CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
EFTA00031016.pdf
This document is a discovery letter dated May 3, 2021, from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It accompanies the production of photographs (Bates range SDNY_GM_02753399 to SDNY_GM_02753431) designated as confidential under a Protective Order.
EFTA00030992.pdf
This document is a discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 21, 2020. It outlines the production of various evidentiary materials, including Boies Schiller documents, emails, search warrant photos, Jeffrey Epstein's deposition recordings (2010), travel records, and SORNA records. The letter explicitly notes that 'highly confidential' materials containing sexualized images are being provided only to counsel, not the defendant, and refuses to produce a separate FBI obstruction file regarding a redacted former employee of Epstein deemed irrelevant to the case.
EFTA00030973.pdf
This document is an email dated February 23, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to defense team members Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of a 'Maxwell Bail Application' filed that day in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00030941.pdf
This document is an email thread between defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). On December 28, 2020, Everdell requested a Bill of Particulars. On January 10, 2021, the USANYS responded with an attached letter regarding the request in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (indicated by 'GM' in the filename).
EFTA00030912.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding various discovery disputes. Key issues include Maxwell's inability to access files on a CD at the MDC prison, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006, missing subscriber info in AT&T records, and clarification regarding missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers. The prosecution responds that the 'missing' Rodgers pages were produced in a separate file (SDNY_GM_00005650-5676) and confirms that a Daily Beast article referenced a document unsealed by a New Hampshire court, not leaked by the prosecution.
EFTA00030900.pdf
An email dated August 9, 2020, from attorney Jeff Pagliuca to redacted recipients and several cc'd attorneys (Menninger, Everdell, Cohen, Simmons). The email transmits an attached conferral letter regarding a protective order and discovery to the USA (likely US Attorney). The document originates from the Ghislaine Maxwell defense team (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman; Cohen Gresser).
EFTA00030880.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be given to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. She also requests that Maxwell be granted access to a government-provided laptop because standard MDC computers cannot open the necessary discovery documents, arguing that denial of access hinders Maxwell's defense. The BOP recipient responds that the legal department does not process mail and that BOP policies must be followed.
EFTA00030861.pdf
This document is an email chain and legal correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. Defense attorney Christian Everdell lists eight specific issues, including the urgent need for a hard drive for Maxwell to review evidence in prison, missing subscriber info for AT&T documents, and specifically noting that the first 27 pages of flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers ('Rodgers000001-000027') were missing. The defense also inquires about a Daily Beast article referencing a cell-site simulator affidavit that they believe was not properly unsealed.
EFTA00030755.pdf
This document captures the metadata of an email sent by attorney Christian Everdell regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Dated December 8, 2020, the email conveys a 'Renewed Bail Motion and Exhibits' to be filed under seal. The email originated from the domain CohenGresser.com and was blind copied to a USAHUB address.
EFTA00030569.pdf
This document is a formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 22 specific discovery requests made on October 13, 2020. The government addresses requests for Epstein's diary, the 'Billionaires Playboy Club' manuscript, flight logs (implied in broader requests but not itemized), and the identities of minor victims, often denying immediate production based on Rule 16 restrictions or asserting that materials have already been produced. The letter also discusses the handling of potential 'Brady' and 'Giglio' materials, stating that impeachment evidence will be produced closer to trial.
EFTA00030092.pdf
A cover letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated March 12, 2021. The letter accompanies a discovery production of photographs and documents received from victims not referenced in the indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330), designated as confidential under a protective order.
EFTA00030052.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 30, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Redactions'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys known to represent Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The sender information and specific email addresses are redacted.
EFTA00029942.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Attorney Christian Everdell raises seven specific discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to access files on disks via the prison computer, missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and significant metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Epstein's devices show modification dates (July 2020) well after his death and device seizure. The email specifically requests metadata overlays to correct these issues and inquires about a gap in document production numbers.
EFTA00029600.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email, dated September 15, 2021, transmits a government letter regarding 'Flatley' and a document labeled '3503-001', likely referring to Jencks Act material (witness statements).
EFTA00029574.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 involving the transmission of Defense Rule 16 Disclosure documents from Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The attachments include certifications from AT&T and FedEx, FedEx invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The thread shows internal USANYS staff coordinating to save these files to a shared drive.
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00029423.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca), likely regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence concerns proposed redactions for filings related to 'Witness-3' and includes an attachment referencing a letter to Judge Nathan. Christian Everdell requests a quick phone call with the prosecutor during the exchange.
EFTA00029301.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (specifically a letter regarding legal mail) to prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was then forwarded internally within the USANYS office.
EFTA00029294.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government representatives (including Christian Everdell). Sternheim complains that legal materials (a hard drive and books) sent by the government via FedEx were delivered to the MDC on October 12, 2021, but had not been given to Maxwell as of October 14. The document includes screenshots of FedEx tracking information (Tracking #8166 1429 9130 and #8166 1429 9141) confirming delivery to Brooklyn, NY.
EFTA00029236.pdf
This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Sternheim is sending a courtesy copy of an ECF filing, specifically a reply letter concerning the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center), to redacted recipients and co-counsel including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00029162.pdf
This document is an email dated August 18, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to other defense counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to transmit a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell. The attachment references 'Letter_re_VTCs', likely concerning Video Teleconferences for the trial proceedings.
EFTA00028733.pdf
A discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated May 20, 2021. The production includes 'Interlochen records' and native 'carved' image files from various electronic devices (identified by codes such as NYC024321) that were previously produced in PDF format. The letter and materials are marked confidential under a Protective Order.
EFTA00028646.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties Maxwell faced in reviewing digital evidence at the MDC prison (specifically reading disks vs. hard drives), missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and metadata discrepancies for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The correspondence details the logistical back-and-forth regarding file formats, USAfx transfers, and the potential need for judicial intervention (Judge Nathan) to force the MDC to accept specific hard drives.
EFTA00028585.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven key issues, including over 109,000 emails missing attachments, metadata discrepancies on files extracted from Epstein's devices, and difficulties providing discovery materials to Maxwell at the MDC due to technical and bureaucratic limitations. The prosecution responds with technical explanations regarding FBI CART processes, 'carved' or deleted files lacking metadata, and the conversion of VHS/cassette tapes.
EFTA00028584.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated May 22, 2021, the email submits the Government's opposition to the defense's supplemental pretrial motions. The sender notes they are emailing the document because the electronic filing system prevents them from filing an opposition brief before the original defense motion appears on the public docket.
No Subject
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Christian Everdell.
Stipulation of Testimony
Reading of a legal stipulation regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson concerning a cardboard box recovered during a search.
Objections to the Presentence Investigation Report
Support memorandum filed by defense.
RE: Witness-3 - proposed redactions
Confirming the correct document is attached.
Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Res...
Instructions to refer to Dkt. No. 474 for filing the redacted letter.
[EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Submission of defense response regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims, filed under temporary seal.
RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Res...
Informing Chambers that the defense has no redactions to add to the government's proposed redactions and is awaiting instructions.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Respons...
Submitting Maxwell's response to the government's Nov 11 letter regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims under temporary seal.
[EXTERNAL] RE: Stip
Follow-up asking if the revised stipulation is acceptable to the government.
[EXTERNAL] RE: Witness-3 - proposed redactions
Asking for a quick cell phone call.
Stip
Proposing specific wording for a stipulation regarding a witness's trial testimony transcript given on February 26.
[EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's response to government letters dated Nov 5 and Nov 7, 2021, regarding Accuser-3's evidence. Submitted under temporary seal.
RE: Pseudonyms
Sending draft letter regarding logistics relating to pseudonyms; asking for position language by tomorrow evening.
[EXTERNAL] FW: 20cr330, US v. Maxwell
Stating understanding that the government was supposed to handle victim notifications and report to the Court.
[EXTERNAL] Defense Rule 16 Disclosure
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
RE: Pseudonyms
Confirming letter will be sent later; requests extra drives be brought to the hearing.
[EXTERNAL] RE: Pseudonyms
Agreeing to drop hard drives at the security tent.
RE: Pseudonyms
Suggesting drop off at security tent next door to office to avoid delays.
[EXTERNAL] RE: Pseudonyms
Discussing logistics of handing off 4 hard drives; suggests meeting paralegal at 40 Foley side entrance.
[EXTERNAL] Pseudonyms
Listing three joint letters due to court tomorrow regarding pseudonyms, limiting instructions, and voir dire procedures. Requests proposals by COB.
[EXTERNAL] Defense Rule 16 Disclosure
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
[EXTERNAL] Defense Rule 16 Disclosure
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
[EXTERNAL] RE: questionnaires
Planning to send strikes by noon but requesting simultaneous exchange of strike lists.
RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine
Sending draft joint letter.
[EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine
Confirming Gov incorporated defense redactions. Opposing additional Gov redactions. Stating defense will file motions/exhibits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity