Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MS. MENNINGER

Person
Mentions
1436
Relationships
123
Events
528
Documents
700
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
123 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person A. Farmer
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
16
View
person JANE
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
11
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
13 Very Strong
11
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
12
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
10
View
person JANE
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person A. Farmer
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person your Honor
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
23
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
144
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Mr. Everdell
Co counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
organization The government
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person JANE
Adversarial
8 Strong
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
8 Strong
4
View
person Meder
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Jane
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court examination Cross-examination of witness JANE by Ms. Menninger. N/A View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Jane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Stephen Flatley Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of female witness Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Defense summation (closing argument) regarding memory science and conspiracy charges. Court View
N/A N/A Closing arguments/Summation where Ms. Menninger allegedly argued Maxwell was a substitute for Eps... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding witness recall and sequestration violations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar regarding cross-examination of witness 'Jane'. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' regarding prior statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court discussion regarding jury deliberations and note interpretation Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of technical testimony about CD burning and file dates (cre... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Hearing/Sidebar Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Paul Kane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Identification of Exhibit AF9 (Cowboy boots). Courtroom View
N/A Trip Ms. Menninger and her sister visited New York and engaged in various activities like seeing a pla... New York View
N/A Meeting Ms. Menninger and her sister met with Epstein in his office to discuss her college applications. Epstein's office, New York View
N/A Alleged sexual abuse While watching a movie she remembers as 'Five Monkeys', Epstein caressed and held Ms. Menninger's... A movie theater in New York View
N/A Trial testimony A witness gave testimony about her encounters with Maxwell and Epstein, which is now being discus... Courtroom View
N/A Trial Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th. Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00016370.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a massage performed by someone named Ghislaine, with the witness stating her entire breast was exposed and refuting the suggestion that the massage was not explicitly sexual. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger are present, with the former making objections and the latter conducting the examination.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016367.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning centers on a statement Farmer gave to Mr. Baker of The New York Times in August 2019 regarding her state of dress during a massage. Another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes an objection which is overruled by the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016366.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is cross-examining witness A. Farmer regarding potential inconsistencies between her testimony about being nude during a massage and statements she made to Mr. Baker of The New York Times. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to the line of questioning, and the Judge sustains the objection, ruling it is not a prior inconsistent statement.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016364.jpg

This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on a specific interaction involving a foot massage given by Jeffrey Epstein, whether the witness recalled it being sexualized at the time she spoke to the government in May 2020, and whether any private body parts were touched. The witness clarifies that while there was no touching of private parts, she considered the interaction sexualized.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016363.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a prior interview with the government and FBI on May 9, 2020. The questioning focuses on whether the witness previously stated that a specific 'foot massage' was not sexualized.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016362.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning centers on an incident where Ghislaine Maxwell massaged one of Jeffrey Epstein's feet and instructed the witness to massage the other. While the witness confirms there was no touching of private parts, they state they considered the event to be 'sexualized'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016361.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on an incident in a New Mexico movie theater where Jeffrey Epstein held the witness's hand. The defense establishes that while Ghislaine Maxwell was sitting on the other side of Epstein, the witness does not know if Maxwell saw the contact, and Maxwell did not comment on it afterward.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016360.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger. They are arguing over the relevance of an August 2019 email in which the witness, A. Farmer, recounts her memory of a 2007 meeting with the FBI. Ms. Menninger argues it tests the witness's memory regarding events in 1996, but the judge ultimately sustains an objection, ruling the evidence is 'two steps removed' and irrelevant.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016359.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, concerning Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) is being cross-examined by Ms. Menninger about a 2006 visit from agents and the presence of holiday decorations. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to the defense attempting to show the witness an exhibit marked AF10.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016358.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding a pair of boots purchased for her by Jeffrey Epstein. The questioning focuses on the wear and tear of the boots, specifically that the witness wore them 'two-stepping' (dancing) after 2006, and whether she had disclosed this usage to the government prosecutors.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016355.jpg

This court transcript page, filed on August 10, 2022, documents the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning centers on a pair of cowboy boots, marked as exhibit AF9, which Farmer confirms were collected by the FBI from her Texas home around June 29, 2022. Farmer is also questioned about the origin of the boots, with the implication that they were a gift from Mr. Epstein.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016353.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning focuses on contradicting the witness's current testimony about the amount of time spent horseback riding at a ranch with statements they allegedly made to the FBI during an interview in 2006. The attorney, Ms. Menninger, directs the witness to the specific document containing the prior statements.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016344.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding, specifically a cross-examination of A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on whether Ms. Farmer spoke with Jeffrey Epstein or Ms. Maxwell about a trip to New Mexico.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016341.jpg

This document is page 125 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a brief procedural exchange immediately before a luncheon recess where the Judge (The Court) confirms with Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) that there are no matters to discuss while the jury is not present. The header indicates that a witness named 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer) was previously under cross-examination.

Court transcript (trial proceedings)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016340.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning confirms that Farmer met with FBI agents Kuyrkendall and Slater at their home in November 2006, where the agents took notes and wrote a report. The transcript concludes with the judge announcing a lunch break for the court and jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016339.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by Ms. Menninger regarding a 2006 FBI interview. The questioning focuses on a discrepancy between the witness's current memory and an FBI report stating that a person named Maria was originally supposed to accompany Annie to New Mexico.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016337.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a trip the witness took to New Mexico, where they encountered a person named Ghislaine, and probes inconsistencies in the witness's memory regarding the date of a meeting with the FBI, which they recall as being in either 2006 or 2007.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016332.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on establishing Ms. Farmer's prior communications with Mike Baker, a journalist for The New York Times. Ms. Farmer confirms she had email exchanges and gave an interview to Mr. Baker, and that one of the topics discussed was the timing of her trip to New Mexico.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016331.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions the witness about the lack of journal entries regarding a trip to New Mexico and suggests her memory is reconstructed based on internet research about the release date of the movie 'Primal Fear'. The witness maintains that the movie confirmed her existing memory of the timeline. The page concludes with the introduction of exhibit AF-8.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016326.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony centers on verifying a specific page of a journal (Exhibit 604/AF-1) that the witness provided to the government as evidence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016323.jpg

This document is page 107 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry written on January 25, 1996. The questioning focuses on Farmer's conflicting descriptions of Jeffrey Epstein's behavior in a movie theater at that time, noting she described it simultaneously as 'weird,' 'normal,' and 'not a big deal.'

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016316.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. Counsel, Ms. Menninger, raises an issue with redactions and the court addresses a 'terminological issue' regarding the labeling of exhibit AF1, which overlaps with Government Exhibit 603. The court decides to temporarily admit the full exhibit under seal to allow the questioning to proceed.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016315.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination dated August 10, 2022, involving Ms. Menninger questioning A. Farmer. The testimony focuses on entries made by Farmer after returning from New York, specifically confirming details about attending 'Phantom of the Opera', visiting Mr. Epstein's home, meeting Maria's boyfriend, and going cross-country skiing during a trip. Ms. Pomerantz also addresses 'Your Honor' during the proceeding.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016313.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, specifically regarding the admission of a journal entry (Exhibit AF1, Bates AFarmer10472) written by Farmer before a trip to New York. The government, represented by Ms. Pomerantz, agrees that no redactions are necessary for this specific page.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
82
As Recipient
6
Total
88

Exhibits/Redactions

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Email sent regarding exhibits/redactions.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits J-8/9 and J-15

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Discussions regarding the release and redaction of specific defense exhibits.

Conferral
N/A
Communication Source

Request for exhibits

From: the media
To: MS. MENNINGER

Media requests for the exhibits mentioned.

Requests
N/A
Communication Source

Travel history

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: JANE

Ms. Menninger asked Jane about an international trip which Jane did not remember.

Legal questioning
N/A
Communication Source

3509-008, page five

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: JANE

Defense attorney asks witness to read a specific paragraph from a document to refresh recollection.

Document reference
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions (implied)

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Government officials

Regarding exhibits and redactions.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification of legal standard

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Explaining the punctuation in a hypothetical question and clarifying that the flight must be for the purpose of illegal sexual activity.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Strategy

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: co-counsel

(Counsel conferred)

Conference
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of hearsay

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Agreement regarding the exclusion of Maria Farmer's hearsay statements.

Meeting/conferral
N/A
Communication Source

Encounters with Epstein in New York

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Court/Investigator ('y...

Ms. Menninger recounted two instances of meeting Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting about college applications. The second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported as sexual abuse to the Victims Compensation Fund. She also stated Ghislaine Maxwell was not present and had no involvement she was aware of.

Testimony/statement
N/A
Communication Source

Communication efforts

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: chambers (The Court)

Ms. Menninger offers to email the judge's chambers with the dates and times of communication efforts to create a factual record.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Ms. Moe

Ms. Menninger reports to the court that "Ms. Moe and I spoke briefly."

In-person conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding a trip to New Mexico and a me...

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: ["A. Farmer"]

Ms. Menninger questions the witness, A. Farmer, about their trip to New Mexico, their encounter with Ghislaine, and a meeting with the FBI, highlighting conflicting memories about the date of the meeting.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: MS. MENNINGER

Discussion regarding delaying Brian's testimony.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Application

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Application received at 11:54, missing a proposed order.

Application/filing
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: A. Farmer

Questioning regarding the submission of a journal (Exhibit 604) to the government.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Closing Argument (Summation)

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Jury/Court

Defense attorney arguing against the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi and introducing the testimony of Dr. Loftus.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross Examination

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Annie Farmer

Legal examination in court

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination and admission of evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: The Court / A. Farmer

Discussion regarding the admission of Exhibit AF1 (Bates AFarmer10472), a journal page, into evidence without redactions.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Impeachment arguments

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the permissibility of arguing impeachment based on read-aloud quotes during closing arguments.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Rule 16 and Impeachment Evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding whether impeachment documents must be disclosed to the prosecution prior to use.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: A. Farmer

Questioning regarding settlement payout and specific abuse allegations.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Trial Schedule

From: THE COURT
To: MS. MENNINGER

Discussion regarding the timing of closing arguments, jury lunch, and the start of deliberations.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Introduction of Exhibit AF1

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the location of exhibits in a binder and the introduction of a specific page from a journal as evidence.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search