| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Co-counsel
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial in deposition |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent adversarial |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Witness questioner |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversaries in a deposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator witness |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Saige
|
Adversarial questioner deponent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Termination of deposition due to attorney conflict. | Unknown (Transcription serv... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding witness credibility. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition Recess | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Five-minute recess/break taken during deposition. | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Exhibit 31-001 | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Proceeding | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a redacted witness | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhib... | Unknown (Reporting firm bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition argument regarding a break and obstruction. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness | Unknown (Likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness (Ms. [Redacted]). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cancelled Hearing | Unknown Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition hearing | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A photograph marked '18-001' is presented to the witness. The witness identifies themselves and a... | During deposition | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of the witness by Mr. Tein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where Mr. Tein questioned an unnamed witness represented by Mr. Leopold. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was scheduled to take place, but Mr. Leopold could not start it on time due to a cou... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness represented by attorney Mr. ... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by MR. TEIN. The questioning focuses on wheth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious legal deposition or hearing where a witness is being questioned. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A scheduled appearance was allegedly missed by the deponent, which Mr. Tein refers to as breaking... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent who is represen... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A hearing was scheduled but got cancelled. An agreement related to this cancellation was allegedl... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony is being conducted, as detailed on page 31 of the transcript. | Unknown | View |
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a photograph from a press conference related to the witness's lawsuit, which features the witness's father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects, leading to a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, about the grounds for making objections.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving a witness (Ms. [Redacted]) being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold raising objections. The questioning focuses on confirming that an attorney named Mr. Herman filed a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein on the witness's behalf and subsequently held a press conference. The document includes a DOJ Bates stamp and a processing date of 07/26/17.
This document is page 12 of a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they are aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filed a lawsuit on their behalf. Mr. Leopold objects based on attorney-client privilege, specifically referencing conversations between himself and the witness, as well as an 'attorney from Miami'.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Leopold, Goldberger, and Tein, dated July 26, 2017 (based on the footer stamp). The text captures a contentious exchange where Mr. Leopold defends his objections regarding 'improper foundation,' while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein accuse him of wasting time and obstructing the process. Mr. Tein specifically reprimands Leopold for failing to appear earlier in the morning after a separate hearing was cancelled, allegedly breaking a prior agreement.
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. It captures a legal dispute between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold instructs his client not to answer a question based on attorney-client privilege, leading to a heated argument about procedural rules and 'speaking objections'.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, in which attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning centers on the witness's awareness of a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein by their attorney, Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, instructing his client not to reveal any information learned through their privileged attorney-client conversations.
This document is page 4 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates in Florida. It captures the swearing-in of a witness whose name is heavily redacted and the commencement of direct examination by an attorney named Mr. Tein. The footer indicates the document was part of a Public Records Request processed on July 26, 2017, and bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 131) produced by Consor & Associates. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding scheduling and professional courtesy, specifically concerning someone named Jack canceling vacation plans. The argument escalates until Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold selfish and abruptly terminates the deposition, with Mr. Goldberger instructing to go off the record.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated argument between several individuals, primarily Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of being a liar and an obstructionist, specifically claiming that Mr. Leopold lied in a letter to his co-counsel about being unavailable for a hearing.
This document appears to be a transcript of a legal deposition. The discussion centers around exhibits, their marking, and preventing their removal from the room. Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein are involved in a disagreement regarding the exhibits.
This document is page 124 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated and adversarial exchange between several individuals, identified as Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Tein, regarding the proper procedure for copying and marking photo exhibits. The conversation is marked by frequent interruptions, personal insults, and appeals to a third party, highlighting significant conflict between the participants.
This document is page 121 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about her sexual history before meeting Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states she had sexual intercourse with two men, Zack Bryan and Ryan Ortell, starting when she was 14 years old.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about the credibility of their parents, specifically establishing that the witness's father served two years in federal prison for financial fraud and stealing from a financial institution. Opposing counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, leading to an accusation of witness coaching from Mr. Tein.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript marked 'Page 117' and 'Page 2792'. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding procedural rules and objections. Mr. Tein aggressively questions a witness, asserting that the witness's parents, who filed a police report, are 'liars,' prompting Mr. Leopold to instruct the witness not to answer and to state for the record that the question was inappropriate and misleading.
This document is page 110 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about serious allegations, including whether a firefighter named Brett is in a relationship with a minor and whether the witness has lied about their sister's alleged drug habit. The witness denies the accusations while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as argumentative.
This document is page 106 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An interrogator, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about two photographs. The witness identifies their stepmother as the photographer of one picture taken at Buca di Beppo, and a man named Chris (also known as Swiss) as the photographer of another, while repeatedly denying Mr. Tein's characterization that the photos depict sexual acts.
This document is page 81 of a deposition transcript where an individual, questioned by Mr. Tein, recounts an interview she had with the FBI. The FBI interview took place approximately a year to a year and a half prior at her father's residence on Downers Road in Loxahatchee. The interviewee states that four FBI agents were present and that her stepmother was at the house but not involved in the conversation.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, discusses their extensive contact with the Palm Beach Police Department regarding Epstein. The witness states they spoke with police 'more than I like can count' over a four-year period, with the last contact being about a year to a year and a half prior, and confirms remembering Detective Michelle Pagan but not Detective Recarey.
This document is a transcript from a deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning focuses on a scheduling conflict where the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, was unable to start the deposition that morning due to a court appearance. The witness is also asked if they have listened to a prior tape-recorded statement they gave to the police.
This document is page 75 of a deposition transcript, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012470'. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about whether their family members (mother and mother's husband, Paul) or another redacted individual have spoken to or received money from reporters, which the witness denies. Mr. Tein then attempts to refresh the witness's memory by mentioning a past event where 'she' was arrested for drugs.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript showing a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Mr. Leopold is objecting to the line of questioning, arguing for professionalism and accusing Mr. Tein of harassing the witness. Mr. Tein urges Mr. Leopold to conclude his objection so that he can continue asking questions.
This document is a single page from a contentious deposition transcript, identified by a House Oversight control number. Attorney Mr. Tein aggressively questions a female witness (possibly named Saige) about her family speaking to reporters, leading to a heated argument with the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, who threatens to end the deposition over Mr. Tein's unprofessional conduct.
This document is page 69 of a deposition transcript, likely dated September 29, 2004. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness who denies knowing an individual named Tony, even when presented with details of his alleged criminal past. The witness also denies remembering making a statement to a Detective Pagan but confirms they have read the police reports online and were surprised by their release.
This document is a deposition transcript from approximately September 29, 2004, identified by a House Oversight bates stamp. An unidentified witness, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a person named Steven. The witness states she visited Steven's apartment once 'this past weekend' but does not know the address and that they 'no longer speak'.
This document is page 65 of a legal transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about the identity of a woman they were in a car with. The witness claims not to know the woman's name but had previously described her as "dark like a Spanish girl." Mr. Tein accuses the witness of lying to the police about the woman's identity, which the witness denies.
Tein accuses the witness of lying about their age to obtain body piercings. The witness denies lying but discusses the number of piercings they have.
Argument regarding repetitive questioning, yelling, and a mistaken identity of Mr. Tein's first name.
Questioning regarding the witness's understanding of the seriousness of the deposition and respect for the court.
Verbal argument regarding taking a recess and preserving audio recordings of the deposition.
Introductory questions establishing the witness's name (redacted) and setting ground rules for the deposition.
Questioning regarding individuals in a specific photograph.
Questioning regarding whether anyone persuaded the witness to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money.
Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about discussions with federal prosecutors regarding reimbursement or money from Mr. Epstein. The witness denies these discussions but admits to meeting with federal prosecutors, possibly the FBI, at their house in 2008.
MR. TEIN questions THE WITNESS about an incident involving evading service from Mr. Epstein's process servers, with MR. LEOPOLD representing the witness.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
A recorded Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about a photograph and the circumstances of being served a subpoena. The session includes procedural arguments between the attorneys.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
A heated exchange between the two attorneys. Mr. Tein questions a witness about their family speaking to reporters. Mr. Leopold objects and threatens to leave. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding for your client' and tells him to 'be quiet'.
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about instances of lying about their age, specifically to buy beer, on MySpace, and in relation to Exhibits 26-01 and 33.
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity