| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and Bureau of Prisons officials. Sternheim alleges 'foul play' regarding legal mail that went missing and reappeared with a USPS barcode despite never being mailed externally. She also complains about poor conditions at the MDC, including cramped meeting rooms violating COVID protocols, electricity/water issues, and the prison serving Maxwell a bologna sandwich despite her vegetarian diet.
An email chain from February 23, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca) sending a courtesy copy of a bail application filing to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email was forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office with the commentary 'Apparently they think third time's the charm,' referring to Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure bail.
This document is an email chain dated October 29, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to prison officials (MDC), complaining that Ghislaine Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week. Sternheim provides four USPS tracking numbers showing legal mail has been 'Available for Pickup' at the Brooklyn post office for days (dating back to Oct 12) without being retrieved by the facility. Sternheim threatens to file an 'order to show cause' requiring the recipients' presence in court if the issue is not resolved immediately.
This document is a letter dated October 11, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It formally notifies the defense that the government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals as co-conspirators during the trial, specifically for the purpose of admitting evidence under the co-conspirator hearsay exception. The letter is marked as Exhibit 1 and designated as confidential under a protective order.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, etc.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling and procedure for filing a 'request to charge' (jury instructions) with Judge Nathan. The parties discuss extensions, the possibility of filing separate requests rather than a joint one, and agree to a schedule where the Government files first, followed by the Defense's redline or separate filing in early November.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses. The letter clarifies a stamping error in a previous production (October 11, 2021) involving records 3501.507-516 and explains new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP officials regarding legal access at the MDC. Sternheim requests permission to hand-deliver time-sensitive legal documents due to postal delays ahead of a January 25th filing deadline. The BOP official denies the request, citing policies requiring standard mail processing and a ban on visitors (likely due to COVID-19 protocols). The emails also confirm a schedule for Video Teleconferences (VTCs) for the week.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and government/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be provided to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. The correspondence also includes a request for Maxwell to have access to a government-provided laptop to review discovery materials, arguing that MDC computers are insufficient for her defense.
This document is a discovery production letter dated November 24, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the production of confidential records related to JPMC (JPMorgan Chase) and Lockheed Martin, governed by a Protective Order. The letter explains the specific confidentiality markings applied to the produced materials.
An email dated May 5, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Lara [Redacted] to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The prosecutor is sharing a draft letter regarding 'flashlight checks' (as indicated by the attachment filename) pursuant to Judge Nathan's April 29 order, asking the defense to identify any necessary redactions of private medical information before the letter is publicly filed.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in Case 20 Cr. 330. The defense argues strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense also leverages the scheduling dispute to suggest that granting Maxwell bail would resolve the flexibility issues.
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated May 11, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email attaches a letter requesting a trial start date of November 8th. Several other attorneys, including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, are copied on the correspondence.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Defense attorney Christian Everdell submits a response to the court regarding the self-authentication of birth certificates for alleged minor victims. In an internal forward, a USANYS (prosecution) staff member notes that the defense has 'conceded' on the issue, prompting a colleague to reply 'Nice work!'.
This document contains an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials from January 2021. Sternheim asserts that Maxwell is being targeted, physically mistreated (specifically alleging a guard squeezed her breast during a search), and denied proper food (receiving rotting fruit and meat despite a non-flesh diet). The correspondence references Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody as a reason for heightened concern regarding Maxwell's safety and requests the removal of the current guard team.
This document contains email metadata from January 7, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (referencing her inmate number 02879-509). The email was routed through the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP.GOV) system and addressed to her defense team, including Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, and Mark Cohen.
A discovery cover letter dated May 3, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss's office to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of photographs stamped SDNY_GM_02753399 through SDNY_GM_02753431, noting that the materials and the letter itself are designated as confidential under a Protective Order.
A discovery production letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated October 28, 2021. The letter lists produced materials including a scanned contact book page, records from the United Kingdom, and materials from the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, noting confidentiality designations under a protective order.
This document is an email thread between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in 'US v. Maxwell'. The defense advocates strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the Government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense suggests that consenting to bail would resolve the scheduling flexibility issues.
An email chain from July 6, 2020, coordinating a pretrial interview for Ghislaine Maxwell. An Assistant U.S. Attorney introduces Maxwell's defense lawyers, Christian Everdell and Mark Cohen, to a U.S. Pretrial Services officer to arrange the interview ahead of a bail hearing scheduled for that week.
This document is an email chain from July 6, 2020, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and U.S. Pretrial Services. The correspondence concerns arranging a pretrial interview for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell with her attorneys, Christian Everdell and Mark S. Cohen, in preparation for her bail hearing later that week. Pretrial Services confirms they will handle the request.
This document is an email dated October 29, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email notifies counsel of an additional discovery production being made via USAfx and discusses logistical arrangements for providing these materials to Ms. Maxwell at the MDC, either via CD or hard drive.
This document is an email thread from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and MDC officials. Sternheim raises concerns about non-functioning HEPA filters during attorney visits, requests the use of a larger corner room for future visits, and complains about delays in legal mail pickup. The final response from the facility confirms that the legal mail in question was picked up and delivered to Maxwell on the 15th and 18th of the month.
This document is an email dated October 26, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan's chambers. It serves to file the Government's opposition to the Defense's motions in limine in the case US v. Maxwell (20 CR 330). The email indicates that redacted versions of the opposition will be filed publicly on October 29.
This document is an email chain dated October 29, 2021, related to the US v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr 330). Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (a legal mail delivery request) to co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca) and potentially opposing counsel. The top email discusses the filing and attempts to schedule a call regarding an issue to be addressed at the final pretrial conference scheduled for the following Monday at 11 a.m.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 related to the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP submits reply memoranda and exhibits for pretrial motions to Judge Nathan's chambers and government prosecutors (USANYS), noting that documents are being filed under seal with redacted versions for the public docket.
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Christian Everdell.
Reading of a legal stipulation regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson concerning a cardboard box recovered during a search.
Support memorandum filed by defense.
Confirming the correct document is attached.
Instructions to refer to Dkt. No. 474 for filing the redacted letter.
Submission of defense response regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims, filed under temporary seal.
Informing Chambers that the defense has no redactions to add to the government's proposed redactions and is awaiting instructions.
Submitting Maxwell's response to the government's Nov 11 letter regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims under temporary seal.
Follow-up asking if the revised stipulation is acceptable to the government.
Asking for a quick cell phone call.
Proposing specific wording for a stipulation regarding a witness's trial testimony transcript given on February 26.
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's response to government letters dated Nov 5 and Nov 7, 2021, regarding Accuser-3's evidence. Submitted under temporary seal.
Sending draft letter regarding logistics relating to pseudonyms; asking for position language by tomorrow evening.
Stating understanding that the government was supposed to handle victim notifications and report to the Court.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Confirming letter will be sent later; requests extra drives be brought to the hearing.
Agreeing to drop hard drives at the security tent.
Suggesting drop off at security tent next door to office to avoid delays.
Discussing logistics of handing off 4 hard drives; suggests meeting paralegal at 40 Foley side entrance.
Listing three joint letters due to court tomorrow regarding pseudonyms, limiting instructions, and voir dire procedures. Requests proposals by COB.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Planning to send strikes by noon but requesting simultaneous exchange of strike lists.
Sending draft joint letter.
Confirming Gov incorporated defense redactions. Opposing additional Gov redactions. Stating defense will file motions/exhibits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity