| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and defense counsel Christian Everdell (Cohen Gresser). Everdell submitted a Defense Rule 16 Disclosure letter. The internal USANYS emails discuss saving this document to the shared drive (specifically the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' folder) and organizing discovery materials into subfolders like 'AT&T' and 'Federal Express'.
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated November 9, 2021, regarding the production of discovery materials (Jencks Act and Giglio) for her trial. The letter explains that materials previously designated as 'confidential' are now marked with a specific reference to the Protective Order paragraphs to avoid confusion with classified document markings.
An email chain from October 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, demanding immediate confirmation of the status of legal mail at the MDC. Sternheim notes that USPO tracking shows mail available for pickup that the facility has not retrieved, and threatens court action if not resolved. The chain includes a signature block for Isabel Maxwell, acting as a paralegal for the Law Offices of Leah Saffian.
This document is a discovery production letter dated October 1, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It details the transfer of financial records from Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, UBS, and American Express, many of which are designated as confidential. The letter specifically links Ghislaine Maxwell to various entities including the Terramar Project, Max Foundation, and Angara Trust via UBS records, and notes shared American Express records between Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and US prosecutors (USANYS). The defense raises seven specific technical issues regarding discovery, including the need to provide evidence on hard drives rather than disks for the prison computer, over 100,000 emails missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation dates after his death (July 2020). The email also mentions videos from SDFL and PBPD investigations.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The defense raises several technical discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to read discovery disks on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices (showing 2020 dates instead of original dates). The prosecution forwards these issues to their contractor (PAE) to address.
An email dated October 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves to distribute a courtesy copy of a defense filing (Defense_Reply_to_Dkt_350.pdf) to redacted recipients, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2021, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USANYS) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. Following a letter filed by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding legal mail at the MDC, Judge Nathan ordered the prosecution to respond by 5 PM on October 15. The emails depict the prosecution team scrambling to draft a response, coordinating with the BOP and a contact named Sophia at the MDC, and expressing frustration regarding the tight deadlines imposed by Judge Nathan.
This document is an email dated October 19, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca). The email serves to serve the Government's 'motions in limine' and requests that certain attached documents be filed under seal. The email references case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
This document contains an email chain from November 2021 regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell submits a response to the government's letters concerning 'Accuser-3's evidence' to Judge Nathan's chambers, filing the document under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions. The correspondence also lists other defense team members including Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, and Bobbi Sternheim.
An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.
This document is a discovery production letter from the DOJ to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 5, 2021. It lists materials being turned over, including files recovered from discs seized at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence, images from his electronic devices, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a 1995 Oxford letter. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.
This document is a discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 4, 2021. It lists produced materials including FBI recovered metadata, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a letter from 1995 related to Oxford. The letter also clarifies new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
This document is an email header dated October 20, 2020, regarding 'US v. Maxwell - discovery production'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, and Bobbi Sternheim. The sender is redacted, and the document appears to be part of the legal discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 20, 2020, serving as a cover letter for a discovery production. The production includes various materials such as FBI documents from Florida and NY, PBPD materials, and videos, listed with Bates numbers. The letter also addresses the status of data extracted from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties, noting that privilege reviews are ongoing and that the Epstein Estate has not waived privilege.
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and redacted government officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement. Sternheim requests that Maxwell be allowed legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she was held idle for over three hours. The government responds that they do not object but that the US Marshals require a court order.
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The correspondence details disputes over the location of the review (FBI Bronx Warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), specifically concerning 'bulky' items such as massage tables, plaster busts, and framed art which the government refused to transport. Significant discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials, including approximately 2,100 nude or obscene electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, which required specific viewing conditions on non-networked laptops due to their nature.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 8, 2020. The government asserts it has met its discovery obligations despite technical issues at the MDC, detailing efforts to reformat files and provide IT support. The letter also addresses Maxwell's conditions of confinement, confirming she must sleep in an isolation cell and undergo weekly body scans, while noting she has access to commissary food, mail, and 13 hours of discovery review time per day. It mentions the FBI possesses 43,500 images from Epstein's residences (3,500 containing nudity) which will be made available for review via a secure laptop brought to the MDC.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 8, 2020, refuting claims that the government failed to meet discovery obligations. The letter details technical efforts to ensure Maxwell can review digital evidence at the MDC, including the provision of a secure laptop to review 43,500 images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties (3,500 of which contain nudity). It also addresses conditions of confinement, confirming Maxwell remains in an isolation cell for safety, undergoes weekly body scans, and has access to commissary food items.
An email dated February 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to 'MDC Conditions' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 24, 2020, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell'. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing titled 'Maxwell_Reply_to_90-day_conditions_ltr.pdf' to a group of attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document represents an email thread between defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and an official at MDC Brooklyn regarding the confinement status of Ghislaine Maxwell on November 19, 2020. The official informs Sternheim that Maxwell was placed in quarantine (not the SHU) for 14 days after close contact with a staff member who tested positive for COVID-19, resulting in the suspension of in-person legal visits.
This document is a series of emails from October 2020 concerning discovery production in the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The correspondence details the delivery and pickup of hard drives, the sending of Ms. Maxwell's drive to the MDC, and the scheduling of a prison visit for Ms. Maxwell to review a secure laptop. The emails involve legal teams from the Southern District of New York, Cohen Gresser, and HMFLAW, discussing logistical arrangements for evidence exchange and client access.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 detailing complaints by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, regarding conditions at the MDC. Sternheim alleges 'foul play' or a 'cover-up' regarding legal mail that went missing and reappeared with USPS markings despite being placed in an internal mailbox. Additional complaints include inadequate space and COVID safety during legal visits, denial of requests to see the Warden, and issues with food (receiving meat while on a vegetarian diet) and electricity.
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Christian Everdell.
Reading of a legal stipulation regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson concerning a cardboard box recovered during a search.
Support memorandum filed by defense.
Confirming the correct document is attached.
Instructions to refer to Dkt. No. 474 for filing the redacted letter.
Submission of defense response regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims, filed under temporary seal.
Informing Chambers that the defense has no redactions to add to the government's proposed redactions and is awaiting instructions.
Submitting Maxwell's response to the government's Nov 11 letter regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims under temporary seal.
Follow-up asking if the revised stipulation is acceptable to the government.
Asking for a quick cell phone call.
Proposing specific wording for a stipulation regarding a witness's trial testimony transcript given on February 26.
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's response to government letters dated Nov 5 and Nov 7, 2021, regarding Accuser-3's evidence. Submitted under temporary seal.
Sending draft letter regarding logistics relating to pseudonyms; asking for position language by tomorrow evening.
Stating understanding that the government was supposed to handle victim notifications and report to the Court.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Confirming letter will be sent later; requests extra drives be brought to the hearing.
Agreeing to drop hard drives at the security tent.
Suggesting drop off at security tent next door to office to avoid delays.
Discussing logistics of handing off 4 hard drives; suggests meeting paralegal at 40 Foley side entrance.
Listing three joint letters due to court tomorrow regarding pseudonyms, limiting instructions, and voir dire procedures. Requests proposals by COB.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Planning to send strikes by noon but requesting simultaneous exchange of strike lists.
Sending draft joint letter.
Confirming Gov incorporated defense redactions. Opposing additional Gov redactions. Stating defense will file motions/exhibits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity