of witness 'Annie' Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz, where Government Exhibit 601 is admitted into evidence and Government Exhibit 603 is identified by the witness as an entry from her journal. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises objections based on Rule 106 (Rule of Completeness).

Court transcript / trial testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
82
As Recipient
6
Total
88

Exhibits/Redactions

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Email sent regarding exhibits/redactions.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits J-8/9 and J-15

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Discussions regarding the release and redaction of specific defense exhibits.

Conferral
N/A
Communication Source

Request for exhibits

From: the media
To: MS. MENNINGER

Media requests for the exhibits mentioned.

Requests
N/A
Communication Source

Travel history

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: JANE

Ms. Menninger asked Jane about an international trip which Jane did not remember.

Legal questioning
N/A
Communication Source

3509-008, page five

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: JANE

Defense attorney asks witness to read a specific paragraph from a document to refresh recollection.

Document reference
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions (implied)

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Government officials

Regarding exhibits and redactions.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification of legal standard

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Explaining the punctuation in a hypothetical question and clarifying that the flight must be for the purpose of illegal sexual activity.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Strategy

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: co-counsel

(Counsel conferred)

Conference
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of hearsay

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Agreement regarding the exclusion of Maria Farmer's hearsay statements.

Meeting/conferral
N/A
Communication Source

Encounters with Epstein in New York

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Court/Investigator ('y...

Ms. Menninger recounted two instances of meeting Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting about college applications. The second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported as sexual abuse to the Victims Compensation Fund. She also stated Ghislaine Maxwell was not present and had no involvement she was aware of.

Testimony/statement
N/A
Communication Source

Communication efforts

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: chambers (The Court)

Ms. Menninger offers to email the judge's chambers with the dates and times of communication efforts to create a factual record.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Ms. Moe

Ms. Menninger reports to the court that "Ms. Moe and I spoke briefly."

In-person conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding a trip to New Mexico and a me...

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: ["A. Farmer"]

Ms. Menninger questions the witness, A. Farmer, about their trip to New Mexico, their encounter with Ghislaine, and a meeting with the FBI, highlighting conflicting memories about the date of the meeting.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: MS. MENNINGER

Discussion regarding delaying Brian's testimony.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Application

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Application received at 11:54, missing a proposed order.

Application/filing
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: A. Farmer

Questioning regarding the submission of a journal (Exhibit 604) to the government.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Closing Argument (Summation)

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Jury/Court

Defense attorney arguing against the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi and introducing the testimony of Dr. Loftus.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross Examination

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Annie Farmer

Legal examination in court

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination and admission of evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: The Court / A. Farmer

Discussion regarding the admission of Exhibit AF1 (Bates AFarmer10472), a journal page, into evidence without redactions.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Impeachment arguments

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the permissibility of arguing impeachment based on read-aloud quotes during closing arguments.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Rule 16 and Impeachment Evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding whether impeachment documents must be disclosed to the prosecution prior to use.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: A. Farmer

Questioning regarding settlement payout and specific abuse allegations.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Trial Schedule

From: THE COURT
To: MS. MENNINGER

Discussion regarding the timing of closing arguments, jury lunch, and the start of deliberations.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Introduction of Exhibit AF1

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the location of exhibits in a binder and the introduction of a specific page from a journal as evidence.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search