| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
This document is a formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 11, 2021. It serves to notify the defense that the Government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals as co-conspirators during the trial, pursuant to a court order. The letter is marked as Exhibit 1 and designated as confidential under a protective order.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger) dated July 27, 2020. The prosecution requests a 'meet and confer' to discuss a protective order, specifically challenging the defense's desire to name victims in public filings rather than using pseudonyms. The email also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
This document is an email chain from August 9-12, 2020, between defense attorneys (Jeff Pagliuca, Nicole Simmons, Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen) and the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY regarding a discovery dispute. The defense is pressing for a quick response to an August 9th letter, citing a tight schedule with the Circuit and threatening to advise Judge Nathan if they do not receive a response sooner than the Government's proposed date of August 13th. The correspondence also notes technical email issues at the defense firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman.
This document is an email chain from August 2020 involving legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, etc.) and likely government prosecutors (names redacted). The discussion concerns a discovery letter sent by the defense, the handling of criminal grand jury materials in relation to Maxwell's civil cases, and a dispute over the disclosure of victim names. The redacted senders discuss strategy for responding to 'Jeff and Laura,' specifically refuting claims of government malfeasance and debating whether to allow materials to be filed under seal.
An email chain from July 2020 involving defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, et al.) discussing a 'Protective Order' for discovery, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by 'GM' in filenames). Everdell sends a revised draft to the Government following a call on July 20th. The top emailer (name redacted) forwards this message expressing confusion, noting they cannot see the difference between the attached documents or find the redline.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 12, 2021. It serves as notice that the Government intends to introduce evidence showing Maxwell provided other men with access to women, in addition to her conduct with Epstein. The letter also discloses a redacted witness who worked for Epstein in 2005-2006 and will testify about scheduling sexualized massages with underage girls.
An email dated July 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a group of recipients including David Oscar Markus, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of a legal filing (Reply_to_Order_Dkt_312.pdf) related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. S2 20 Cr. 330).
A letter from US Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 23, 2021. The letter details the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as courtesy materials regarding individuals the government does not currently plan to call. It also clarifies confidentiality designations under a Protective Order.
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated November 23, 2021, accompanying a discovery production. The production includes JPMC records, phone records, and other documents designated as confidential under a protective order. The letter clarifies labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office regarding various discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties with Maxwell accessing discovery on prison computers, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Epstein's devices, and clarification regarding 'missing' pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (which the prosecution explains were re-numbered/included in a different file). The defense also raises concerns about a Daily Beast article referencing a search warrant affidavit, which the prosecution confirms was unsealed by the court in New Hampshire, not leaked by their office.
This document is an email dated November 9, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim). The email notifies counsel that a hard drive containing new discovery production is available for pickup at One St. Andrew's Plaza and highlights a specific disclosure regarding a witness statement. It also confirms that copies of this and prior productions are being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell's review.
This document is a discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 13, 2021. It accompanies the production of spreadsheets previously reviewed by the defense at an FBI office in Denver. The letter notes that the original spreadsheets contained embedded hyperlinks to images of 'child exploitation materials,' necessitating the creation of a sanitized version for production.
This document is an email chain dated July 14, 2020, providing a detailed log of legal calls made by Ghislaine Maxwell (USMS No. 02879-509) between July 6 and July 14, 2020. The sender forwards this list to ensure that 'Mark' (likely Mark Cohen or opposing counsel) does not misrepresent Maxwell's access to counsel during an upcoming hearing. The log details dates, times, durations, and participants of the calls, which primarily include attorneys Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, as well as Lea Harmon from Pretrial Services.
An email dated October 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), copying Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email attaches joint proposed jury questionnaires and voir dire questions, likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings.
This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.
This document is an email correspondence between attorney David Oscar Markus and Assistant United States Attorneys regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus informs the government of his representation of Maxwell in her bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries, while the government responds regarding document availability and existing protective orders.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific technical issues regarding discovery production, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on over 110,000 documents extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution team discusses internally setting up a call with their vendor, PAE, to address these errors.
This document contains an email chain from March 29, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence details technical disputes regarding discovery materials, specifically the defense's inability to provide a hard drive to Maxwell in prison (MDC), issues with unreadable disks, missing email attachments, and discrepancies in metadata for over 110,000 files seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution explains that some metadata is missing because files were 'carved or deleted' and offers solutions for transferring missing files.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven specific issues, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), metadata discrepancies suggesting files were created/modified after seizure, and gaps in Bates numbering. The prosecution responds by explaining technical limitations with the MDC (prison), asserting that metadata reflects the state of files upon FBI seizure or carving, and clarifying that certain images came from physical CDs seized from Epstein's residences in 2019 rather than electronic extractions.
An email dated April 30, 2021, from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to redacted recipients and copied to members of the defense team (Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email serves to circulate an attached letter regarding 'Hard Drives' that was recently filed on the docket addressed to Judge Nathan.
A formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 11, 2021. The letter discloses that the Government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and two other redacted individuals (one with a former alias) as 'co-conspirators' during the upcoming trial. The document is marked confidential under a protective order.
An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (likely MDC/BOP). Sternheim complains about the conditions of Maxwell's confinement, specifically alleging that guards repeatedly woke Maxwell due to shivering from cold temperatures only to subsequently confiscate her blankets. The correspondence also addresses technical failures with Video Teleconferencing (VTC) equipment hindering attorney-client preparation and alleges unprofessional behavior by guards.
This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sent a courtesy copy of an ECF filing—specifically a letter regarding sleep deprivation—to US Attorneys and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responding to a discovery request. The Government declines to produce broad FOIA-related documents citing lack of legal basis under Rule 16, but provides specific materials related to Radar Online and FBI-NY's involvement in the SDFL investigation as a courtesy. The letter also corrects a defense assertion regarding the FBI Florida office's role in the prosecution team.
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of materials stamped SDNY_GM_00274187 through SDNY_GM_0274302, which are identified in the index as a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated 12-15-2020. The document notes that the letter and materials are subject to a protective order.
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Christian Everdell.
Reading of a legal stipulation regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson concerning a cardboard box recovered during a search.
Support memorandum filed by defense.
Confirming the correct document is attached.
Instructions to refer to Dkt. No. 474 for filing the redacted letter.
Submission of defense response regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims, filed under temporary seal.
Informing Chambers that the defense has no redactions to add to the government's proposed redactions and is awaiting instructions.
Submitting Maxwell's response to the government's Nov 11 letter regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims under temporary seal.
Follow-up asking if the revised stipulation is acceptable to the government.
Asking for a quick cell phone call.
Proposing specific wording for a stipulation regarding a witness's trial testimony transcript given on February 26.
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's response to government letters dated Nov 5 and Nov 7, 2021, regarding Accuser-3's evidence. Submitted under temporary seal.
Sending draft letter regarding logistics relating to pseudonyms; asking for position language by tomorrow evening.
Stating understanding that the government was supposed to handle victim notifications and report to the Court.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Confirming letter will be sent later; requests extra drives be brought to the hearing.
Agreeing to drop hard drives at the security tent.
Suggesting drop off at security tent next door to office to avoid delays.
Discussing logistics of handing off 4 hard drives; suggests meeting paralegal at 40 Foley side entrance.
Listing three joint letters due to court tomorrow regarding pseudonyms, limiting instructions, and voir dire procedures. Requests proposals by COB.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Planning to send strikes by noon but requesting simultaneous exchange of strike lists.
Sending draft joint letter.
Confirming Gov incorporated defense redactions. Opposing additional Gov redactions. Stating defense will file motions/exhibits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity