| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Co-counsel
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial in deposition |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent adversarial |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Witness questioner |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversaries in a deposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator witness |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Saige
|
Adversarial questioner deponent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Termination of deposition due to attorney conflict. | Unknown (Transcription serv... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding witness credibility. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition Recess | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Five-minute recess/break taken during deposition. | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Exhibit 31-001 | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Proceeding | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a redacted witness | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhib... | Unknown (Reporting firm bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition argument regarding a break and obstruction. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness | Unknown (Likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness (Ms. [Redacted]). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cancelled Hearing | Unknown Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition hearing | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A photograph marked '18-001' is presented to the witness. The witness identifies themselves and a... | During deposition | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of the witness by Mr. Tein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where Mr. Tein questioned an unnamed witness represented by Mr. Leopold. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was scheduled to take place, but Mr. Leopold could not start it on time due to a cou... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness represented by attorney Mr. ... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by MR. TEIN. The questioning focuses on wheth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious legal deposition or hearing where a witness is being questioned. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A scheduled appearance was allegedly missed by the deponent, which Mr. Tein refers to as breaking... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent who is represen... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A hearing was scheduled but got cancelled. An agreement related to this cancellation was allegedl... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony is being conducted, as detailed on page 31 of the transcript. | Unknown | View |
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies that Epstein or his staff ever harmed their father or his property, and is then questioned about a potentially false statement made to police regarding a trip with a person named Hayley to Epstein's house.
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The focus is on a prior tape-recorded statement the witness allegedly gave to police 'three years ago', accusing Jeffrey Epstein of attempting to murder her father by tampering with his car tires. The witness denies making such a statement, while the attorney confronts her with a direct quote from her alleged police report.
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or testimony where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, likely drove them to a Grand Jury testimony when they were 14 or 15. The witness also admits to lying on their MySpace page about their income, claiming 'as a joke' to have made a quarter-million dollars a year.
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies on the witness's MySpace profiles, specifically their stated age (18 vs. 19) and the timing of an age change made just four days before a scheduled Grand Jury testimony. The witness admits to lying about their age to use the platform but claims not to know what the questioner is talking about regarding the suspicious timing.
This document is page 59 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page. The witness confirms the page is theirs and admits to having lied about their age, stating they were 18, because of a rule on the platform that required users to be that age to post.
This document is a transcript from page 58 of a deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about lying about their age. The witness denies lying to buy beer or on their MySpace pages in general but admits to lying about being 18 in reference to 'Exhibit 26-01' and denies lying about being 19 in reference to 'Exhibit 33'. Other attorneys, Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold, are also present and interject.
This document is page 56 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about deleting their MySpace page after receiving a subpoena. The witness confirms the deletion but claims it was a regular habit, not an attempt to hide information. Mr. Tein then accuses the witness of frequently lying about their age, which the witness denies, while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questions.
This document is page 55 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The questioning covers an altercation at a restaurant involving Mr. Epstein's process servers and the police, as well as the witness's decision to delete their MySpace page just days before the deposition. The witness denies the attorney's allegations about the restaurant incident but confirms the timing of the MySpace deletion.
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.
This document is a page from a contentious legal deposition transcript. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about an incident where they allegedly evaded process servers with the help of a manager named Justin. The witness confirms that Justin lied for them by stating they were not present.
This document is a transcript of a contentious legal proceeding, likely a deposition. It captures a heated exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, who appear to be opposing attorneys, regarding the questioning of an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's conduct, accusing him of berating the witness, leading to a personal argument where names are mistaken and prior court encounters are mentioned.
This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.
This document is a page from a contentious deposition transcript where an unnamed female witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about evading people by switching name tags at work. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects forcefully, calling the question 'harassment' and refusing to let his client answer, leading to a heated exchange between the lawyers.
This document is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on an incident where the witness wore someone else's name tag, which they claim was a coincidence, on the same day they were to be served with a subpoena. The witness denies having prior knowledge that process servers were looking for them.
This document is a two-page excerpt from a deposition transcript, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443'. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about a photograph (marked 18-001) showing the witness and a redacted friend, connecting the friend's presence to the day the witness was served a subpoena. The transcript also records a tense procedural discussion between the attorneys, Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger, regarding the marking of evidence.
This document is page 47 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Tein. The witness denies asking co-workers to lie and refutes an accusation about getting a friend to switch name tags, claiming the situation was a coincidence. The transcript includes objections from an attorney, Mr. Leopold, and a discussion about marking photographic exhibits for the deposition.
This document is page 46 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, aggressively questions a witness named Saige. He accuses her of lying about her name to avoid a subpoena and of lying to get out of the deposition. Saige's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions and ultimately instructs her not to answer.
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition (page 45), where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed female witness about evidence she provided and her connection to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms giving her cell phone to a 'Michelle Pagan' 3-4 years prior. When asked how much money she hopes to get from Mr. Epstein, her lawyer, Mr. Leopold, objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and instructs her not to answer.
This document is a page from a legal transcript, page 44, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about receiving reimbursement for damages and a victim notification letter. The witness denies receiving either and states they no longer live at the relevant residence. Another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the form of the questions.
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a meeting with 'Mr. Herman'. The witness confirms the meeting occurred at her aunt's house, where a lawsuit was discussed, but claims her aunt's only involvement was opening the door. The witness's attorneys, Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold, are also present, with Mr. Leopold objecting to a question about 'privileged matters'.
This document is page 41 of a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is questioned about their lawyer, Mr. Herman. The witness clarifies that their father, not them, selected Mr. Herman, and they met him once at a friend's house with their aunt present. An attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to further questions about the meeting, successfully invoking attorney-client privilege.
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness denies knowing individuals named Marie Villafona and Jeffrey Sloman but confirms that they know someone named Jeffrey Herman. The questioning also covers a visit by 'two ladies and two guys' to the witness's house and whether any cell phone communication occurred.
This document is page 37 of a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about events following a visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness denies spending money received there but admits to going to a Marshall's store with two other girls, where one of them bought a purse. The questioning concludes by asking the witness about conversations with federal prosecutors regarding financial reimbursement.
This document is page 34 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a massage she gave to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states that, contrary to just giving a massage, Epstein also asked her to remove her bra and did touch her. She denies touching Epstein's penis or 'whacking him off,' which she clarifies means masturbating, and is confronted with what appears to be a contradictory prior statement to the police.
Tein accuses the witness of lying about their age to obtain body piercings. The witness denies lying but discusses the number of piercings they have.
Argument regarding repetitive questioning, yelling, and a mistaken identity of Mr. Tein's first name.
Questioning regarding the witness's understanding of the seriousness of the deposition and respect for the court.
Verbal argument regarding taking a recess and preserving audio recordings of the deposition.
Introductory questions establishing the witness's name (redacted) and setting ground rules for the deposition.
Questioning regarding individuals in a specific photograph.
Questioning regarding whether anyone persuaded the witness to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money.
Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about discussions with federal prosecutors regarding reimbursement or money from Mr. Epstein. The witness denies these discussions but admits to meeting with federal prosecutors, possibly the FBI, at their house in 2008.
MR. TEIN questions THE WITNESS about an incident involving evading service from Mr. Epstein's process servers, with MR. LEOPOLD representing the witness.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
A recorded Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about a photograph and the circumstances of being served a subpoena. The session includes procedural arguments between the attorneys.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
A heated exchange between the two attorneys. Mr. Tein questions a witness about their family speaking to reporters. Mr. Leopold objects and threatens to leave. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding for your client' and tells him to 'be quiet'.
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about instances of lying about their age, specifically to buy beer, on MySpace, and in relation to Exhibits 26-01 and 33.
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity