Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MS. MENNINGER

Person
Mentions
1436
Relationships
123
Events
528
Documents
700
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
123 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person A. Farmer
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
16
View
person JANE
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
11
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
13 Very Strong
11
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
12
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
10
View
person JANE
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person A. Farmer
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person your Honor
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
23
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
144
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Mr. Everdell
Co counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
organization The government
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person JANE
Adversarial
8 Strong
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
8 Strong
4
View
person Meder
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Jane
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court examination Cross-examination of witness JANE by Ms. Menninger. N/A View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Jane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Stephen Flatley Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of female witness Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Defense summation (closing argument) regarding memory science and conspiracy charges. Court View
N/A N/A Closing arguments/Summation where Ms. Menninger allegedly argued Maxwell was a substitute for Eps... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding witness recall and sequestration violations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar regarding cross-examination of witness 'Jane'. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' regarding prior statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court discussion regarding jury deliberations and note interpretation Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of technical testimony about CD burning and file dates (cre... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Hearing/Sidebar Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Paul Kane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Identification of Exhibit AF9 (Cowboy boots). Courtroom View
N/A Trip Ms. Menninger and her sister visited New York and engaged in various activities like seeing a pla... New York View
N/A Meeting Ms. Menninger and her sister met with Epstein in his office to discuss her college applications. Epstein's office, New York View
N/A Alleged sexual abuse While watching a movie she remembers as 'Five Monkeys', Epstein caressed and held Ms. Menninger's... A movie theater in New York View
N/A Trial testimony A witness gave testimony about her encounters with Maxwell and Epstein, which is now being discus... Courtroom View
N/A Trial Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th. Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00013093.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony centers on a computer which had only one non-default user account belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that other people could have accessed the computer, but the witness repeatedly states they do not know who had access or where the computer was located.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013083.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning concerns a hard drive (exhibit GX54) found in Mr. Epstein's New York home. Prior to the cross-examination, Mr. Flatley reads a quote describing a very close partnership and friendship between individuals named 'Jeffrey' and 'Ghislaine'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013075.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the authentication of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422, which are identified as Word documents printed from Government Exhibit 54. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the exhibits are admitted into evidence by the Court.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013074.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley testifies that he reviewed evidence using forensic software, and Ms. Pomerantz successfully enters Government Exhibit 418B into evidence without objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger. Ms. Pomerantz then prepares to present additional exhibits (420, 421, and 422) for the witness's review.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013073.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by counsel Ms. Pomerantz. During the testimony, Government Exhibits 418 and 418R are admitted into evidence, with the court noting that 418 is sealed due to third-party phone numbers, and Mr. Flatley identifies another exhibit (418B) as showing the properties of exhibit 418.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013068.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The primary action is the successful authentication and admission of an email, labeled Government Exhibit 424, into evidence. The court admits the exhibit without objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013066.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 419 as software registry information derived from Government Exhibit 54 and explains that a registry is a database used by Windows. The exhibit is subsequently admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013061.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Flatley. Flatley identifies themselves as the CART (Computer Analysis Response Team) coordinator and a digital forensic examiner for the FBI with over 16 years of experience. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of the testimony relative to Rule 702 (expert vs. fact testimony).

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013059.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Ms. Meder. Prosecutor Ms. Comey attempts to ask the witness about specific initials on black binders and dates on CDs, but Defense Attorney Ms. Menninger successfully objects on hearsay grounds. The witness is subsequently excused by the Court.

Court transcript (redirect examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013058.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Meder by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. Meder testifies that they have no personal knowledge regarding the authenticity, accuracy, or origin of photos on CDs, including whether they were altered or previously sent to someone named Epstein. The questioning establishes the witness's inability to verify the integrity or factual representation of the photographic evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013056.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger cross-examines a witness, Ms. Meder, about handwritten notes taken during a review of thousands of photographs. Ms. Meder confirms the handwriting is hers and acknowledges reviewing one set of over 20,000 photos and another set containing between four and ten thousand photos.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013055.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Meder by attorney Ms. Menninger regarding evidence collection. Meder confirms participating in two searches in July 2019 where hundreds of CDs containing thousands of photographs were seized and subsequently reviewed.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013051.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. An attorney for the government, Ms. Comey, successfully enters Exhibit 332 into evidence under seal to protect a third party's privacy. After the jury is instructed to view the evidence, attorney Ms. Menninger begins her cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Meder, regarding photographs she copied.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013050.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Ms. Comey conducting a direct examination of a witness named Meder. The testimony centers on identifying a photograph (Government Exhibit 332) from a CD that was part of the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation.' The witness is also questioned about their familiarity with the appearance of Virginia Roberts.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013049.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey questions witness Ms. Meder regarding Government Exhibit 313, which is identified as a photo of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein retrieved from a CD (Evidence Log 1B75) during the investigation. The government successfully moves to admit this exhibit under seal to protect the privacy of a party involved.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013044.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey, regarding the admission of a photograph (Government Exhibit 343) found on a CD (logged as 1B63). The witness confirms the photograph depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and the judge admits the exhibit into evidence over an objection by defense attorney Ms. Menninger.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013043.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a hearing on August 10, 2022, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. During the direct examination of a witness named Meder, a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein is identified and admitted into evidence as Exhibit GX-342. The photo originated from a CD logged as '1B63' from the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013034.jpg

This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). A witness named Meder is under direct examination by Ms. Comey regarding evidence collected during the Epstein and Maxwell investigation. The witness identifies Government Exhibit 307 as a photograph of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, retrieved from a CD logged as evidence number 1B26.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013033.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding Government Exhibits 304 and 306. The witness identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in a photograph (Exhibit 304) and identifies Maxwell in another photo (Exhibit 306) retrieved from an investigation CD labeled '1B26'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013032.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. During a direct examination, a witness named Meder is questioned by an attorney, Ms. Comey, about a photograph (Government Exhibit 304) from the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation'. The witness identifies the individuals in the photograph as Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013028.jpg

This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of a witness's testimony concerning the technical properties of burning CDs and file dates (created vs. modified). The defense argues that certain technical details were not disclosed in a 'November 26 letter,' while the prosecution argues these details are common knowledge not requiring specialized expertise.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013027.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the upcoming testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The dispute centers on whether Flatley's testimony regarding file dates on CDs constitutes expert opinion or purely factual testimony based on '3500 material'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013024.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a conversation between two lawyers, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe, and the judge regarding the testimony of a witness named Brian. The discussion focuses on scheduling Brian's testimony around his plan to fly home the next day and the scope of his questioning, specifically concerning information he may have received from another individual named Jane.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013023.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Ms. Menninger) are discussing a potential violation regarding witness communication. Specifically, a witness named 'Jane' called an individual named 'Brian' after her testimony to warn him that the defense attorney was an 'expletive' and mentioned being shown an 'Interlochen application' during cross-examination.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013021.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Moe (Prosecution) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) argue before the Court regarding the admissibility of testimony from a witness named Brian, specifically concerning his communications with a 'Jane' and the late timing (3 AM) of the government's disclosure of notes to the defense. The Judge questions whether the late disclosure warrants the exclusion of testimony or simply provides grounds for cross-examination.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
82
As Recipient
6
Total
88

Exhibits/Redactions

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Email sent regarding exhibits/redactions.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits J-8/9 and J-15

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Discussions regarding the release and redaction of specific defense exhibits.

Conferral
N/A
Communication Source

Request for exhibits

From: the media
To: MS. MENNINGER

Media requests for the exhibits mentioned.

Requests
N/A
Communication Source

Travel history

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: JANE

Ms. Menninger asked Jane about an international trip which Jane did not remember.

Legal questioning
N/A
Communication Source

3509-008, page five

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: JANE

Defense attorney asks witness to read a specific paragraph from a document to refresh recollection.

Document reference
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions (implied)

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Government officials

Regarding exhibits and redactions.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification of legal standard

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Explaining the punctuation in a hypothetical question and clarifying that the flight must be for the purpose of illegal sexual activity.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Strategy

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: co-counsel

(Counsel conferred)

Conference
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of hearsay

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: the government

Agreement regarding the exclusion of Maria Farmer's hearsay statements.

Meeting/conferral
N/A
Communication Source

Encounters with Epstein in New York

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Court/Investigator ('y...

Ms. Menninger recounted two instances of meeting Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting about college applications. The second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported as sexual abuse to the Victims Compensation Fund. She also stated Ghislaine Maxwell was not present and had no involvement she was aware of.

Testimony/statement
N/A
Communication Source

Communication efforts

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: chambers (The Court)

Ms. Menninger offers to email the judge's chambers with the dates and times of communication efforts to create a factual record.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Ms. Moe

Ms. Menninger reports to the court that "Ms. Moe and I spoke briefly."

In-person conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding a trip to New Mexico and a me...

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: ["A. Farmer"]

Ms. Menninger questions the witness, A. Farmer, about their trip to New Mexico, their encounter with Ghislaine, and a meeting with the FBI, highlighting conflicting memories about the date of the meeting.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: MS. MENNINGER

Discussion regarding delaying Brian's testimony.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Application

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Application received at 11:54, missing a proposed order.

Application/filing
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: A. Farmer

Questioning regarding the submission of a journal (Exhibit 604) to the government.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Closing Argument (Summation)

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Jury/Court

Defense attorney arguing against the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi and introducing the testimony of Dr. Loftus.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross Examination

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Annie Farmer

Legal examination in court

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination and admission of evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: The Court / A. Farmer

Discussion regarding the admission of Exhibit AF1 (Bates AFarmer10472), a journal page, into evidence without redactions.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Impeachment arguments

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the permissibility of arguing impeachment based on read-aloud quotes during closing arguments.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Rule 16 and Impeachment Evidence

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding whether impeachment documents must be disclosed to the prosecution prior to use.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: A. Farmer

Questioning regarding settlement payout and specific abuse allegations.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Trial Schedule

From: THE COURT
To: MS. MENNINGER

Discussion regarding the timing of closing arguments, jury lunch, and the start of deliberations.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Introduction of Exhibit AF1

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the location of exhibits in a binder and the introduction of a specific page from a journal as evidence.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search