MR. TEIN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Co-counsel
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial in deposition |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent adversarial |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Witness questioner |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversaries in a deposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator witness |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Saige
|
Adversarial questioner deponent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Termination of deposition due to attorney conflict. | Unknown (Transcription serv... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding witness credibility. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition Recess | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Five-minute recess/break taken during deposition. | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Exhibit 31-001 | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Proceeding | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a redacted witness | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhib... | Unknown (Reporting firm bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition argument regarding a break and obstruction. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness | Unknown (Likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness (Ms. [Redacted]). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cancelled Hearing | Unknown Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition hearing | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A photograph marked '18-001' is presented to the witness. The witness identifies themselves and a... | During deposition | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of the witness by Mr. Tein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where Mr. Tein questioned an unnamed witness represented by Mr. Leopold. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was scheduled to take place, but Mr. Leopold could not start it on time due to a cou... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness represented by attorney Mr. ... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by MR. TEIN. The questioning focuses on wheth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious legal deposition or hearing where a witness is being questioned. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A scheduled appearance was allegedly missed by the deponent, which Mr. Tein refers to as breaking... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent who is represen... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A hearing was scheduled but got cancelled. An agreement related to this cancellation was allegedl... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony is being conducted, as detailed on page 31 of the transcript. | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012428.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition dated September 29, 2010. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over a question Mr. Tein posed to an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold accuses Mr. Tein of asking an improper and unethical question intended to make the witness, who claimed not to remember something, appear to be lying.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012427.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, admits to intentionally lying to Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms they pretended to be 18 when they were not and also lied about which school they attended. The document contains two redactions, likely obscuring the name of the school, and notes an objection from another attorney, Mr. Leopold.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012426.jpg
This document is page 31 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a prior statement she made to a Detective Pagan, in which she allegedly described lying about her age to Jeffrey Epstein by saying it "really fast." The witness's attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Ms. Belohlavek, repeatedly object to the line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012424.jpg
This document is page 29 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. It captures a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over questioning procedure before Mr. Tein asks the witness about a conversation she had with a woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing lack of foundation and predicate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012423.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about her first meeting with Jeff Epstein. The witness confirms Epstein asked her age 'upstairs' during a massage, not upon initial introduction, and denies having spoken to Epstein's assistant who escorted her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012420.jpg
This document is page 25 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questioning style, noting the presence of a child, while Mr. Tein asks if the witness was persuaded to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money and about specific methods of communication, which the witness denies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012419.jpg
This document is a two-page transcript from a contentious legal deposition, likely related to a U.S. House Oversight Committee investigation. It captures a heated argument between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over deposition procedure and professional conduct, with a third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, attempting to mediate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012418.jpg
This document is page 23 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012418'. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Leopold vehemently objects to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female witness, accusing him of unprofessional conduct and harassment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012417.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, likely dated September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about whether they were induced by anyone to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money, which the witness denies. The transcript captures a contentious exchange between Mr. Tein and the witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, whom Mr. Tein repeatedly accuses of coaching the witness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012415.jpg
This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about an incident at Jeff Epstein's house three years prior. The witness confirms they previously told police they did not have sex with Epstein and maintains this denial, while also being questioned about a fifty-million-dollar civil complaint they filed against him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012414.jpg
This document is page 19 of a deposition transcript featuring a heated argument between opposing counsel, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over deposition procedures in West Palm Beach. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction before proceeding to question the deponent, Saige, about whether she believes giving testimony is 'bull s-h-i-t' and if she wrote that on MySpace the previous week.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012413.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition, page 18 of a larger volume. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a message they sent to a friend, in which they described the deposition as "stupid court s-h-i-t." The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as having been 'asked and answered'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012412.jpg
This document is page 17 of a deposition transcript, potentially from a U.S. House Oversight investigation. An unnamed witness is questioned about using the racial slur 'Niggaa' in a message, which they state they do not find offensive. The transcript also captures a heated procedural argument between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, over the questioning and the proper identification of an exhibit numbered 31-001.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012411.jpg
This document is page 16 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a female witness about a message she sent on MySpace. The questioning becomes contentious when Mr. Tein asks if the witness finds a racial slur offensive, implying she used it, which the witness denies. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, leading to procedural arguments between the lawyers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012410.jpg
This document is a transcript from a deposition where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001). The witness reads the message aloud, which mentions "stupid court shit," and then claims not to know when it was sent because they have since deleted their MySpace account. The questioning implies a contrast between the witness's professed respect for the court and the derogatory language used in the message.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012409.jpg
This document is page 14 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstructing the deposition and being severely late. The argument revolves around taking a five-minute break, and Mr. Leopold requests assurance that the audio record will be preserved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012408.jpg
This document is page 13 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012408'. It captures a heated argument between several individuals, likely attorneys, named Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Leopold. The conflict involves accusations of obstruction and inappropriate aggression, leading to a threat to cancel the deposition before the participants agree to take a break.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012407.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, possibly related to a U.S. House Oversight investigation. A witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a press conference held by their father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman regarding the witness's lawsuit. The deposition becomes contentious as the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects and threatens to leave, prompting a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012406.jpg
This document is page 11 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein by attorney Jeffrey Herman. The deponent's counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects but the deponent ultimately confirms their awareness of the lawsuit.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012405.jpg
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a redacted deponent, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, about their awareness of a lawsuit filed on their behalf by lawyer Jeffrey Herman. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing attorney-client privilege, leading to a dispute over the validity of the privilege claim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404.jpg
This document is page 9 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404'. It captures a procedural argument between attorneys, where Mr. Tein repeatedly instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections.' Mr. Leopold defends his actions as necessary to protect his client from improperly formulated questions, while another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, suggests a simpler method of objection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012403.jpg
This document is a fragment of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects and instructs the witness not to answer questions if their knowledge comes from their private conversations, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness denies having knowledge of the lawsuit from any other source.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012402.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit recently filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing his client not to answer if their knowledge comes only from their protected conversations. The exchange becomes tense, with Mr. Leopold mistakenly calling the questioning attorney 'Lewis'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012398.jpg
This document is page 4 of a deposition transcript from a case in Florida, identified by the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012398. An attorney, Mr. Tein, begins his direct examination of a witness who has just been sworn in by Court Reporter Judith F. Consor. The witness's name and the spelling of their name are fully redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012397.jpg
This document is an index page from a legal transcript, likely from a deposition on or around September 29, 2004. It details the participants, including attorney Jack A. Goldberger representing 'the Defendant,' and indicates a direct examination of a redacted witness was conducted by Mr. Tein. The document footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012397' suggests it is part of a collection of evidence for a congressional committee.
Age and Body Piercings
Tein accuses the witness of lying about their age to obtain body piercings. The witness denies lying but discusses the number of piercings they have.
Questioning tactics and volume of voice
Argument regarding repetitive questioning, yelling, and a mistaken identity of Mr. Tein's first name.
Seriousness of testimony
Questioning regarding the witness's understanding of the seriousness of the deposition and respect for the court.
Deposition Break and Evidence Preservation
Verbal argument regarding taking a recess and preserving audio recordings of the deposition.
Direct Examination
Introductory questions establishing the witness's name (redacted) and setting ground rules for the deposition.
Photo Identification
Questioning regarding individuals in a specific photograph.
Solicitation for sexual activity
Questioning regarding whether anyone persuaded the witness to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money.
Questioning about reimbursement, Mr. Epstein, and meeting...
Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about discussions with federal prosecutors regarding reimbursement or money from Mr. Epstein. The witness denies these discussions but admits to meeting with federal prosecutors, possibly the FBI, at their house in 2008.
No Subject
MR. TEIN questions THE WITNESS about an incident involving evading service from Mr. Epstein's process servers, with MR. LEOPOLD representing the witness.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
A recorded Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about a photograph and the circumstances of being served a subpoena. The session includes procedural arguments between the attorneys.
No Subject
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
No Subject
A heated exchange between the two attorneys. Mr. Tein questions a witness about their family speaking to reporters. Mr. Leopold objects and threatens to leave. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding for your client' and tells him to 'be quiet'.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about instances of lying about their age, specifically to buy beer, on MySpace, and in relation to Exhibits 26-01 and 33.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity