| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
144 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Opposing counsel |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Opposing counsel |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court examination | Cross-examination of witness JANE by Ms. Menninger. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding admissibility of testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of female witness | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense summation (closing argument) regarding memory science and conspiracy charges. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closing arguments/Summation where Ms. Menninger allegedly argued Maxwell was a substitute for Eps... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding witness recall and sequestration violations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar regarding cross-examination of witness 'Jane'. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' regarding prior statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court discussion regarding jury deliberations and note interpretation | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding admissibility of technical testimony about CD burning and file dates (cre... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Hearing/Sidebar | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Paul Kane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of Exhibit AF9 (Cowboy boots). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trip | Ms. Menninger and her sister visited New York and engaged in various activities like seeing a pla... | New York | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Ms. Menninger and her sister met with Epstein in his office to discuss her college applications. | Epstein's office, New York | View |
| N/A | Alleged sexual abuse | While watching a movie she remembers as 'Five Monkeys', Epstein caressed and held Ms. Menninger's... | A movie theater in New York | View |
| N/A | Trial testimony | A witness gave testimony about her encounters with Maxwell and Epstein, which is now being discus... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th. | Courtroom | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on verifying the timeline of a trip the witness took to Thailand in the summer of 1996 (specifically early July) with a nonprofit organization called Global Roots. The defense attorney presses the witness on the existence of physical records, such as passport stamps or organizational records, to substantiate the specific dates of this travel.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Ms. Farmer's prior communications with Mike Baker, a journalist for The New York Times. Ms. Farmer confirms she had email exchanges and an interview with Mr. Baker about her experiences, including a trip she took to New Mexico.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's memory of a trip to New Mexico, which they admit is a "reconstructed memory." The witness explains they established the timeline by researching the release date of the movie 'Primal Fear', which they saw during the trip.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is cross-examining witness A. Farmer regarding a specific piece of evidence, Exhibit 604 (a journal), confirming that the witness provided a picture of the back of the journal to the government. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) confirms possession of the copy.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney questions Farmer to establish that she never mentioned Ghislaine Maxwell in any of her journals, including those written in Thailand and during her senior year, even after the alleged 'New Mexico event' occurred. The page also includes procedural dialogue regarding the display of Exhibit 604.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry written on January 25, 1996. The questioning focuses on the witness's contemporaneous perception of Jeffrey Epstein's behavior in a movie theater, specifically contrasting her journal descriptions of it being 'normal' or 'not a big deal' versus 'weird'.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Farmer's journal entries from January 7th and January 25th, 1996, specifically establishing that Ghislaine Maxwell was not mentioned in these entries. The witness confirms adding details retrospectively in the January 25th entry, including going to see a play.
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding from August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, cross-examines a witness, A. Farmer, about a journal entry detailing a trip to a ski cabin for cross-country skiing and watching a movie called 'Sleuth'. The judge also clarifies that a seven-page document, marked AF1, is being admitted into evidence under seal.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and counsel (Ms. Menninger, Ms. Pomerantz) during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The parties address a terminological issue regarding the admission of exhibits labeled "AF1" and "Government Exhibit 603," with the court deciding to temporarily admit a seven-page version of AF1 under seal. Ms. Menninger also notes a disagreement over redactions, which is deferred to a later time to avoid delaying the jury.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on a journal entry the witness wrote after a trip to New York, confirming she visited Jeffrey Epstein's home, attended 'Phantom of the Opera' (which she described as the best night of the trip), went cross-country skiing, and met a woman named Maria's boyfriend.
This document is page 98 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her past hopes that Epstein (referenced as 'Maria's boss') would pay for her college or help her gain admission. The testimony confirms she wrote these hopes down before traveling to New York but did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell in those specific notes.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The court admits a single page document, Bates labeled AFarmer10472, as exhibit AF1 without objection from the government. Attorney Ms. Menninger then begins questioning the witness about a handwritten journal entry made before a trip to New York.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer (Maria), by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding an undated entry about an upcoming trip to New York. The witness confirms her excitement about seeing her sister and meeting a person named Epstein, who had purchased a ticket for her.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. Ms. Menninger introduces a new exhibit, labeled AF1, which is a page from a journal not previously included in the government's exhibits. After receiving no objection from Ms. Pomerantz, the Court admits exhibit AF1 temporarily under seal.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on the witness's journals, specifically regarding a trip to Thailand, and her previous media appearances (including a '2020 special') where she read from these journals. The defense attorney (Menninger) introduces 'Defendant's Exhibit AF1,' noting discrepancies with a government exhibit, and requests permission to approach the bench with a paper binder.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's habit of keeping journals during high school, exploring the consistency of this practice and referencing specific journals from trips to Thailand and New York. The questioner also brings up a statement the witness made to the government in September 2019 regarding their journaling.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Farmer's use of a personal journal to refresh their memory before a meeting with the government in September 2019, and references specific pages of the journal previously introduced as evidence.
This document is page 91 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a statement Farmer made to the government in September 2019. The questioning focuses on whether Farmer used a journal to refresh her memory about her age (specifically being 16) during a specific trip to New York in her junior year.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to Mr. Epstein's New York home for a New Year's Eve party after Christmas 1995. The witness confirms no sexual activity occurred during the stay and discusses the possibility that the home was under renovation in early 1996.
This is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger cross-examines witness A. Farmer about a journal entry, establishing that the witness returned from a week-long trip to New York on January 7th, 1996. The questioning references 'Government Exhibit 603', which is the witness's journal.
This is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a brief recess during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The judge coordinates with attorneys Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger before recalling the witness and jury.
This document is page 84 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony concerns a visit Farmer made to Mr. Epstein's home in late 1995 or early 1996, specifically discussing the layout of a room with a desk (presumed office) and potential renovations occurring at the time. The timeline is corroborated by a journal entry dated January 7th, shortly after the witness returned from the trip.
This document is a page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Ms. Menninger questions the witness about a specific trip to New York to visit her older sister (who was 25 at the time) and questions her prior statements to law enforcement in 2019 regarding her history of flying alone as a minor.
This document is page 74 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the beginning of the cross-examination of Ms. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony establishes that Ms. Farmer traveled to New York to visit her older sister when she was a 16-year-old high school junior.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from a case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer, who is questioned about a past settlement received from a fund, the dismissal of a lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein, and whether their civil case is concluded. A. Farmer confirms the civil case is over, they do not expect more money, and have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
Email sent regarding exhibits/redactions.
Discussions regarding the release and redaction of specific defense exhibits.
Media requests for the exhibits mentioned.
Ms. Menninger asked Jane about an international trip which Jane did not remember.
Defense attorney asks witness to read a specific paragraph from a document to refresh recollection.
Regarding exhibits and redactions.
Explaining the punctuation in a hypothetical question and clarifying that the flight must be for the purpose of illegal sexual activity.
Agreement regarding the exclusion of Maria Farmer's hearsay statements.
Ms. Menninger recounted two instances of meeting Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting about college applications. The second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported as sexual abuse to the Victims Compensation Fund. She also stated Ghislaine Maxwell was not present and had no involvement she was aware of.
Ms. Menninger offers to email the judge's chambers with the dates and times of communication efforts to create a factual record.
Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.
Ms. Menninger reports to the court that "Ms. Moe and I spoke briefly."
Ms. Menninger questions the witness, A. Farmer, about their trip to New Mexico, their encounter with Ghislaine, and a meeting with the FBI, highlighting conflicting memories about the date of the meeting.
Discussion regarding delaying Brian's testimony.
Application received at 11:54, missing a proposed order.
Questioning regarding the submission of a journal (Exhibit 604) to the government.
Defense attorney arguing against the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi and introducing the testimony of Dr. Loftus.
Legal examination in court
Discussion regarding the admission of Exhibit AF1 (Bates AFarmer10472), a journal page, into evidence without redactions.
Discussion regarding the permissibility of arguing impeachment based on read-aloud quotes during closing arguments.
Argument regarding whether impeachment documents must be disclosed to the prosecution prior to use.
Questioning regarding settlement payout and specific abuse allegations.
Discussion regarding the timing of closing arguments, jury lunch, and the start of deliberations.
Discussion regarding the location of exhibits in a binder and the introduction of a specific page from a journal as evidence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity